DuckDice.io Representative Using Threatening Tactics to Blackmail Users

[Horsbyname]

Blackmailer Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2912800
I created a thread against DUckdice.io https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5521053.0
Where I questioned Duckdice.io fairness, and asked from them to provide my bets details. Instead of helping me, Duckdice.io representative @kirito89 Start accusing me from 4 sides, he was throwing accusations upon accusation, and I was clearing all his accusation, proving him wrong all the time as can be read in the thread linked.

He asked me to allow him to publically prove it that I am the scammer and blackmailing them for 0.01 btc, I gave him my permiss

He stated multiple times that the email they have received from the scammer as similar to mine but different with 1 later.
Here what he Stated

4. OP didn't take into account, that the blackmailer's email, and his email are unique, only separated by 1 letter, so if someone was trying to take advantage of his bitcointalk thread, there would be no way of guessing his unique email, I've actually asked him in the other thread if he gives me permission (due to GDPR constraints) to disclose his email, which he conviniently ignored, so regardless of any reason provided by you, or me, or anyone else for that matter, he will simply ignore it and spam the thread so he can push his narrative.
 

And then again he asked me the same-He was trying to weak my voice by claiming I am scammer

And 2.  Do I have permission to publicly show the email address you've been in contact with us? that way I can show the blackmailer's email address, and let bitcointalk give their oppinion on it .

You asked for permission to publicly share the email address I used to contact your team. I’ve already posted a screenshot of the email correspondence, including the details of my communication and the purpose of contacting your team. You can view the screenshot here: https://imgur.com/a/tvK4qIA

To clarify, you have my full permission to share both the email addresses and the conversations publicly. I believe this transparency will help ensure clarity and allow everyone to evaluate the situation fairly.

After I gave him my permission to post it so everyone can see who is the scamer, He get disappeared of the forum for weeks and comeback with another accusation

He accused me that I have posted multiple 1 star Trsutpilot reviews against Duckdice.io. Which I never did.

Hi there,
For full transparency,  the email connection I've had linking OP was due to the trustpilot review he has posted, the one he confirmed in this thread as being his aswell, where we can request further information and are able to see more info provided by OP, including email address he used to provide that review.  In the meantime ( and likely due to my big mouth as I've stated I can link him due to the emails) his trustpilot review dissapeared, making the information unavailable.   I've currently contactd trustpilot in the hopes they restore the provided information.   But in the meantime OP, can you provide a confirmation email from trustpilot that they have removed the review? ( they send an email notification if one of your reviews gets taken down) And that it wasn't you who deleted it ?

I provided him all the requested details he asked for, but he never provided a single of his.


He made many accusations and I cleared them, as per duckdice.io history I point it out that Duckdice.io is using same blackmailing strategies to weak the voice of those who speak against them in public, they accused many other users as well, I requested him to post all the evidences he said he is going to post but yet Duckdice.io representative never posted it. Instead, he dodges it and run away.


I request all the community to support my flag against duckdice.io representative until he posts the evidence or he apologies in public.

Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2912800;page=iflags

[LoyceV]

Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3386

Have you even read this Flag? This Flag is against you! I'll quote:

Kirito89 alleges: Horsbyname violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. Horsbyname did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around March 2025. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.

You guys have no idea what you're doing! When the same Flag came up earlier, I posted this:

I have created a flag against OP https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3386   please support it based on this thread

I saw your post in Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags. You're linking to a thread created by the accused. I'm not going to read 45 posts that have nothing to do with your accusation: please create one post that summarizes the written contract OP has violated.

I've now Opposed the Flag.

[Horsbyname]

Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3386

Have you even read this Flag? This Flag is against you! I'll quote:

Kirito89 alleges: Horsbyname violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. Horsbyname did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around March 2025. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.

You guys have no idea what you're doing! When the same Flag came up earlier, I posted this:

I have created a flag against OP https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3386   please support it based on this thread

I saw your post in Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags. You're linking to a thread created by the accused. I'm not going to read 45 posts that have nothing to do with your accusation: please create one post that summarizes the written contract OP has violated.

I've now Opposed the Flag.

Yes, I knew it, and I waited because of your post, I thought he will create the flag against me so I can describe what happened, But Holydarkness stop him and asked him not to create flag, as creating a flag against me was going to be his own death- Ummm Clever holydarkness saved him that time too.

I wasn't having any Idea that you can create a flag if someone's agree with you on something and then he turn on it, Until Holydarkness instruct him.

[nutildah]

Here is the link to the flag you created:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3350

Yes, I knew it, and I waited because of your post, I thought he will create the flag against me so I can describe what happened, But Holydarkness stop him and asked him not to create flag, as creating a flag against me was going to be his own death- Ummm Clever holydarkness saved him that time too.

Uhh, Kirito did create the flag, which is the one you are asking people to support. 

In the name of fairness and trying to be objective, I have opposed Kirito's flag as well.

You guys have no idea what you're doing!

Maybe there needs to be an explanation of how flags work in the "Add flag" section. What is straightforward to us might be considered confusing to someone else.

[Horsbyname]

In the name of fairness and trying to be objective, I have opposed Kirito's flag as well.

I dont know how you can oppose both parties flags? You must support or oppose one.

[nutildah]

I dont know how you can oppose both parties flags? You must support or oppose one.

No, because both flags aren't supported by any kind of evidence. I'll break it down for you.

#1

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3350

Flag on DuckDice.io

Horsbyname alleges: DuckDice.io violated a casual or implied agreement, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here.

This flag links to a topic titled "Holydarkness and Casino Disputes—Something’s Fishy". There is no evidence presented here that DuckDice violated a casual or implied agreement with you.

#2

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3386

Flag on Horsbyname

Kirito89 alleges: Horsbyname violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here.

This flag links to the same topic! Furthermore, there is no evidence of "damage" done by you violating a written contract, lol.

So both flags should be opposed.

[Horsbyname]

This flag links to the same topic! Furthermore, there is no evidence of "damage" done by you violating a written contract, lol.

So both flags should be opposed.

First of all the Flags you have posted is not what I was meant to post, It was a mistake and you know it already, I will request you stop confusing others- you are totally trying to confuse other, Cant you see I have updated the topic, where I Updated Flag link.

The flag I asked for support is : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2912800;page=iflags
Where you can see he accused me and confessed that he have Proofs of me scamming them, Duckdice.io representative asked for my consent to post those evidences he have of me scamming them publically. After I gave him my consent he get disappear of the forum and came again with another accusation which I proved wrong already.

I will advise you to read the post and know what for I have requested, don’t just confuse other please.


There are 2 flags from 2 parties, and you opposed both, it doesn't make sense at all.

[nutildah]

First of all the Flags you have posted is not what I was meant to post, It was a mistake and you know it already, I will request you stop confusing others- you are totally trying to confuse other, Cant you see I have updated the topic, where I Updated Flag link.

What the hell are you talking about? You edited your post after I wrote my Apr 25 comment, and in my Apr 27 comment I am responding to your comment written just hours before your edited the post. And you are accusing me of trying to confuse others? You have a lot of nerve.

The flag I asked for support is : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2912800;page=iflags
Where you can see he accused me and confessed that he have Proofs of me scamming them, Duckdice.io representative asked for my consent to post those evidences he have of me scamming them publically. After I gave him my consent he get disappear of the forum and came again with another accusation which I proved wrong already.

You are accusing Kirito89 of blackmail, which never happened. I don't think you understand what the word "blackmail" means. In your most recent flag, you fail to show where any violation of a written contract occurred. And again, none of what Kirito89 said changes the fact that there is no evidence to support your original claim of bets being affected by "fairness issues."

There are 2 flags from 2 parties, and you opposed both, it doesn't make sense at all.

There are 3 flags from 2 parties, and none of them make sense, which is why I have opposed all 3.

[Horsbyname]

I am not accusing kirito89 of blackmailer, Instead I have evidences he is a blackmailer. The evidences that you and holydarkness have read more than 50 times but you don't want to speak on that.



Well you please mind reading this again? Here what he accused me of,

To give context to bitcointalk, the moment OP started this bitcointalk thread,  we've been getting bombarded on Trustpilot with fake reviews, and blackmail demands,  in context,  OPs email lets say is something like johndoe@gmail.com,  blackmailler's email address is johndoee@gmail.com, while OP initially stated its just a coincidence, its really one hell of a coincidence for the blackmailer to also know OPs email address .  

Like I've said OP, regardless of anything, you will not be getting a single $.   Your provably fairness accusation has been disproved, regardless of how much you spam to cover the thread up.


Kirito89,
Duckdice Support.

Here Again what he accused me of,

4. OP didn't take into account, that the blackmailer's email, and his email are unique, only separated by 1 letter, so if someone was trying to take advantage of his bitcointalk thread, there would be no way of guessing his unique email, I've actually asked him in the other thread if he gives me permission (due to GDPR constraints) to disclose his email, which he conviniently ignored, so regardless of any reason provided by you, or me, or anyone else for that matter, he will simply ignore it and spam the thread so he can push his narrative.

Kirito89,

Duckdice Support.

And you know what? He asked for my permission to post that evidences in public so everyone like you and Holydarkness can see that I am the blackmailer or scammer sending them emails for 0.01 btc. But guess what? I gave him my consent to post it publicly and he get disappeared of the bitcointalk and came with another accusation as you know holydarknes was coaching him directly.

I hope you head is now clear on why I asked for the support of the flag.