List of users promoting the BetPanda.io scam casino

[CoffeeSipper64]

Finally people seem to be realizing that the biggest scammers on this community are betpanda.io and nearly all the rest casinos that support the BetBy scam odds provider ,after bettors from all categories (value bettors , sharps and  just straight up gamblers) reported them nearly 50times each with their own case and proofs ,for the past 5-6 months.

Happy to see more people calling them out and known members of this forum stop taking their side when they try to justify not giving payouts and blocking accounts.

Good day to all!

[coupable]

Finally people seem to be realizing that the biggest scammers on this community are betpanda.io and nearly all the rest casinos that support the BetBy scam odds provider ,after bettors from all categories (value bettors , sharps and  just straight up gamblers) reported them nearly 50times each with their own case and proofs ,for the past 5-6 months.

I get your point. However i still can't figure out the purposes of this thread. If it's about Betpanda being a scam, then better provide evidences and proofs in a clear format as detailed in the sticked topics in top of the board. Or if it's about users promoting Betpanda, then yhe topic should be posted in Reputation sub-board.
All what i can understand is that Op has a unsolved dispute with Betpanda, so he tries to attack users participating in the signature campaign.

[acroman08]

All what i can understand is that Op has a unsolved dispute with Betpanda, so he tries to attack users participating in the signature campaign.

Judging by the OP's post history, it seems like his issue has nothing to do with betpanda but with logfiles specifically, as pointed out by nutildah based on the OP's post history. In short, the whole shtick about this thread is just a retaliatory smearing because of what logfiles commented about OP's project.

[coupable]

All what i can understand is that Op has a unsolved dispute with Betpanda, so he tries to attack users participating in the signature campaign.

Judging by the OP's post history, it seems like his issue has nothing to do with betpanda but with logfiles specifically, as pointed out by nutildah based on the OP's post history. In short, the whole shtick about this thread is just a retaliatory smearing because of what logfiles commented about OP's project.

I can conclude this as well. However this is not the apropriate way to address someone reputation especially a veteran trusted forum member. So to attack logfile he drag others into a mess; I mean Betpanda brand and some other forum users who participated in Betpanda sig campaign. I can't understand why he uses this way to do so, as it seems no one really interested addressing such issues in a childish manner.

[acroman08]

All what i can understand is that Op has a unsolved dispute with Betpanda, so he tries to attack users participating in the signature campaign.

Judging by the OP's post history, it seems like his issue has nothing to do with betpanda but with logfiles specifically, as pointed out by nutildah based on the OP's post history. In short, the whole shtick about this thread is just a retaliatory smearing because of what logfiles commented about OP's project.

I can conclude this as well. However this is not the apropriate way to address someone reputation especially a veteran trusted forum member. So to attack logfile he drag others into a mess; I mean Betpanda brand and some other forum users who participated in Betpanda sig campaign. I can't understand why he uses this way to do so, as it seems no one really interested addressing such issues in a childish manner.

He wanted to stain Logfile's reputation, so he found a way to do it, and he thought using scam accusations against betpanda is the best way to do it, since logfile wears betpanda's signature banner, he couldn't care less who he drags into it as long as his target is in it. To be honest, it's kind of sad how desperate he is.

[TravelMug]

Finally people seem to be realizing that the biggest scammers on this community are betpanda.io and nearly all the rest casinos that support the BetBy scam odds provider ,after bettors from all categories (value bettors , sharps and  just straight up gamblers) reported them nearly 50times each with their own case and proofs ,for the past 5-6 months.

I get your point. However i still can't figure out the purposes of this thread. If it's about Betpanda being a scam, then better provide evidences and proofs in a clear format as detailed in the sticked topics in top of the board. Or if it's about users promoting Betpanda, then yhe topic should be posted in Reputation sub-board.
All what i can understand is that Op has a unsolved dispute with Betpanda, so he tries to attack users participating in the signature campaign.

I guess the purposes of this is very obvious, a smear campaign on Betpanda and it's signature campaign participants because someone has a grudge against one of them. Nevertheless, for those who have been in this community for many years, we have seen this kind of attacks and so we should be educated enough not to fall for this kind of trick. And even if he raises this to Reputation board, it will not garnered enough attention. But the OP has his rights as this community is very open to anyone to accused a casino but if it has no weight in it, then it this allegation will just die a natural death here.

[haircombint]

yes logfiles smeared an open source project i am interested in which led to me discovering that he himself is guilty of promoting a scam. i'm not a victim of betpanda myself but that's how i discovered what was going on. it just sounds like you guys have an issue with taking accountability since you yourselves are paid to shill for casinos that may or may not be just as scammy so you take his side over the victims

[haircombint]

bump

[haircombint]

new shill discovered:

10. PX-Z

i am colleting betpanda shills like pokemon. it is a betpanda pokedex. haha

[nutildah]

Over half your posts are now trolling BetPanda and logfiles.

This just makes your project look like a scam (even if its not), and like you are losing your sanity.

Its very childish behavior which will not help the Haircomb project at all. You should concentrate on

1) Countering the allegations in this thread.
2) Promoting Haircomb in its own thread.

[yahoo62278]

new shill discovered:

10. PX-Z

i am colleting betpanda shills like pokemon. it is a betpanda pokedex. haha

You're a pretty ignorant collector if you are in fact collecting names of people wearing the BetPanda signature. I mean, there's a whole spreadsheet with 21 names on it, there's a manager handling the campaign, and I'm pretty sure that none of these people care if you are discovering them.

If the service starts showing legitimate scam issues the manager will likely end the campaign and the promotion on this forum will be over.

FYI you may as well just go through this section and collect your names for every scam accusation out there. Not sure what you are thinking you'll accomplish, but have fun with your list.

[haircombint]

Over half your posts are now trolling BetPanda and logfiles.

This just makes your project look like a scam (even if its not), and like you are losing your sanity.

Its very childish behavior which will not help the Haircomb project at all. You should concentrate on

1) Countering the allegations in this thread.
2) Promoting Haircomb in its own thread.

ive already countered the allegations. everything alleged in that thread is bullshit besides the stock photo thing which shouldnt even make a difference. i've already shown that it's open source and not a virus. nobody listens and the damage has been done over the past 5 years anyway. this fuckin forum only exists in it's current state for gamblers and shills for gambling anyway...all publicity is good publicity

[haircombint]

new shill discovered:

10. PX-Z

i am colleting betpanda shills like pokemon. it is a betpanda pokedex. haha

You're a pretty ignorant collector if you are in fact collecting names of people wearing the BetPanda signature. I mean, there's a whole spreadsheet with 21 names on it, there's a manager handling the campaign, and I'm pretty sure that none of these people care if you are discovering them.

If the service starts showing legitimate scam issues the manager will likely end the campaign and the promotion on this forum will be over.

FYI you may as well just go through this section and collect your names for every scam accusation out there. Not sure what you are thinking you'll accomplish, but have fun with your list.

i prefer to do things the old fashioned way, discovering the betpanda shills as i go along...no fun in it otherwise

the service will likely end the campaign on the forum? don't threaten me with a good time

[AHOYBRAUSE]

Useless thread, seriously. Blaming people for wearing a signature is utter nonsense. If you had the possibility of earning some money on the side, just wearing some signature, you would also do it.

And by the way, you can reply to several people within 1 single reply, you can add quotes while writing the reply. The way you post, back to back with in some minutes, is against forum rules. Just sayin....

[haircombint]

Useless thread, seriously. Blaming people for wearing a signature is utter nonsense. If you had the possibility of earning some money on the side, just wearing some signature, you would also do it.

And by the way, you can reply to several people within 1 single reply, you can add quotes while writing the reply. The way you post, back to back with in some minutes, is against forum rules. Just sayin....

casino shill = opinion discarded

[Not in Town]

Useless thread, seriously. Blaming people for wearing a signature is utter nonsense. If you had the possibility of earning some money on the side, just wearing some signature, you would also do it.

It's actually perfectly valid criticism. Bitcointalk didn't start with people selling out their avatar and signature space for a few bucks. You essentially sold your soul; you just did the internet equivalent of that. Pretty bold of you to assume everyone would follow in your footsteps.

If BetPanda has scammed people, it's worth calling out users who are getting paid by it and properly disregard their opinion, isn't it? At least OP has opened a dialogue. It doesn't sound like a site on which I would want to gamble.

[haircombint]

Useless thread, seriously. Blaming people for wearing a signature is utter nonsense. If you had the possibility of earning some money on the side, just wearing some signature, you would also do it.

It's actually perfectly valid criticism. Bitcointalk didn't start with people selling out their avatar and signature space for a few bucks. You essentially sold your soul; you just did the internet equivalent of that. Pretty bold of you to assume everyone would follow in your footsteps.

If BetPanda has scammed people, it's worth calling out users who are getting paid by it and properly disregard their opinion, isn't it? At least OP has opened a dialogue. It doesn't sound like a site on which I would want to gamble.

Thank you.

Side note: Logfiles is getting the jannies to delete my posts now

[nutildah]

It's actually perfectly valid criticism.

Its not even criticism; its just a disgruntled child throwing a temper tantrum. I've seen it a hundred times on this forum. Somebody gets sad because their bags have been attacked, so they set about attacking the attacker as a form blind revenge, which ultimately helps them in zero ways. How sad do you have to be as a human to derive joy from engaging in this behavior. Its petty & stupid.

Bitcointalk didn't start with people selling out their avatar and signature space for a few bucks. You essentially sold your soul; you just did the internet equivalent of that.

Guess you aren't familiar with the concept of "advertising." Its what companies do to get exposure for their products and services.

Side note: Logfiles is getting the jannies to delete my posts now

Nope, that's me reporting your posts.

[ABCbits]

OP, i would recommend you to stop creating multiple posts in a row since it violate forum rule.

32. Posting multiple posts in a row (excluding bumps and reserved posts by the thread starter) is not allowed.

i've already shown that it's open source and not a virus.

Are you talking about this GitHub repository https://github.com/natasha-otomoski/haircomb? AFAIK it doesn't meet criteria of open source since,
1. I unable to see any source code. I'm not talking about executable binary file.
2. I unable to find any attached open source license or any kind of license. According to https://choosealicense.com/no-permission/, it means exclusive copyright rather than open source.

Please correct me if i mentioned wrong repository.

[haircombint]

Guess you aren't familiar with the concept of "advertising." Its what companies do to get exposure for their products and services.

No actually it just seems like you aren't familiar with the concept of shilling. Big difference between 'advertising' and 'shilling'. Big difference between 'company' and 'scam'.

Nope, that's me reporting your posts.

Soyboy LOL

OP, i would recommend you to stop creating multiple posts in a row since it violate forum rule.

32. Posting multiple posts in a row (excluding bumps and reserved posts by the thread starter) is not allowed.

i've already shown that it's open source and not a virus.

Are you talking about this GitHub repository https://github.com/natasha-otomoski/haircomb? AFAIK it doesn't meet criteria of open source since,
1. I unable to see any source code. I'm not talking about executable binary file.
2. I unable to find any attached open source license or any kind of license. According to https://choosealicense.com/no-permission/, it means exclusive copyright rather than open source.

Please correct me if i mentioned wrong repository.

https://bitbucket.org/watashi564/combdownloader/src/master/