UEFA Champions League 2025/26 Season

[Luzin]

However, let’s not forget the great effort by PSG in defense and turning every counter attack to a dangerous one. Both teams missing lots of close goals.

I was still optimistic in the beginning when it was just a 1-goal difference. But Bayern Munich really seems to have difficulty scoring. Enrique truly proves himself as a tactical expert. They locked down Olise. Then unfortunately the other players couldn’t develop. Enrique’s decision to kick the ball from a goal kick to Olise's position and make a throw-in. There, Olise played many roles but was locked down. This proves Enrique is the best; he got rid of Mbappe and they became better. Should Madrid do the same?

[DanWalker]

However, let’s not forget the great effort by PSG in defense and turning every counter attack to a dangerous one. Both teams missing lots of close goals.

I was still optimistic in the beginning when it was just a 1-goal difference. But Bayern Munich really seems to have difficulty scoring. Enrique truly proves himself as a tactical expert. They locked down Olise. Then unfortunately the other players couldn’t develop. Enrique’s decision to kick the ball from a goal kick to Olise's position and make a throw-in. There, Olise played many roles but was locked down. This proves Enrique is the best; he got rid of Mbappe and they became better. Should Madrid do the same?

Bayern Munich could not win against Enrique's decent  match strategy. I will not blame Bayern munich players. They were able to  perform quite well in both matches. But they failed to win both  matches. In the first leg match, both teams  attacked a lot and we saw 9 goals. In the second leg match, both teams scored only  2 goals. But both were able to attack quite strongly. If the defense was shaky, we would have seen  many goals in this match too. In the end, I will  say that both teams' performances were  quite strong. But against luis enrique, Kompany could  not win.

[laspol65]

However, let’s not forget the great effort by PSG in defense and turning every counter attack to a dangerous one. Both teams missing lots of close goals.

I was still optimistic in the beginning when it was just a 1-goal difference. But Bayern Munich really seems to have difficulty scoring. Enrique truly proves himself as a tactical expert. They locked down Olise. Then unfortunately the other players couldn’t develop. Enrique’s decision to kick the ball from a goal kick to Olise's position and make a throw-in. There, Olise played many roles but was locked down. This proves Enrique is the best; he got rid of Mbappe and they became better. Should Madrid do the same?

Bayern Munich could not win against Enrique's decent  match strategy. I will not blame Bayern munich players. They were able to  perform quite well in both matches. But they failed to win both  matches. In the first leg match, both teams  attacked a lot and we saw 9 goals. In the second leg match, both teams scored only  2 goals. But both were able to attack quite strongly. If the defense was shaky, we would have seen  many goals in this match too. In the end, I will  say that both teams' performances were  quite strong. But against luis enrique, Kompany could  not win.

Although Bayern Munich failed to enter the final, I will not blame their performance. Because they have performed adequately in two matches, only because of bad luck, Bayern Munich team could not enter the final match. But PSG team, they entered the final match mainly because of good luck, but here I am basing PSG team's goalkeeper on PSG team's goalkeeper.
Bayern Munich team had so much attack that the attacks only went outside the goal post bar and the goalkeeper saved. However, Bayern Munich team's luck is being blamed the most.

[Iranus]

Although Bayern Munich failed to enter the final, I will not blame their performance. Because they have performed adequately in two matches, only because of bad luck, Bayern Munich team could not enter the final match. But PSG team, they entered the final match mainly because of good luck, but here I am basing PSG team's goalkeeper on PSG team's goalkeeper.
Bayern Munich team had so much attack that the attacks only went outside the goal post bar and the goalkeeper saved. However, Bayern Munich team's luck is being blamed the most.

I partly agree with you. It was unfortunate , but I would say that they lost against Enrique's strategy. I also think that Munich's players played well enough. They did not spare any effort to win the  match. They tried their best. Still, munich could not win.

In the first match, we saw psg playing completely aggressively at home. Munich's performance was also similar. As a result, the match ended  5-4. In the second leg, enrique kept his defense  strong and then tried to attack. The turning point of  the match was taking the lead with a goal by dembele in just 3 minutes. As a result, the  path to qualifying for the final became wider for psg .

[Futurexxx]

Although Bayern Munich failed to enter the final, I will not blame their performance. Because they have performed adequately in two matches, only because of bad luck, Bayern Munich team could not enter the final match. But PSG team, they entered the final match mainly because of good luck, but here I am basing PSG team's goalkeeper on PSG team's goalkeeper.
Bayern Munich team had so much attack that the attacks only went outside the goal post bar and the goalkeeper saved. However, Bayern Munich team's luck is being blamed the most.

You are talking about luck here as if Bayern munich played well in the second leg that ended 1-1. I even think that they were even lucky not to have been embarrassed by an emphatic scoreline, because Neuer was their saviour on the day, if not, they would have concede up to four goals or more, so if you are speaking about luck here, Bayern munich are the once that are lucky not to have been embarrassed, not PSG that made it to the finals convincingly.

Among the last four teams that was at the semi finals stage, Bayern munich defense was the worst, and in competition like this, your defense is what's going to keep you going even though your attack is not that efficient, so that was why they were eliminated by PSG, not that they were unlucky as you are proclaiming.

[satscraper]

However, let’s not forget the great effort by PSG in defense and turning every counter attack to a dangerous one. Both teams missing lots of close goals.

I was still optimistic in the beginning when it was just a 1-goal difference. But Bayern Munich really seems to have difficulty scoring. Enrique truly proves himself as a tactical expert. They locked down Olise. Then unfortunately the other players couldn’t develop. Enrique’s decision to kick the ball from a goal kick to Olise's position and make a throw-in. There, Olise played many roles but was locked down. This proves Enrique is the best; he got rid of Mbappe and they became better. Should Madrid do the same?

Bayern Munich could not win against Enrique's decent  match strategy. I will not blame Bayern munich players. They were able to  perform quite well in both matches. But they failed to win both  matches. In the first leg match, both teams  attacked a lot and we saw 9 goals. In the second leg match, both teams scored only  2 goals. But both were able to attack quite strongly. If the defense was shaky, we would have seen  many goals in this match too. In the end, I will  say that both teams' performances were  quite strong. But against luis enrique, Kompany could  not win.

Although Bayern Munich failed to enter the final, I will not blame their performance. Because they have performed adequately in two matches, only because of bad luck, Bayern Munich team could not enter the final match. But PSG team, they entered the final match mainly because of good luck, but here I am basing PSG team's goalkeeper on PSG team's goalkeeper.
Bayern Munich team had so much attack that the attacks only went outside the goal post bar and the goalkeeper saved. However, Bayern Munich team's luck is being blamed the most.

Agreed. This is especially true for the second leg. Besides luck, I think they were also influenced by Dembele’s quick goal at the very beginning of the match. Covering and even overcoming a two‑goal difference in general is not the same as doing it when the gap is only one goal, so that early goal really dampened their spirits in the first half. In addition, PSG’s strong defensive tactics played their role.

[kennycryptoitalia]

The final is already decided. It will be between Arsenal and PSG. It's difficult to predict who will win, everyone is currently saying PSG are the favorites, but everyone was saying PSG would win in the last Club World Cup final where they lost to Chelsea. Therefore, it's important to remember that finals are unpredictable and difficult to predict. I admit PSG fought very well and eliminated many strong opponents to get this far, but Arsenal is a team that has been aiming for the championship for many years. They can prepare very well for that match and win.

from how it started, i would never have thought that PSG could have eliminated Bayern Munich so easily, this is because they studied the opponent obsessively, found his weak points and then punished him at the most opportune moment, this is what they did and they won

[Xyloo]

However, let’s not forget the great effort by PSG in defense and turning every counter attack to a dangerous one. Both teams missing lots of close goals.

I was still optimistic in the beginning when it was just a 1-goal difference. But Bayern Munich really seems to have difficulty scoring. Enrique truly proves himself as a tactical expert. They locked down Olise. Then unfortunately the other players couldn’t develop. Enrique’s decision to kick the ball from a goal kick to Olise's position and make a throw-in. There, Olise played many roles but was locked down. This proves Enrique is the best; he got rid of Mbappe and they became better. Should Madrid do the same?

Bayern Munich could not win against Enrique's decent  match strategy. I will not blame Bayern munich players. They were able to  perform quite well in both matches. But they failed to win both  matches. In the first leg match, both teams  attacked a lot and we saw 9 goals. In the second leg match, both teams scored only  2 goals. But both were able to attack quite strongly. If the defense was shaky, we would have seen  many goals in this match too. In the end, I will  say that both teams' performances were  quite strong. But against luis enrique, Kompany could  not win.

Although Bayern Munich failed to enter the final, I will not blame their performance. Because they have performed adequately in two matches, only because of bad luck, Bayern Munich team could not enter the final match. But PSG team, they entered the final match mainly because of good luck, but here I am basing PSG team's goalkeeper on PSG team's goalkeeper.
Bayern Munich team had so much attack that the attacks only went outside the goal post bar and the goalkeeper saved. However, Bayern Munich team's luck is being blamed the most.

Agreed. This is especially true for the second leg. Besides luck, I think they were also influenced by Dembele’s quick goal at the very beginning of the match. Covering and even overcoming a two‑goal difference in general is not the same as doing it when the gap is only one goal, so that early goal really dampened their spirits in the first half. In addition, PSG’s strong defensive tactics played their role.

Paris Saint-Germain's early goal disrupted all of Bayern Munich's game plan. I predicted Bayern Munich would start cautiously in the opening minutes, then increase the tempo to try and score, but conceding an early goal turned all their plans upside down, and they couldn't break through Paris's strong defense. Ultimately, it was a great match, and Paris Saint-Germain, having reached the final, will likely win the trophy.

[m4r1o]

I never saw Atletico Madrid VS Bayern Munic finals, my prediction was Arsenal VS Bayern Munic but it seems I was wrong because at this stage its looking like Bayern Munic will not survive this match. This may just things aligning well for Arsenal to win the trophy because I believe that PSG will be easier for Arsenal than Bayern Munic who would not want to be beaten twice by Arsenal in the same competition.  They would have given Arsenal serious headache if they had qualified for the final.

everyone expected this type of final, even i would have been happy if it had been Atletico Madrid-Bayern Munich, this was completely strange, PSG is still a very high level team, which doesn't really have to ask anyone, it certainly doesn't have to prove that it is less than anyone.

[Pandu Geddon]

from how it started, i would never have thought that PSG could have eliminated Bayern Munich so easily, this is because they studied the opponent obsessively, found his weak points and then punished him at the most opportune moment, this is what they did and they won

If you follow the two legs of the PSG vs Munich match, nothing is easy for PSG. They are indeed strong, but getting a victory from Munich is really difficult and requires hard work. No one easily reaches the Champions League final. Now we are just waiting for the final match to take place, whether Arsenal will make new history for their club. Or PSG, who will defend their championship title.

[Phoenix Anka]

from how it started, i would never have thought that PSG could have eliminated Bayern Munich so easily, this is because they studied the opponent obsessively, found his weak points and then punished him at the most opportune moment, this is what they did and they won

If you follow the two legs of the PSG vs Munich match, nothing is easy for PSG. They are indeed strong, but getting a victory from Munich is really difficult and requires hard work. No one easily reaches the Champions League final. Now we are just waiting for the final match to take place, whether Arsenal will make new history for their club. Or PSG, who will defend their championship title.

Paris Saint-Germain has a chance to win the trophy again. Arsenal currently have less of a chance at the championship compared to them. Nevertheless, it's always difficult to predict who will win the final. Whether Arsenal, who are on track to win the Premier League, can repeat this success in the Champions League remains to be seen.

[Frankolala]

However, let’s not forget the great effort by PSG in defense and turning every counter attack to a dangerous one. Both teams missing lots of close goals.

I was still optimistic in the beginning when it was just a 1-goal difference. But Bayern Munich really seems to have difficulty scoring. Enrique truly proves himself as a tactical expert. They locked down Olise. Then unfortunately the other players couldn’t develop. Enrique’s decision to kick the ball from a goal kick to Olise's position and make a throw-in. There, Olise played many roles but was locked down. This proves Enrique is the best; he got rid of Mbappe and they became better. Should Madrid do the same?

After I watched the first leg, I knew that PSG would still be the team to advance to the finals because of that one goal advantage. Secondly, Luis Enrique is more experienced in the coaching system than Kompany. The only coach that always understands Luis Enrique tactics and overcome it is Ancelotti. Both teams strengths are equal but one has a well experienced coach.

[X-ray]

I don't know why many people are putting Arsenal ahead of PSG in term of title winning. They have best defense, yeah that's true. However, their opponent is also having good offense too, and much more balanced. So i think it has to be 50:50.

I also remind you guys how PSG was the only club that beat Arsenal two times in UCL in the last 24 games of Arsenal in UCL. This is why i think it's hard to put Arsenal as favorite to win game.

It's also my reason i may not be betting on moneyline instead i will try to bet my luck on BTTS. I hope there will be no more haram ball to be showed in the final.

It's gonna be disappointment if we'll see no peak gameplay in the final.

[CageMabok]

from how it started, i would never have thought that PSG could have eliminated Bayern Munich so easily, this is because they studied the opponent obsessively, found his weak points and then punished him at the most opportune moment, this is what they did and they won

So, why didn't the referee give two fouls for PSG players' hands, one of which occurred inside the penalty area? I don't think PSG played badly, as they also put up a great fight, but what happened against Bayern Munich is clearly a big question mark. Because the referee didn't give a foul for that, the match seemed easy, even though it was a tough match for both teams, as both teams fought to the best of their abilities. And despite all that, I also hope Arsenal can perform better in the final, because that will be the deciding factor in who wins.

[Jegileman]

I was still optimistic in the beginning when it was just a 1-goal difference. But Bayern Munich really seems to have difficulty scoring. Enrique truly proves himself as a tactical expert. They locked down Olise. Then unfortunately the other players couldn’t develop. Enrique’s decision to kick the ball from a goal kick to Olise's position and make a throw-in. There, Olise played many roles but was locked down. This proves Enrique is the best; he got rid of Mbappe and they became better. Should Madrid do the same?

This is really one kind of approach that I really envision from this team, they’ve really studied their opponents so well that they know the targeted player that gives the whole team strength and morale to play better, to move the game, as in the main playmaker of the team. Enrique happens to prove once again that he is a tactical coach and has more experience than his rival coaches in this competition which has earned him the final spot for two consecutive time now. This is really a tactical move and it paid well for them in the end.

[changaa]

Bayern Munich 1 Vs PSG 1 FT
PSG advances by aggregate, their win in France is the reason why the game couldn't get to extra time. Bayern Munich played out their heart, PSG in most part of the game were defending but very dangerous when they move move forward. Both teams would have scored lots of goals if not for their goalkeeper who were excellent in front of their goals. They did their jobs excellently. Olise was not as effective as he was in the first leg, Enrique learnt from the first leg and didn't leave only Mendez to mark Olise, great lesson he learnt from the first leg and I think it was key to holding Bayern's attack from his wing. I enjoyed the game as both teams were at each others throat trying to find the back of the net.

PSG did an excellent defensive job, which was done very well and with great precision, is what they planned all this time, is clear that they didn't have a very competitive match and in fact they controlled the result, i have to say that i didn't expect Khvicha Kvaratskhelia to be so good.

[Justbillywitt]

PSG were the better team, it was the final I expected. It might've been better for Arsenal if Bayern had made it to the final. The match against PSG will be very tough. There are no favorites in the finals. Every team that has made it this far is top-class. PSG squad are more experienced, but Arsenal will be hungry because they haven't won this trophy in years. Arteta now has 2 chances to prove himself to everyone without living in Pep's shadow. He'll want to make the most of this opportunity.

Arteta had to, what are the chances that he is going to make it to this point in the Champions League again, I clearly see PSG to be the favourite. Apart from Luis Enrique's masterclass in tactics, we have come to see that this  PSG can adapt to defense and are excellent in attack and coupled with there less tight schedule in the Ligue 1 which the reverse is the case for Arsenal, PSG has the edge.

You are absolutely correct, PSG is a more complete team compared to Arsenal. Look at how they able to shut out Bayern Munich from scoring them much goals defensively for the entire 90 minutes, something I don't think Arsenal could have achieved at Bayern Munich home. Arsenal have defense, PSG have it too. Midfield both clubs have it, but PSG boast of a more robust attack which is something that Arsenal lacks.

[Crytohillss]

PSG were the better team, it was the final I expected. It might've been better for Arsenal if Bayern had made it to the final. The match against PSG will be very tough. There are no favorites in the finals. Every team that has made it this far is top-class. PSG squad are more experienced, but Arsenal will be hungry because they haven't won this trophy in years. Arteta now has 2 chances to prove himself to everyone without living in Pep's shadow. He'll want to make the most of this opportunity.

Finals are a bit different kind of pressure entirely Arsenal might actually benefits from seen as the underdogs because they will play with more passion, freedom and hunger PSG have the the best experience players no doubt but Arsenal intensity and motivation can make it very uncomfortable for PSG this feels like one of those finals could be decided by mentality more than quality and for Arteta  this is definitely a big moment to step out of pep Guardiola shadows and builds his own legacy.

[bastisisca]

Psg almost won the game by three a goals margin in the first leg which could've been an embarrassment to Bayern munich fans. The timeframe Bayern Munich conceded the three goals gave me a change of thought whether Bayern munich could beat PSG to qualify for the final. I started doubting Bayern munich from that moment because of their defense..I  though kompany would address the lapses before the second leg as that was what led to their defeat in first leg but he didn't address it.  if he had address the lapse in their defense before the second leg, Bayern munich wouldn't have loss to PSG.

Paris Saint-Germain is strong, and you will see, as i told you, they will win the Champions League again this season.
At the moment his coach is also one of the smartest, not being physical in the air, if you noticed with Bayern they always threw the ball with the return from the baseline into Bayern's half of the field outside, to play it on the ground. Cunning

[RaltcoinsB]

Psg almost won the game by three a goals margin in the first leg which could've been an embarrassment to Bayern munich fans. The timeframe Bayern Munich conceded the three goals gave me a change of thought whether Bayern munich could beat PSG to qualify for the final. I started doubting Bayern munich from that moment because of their defense..I  though kompany would address the lapses before the second leg as that was what led to their defeat in first leg but he didn't address it.  if he had address the lapse in their defense before the second leg, Bayern munich wouldn't have loss to PSG.

Paris Saint-Germain is strong, and you will see, as i told you, they will win the Champions League again this season.
At the moment his coach is also one of the smartest, not being physical in the air, if you noticed with Bayern they always threw the ball with the return from the baseline into Bayern's half of the field outside, to play it on the ground. Cunning

When tactics are mentioned, Luis Enrique comes to mind. His ritualistic kick, especially after the center circle, has become a classic. Paris Saint-Germain starts by giving the ball away to the opponent and then pressing. They develop different tactics in every area of ​​the pitch, and they've developed tactics that suit Bayern Munich as well. Perhaps that was the reason they won the return leg.