♻️ CCE.Cash - Instant & Automatic Exchange!

[zasad@]

From what I've heard from friends who live there permanently, all of these apps are legally banned because they don't have a license to operate. The government filters them so that regular users can't use most of popular texting apps, forcing them to install a VPN on all their devices for a monthly subscription. However, it's easy to see that this ban doesn't help at all because everyone uses a VPN.
In Qatar, for example, WhatsApp is essential for all businesses and provides a great service. However, it can only be used via a VPN, and those who can't use it resort to the IMO messaging app. There may be other reasons we're not aware of, but I don't think they're valid.

The funny thing is that messages via WhatsApp and Telegram can be sent without a VPN, but calls don't work anymore. If the ban is formal and no one is fighting it, then there is no ban.
I have not seen or heard of anyone checking people's phones for illegal apps in these countries.
If you fly to Russia, your phone and correspondence can be checked, and there are people at customs who know English, Arabic and other languages.

[Peanutswar]

I guess im a bit late but just recently tried your platform, as of now I don't have a problem with the transaction and its so smooth and acecssible also there's a note or tutorial for the new users how to navigate with the platform itself, also try to reach out the support even though I don't have a concern and its just took over 1 minute and I guess I considered this as a fast response. Its good if you open too different language with your support for easy and fast action.

[coupable]

From what I've heard from friends who live there permanently, all of these apps are legally banned because they don't have a license to operate. The government filters them so that regular users can't use most of popular texting apps, forcing them to install a VPN on all their devices for a monthly subscription. However, it's easy to see that this ban doesn't help at all because everyone uses a VPN.
In Qatar, for example, WhatsApp is essential for all businesses and provides a great service. However, it can only be used via a VPN, and those who can't use it resort to the IMO messaging app. There may be other reasons we're not aware of, but I don't think they're valid.

The funny thing is that messages via WhatsApp and Telegram can be sent without a VPN, but calls don't work anymore. If the ban is formal and no one is fighting it, then there is no ban.
I have not seen or heard of anyone checking people's phones for illegal apps in these countries.
If you fly to Russia, your phone and correspondence can be checked, and there are people at customs who know English, Arabic and other languages.

They probably think they're fighting privacy apps, but in a rather naive way. Apps like Telegram allow you to permanently erase messages and chats, so blocking voice chats makes no sense. Furthermore, the authorities know that everyone uses VPNs because of the discussing apps increasing popularity. What I can understand is that citizens aren't banned from using these apps, but the government wants to direct them to use specific alternatives. However, I doubt this approach has been very successful, given the size and the expanding growth of the market.

[CCECash]

Are you by any chance in one of those countries that are now blocking IPs because of IPTV?

Some countries have used aggressive blocking techniques, which end up affecting legitimate services for a few hours. A few months ago, a block of this kind blocked Google Drive for several hours, it was crazy.

I highly doubt that. But it looks like just rebooting the router has done it for me.

@CCECash I would suggest you guys investigate this further since it doesn't seem like I'm the only one facing this issue.

Yes, we have always paid attention to user usage and feedback. And we are investigating this issue.

I guess im a bit late but just recently tried your platform, as of now I don't have a problem with the transaction and its so smooth and acecssible also there's a note or tutorial for the new users how to navigate with the platform itself, also try to reach out the support even though I don't have a concern and its just took over 1 minute and I guess I considered this as a fast response. Its good if you open too different language with your support for easy and fast action.

We support adding languages ​​based on user feedback, if there is a language needed, please leave us a message.

[zasad@]

From what I've heard from friends who live there permanently, all of these apps are legally banned because they don't have a license to operate. The government filters them so that regular users can't use most of popular texting apps, forcing them to install a VPN on all their devices for a monthly subscription. However, it's easy to see that this ban doesn't help at all because everyone uses a VPN.
In Qatar, for example, WhatsApp is essential for all businesses and provides a great service. However, it can only be used via a VPN, and those who can't use it resort to the IMO messaging app. There may be other reasons we're not aware of, but I don't think they're valid.

The funny thing is that messages via WhatsApp and Telegram can be sent without a VPN, but calls don't work anymore. If the ban is formal and no one is fighting it, then there is no ban.
I have not seen or heard of anyone checking people's phones for illegal apps in these countries.
If you fly to Russia, your phone and correspondence can be checked, and there are people at customs who know English, Arabic and other languages.

They probably think they're fighting privacy apps, but in a rather naive way. Apps like Telegram allow you to permanently erase messages and chats, so blocking voice chats makes no sense. Furthermore, the authorities know that everyone uses VPNs because of the discussing apps increasing popularity. What I can understand is that citizens aren't banned from using these apps, but the government wants to direct them to use specific alternatives. However, I doubt this approach has been very successful, given the size and the expanding growth of the market.

And what local messenger do citizens use?
I noticed that WhatsApp is very popular there, Telegram is used by fewer people.
To register in WhatsApp, you need a phone number, and even if you use a VPN, it will not ensure privacy

[coupable]

From what I've heard from friends who live there permanently, all of these apps are legally banned because they don't have a license to operate. The government filters them so that regular users can't use most of popular texting apps, forcing them to install a VPN on all their devices for a monthly subscription. However, it's easy to see that this ban doesn't help at all because everyone uses a VPN.
In Qatar, for example, WhatsApp is essential for all businesses and provides a great service. However, it can only be used via a VPN, and those who can't use it resort to the IMO messaging app. There may be other reasons we're not aware of, but I don't think they're valid.

The funny thing is that messages via WhatsApp and Telegram can be sent without a VPN, but calls don't work anymore. If the ban is formal and no one is fighting it, then there is no ban.
I have not seen or heard of anyone checking people's phones for illegal apps in these countries.
If you fly to Russia, your phone and correspondence can be checked, and there are people at customs who know English, Arabic and other languages.

They probably think they're fighting privacy apps, but in a rather naive way. Apps like Telegram allow you to permanently erase messages and chats, so blocking voice chats makes no sense. Furthermore, the authorities know that everyone uses VPNs because of the discussing apps increasing popularity. What I can understand is that citizens aren't banned from using these apps, but the government wants to direct them to use specific alternatives. However, I doubt this approach has been very successful, given the size and the expanding growth of the market.

And what local messenger do citizens use?
I noticed that WhatsApp is very popular there, Telegram is used by fewer people.
To register in WhatsApp, you need a phone number, and even if you use a VPN, it will not ensure privacy

There is no other explanation for why authorities would limit the features of messaging apps. What's even stranger is that Messenger app from Meta is allowed, while the features of WhatsApp, also from the same company, are limited. In any case, these measures are meaningless in reality, given that people use all the apps. In the age of the free internet, imposing such restrictions is absurd, especially when no alternatives are offered.

[CCECash]

There is no other explanation for why authorities would limit the features of messaging apps. What's even stranger is that Messenger app from Meta is allowed, while the features of WhatsApp, also from the same company, are limited. In any case, these measures are meaningless in reality, given that people use all the apps. In the age of the free internet, imposing such restrictions is absurd, especially when no alternatives are offered.

The era of free internet ended 10 years ago. The authorities try to interfere with any established processes, but they need time to control them everywhere. Even 10 years ago they didn't care about messengers because it was like one of those things that come and go, but now everything has changed, more algorithms, more data, more control and, of course, more extensive appetites of the government.

[coupable]

There is no other explanation for why authorities would limit the features of messaging apps. What's even stranger is that Messenger app from Meta is allowed, while the features of WhatsApp, also from the same company, are limited. In any case, these measures are meaningless in reality, given that people use all the apps. In the age of the free internet, imposing such restrictions is absurd, especially when no alternatives are offered.

The era of free internet ended 10 years ago. The authorities try to interfere with any established processes, but they need time to control them everywhere. Even 10 years ago they didn't care about messengers because it was like one of those things that come and go, but now everything has changed, more algorithms, more data, more control and, of course, more extensive appetites of the government.

Also, more out-of-the-box development. The good thing about internet technologies is that no one person can fully control everything, and no single entity can censor everything that happens online. There's always room to break free from these restrictions, as we're seeing now in Arab Gulf countries, which are imposing limits on messaging apps; The government still doesn't realize that a teenager in his apartment can create his own apps without anyone knowing, and that scientific knowledge isn't limited to the engineers who work for it or the technicians who monitor citizens' social media activity. Thanks Internet. Thanks blockchain.

[DireWolfM14]

And what local messenger do citizens use?
I noticed that WhatsApp is very popular there, Telegram is used by fewer people.
To register in WhatsApp, you need a phone number, and even if you use a VPN, it will not ensure privacy

I'm not sure if it's government restrictions preventing people from making calls on Whatsapp.  I have lots of family in Jordan, and some of them can make calls on Whatsapp, while most can't.  I think it's one of the bigger mobile phone plan carriers (Orange?) that's limiting phone calls on Whatsapp, while the smaller carriers don't seem to have those restrictions.  What's funny is that the ones who can't use Whatsapp for calls can use Facebook Messenger to make calls, even though both apps are operated by Meta.

If privacy is a must, neither of those apps is recommended.  Even though Whatsapp claims phone calls are end to end encrypted, they're still routed through a centralized server and the encryption isn't controlled by the end user.

All my contacts in Palestine can use Whatsapp for calls, which wouldn't make sense if the restrictions on voice calls was initiated at the government level.

[zasad@]

And what local messenger do citizens use?
I noticed that WhatsApp is very popular there, Telegram is used by fewer people.
To register in WhatsApp, you need a phone number, and even if you use a VPN, it will not ensure privacy

I'm not sure if it's government restrictions preventing people from making calls on Whatsapp.  I have lots of family in Jordan, and some of them can make calls on Whatsapp, while most can't.  I think it's one of the bigger mobile phone plan carriers (Orange?) that's limiting phone calls on Whatsapp, while the smaller carriers don't seem to have those restrictions.  What's funny is that the ones who can't use Whatsapp for calls can use Facebook Messenger to make calls, even though both apps are operated by Meta.

If privacy is a must, neither of those apps is recommended.  Even though Whatsapp claims phone calls are end to end encrypted, they're still routed through a centralized server and the encryption isn't controlled by the end user.

All my contacts in Palestine can use Whatsapp for calls, which wouldn't make sense if the restrictions on voice calls was initiated at the government level.

I had no desire to understand the reasons for blocking, but their tariffs, like in my country, include a certain package of traffic and call time. If companies want to earn more money, they will have to spend a lot on blocking VPN protocols, but it is impossible to block all protocols.
The first time I was in Dubai was more than 10 years ago, and there I could not use some Russian services. I installed a VPN and everything worked as I needed. I can say that in a little over 10 years it has not gotten worse

In my country, only the following protocols work without problems:

Code:

Protocols with traffic Masking (Obfuscation): OpenVPN over Cloak plugin, Shadowsocks (OpenVPN over Shadowsocks), AmneziaWG and XRay.

Our government is trying to increase the literacy of the population, I even learned how to rent a server and set up clients for these protocols on it.
Therefore, for me, the restrictions in these countries seemed very funny.

[bitmover]

Have anyone ever tried to bump a fee of a transaction using cce.cash?

I am a bit affraid that bumping might cause some error. And the transaction is taking long to confirm.

My first time using CCE.CASH. I will tell share my experience when it is over  

[examplens]

Have anyone ever tried to bump a fee of a transaction using cce.cash?

I am a bit affraid that bumping might cause some error. And the transaction is taking long to confirm.

My first time using CCE.CASH. I will tell share my experience when it is over  

Two things are important: whether the exchange recognizes the incoming transaction and how the service behaves in case of two transactions in the same order.

The FAQ does not say too much about similar situations, but it refers to the support contact to possibly start the transaction manually in case the order has expired.

Code:

2. What should I do if my order expired?
If your transaction has not arrived before the order time has passed, you can contact Customer Service:

Continue the exchange at a floating rate. The order will be executed after the transaction is received and the required number of network confirmations is received.

Make a refund of the amount sent for the exchange minus the network fee. To do this, you need to specify your address, to which the coins will be returned after receiving your transaction.

[CCECash]

Have anyone ever tried to bump a fee of a transaction using cce.cash?

I am a bit affraid that bumping might cause some error. And the transaction is taking long to confirm.

My first time using CCE.CASH. I will tell share my experience when it is over  

Two things are important: whether the exchange recognizes the incoming transaction and how the service behaves in case of two transactions in the same order.

The FAQ does not say too much about similar situations, but it refers to the support contact to possibly start the transaction manually in case the order has expired.

Code:

2. What should I do if my order expired?
If your transaction has not arrived before the order time has passed, you can contact Customer Service:

Continue the exchange at a floating rate. The order will be executed after the transaction is received and the required number of network confirmations is received.

Make a refund of the amount sent for the exchange minus the network fee. To do this, you need to specify your address, to which the coins will be returned after receiving your transaction.

Here are the answers to your questions:
1. CCE Cash will automatically recognize the transaction
2. If you deposit multiple amounts in a single order, you can contact online customer service for help.

[bitmover]

Thanks CCECash.

My order was completed a few hours ago. Quick and everything worked.
I was satisfied with the service.

A simple btc > usdt swap.

I will swap some XAUT in a few days. Thank you.

[CCECash]

Thanks CCECash.

My order was completed a few hours ago. Quick and everything worked.
I was satisfied with the service.

A simple btc > usdt swap.

I will swap some XAUT in a few days. Thank you.

Thank you so much!

We are always honest with our users.

Waiting for you again

Best regards,
CCECash team.
Think big. Exchange wisely.

[inspace]

How long does it take for funds to be credited to the Solana network? My bitcoin transaction has been showing as confirmed for 10 minutes now but the funds have not arrived yet. And can you add a pay what you want feature? Or at least so that users can choose their preferred one. For me, 2% commission is a bit expensive when it comes to a large amount.

[bitmover]

How long does it take for funds to be credited to the Solana network? My bitcoin transaction has been showing as confirmed for 10 minutes now but the funds have not arrived yet. And can you add a pay what you want feature? Or at least so that users can choose their preferred one. For me, 2% commission is a bit expensive when it comes to a large amount.

I noticed that it is also very important to specify every satoshi in the exchange screen.

For example, if I make an exchange of about 0.0012 I will get about ~105 USD.

However, if I send 0.001268425 I will get the same ~105usd , the remaning 0.000068425  (6usd) will be like a donation.... the system doesn't automatically adjust the value you send.

At least this happened to me. Very small value, I lost about 1usd. No big deal, but I think the system should auto adjust the value.

[Forsyth Jones]

Yesterday I needed to exchange about $75 worth of LTC that I had withdrawn from the exchange to my Trezor Suite.

I always convert the desired coin to Litecoin (i.g: LTC to ETH) because LTC has very low withdrawal fees, and then use a Swap exchange to swap the LTC for the coin I want.

I tried to swap about 0.086 LTC for ETH using Changelly through the Trezor Suite UI, but the amount I had available in LTC was lower than the minimum amount to exchange LTC for another coin, so I remembered CCE Cash.

So I made the swap of LTC to ETH using CCE Cash, the LTC amount was accepted normally within the minimum limit, the transaction was very fast and smooth, I've nothing to complain about the conversion fee rate. I had a great experience, everything was very simple.

[bitmover]

So I made the swap of LTC to ETH using CCE Cash, the LTC amount was accepted normally within the minimum limit, the transaction was very fast and smooth, I've nothing to complain about the conversion fee rate. I had a great experience, everything was very simple.

I also had a very good experience. I wanted to make now a conversion of a much higher value than I did before.

however, I agree with inspace here: Fees are way to high... I just can't pay 2.5% for a single swap for high values...


Maybe if there is some kind of promotion for bitcointalk users, discount code, special link, whatever...

[examplens]

I also had a very good experience. I wanted to make now a conversion of a much higher value than I did before.

however, I agree with inspace here: Fees are way to high... I just can't pay 2.5% for a single swap for high values...

2.5% is a high, but it may be acceptable, plus a lot depends on what exchange rate that 2.5% is.

Maybe if there is some kind of promotion for bitcointalk users, discount code, special link, whatever...

I am more of a supporter of lower fees being regular, not only for certain users. Maybe there is already a discount for users of some other platform, which would force me to use some other forums that I'm not even interested in.