[Call to action] BC.game is not entity that should be trusted.

[gh0573d]

tldr: BC.game should not be trusted platform.


Hi BitcoinTalk members,

First of all, I am an actual newbie here (I don't have main account, nor ever interacted with anyone on this forum prior my BC.game complaint) and would like to call people to take action against rather unethical casino operator - BCgame.

Background

Obviously, there is a reason for me opening this thread and forming it the way I will - I was direct victim of their scummy practices: avoiding to pay out winnings, avoiding legal jurisdiction, constant fabrication of data, avoiding to address public complaints directly, but rather gatekeeping it and what not.

So, before you engage with this thread, have in mind that there is personal "vendetta" against BC.game.

Having that in mind, I will be only stating obvious facts and observation of said entity in public (whether it's here, social media or any other source).

Agenda - get their accounts flagged. Simple as that. While I may be minority of people who has been victimized by them, I would like to, at least, inform wider audience to take extra precaution before engaging with said entity.

Avoiding legal jurisdiction and paying out legitimate players' winnings

Between 2023 and 2024, several other players and me have been victimized by BC.game by them refusing to pay out legitimate winnings, and instead ignoring us, thus not giving us any attempt to resolve issues. Being there is no other choice, we've decided to pursue legal ways of claiming our funds.

What happened: short story - lawyer sent out demand letters, and after being ignored he decided that the best strategy would be filing for bankruptcy of their entities (Small House BV and Blockdance BV, case numbers CUR 202403133 and 202403134) so he can use legal means to even give us an opportunity to get our funds, by requiring them to deposit a security ($2.x million) and give them an opportunity to fight these claims in court.

They decided not to fight it legally at all, not securing that deposit and getting declared bankrupt by default.

You can find a decision in most online media (next.io sigma.world etc) in regards to their bankruptcy. More details inside my complaint thread.

Fabrication of data

Interesting fact related to our legal complaint in Curacao was that BC.game constantly fabricated data and evidence publicly.

Mario Galea engaged in conversation with individual named Fabiano about creating new entity so they can avoid legal claims: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzwXfRBG4is
Shortly after, an announcement has been attached to their website, which directly proves their intentions: https://bc.game/help/announcement (according to archive.org, first time this page occured was in May 14, 2024 - https://web.archive.org/web/20240201000000*/https://bc.game/help/announcement). There was another announcement page which they took shortly after disclaiming their new license from Anjouan.

Some details - https://imgur.com/a/V4tg8UN

Fabrication of evidence: When bankruptcy proceeding was filed, BC.game's lawyer provided following evidence in regards to my account: https://imgur.com/a/Pk7wder

Lets dig deeper into fabrication:
1 - My original account and the account created because of their Google Single Sign on bug were public during 2024. They only became private after BC.game was declared bankrupt. Third account mentioned remains: public for people to view, and is unknown to me, nor I have ever had any other account other than above mentioned.
2 - They claimed they were at loss because they previously processed up to $122k of withdrawals to me. Legitimate ones, same as the conflicting one.
3 - (intentionally?) blurred image as an evidence in court. Yes, we never received any actual visible evidence, nor proof that third account has any relationship with me (like to whom it is registered or is KYC done), even after requesting such for hearing preparation - https://imgur.com/a/IcpudEi

and the final, juicy part. Remember that throughout this whole saga, there were 3 accounts in total mentioned (my actual/used one, KYC verified from day one, the one created due to their technical error and third, conflicting and unknown to me)?

Here goes the twist - Casino guru complaint - https://casino.guru/bc-game-casino-player-s-account-has-been-closed-without-3

and decision made by their representative - https://imgur.com/a/RBgBDQP

A violation of the casino's Terms and Conditions accepted upon registration(s) - multiple accounts (at least 2 other linked accounts used on the same device, besides the duplicate mentioned above as a result of a mistaken login via the Google button, while one of them was even registered a day before the disputed account - the user was not allowed to register another (the disputed) account and play), self-referral - at least it is clear from the provided evidence, and it would be likely impossible to prove otherwise

so according to them (or evidence provided by BC.game), there are 4 accounts in total conflicting, while in their court defense there were only 3?

At this point, I believe it is obvious that they are actual scammers.

Avoiding to address complaints publicly

So, even though they have representative here on BitcoinTalk, and obviously on Casino.guru as well, it appears that none of their representatives are addressing, nor escalating issues appropriately, even though they are active. Instead, most of victims need to rely on a single person (@holydarkness, thanks for existing for others) in getting their complaints addressed.

Casino.guru is obviously whole another story. I believe this is by far biggest conflict of interest in resolving player's complaints, considering that Casino.guru is affiliate partner of BC.game, so they are biased towards them and or not reviewing any complaints appropriately. Furthermore, BCgame representatives are not even engaging publicly in those complaints at all. So, it's basically hearsay "we saw evidence and we say you abused BC.game platform".

Why would they do that? Simply - plausible deniability and keeping their reputation untarnished. If they engage publicly in complaint, they are aware that one exist and have to resolve it, otherwise their reputation is going down the sink. You can pretty much see that all complaints here on Bitcointalk are addressed by @holydarkness only, and many of them are even closed, because his contact said so (or fabricated evidence, as proven above).

In this instance, the only person that gets undeserved hate is holydarkness himself. While trying to help others by using his contacts, most of the time "resolution" is based on what two parties have to say. And I believe I certainly proved that the main party (BC.game) is giving him false data.

Example: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5527118.60

I know there is a possibility that this player's claim might be fraudulent one, considering he is a newbie, as am I. But doesn't it seem little strange that there are number of similarities in such cases that "newbies" are thrown down the bus even though most of them are probably just actual Newbies here and have more integrity than BCgame themselves?

Now, here's another example - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5504423.0

OP's update:

Edit 6: I have received all 7 million dollars. no i didn't only receive half or any shit like that. i was right about them being able to pay it and not care. if trusted members wants proof in pms i can provide. it was truly just bad timing on their end, coco was in the fucking hospital the entire few weeks lmfao i had a long convo with him

ty sers, godspeed.

or something even more intriguing:

apart from this thread, there are several KYC-related complaint threads created against BC.game. the complaints were very similar to each other, the gambler tried to withdraw and was asked to perform KYC and then they either don't get an update on their KYC status or their KYC was denied. I don't know what is going on with their management but they seem to not respond to new cases posted here in the forum.

Would you mind sharing a screenshot to back up your claim?

so, in reality this was their strategy all along at the same time my account was closed?

Take an action

I would ask everyone to go thoroughly through this thread, my complaint and all complaints against BC.game on BitcoinTalk and objectively "Support" or "Oppose" flag that I've placed for both @BC.GAME and @BC.Game Support, thus informing wide audience on who are BC.game in fact.

Flags: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3403 and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3404

[Don Pedro Dinero]

Creating two threads for the same issue will get you as far as creating two flags for the same issue has gotten you, nowhere. This thread is not exactly the same as the other one so you are not breaking the rule about duplicated threads but I suggest you lock this one and continue the conversation on the other one. I will reply you there.

[gh0573d]

Creating two threads for the same issue will get you as far as creating two flags for the same issue has gotten you, nowhere. This thread is not exactly the same as the other one so you are not breaking the rule about duplicated threads but I suggest you lock this one and continue the conversation on the other one. I will reply you there.

Thanks for the feedback.

Flag related: I don't know how to create one flag to be honest (tried looking for and couldn't find).
Thread related: In regards to my initial thread, it is complaint against BC.game. This one I've created simply for people to investigate BC.game actions regardless of my complaint (platform-wide).

Basically, when I opened initial complaint thread, my intentions were to focus solely on my complaint, but during the thread, I've basically went to collect more evidence on their behavior platform-wide.

[holydarkness]

Note for the flag for those who [with just mind] are considering to support or oppose? Do all of you mind to wait a little? I'm already in this case and is still waiting for my contact. The complexity of the case require me to reach that contact as they have a cat-like fluidity to maneuver interdepartment, and I'm not sure if this is related to legal, compliance, risk, promotion, or whatever else division they have and related to this one and/or handling the situation.

Thus, I reach them. But they're kinda hard to chase and get a time with. I'm trying to urge the other contacts I have to reach that contact too and to spare some time with me.

Until I can have a sit with them and have a better understanding of the matter from their side, I'll appreciate if DT would refrain from taking any action. My gut feeling said there are more to this situation than what our eyes meet.

[gh0573d]

Happy to wait, but I don't think they'll ever engage in any discussion transparently, as proven.

I'm waiting for a year already so all I have is time

[Pmalek]

The Casino Guru representative claims that he has seen enough supporting evidence that you referred yourself from the same device that you used for multiple accounts. You are denying that you did. Obviously, no one hear can know if you are telling the truth or not.

Back when the second account was mistakenly created, you said you reported this to BC.Game support and never used the account again. Do you have proof of that correspondence and did they confirm closing/blocking that account?   

[gh0573d]

The Casino Guru representative claims that he has seen enough supporting evidence that you referred yourself from the same device that you used for multiple accounts. You are denying that you did. Obviously, no one hear can know if you are telling the truth or not.

Back when the second account was mistakenly created, you said you reported this to BC.Game support and never used the account again. Do you have proof of that correspondence and did they confirm closing/blocking that account?  

Casino.guru also claims that there are in total 4 accounts they've seen based on the evidence from BC.game.

On the other hand, last year in court, there were only 3 accounts in total conflicted. Where does the fourth coming from all of sudden?

As for the double account, I've became aware of this just about a month before initial court hearing, after lawyer and his technical guy informed me about it, which was months after my account became blocked. At that point I've found out about that second account, and the reason for its existence. So they've been informed via demand letter (seen by @holydarkness).

So to summarize, I never even knew about that second account at all prior or during my ban. Third account which they claim is mine I never even heard of, let alone own it.

After multiple attempts to get any information on that (3rd) account, they ignored me and my lawyers, and never even provide any evidence of that account information (registered date, deposit TXs, KYC if there is any etc). Please note that I would be happy to throw the towel for just one proof that I did anything wrong or even admit it, but I never did. I've been playing on various casinos throwing even more money than on BC.game and none of those never questioned my integrity.

And now, 4th account was never mentioned in 2024 anywhere (not to me, not to court and certainly not to my lawyer), but only Casino Guru seen it? I'd rather have explanation on that.

Here's one of the transactions I did to BC.game account - https://polygonscan.com/tx/0xefe7cb00882c2d8cd58f946f2f99d39496712e11fe8914eb4fa684fa6a000546

So the only other scenario that could happen here at all is them flagging my account for double because of source of funds being OKX hot wallet, which appears to be scenario happening a lot nowadays.

edit: Let me link all three accounts they've mentioned in their defense, so you can see how ridiculous this is.

1st account - Mine - https://bc.game/user/profile/35865086 (it was public, but they hid it after bankruptcy)
2nd account - Mine created due to their technical error explained in initial post - https://bc.game/user/profile/35733412 (they hid this one as well). Please note that there was $0 usage of this account: no deposits, no withdrawals and certainly not any bonus abuses, as I never claimed single bonus from them.
3rd account - NOT mine - https://bc.game/user/profile/37958301 - This one I don't even know who owns it. After several attempts, they never gave any information that relates to me.
4th account - I don't even know there was fourth one.

On top of all that, why would I risk creating third account and "self refer" with public wager seeming to be $1.5k, just to risk $1.5m?

EDIT #2: Actually, I reported it to them on July, but didn't know how to explain the actual bug: https://imgur.com/a/NmkBWJG

[BenCodie]

I will be creating a flag after I have posted my next thread about bc.game. I will include this case in the thread though I can't support this right away as there is the he said she said about the multiple accounts. Otherwise, it seems like a very valid and shocking (to some) case (that they declared bankruptcy to avoid paying settlements/court). There have been many threads posted against them now and what is abundantly clear is that they are closing/locking accounts and only resolving issues for those who have the capacity to come and post on bitcointalk/pursue on review services.

[Pmalek]

<Snip>

Branislav the Casino Guru representative says that the casino showed him evidence of at least two other linked accounts. So, according to them, there could be four, five, or more... But like I said, this is not something anyone here can verify as true or false. Taking sides based on that information alone would be subjective.

Another thing caught my eye. Who wrote this email back in July 2024? If it was you, then who is writing these posts? The posts in this thread and that email aren't written by the same person.

[gh0573d]

I will be creating a flag after I have posted my next thread about bc.game. I will include this case in the thread though I can't support this right away as there is the he said she said about the multiple accounts. Otherwise, it seems like a very valid and shocking (to some) case (that they declared bankruptcy to avoid paying settlements/court). There have been many threads posted against them now and what is abundantly clear is that they are closing/locking accounts and only resolving issues for those who have the capacity to come and post on bitcointalk/pursue on review services.

So, I'm not the only one.

They did not declared bankruptcy, court did, but they "surrendered" license (even though they knew it's going to be revoked by GCB) and moved to Anjouan, leaving others like me stranded.

<Snip>

Branislav the Casino Guru representative says that the casino showed him evidence of at least two other linked accounts. So, according to them, there could be four, five, or more... But like I said, this is not something anyone here can verify as true or false. Taking sides based on that information alone would be subjective.

Another thing caught my eye. Who wrote this email back in July 2024? If it was you, then who is writing these posts? The posts in this thread and that email aren't written by the same person.

In regards to CG, I've also asked them to see the evidence, as that's something I could possibly use in legal matter in Belize, which I plan to do if there is no resolution in the next month or so. And that's the whole point:

Their defense in bankruptcy hearing against me was that there were three accounts in total (you can find part of it in the first post of this thread), and CG claims there are 4. So either they never received anything from BC.game (considering their reps never responded there) or they are just defending them to keep their "Safety index score" high, considering they are direct affiliates of BC.game (check the link on BC.Game casino guru page). Either way, something's fishy going on.

As for the "sudden" increase of english writing skills, I can assure you (and BC.game as well) that it's same person I've been traveling around the world for the last year with my friend and trying to learn other skills, and of course using a bit of tools to sound more proficient. As I said in my complaint post, CG also claimed that there is reason to believe it's not the same person, so I welcome both of them to hop on a call and verify my identity by checking the passport sent in KYC.

edit: just to clarify, when I was using my account, I wasn't traveling anywhere, so this could not possibly be the reason for account block

[JollyGood]

This is what Casino Guru state on their website: 

The player from Indonesia reported that his account at BC.Game had been locked without justification, and he was unable to access his $1.6M balance. Despite winning a legal case in Curaçao against the casino, they refused to pay him and falsely accused him of using "prohibited techniques." The Complaints Team closed the complaint as unjustified, citing violations of the casino's Terms and Conditions, including multiple accounts and self-referral, which were supported by evidence. The team noted that the issues raised fell outside their scope for review and recommended that the player consult the gambling authority for further action.

This is probably the largest non-payment case I have read about in the forum and it is BC Game that is involved again. If the OP won his case in Curaçao (where BC Game was based at the time) they should have allowed him to withdraw the funds.

Was this the case that BC Game lost and were declared bankrupt (and forced them to quit Curaçao in November 2024)?

[gh0573d]

This is what Casino Guru state on their website:  

The player from Indonesia reported that his account at BC.Game had been locked without justification, and he was unable to access his $1.6M balance. Despite winning a legal case in Curaçao against the casino, they refused to pay him and falsely accused him of using "prohibited techniques." The Complaints Team closed the complaint as unjustified, citing violations of the casino's Terms and Conditions, including multiple accounts and self-referral, which were supported by evidence. The team noted that the issues raised fell outside their scope for review and recommended that the player consult the gambling authority for further action.

This is probably the largest non-payment case I have read about in the forum and it is BC Game that is involved again. If the OP won his case in Curaçao (where BC Game was based at the time) they should have allowed him to withdraw the funds.

Was this the case that BC Game lost and were declared bankrupt (and forced them to quit Curaçao in November 2024)?

It was.

It's not the largest (there was $7m guy last year), but so far it is the largest they're doing everything in their power not to pay because, others included in this bankruptcy case and I made a mess with their Curacao license and just don't want to deal with us anymore at all.

p.s. just to show you how far I'm fighting for the money legitimately won, I've involved UK Gambling Commission in this, to which they forced Stake and BC.game out of UK: https://casinobeats.com/2024/12/02/bc-game-ends-uk-operation-as-speculation-elevates/

I have no motivation to stop, unless I get what's legitimately owed to me. I have plans to take them out (legally) off of Cyprus (Fenice Tech), Belize (Twocent Technology) and US, unless I get my winnings paid.

and just couple days ago, TGP Europe (daddy's firm) did similar to what BC did in Curacao - https://sigma.world/news/gambling-commission-forces-tgp-europe-out-of-gb-market/

[BenCodie]

I will be creating a flag after I have posted my next thread about bc.game. I will include this case in the thread though I can't support this right away as there is the he said she said about the multiple accounts. Otherwise, it seems like a very valid and shocking (to some) case (that they declared bankruptcy to avoid paying settlements/court). There have been many threads posted against them now and what is abundantly clear is that they are closing/locking accounts and only resolving issues for those who have the capacity to come and post on bitcointalk/pursue on review services.

So, I'm not the only one.

They did not declared bankruptcy, court did, but they "surrendered" license (even though they knew it's going to be revoked by GCB) and moved to Anjouan, leaving others like me stranded.

No, you're not. There have been tens, maybe hundreds of cases against bc.game. A lot of them are newbies who had never joined the forum, and had created a thread which was resolved by their PR representative. BC.game resolve any thread posted here as resolving scam accusations make it look like they're legitimate, when the reality is that they only help those who speak up on the forum, while many others who aren't aware of the forum, can't complete kyc, have language barriers and so on, can't speak up.

Though look around. BC.game sponsor just about every member on this forum, whether it be through signature campaign advertisements or sponsored threads...it is clear that they're recycling the wealth they're accumulating from both their casino business and from scamming into advertising on and off of the forum. So, it's very difficult to have a real and objective discussion about them and their practices without the mouths that feed them to, for example, leave a negative trust on your profile calling you a charlatan (which is what has happened to me).

[gh0573d]

I will be creating a flag after I have posted my next thread about bc.game. I will include this case in the thread though I can't support this right away as there is the he said she said about the multiple accounts. Otherwise, it seems like a very valid and shocking (to some) case (that they declared bankruptcy to avoid paying settlements/court). There have been many threads posted against them now and what is abundantly clear is that they are closing/locking accounts and only resolving issues for those who have the capacity to come and post on bitcointalk/pursue on review services.

So, I'm not the only one.

They did not declared bankruptcy, court did, but they "surrendered" license (even though they knew it's going to be revoked by GCB) and moved to Anjouan, leaving others like me stranded.

No, you're not. There have been tens, maybe hundreds of cases against bc.game. A lot of them are newbies who had never joined the forum, and had created a thread which was resolved by their PR representative. BC.game resolve any thread posted here as resolving scam accusations make it look like they're legitimate, when the reality is that they only help those who speak up on the forum, while many others who aren't aware of the forum, can't complete kyc, have language barriers and so on, can't speak up.

Though look around. BC.game sponsor just about every member on this forum, whether it be through signature campaign advertisements or sponsored threads...it is clear that they're recycling the wealth they're accumulating from both their casino business and from scamming into advertising on and off of the forum. So, it's very difficult to have a real and objective discussion about them and their practices without the mouths that feed them to, for example, leave a negative trust on your profile calling you a charlatan (which is what has happened to me).

And if you just look at most recent cases against BC.game here on forum and in Casino Guru, their representatives don't engage at all, and most of complaints end up "resolved" based on the words said by BC.game to CG or third party trying to mediate (holydarkness), so at the end newbies like me don't stand a chance of getting resolution, because their "representative" is word from God.

Why would (for example) Casino guru care about player while they're raking affiliate money from BC game? It is in their interest to keep BCG's trust high enough for people to sign up. Although AskGamblers is BCG affiliate as well, it seems they're trying to do a bit more in regards to transparency. rating them 2.3, but I'm afraid that majority of complaints end up in trash bin because at the end of the day, BC game is trusted platform and players are "guilty until proven otherwise" by default. None of those platforms even question their shady tactics, because players like me mostly end up accepting the fact they were scammed and do nothing to inform others. After all, it's our words against "reputable" platform.

I don't blame other victims, but on the other hand I personally won't stop fighting for what's rightfully mine, even if it includes decade-long fight. And I won't stop until I receive what's rightfully mine. My legal actions forced them out of Curacao and United Kingdom, and this is just a start. I can safely say that United States is going to be their next, and by far the biggest doom, as they thought that they can get away with advertising in US market but blocking US traffic is enough. And of course, Belize and Cyprus will be next two court proceedings against them. Anjouan licensing might lack of regulations, but that license has been assigned to entity outside of Anjouan, and I'm coming for it.

Sorry for way too much off-topic, anger in me just raises to the surface whenever I see scammers, and by far BCG is one of the biggest out there...

[Cointxz]

Was this the case that BC Game lost and were declared bankrupt (and forced them to quit Curaçao in November 2024)?

There’s a high chance that it’s related since casino usually don’t change their license without any major issue.

However, Anjouan license is starting to get popularity from casino due to their casino friendly requirements.


Their declaration of bankruptcy just to dodge this user payout while still using the same brand with different license is big red flag once proven. I’m waiting for @holydarkness summary to avoid premature judgement since this user has a record of potential ToS abuse from CG.

[holydarkness]

Sorry for being silence for couple of days in regards to this case, be it on this thread or on its sister board. I... do my own DD in the abasence of my contact's response and what I found, I'm not sure how to word my findings. I probably will come with something to say later tonight, after I tackled my IRL matters and have more time at hand.

For the time being though, OP, if you can help me understand better, because I am not sure I get it right:

[...]
p.s. just to show you how far I'm fighting for the money legitimately won, I've involved UK Gambling Commission in this, to which they forced Stake and BC.game out of UK: https://casinobeats.com/2024/12/02/bc-game-ends-uk-operation-as-speculation-elevates/

Were you saying that you're involved in a court action or something about this? Because the article is simply about BC UK, no mention of you there. And... if I am not wrong, they're still with Leichester or whichever team on EPL, no?

And while we're at it, might as well divulge more on your involvement in this situation and or how the article related to your matter? I scanned the article and it barely mention BC. Or you.

and just couple days ago, TGP Europe (daddy's firm) did similar to what BC did in Curacao - https://sigma.world/news/gambling-commission-forces-tgp-europe-out-of-gb-market/

[gh0573d]

Sorry for being silence for couple of days in regards to this case, be it on this thread or on its sister board. I... do my own DD in the abasence of my contact's response and what I found, I'm not sure how to word my findings. I probably will come with something to say later tonight, after I tackled my IRL matters and have more time at hand.

For the time being though, OP, if you can help me understand better, because I am not sure I get it right:

[...]
p.s. just to show you how far I'm fighting for the money legitimately won, I've involved UK Gambling Commission in this, to which they forced Stake and BC.game out of UK: https://casinobeats.com/2024/12/02/bc-game-ends-uk-operation-as-speculation-elevates/

Were you saying that you're involved in a court action or something about this? Because the article is simply about BC UK, no mention of you there. And... if I am not wrong, they're still with Leichester or whichever team on EPL, no?

And while we're at it, might as well divulge more on your involvement in this situation and or how the article related to your matter? I scanned the article and it barely mention BC. Or you.

and just couple days ago, TGP Europe (daddy's firm) did similar to what BC did in Curacao - https://sigma.world/news/gambling-commission-forces-tgp-europe-out-of-gb-market/

Before we proceed further, please note that this thread is not intended for my own case, but rather deep dive into BC.game outside of my case, so please don't mix it up. Thread in scam accusations is related to my case, this one is broad overview of BC.game.


Now, to go into further details of what I was claiming in relation to BC.game and connection within UKGC decision, quotes from Casinobeats:

Crypto casino and sportsbook BC.Game has ceased operations in the UK market, elevating speculation over the future of the firm and its partnership with Leicester City FC.

Disruption for BC.Game was fuelled by an ongoing court case in Curaçao, where there were customers who alleged losses due to system issues and accused the company of misconduct.

And to further explain my involvement in them losing UK operations, through my contact who helped me escalate this case legally, I've managed to get in touch with UK Gambling Commission and sat down with them in their Birmingham's office. On that meeting, we've went through all of the documents collected by us (me, other players and our legal rep in Curacao) and informed them directly on what's going on on that platform, including money laundering (ref: https://intel.arkm.com//dashboards/view?dashboardID=2a4ab5c6-0d6c-402a-8f5a-ead2daedc963 & https://x.com/lilbagscientist/status/1846912893784076798) to which they did their own due diligence and have taken actions based upon all information we provided plus additional one that directly relates to their UK market operations.

In regards to TGP Europe -> BC.game, BC.game and Stake were using TGP's UK sublicense to operate in UK (entity Medium Rare N.V. / TGP Europe Ltd, look it up in Companies House). There are additional information in relation to this, but I am not allowed to disclose due NDA. What I can though is that TGP Europe lost their license following detailed UKGC investigation POST BCG/Stake exit from the UK.

[examplens]

Casino.guru is obviously whole another story. I believe this is by far biggest conflict of interest in resolving player's complaints, considering that Casino.guru is affiliate partner of BC.game, so they are biased towards them and or not reviewing any complaints appropriately. Furthermore, BCgame representatives are not even engaging publicly in those complaints at all. So, it's basically hearsay "we saw evidence and we say you abused BC.game platform".

Everyone who registers at bc.game has the option of an affiliate program. You just generate a link and become an affiliate partner. Maybe casino.guru has somewhat better conditions, because they still have more influence, but that does not necessarily mean that it is a conspiracy theory and organized cheating of gamblers.

Now, here's another example - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5504423.0

OP's update:

Edit 6: I have received all 7 million dollars. no i didn't only receive half or any shit like that. i was right about them being able to pay it and not care. if trusted members wants proof in pms i can provide. it was truly just bad timing on their end, coco was in the fucking hospital the entire few weeks lmfao i had a long convo with him

ty sers, godspeed.

or something even more intriguing:

apart from this thread, there are several KYC-related complaint threads created against BC.game. the complaints were very similar to each other, the gambler tried to withdraw and was asked to perform KYC and then they either don't get an update on their KYC status or their KYC was denied. I don't know what is going on with their management but they seem to not respond to new cases posted here in the forum.

Would you mind sharing a screenshot to back up your claim?

so, in reality this was their strategy all along at the same time my account was closed?

In this case, OP was paid and successfully withdrew all $7 million. If there is any doubt that it is a planned action, then why would the OP delete all the information and not leave it as some kind of advertisement for a casino?
btw. He rewarded 7 forum members with $7k who participated in resolving this case.

[gh0573d]

Casino.guru is obviously whole another story. I believe this is by far biggest conflict of interest in resolving player's complaints, considering that Casino.guru is affiliate partner of BC.game, so they are biased towards them and or not reviewing any complaints appropriately. Furthermore, BCgame representatives are not even engaging publicly in those complaints at all. So, it's basically hearsay "we saw evidence and we say you abused BC.game platform".

Everyone who registers at bc.game has the option of an affiliate program. You just generate a link and become an affiliate partner. Maybe casino.guru has somewhat better conditions, because they still have more influence, but that does not necessarily mean that it is a conspiracy theory and organized cheating of gamblers.

Now, here's another example - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5504423.0

OP's update:

Edit 6: I have received all 7 million dollars. no i didn't only receive half or any shit like that. i was right about them being able to pay it and not care. if trusted members wants proof in pms i can provide. it was truly just bad timing on their end, coco was in the fucking hospital the entire few weeks lmfao i had a long convo with him

ty sers, godspeed.

or something even more intriguing:

apart from this thread, there are several KYC-related complaint threads created against BC.game. the complaints were very similar to each other, the gambler tried to withdraw and was asked to perform KYC and then they either don't get an update on their KYC status or their KYC was denied. I don't know what is going on with their management but they seem to not respond to new cases posted here in the forum.

Would you mind sharing a screenshot to back up your claim?

so, in reality this was their strategy all along at the same time my account was closed?

In this case, OP was paid and successfully withdrew all $7 million. If there is any doubt that it is a planned action, then why would the OP delete all the information and not leave it as some kind of advertisement for a casino?
btw. He rewarded 7 forum members with $7k who participated in resolving this case.

Conspiracy theory would be baseless accusations, now lets look at how they perform complaints. In somewhat normal complaint "procedure" (considering they're not legal entity and has zero legal merits in mediating any case) both parties should be able to present supporting/opposing evidence of what one claims to be. In Casino.guru complaints for most of big platforms (Stake, BC game) you can see that recently, there is very little or none casino engagement directly, but most of the cases are resolved based on the evidence that mediator seen.

Please tell me it's not questionable at best, alarming at the worst for players who filed complaints not to be able to see what's presented against them, so they can either face the facts or defend themselves properly (depending on the case)?

In regards to $7m case, I don't imply that it was planned action against that player, but it's became a "strategy" of BC.game simply to ban accounts under false accusations "Breach of ToS" and simply ignore the players, until such cases reach to the public eyes? There are numerous of such cases on smaller amount being taken and never resolved simply because players were either newbies on this forum and have zero trust or lack of deeper understanding of their case, yet all of such cases are KYC related, and most of those are even "double account" claims?

I am not asking you to trust me based off of my words, but based on the facts. If they were so damn sure that I was breaking their Terms of Service, how come they never deposited funds in Curacao bank of theirs, provided banknote guarantee to court and defend their claims legally? That way, if they were so damn sure in their case against me and other players, they would've won cases in court, got their legal fees reimbursed and kept their reputation in green. Instead, they never provided that note, responded to most of the claims with "hearsay" (no actual evidence provided saying they were right) and were declared bankrupt.

Or even better, why would've they risk of going bankrupt in first place if they were certain that all players that filed for their bankruptcy were abusers?

Tell me if you were running such a reputable business, would you risk of getting such verdict, and risk future of your reputation if you know you're right? Didn't think so.


Furthermore, if we look at legal case + CG case specifically, I've already shown you proof that either BCgame fabricated evidence to Casinoguru in regards to my case or Casino Guru just defends BCgame because of not doing so (aka marking them as not safe) would've impose risk to their income stream from them as an affiliates.

Fabrication of evidence: When bankruptcy proceeding was filed, BC.game's lawyer provided following evidence in regards to my account: https://imgur.com/a/Pk7wder

Lets dig deeper into fabrication:
1 - My original account and the account created because of their Google Single Sign on bug were public during 2024. They only became private after BC.game was declared bankrupt. Third account mentioned remains: public for people to view, and is unknown to me, nor I have ever had any other account other than above mentioned.
2 - They claimed they were at loss because they previously processed up to $122k of withdrawals to me. Legitimate ones, same as the conflicting one.
3 - (intentionally?) blurred image as an evidence in court. Yes, we never received any actual visible evidence, nor proof that third account has any relationship with me (like to whom it is registered or is KYC done), even after requesting such for hearing preparation - https://imgur.com/a/IcpudEi

and the final, juicy part. Remember that throughout this whole saga, there were 3 accounts in total mentioned (my actual/used one, KYC verified from day one, the one created due to their technical error and third, conflicting and unknown to me)?

Here goes the twist - Casino guru complaint - https://casino.guru/bc-game-casino-player-s-account-has-been-closed-without-3

and decision made by their representative - https://imgur.com/a/RBgBDQP

A violation of the casino's Terms and Conditions accepted upon registration(s) - multiple accounts (at least 2 other linked accounts used on the same device, besides the duplicate mentioned above as a result of a mistaken login via the Google button, while one of them was even registered a day before the disputed account - the user was not allowed to register another (the disputed) account and play), self-referral - at least it is clear from the provided evidence, and it would be likely impossible to prove otherwise

so according to them (or evidence provided by BC.game), there are 4 accounts in total conflicting, while in their court defense there were only 3?

At this point, I believe it is obvious that they are actual scammers.

So let us ask simple question: How many users were banned for "multiple account" reason just because they were incompetent enough and created scenario where any user would be able to do so unknowingly and unwillingly?

[JollyGood]

If you are the reason BC Game were expelled from the UK market and if you manage to get them expelled from Cyprus, Belize and the US it will certainly hit them hard financially. They must be regretting the day they did not settle with you.

From their perspective, BC Game did state they were against the bankruptcy ruling and disputed it but it cannot alter the fact they obtained a licence from Anjouan after losing their Curacao licence under the circumstances you described.

As for the $7 million winner, it was resolved in the end but your case was not. Your case has to be the largest that I am aware of remains unresolved.

It was.

It's not the largest (there was $7m guy last year), but so far it is the largest they're doing everything in their power not to pay because, others included in this bankruptcy case and I made a mess with their Curacao license and just don't want to deal with us anymore at all.

p.s. just to show you how far I'm fighting for the money legitimately won, I've involved UK Gambling Commission in this, to which they forced Stake and BC.game out of UK: https://casinobeats.com/2024/12/02/bc-game-ends-uk-operation-as-speculation-elevates/

I have no motivation to stop, unless I get what's legitimately owed to me. I have plans to take them out (legally) off of Cyprus (Fenice Tech), Belize (Twocent Technology) and US, unless I get my winnings paid.

and just couple days ago, TGP Europe (daddy's firm) did similar to what BC did in Curacao - https://sigma.world/news/gambling-commission-forces-tgp-europe-out-of-gb-market/