@coupable. Agreed. Also, having these types of analysis will bring how we see bitcoin under the control of centralized blockchain analysis firms where their if there is centralization, there is a chance of corruption and manipulation.
An example of this would be if a certain wallet was declared holding bitcoins that came from the darknet by an blockchain analysis firm and this analysis was this paid for by people who want to buy bitcoin atma cheaper price. This is only a quick example, however, we can agree that there are manipulations that can occur.
I cannnot ignore thinking about such scenarios knowing that this service is acting as a blockchain radar without any mention about the method they use or the purpose of such a feature. Logically, this should be an alarming red flag that can destroy the platform reputation but unfortunetly, most of users don't even get interested with that feature expecting it to be another informative tab without thinking what it may running behind scenes.
This brought to my mind the idea the question about those live blockchain explorers. Do they have an activity licence from any legal authority? Or did it exist auditing third oarts to rate those services? This doesn't only apply to bitcoin blockchain explorers but also for others. You can easily note how etherscan is acting like an official ethereum service while it's not maily related to Vitalik company.
