List of users promoting the BetPanda.io scam casino

[haircombint]

Bump - Happy new year!

Cheers, all. Let us continue our Betpanda alogging.

[T1HGO]

Time flies. Scammed 8 months ago.
Can't wait for 1 year scam anniversary.

[haircombint]

Time flies. Scammed 8 months ago.
Can't wait for 1 year scam anniversary.

Nice personal text and signature! You made me realize I've been underutilizing some valuable real estate.

[haircombint]

Bump!

[haircombint]

I am pleased to announce that the Nutella Man and Logfiles both solidified their reputations as shills with no country by betraying their Betpanda masters in favor of another different shitty casino. All for 30 pieces of silver.

[Rating Place]

Betpanda has a 2.2/10 rating at AskGamblers and a safety rating of 5.4/10 at Casino Guru.

[T1HGO]

I am pleased to announce that the Nutella Man and Logfiles both solidified their reputations as shills with no country by betraying their Betpanda masters in favor of another different shitty casino. All for 30 pieces of silver.

They now advertise duel. I used duel a few months ago. Have 0 complaints, made my bets, withdrawal went smoothly, seems legit to me. At least they are not advertising a scam anymore. Fun fact: duel is alsto betby

Betpanda has a 2.2/10 rating at AskGamblers and a safety rating of 5.4/10 at Casino Guru.

You forgot to mention the amazing 2.4 rating on trustpilot, with complaints very similar to mine are dropped almost every day.


Take a look at this comment i found in another thread. It's hilarious.
https://talkimg.com/images/2026/02/26/U3dFgl.png
https://talkimg.com/images/2026/02/26/U3dEu1.png
This is peak irony.

[nutildah]

Take a look at this comment i found in another thread. It's hilarious.
https://talkimg.com/images/2026/02/26/U3dFgl.png
https://talkimg.com/images/2026/02/26/U3dEu1.png
This is peak irony.

None of the flags against Betpanda are active. You only see the label at the top of the page because you supported the flag. Basically nobody else sees that warning except for you.

[T1HGO]

Take a look at this comment i found in another thread. It's hilarious.
https://talkimg.com/images/2026/02/26/U3dFgl.png
https://talkimg.com/images/2026/02/26/U3dEu1.png
This is peak irony.

None of the flags against Betpanda are active. You only see the label at the top of the page because you supported the flag. Basically nobody else sees that warning except for you.

Damn. Top10 gotcha! moments at bitcointalk. My bad, i admit my mistake. I had no idea it worked that way.
If i may ask you or any other user who reads this and bothers to reply, how exactly does this system work? How do they still have a "good" reputation in this forum given the ammount of accusations? And on the other hand, just to give an example, a casino like thunderpick(again just an example) has a bad reputation with not even close to half of the ammount of complaints betpanda has? Is it just forum presence? I'm sure paying half(exageration) of the legendary status users here must help. Geniune question.

[nutildah]

If i may ask you or any other user who reads this and bothers to reply, how exactly does this system work? How do they still have a "good" reputation in this forum given the ammount of accusations? And on the other hand, just to give an example, a casino like thunderpick(again just an example) has a bad reputation with not even close to half of the ammount of complaints betpanda has? Is it just forum presence? I'm sure paying half(exageration) of the legendary status users here must help. Geniune question.

Sure, I don't mind explaining. By default trust view (what forum members see who haven't customized their trust lists), BetPanda currently has a trust rating of +1. This is because memehunter left them a positive feedback and is in the Default Trust (DT) network. BetPanda has no negative feedbacks from anyone in DT. This is why their net trust score is +1.

As far as flags are concerned, Type 1 (yellow) flags needs to be supported by at least 1 DT member to be active. Type 2 or 3 (orange) flags need to be supported by a net 3 DT members to be active. This is why none of the 5 flags against Betpanda are active.

I'm not bumping this thread anymore. Its dumb to harass people anywhere in any form, especially for as petty of a reason as OP is doing it. You can PM me if you have further questions.

[examplens]

If i may ask you or any other user who reads this and bothers to reply, how exactly does this system work? How do they still have a "good" reputation in this forum given the ammount of accusations? And on the other hand, just to give an example, a casino like thunderpick(again just an example) has a bad reputation with not even close to half of the ammount of complaints betpanda has? Is it just forum presence? I'm sure paying half(exageration) of the legendary status users here must help. Geniune question.

Sure, I don't mind explaining. By default trust view (what forum members see who haven't customized their trust lists), BetPanda currently has a trust rating of +1. This is because memehunter left them a positive feedback and is in the Default Trust (DT) network. BetPanda has no negative feedbacks from anyone in DT. This is why their net trust score is +1.

As far as flags are concerned, Type 1 (yellow) flags needs to be supported by at least 1 DT member to be active. Type 2 or 3 (orange) flags need to be supported by a net 3 DT members to be active. This is why none of the 5 flags against Betpanda are active.

You gave him a lot of information at once, he might not understand again.

@T1HGO, he fact is that when you present a scam, you must clearly prove where and how the fraud occurred. That's the only way you can get enough support for your flag to be visible.
The fact that someone is angry at the casino because he lost money there or is not satisfied with the amount of bonus he got is certainly not enough of a scam accusation.

[T1HGO]

If i may ask you or any other user who reads this and bothers to reply, how exactly does this system work? How do they still have a "good" reputation in this forum given the ammount of accusations? And on the other hand, just to give an example, a casino like thunderpick(again just an example) has a bad reputation with not even close to half of the ammount of complaints betpanda has? Is it just forum presence? I'm sure paying half(exageration) of the legendary status users here must help. Geniune question.

Sure, I don't mind explaining. By default trust view (what forum members see who haven't customized their trust lists), BetPanda currently has a trust rating of +1. This is because memehunter left them a positive feedback and is in the Default Trust (DT) network. BetPanda has no negative feedbacks from anyone in DT. This is why their net trust score is +1.

As far as flags are concerned, Type 1 (yellow) flags needs to be supported by at least 1 DT member to be active. Type 2 or 3 (orange) flags need to be supported by a net 3 DT members to be active. This is why none of the 5 flags against Betpanda are active.

I'm not bumping this thread anymore. Its dumb to harass people anywhere in any form, especially for as petty of a reason as OP is doing it. You can PM me if you have further questions.

Thank you very much for the detailed explanation. Really appreciate it. Cheers.

If i may ask you or any other user who reads this and bothers to reply, how exactly does this system work? How do they still have a "good" reputation in this forum given the ammount of accusations? And on the other hand, just to give an example, a casino like thunderpick(again just an example) has a bad reputation with not even close to half of the ammount of complaints betpanda has? Is it just forum presence? I'm sure paying half(exageration) of the legendary status users here must help. Geniune question.

Sure, I don't mind explaining. By default trust view (what forum members see who haven't customized their trust lists), BetPanda currently has a trust rating of +1. This is because memehunter left them a positive feedback and is in the Default Trust (DT) network. BetPanda has no negative feedbacks from anyone in DT. This is why their net trust score is +1.

As far as flags are concerned, Type 1 (yellow) flags needs to be supported by at least 1 DT member to be active. Type 2 or 3 (orange) flags need to be supported by a net 3 DT members to be active. This is why none of the 5 flags against Betpanda are active.

You gave him a lot of information at once, he might not understand again.

@T1HGO, he fact is that when you present a scam, you must clearly prove where and how the fraud occurred. That's the only way you can get enough support for your flag to be visible.
The fact that someone is angry at the casino because he lost money there or is not satisfied with the amount of bonus he got is certainly not enough of a scam accusation.

Yeah i got the idea. I had no idea how this whole system worked, and only now after 10 months of opening my accusation thread against betpanda, i created my "flag" against them lol(at least i think i did). I only supported other's flags i think. I'm probably too late to get any support now lol. Thanks you for the additional info.

[Rating Place]

If i may ask you or any other user who reads this and bothers to reply, how exactly does this system work? How do they still have a "good" reputation in this forum given the ammount of accusations? And on the other hand, just to give an example, a casino like thunderpick(again just an example) has a bad reputation with not even close to half of the ammount of complaints betpanda has? Is it just forum presence? I'm sure paying half(exageration) of the legendary status users here must help. Geniune question.

Sure, I don't mind explaining. By default trust view (what forum members see who haven't customized their trust lists), BetPanda currently has a trust rating of +1. This is because memehunter left them a positive feedback and is in the Default Trust (DT) network. BetPanda has no negative feedbacks from anyone in DT. This is why their net trust score is +1.

As far as flags are concerned, Type 1 (yellow) flags needs to be supported by at least 1 DT member to be active. Type 2 or 3 (orange) flags need to be supported by a net 3 DT members to be active. This is why none of the 5 flags against Betpanda are active.

I'm not bumping this thread anymore. Its dumb to harass people anywhere in any form, especially for as petty of a reason as OP is doing it. You can PM me if you have further questions.

That's a really good explanation on how things work. As far as Bet Panda goes, there are some that are paid by Bet Panda that will shill and go so far as to lie for them. Anyone betting sports knows that they run a scam sportsbook. Other sites rate Bet Panda poorly. Here Bet Panda will keep gaining positive trust from those they pay. No DT member will give negative trust because they don't want to rock the boat and make enemies. Bet Panda paid for protection.

[haircombint]

If i may ask you or any other user who reads this and bothers to reply, how exactly does this system work? How do they still have a "good" reputation in this forum given the ammount of accusations? And on the other hand, just to give an example, a casino like thunderpick(again just an example) has a bad reputation with not even close to half of the ammount of complaints betpanda has? Is it just forum presence? I'm sure paying half(exageration) of the legendary status users here must help. Geniune question.

Sure, I don't mind explaining. By default trust view (what forum members see who haven't customized their trust lists), BetPanda currently has a trust rating of +1. This is because memehunter left them a positive feedback and is in the Default Trust (DT) network. BetPanda has no negative feedbacks from anyone in DT. This is why their net trust score is +1.

As far as flags are concerned, Type 1 (yellow) flags needs to be supported by at least 1 DT member to be active. Type 2 or 3 (orange) flags need to be supported by a net 3 DT members to be active. This is why none of the 5 flags against Betpanda are active.

I'm not bumping this thread anymore. Its dumb to harass people anywhere in any form, especially for as petty of a reason as OP is doing it. You can PM me if you have further questions.

There's no need to shill for Betpanda anymore, Nutella Man. Or are you just doing it for the love of the game now? You already bit the hand that fed you by betraying your BetPanda slavemaster in favor of your Duel slavemaster. Man cannot serve 2 masters. Are they paying you to shill under the table?

[T1HGO]

If i may ask you or any other user who reads this and bothers to reply, how exactly does this system work? How do they still have a "good" reputation in this forum given the ammount of accusations? And on the other hand, just to give an example, a casino like thunderpick(again just an example) has a bad reputation with not even close to half of the ammount of complaints betpanda has? Is it just forum presence? I'm sure paying half(exageration) of the legendary status users here must help. Geniune question.

Sure, I don't mind explaining. By default trust view (what forum members see who haven't customized their trust lists), BetPanda currently has a trust rating of +1. This is because memehunter left them a positive feedback and is in the Default Trust (DT) network. BetPanda has no negative feedbacks from anyone in DT. This is why their net trust score is +1.

As far as flags are concerned, Type 1 (yellow) flags needs to be supported by at least 1 DT member to be active. Type 2 or 3 (orange) flags need to be supported by a net 3 DT members to be active. This is why none of the 5 flags against Betpanda are active.

I'm not bumping this thread anymore. Its dumb to harass people anywhere in any form, especially for as petty of a reason as OP is doing it. You can PM me if you have further questions.

That's a really good explanation on how things work. As far as Bet Panda goes, there are some that are paid by Bet Panda that will shill and go so far as to lie for them. Anyone betting sports knows that they run a scam sportsbook. Other sites rate Bet Panda poorly. Here Bet Panda will keep gaining positive trust from those they pay. No DT member will give negative trust because they don't want to rock the boat and make enemies. Bet Panda paid for protection.

Very interesting. Can't say i'm surprised. I already suspected this would be the case. I just wasn't aware of how this flag system worked exactly. Just by watching accusations against other casinos where people are so much more agressive to point fingers and when it comes to betpanda, those users are just whistling to the side. It's really smart on their part, i have to admit. 99% of the cases agains them involve sportsbook, which casinoguru won't do anything. So, just blame betby. Easy. Askgamblers are at a point that they won't even accept cases against them, since it's pointless. So, making a good campaing here, buying out some important users on this forum guarantees they can scam freely with 0 consequences. Actually pretty smart. Not sure if other mediation sites exist but if this is it, they actually figured it out pretty nicely. They should improve their bot game in trustpilot tho. Their score is dropping by the day. Maybe put to use all those KYC documents they have been collecting, to create those verified bot accounts. Because let's be real, i have yet to see a case where they have asked for KYC to someone and unbanned them afterwards. When they ask for KYC, it's game over. It's like blue screen of death. You're banned. So why else would they ask for KYC if they have 0 intention of unbanning from the start? Yes, i am implying they are commiting identity theft(arguably). Free tips, betpanda.

[T1HGO]

I know i am 10 months late in taking this measure, but i was simply not aware of the forums trust system.
So i have created a flag against betpanda. If you believe in my case, that i was indeed scammed without any acceptable justification, please consider supporting my flag.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=3675233