Dominant forces in the sport

[Zigabel]

In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?

Who doesn't want a continuous win? If you see that a particular pick on a team consistently gives you a win, why not continue with them, why feeling bored when you are literally making what feels and sounds like free money. I will not stri up anything at any point,  I mean what's the essence when I know too well I cannot just win from the other,  why will I rather choose to loose in the name of fun and wanting to se what the underdogs have got.

For fun, I will love to win more money,  that way I will have more fun and be much more excited with myself than when I loose because for me, I gamble to make profit and not for the funnof it because when I loose I don't find any fun with that, I find fun mostly when I win.

[xenomorfo]

In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?

Nothing lasts forever, even if there is a period when you seem unbeatable, sooner or later age will take its toll and your performance will slowly decline.
The beautiful thing is to stay at the top as a person, as a man or woman to be remembered well

[DaNNy001]

Nobody is invisible when it comes to sports, even the favorites can lose to the underdogs when they miss opportunities... yesterday's match between Chelsea and psg is a clear explanation of this, it doesn't make sense as to how psg can defeat a whole lot of strong teams even before the world cup but to everyones greatest surprise Chelsea ended up winning... Don't rely too much on the strong teams always

[stompix]

In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win.

No, it's not!
We didn't have a consecutive CL winner since Real in 2017, and don't even get me going on the always expected to win on the Club Cup yesterday...
Tennis? Nadal still beat Federer, Djokovic still beat Nadal, and neither Sinner nor Alcaraz is unbeatable!
NBA? Unless you go to 1960 there is only one team that has won it three times consecutively?

By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you?

So, you're tired of making money by betting on the favorite that keeps winning?
Here is my reply from a topic that also thought betting on the clear favorite would always win

Since OP never updated this with another team ,I did took Bayern for a spin:

Bundesliga has 34 matches, Bayern has drawn 7 games, lost 2, so a win of 25-9, which is already pretty bad as you would need at least 1.33 in winning odds just to make it even, an this get worse, in 25 games betting on the Bayern you would have won 6.45 to 25 and lost 9, so constantly betting this season on Bayern would have ended with a -2.55 loss to a $1 bet.

[YOSHIE]

Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?

If you talk about dominant in sports gambling, of course the superior team and the strongest team are the most important considerations in sports betting, I don't think it's here who want to waste money for free in gambling, they all hope to win over their bet.

For me for sports betting there is no fun nature I always focus on both teams and the assessment of the most important thing I did before Place bets, regardless of the end of the match I won or lose, but I remained focused on the original dominant.

[Strongkored]

In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?

If betting on the favorite could consistently generate profits, even if it wasn't much, bettors would always bet on it.
Unfortunately, the fact that bettors can still lose when betting on the favorite makes them open to the option of choosing the underdog under certain conditions.
In sports betting, bettors won't just bet on 1X2 but also other options to increase their chances of winning, which is the result of studying every possible outcomes.

[Pandu Geddon]

In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?

Sometimes I bet on the underdog, but it's not always my preferred option. The favored and dominating team won't always win either, but the average result is a win. It's just that if you want to bet regularly on the team that dominates throughout the season, you also have to pay attention to the Odds. Definitely, the profit is small, although in some matches, when facing a fairly strong team, the Odds definitely increase. We also have to try to predict other possible opportunities that can be obtained.

[$crypto$]

In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?

If betting on the favorite could consistently generate profits, even if it wasn't much, bettors would always bet on it.
Unfortunately, the fact that bettors can still lose when betting on the favorite makes them open to the option of choosing the underdog under certain conditions.
In sports betting, bettors won't just bet on 1X2 but also other options to increase their chances of winning, which is the result of studying every possible outcomes.

Not guaranteeing anything on the favorite team, how many people have lost their favorite team? If this were consistently true many bettors would follow suit, but unfortunately it is NOT.

That's the nice thing about sports betting is that when faced with a tough match there are other betting options not necessarily betting on 1X2 but many of the goals, corners and more.
Many people study betting like this so that the odds they choose are not necessarily which team wins.

[Sim_card]

In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?

The fact is that, you wouldn't know when the favorite team will lose to the underdog. This is why the future is unpredictable and football is full of surprises. A strong team can be defeated at the time that you wouldn't expect it. We are all humans and we draw our conclusions based on facts but in football, it's different. However, I wouldn't bet on the underdogs because only luck can make you win your bet.

[Cityhunter34]

In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?

Honestly, when someone keeps winning all the time, it gets a bit boring for me to bet on them. Sometimes I like to take a risk and put a small bet on the underdog, just to make it more exciting. I know the chances are low, but that’s what makes it fun if it actually hits. Of course, I don’t go big on those bets  it’s more for the thrill.

Gambling brings us more fun when we are on winning streak. So I wonder why someone would feel boring when the winning we are always looking for is already there, to be honest there are gamblers that are still looking for a strategy that can easily get a win in gambling because winning is something that makes the game more fun and entertainment talkles of when someone is still winning all the time. Although it depends on the gambler because there gamblers who have the money already so winning all the time without talking some satting risk might likely seems somehow boring to them.

[mirakal]

In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?

Honestly, I don’t see any team dominantly winning in a certain sport, although they can win once or twice, but after that the chance to lose is always there already. However, if there are instances that a certain team consistently wins all the time, then there’s no reason not to bet for them. Why would I bet into the opposite team when I don’t see any potential for them to win, except if that game they played at the moment the chances for them to win is clearly high, hence my bet goes for them.

Where there is money, then there’s definitely my bet. As simple as that, no need to complicate. After all, we are gambling to make more money, that’s certainly our goal. Getting entertained only come as a bonus especially if your bets are winning.

[Perfectbaby]

There is no clubs or team that will keeps winning for long even though they have proven to have the best sport record in the history of football, one day the new club must surely beat them totally. I can also take instances of PSG... They have been a good club for long and has proven record to be winning lot of teams, but yesterday match shows that even though they had seems to be the strongest team at least Chelsea showed them game they would never forget in their records or history. Therefore, I will say that no team and club remains in the dominant against others, fans can keep trusting them especially when they are meeting junior clubs they knows they can easily win.

[free-bit.co.in]

In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?

There’s no fixed strategy in sports betting that guarantees wins. Just blindly betting on favorites or underdogs won’t make you profitable in the long run. What really matters is beating the spread, and that’s way more complicated than just picking who’ll win or lose. A team can lose the game but still cover the spread, and your bet still cashes.

That’s why it’s not just about who wins, it’s about the value of the line. That’s where the real edge is.

Yeah there is no fun and kinds boring if you always betting only on favorites. I actually don't find any thrilling finding out only 1x2 while betting, the real real fun is analycing handicap, injury, hype also you should have to identify line movement and have to focus on beat-the-spread strategies to find out real value in the odds. If you always relay on finding out underdog or heavy favorite then it is a matter of +EV the expected value, so your edge could come from wrong price line predicting not team's popularity. Actually if the spread pays off then identifying underdog could be profitable but you know it is totally dependent on mindset & math, no chance for luck and drama.

[Nahl]

In football especially from major league the dominant teams not always win for each game but they have high chances to be the winner from their opponents and if people were consistent to bets on dominant teams for whole season i am sure those people will have good winning rates from sport betting but don't expect about the odds because most likely they will have low odds to bets even sometimes the odds 1.1x or even low than that which it is not worth but this option is good to those bets for fun only and not targetting the profit

[AVE5]

In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?

I don't care about favourites, I look up to teams that I can assume their possibilities to bring me winning. I either don't maintain a particular strategy for too long when it haven't been enough to brings me winning.
I also can't just pick an underdog just because I want to derive fun. Moreover the most excitement fun we can get in sport bets is the winning. So it'll be as stupid if anyone has a winning possibility and decides to intentionally loose it for a fun of mixing strategies or picking teams that your instincts couldn't even convince you to bring you success.

[Porfirii]

Most of the time, I find it more entertaining to bet on the underdogs, which doesn't mean that I always do it: what I mean is that, if I risk and win, the victory has a better flavour than if I make a safer bet. And, the times I lose the safer bets, the regret is much deeper compared to when I have the courage to make a risky bet and lose.

In addition, odds when underdogs win pay much better, so you'd need to win several times betting for the favourite to equal that profit, which means that in the mid term your results will be the same no matter who you choose. Under such conditions, I'm clear about it and bet for the one who makes me enjoy more.

[AmoreJaz]

In football especially from major league the dominant teams not always win for each game but they have high chances to be the winner from their opponents and if people were consistent to bets on dominant teams for whole season i am sure those people will have good winning rates from sport betting but don't expect about the odds because most likely they will have low odds to bets even sometimes the odds 1.1x or even low than that which it is not worth but this option is good to those bets for fun only and not targetting the profit

That is because it is actually a challenge to determine which team will really have their goals in every match. You will know how strong a team is but inside the field, you can't really precisely tell which team will end up with more goals. Hence, you still guess which team will have their first goal. You may have idea about their chance but luck is still in play which team will have their first goal.

There is no clubs or team that will keeps winning for long even though they have proven to have the best sport record in the history of football, one day the new club must surely beat them totally. I can also take instances of PSG... They have been a good club for long and has proven record to be winning lot of teams, but yesterday match shows that even though they had seems to be the strongest team at least Chelsea showed them game they would never forget in their records or history. Therefore, I will say that no team and club remains in the dominant against others, fans can keep trusting them especially when they are meeting junior clubs they knows they can easily win.

This is what you call sports. Because there will be born a new athlete or new team that can defy the odds and emerge as the new great in any sports. PSG had their golden days and so another team will come up to snatch that spot. That's what you call life as it is not only sports that we will see such scenario. There's no absolute great in any field. Someday, a new record will emerge.

[o48o]

In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?

Why wouldn't i? Isn't the whole point excitement and decent odds? I am pretty sure that huge portion of us don't always bet the one with lowest odds, or the one majority's favorite.
It would be pretty boring just to bets the front runner on betting odds. I know because i tried this and imho it's counter productive as well, because those odds often won't add up enough to cover the costs in the long run.

So why wouldn't i add a random black horse from time to time. In fact those situations are the times i have made most money. Not that i wouldn't be on negative still when it comes to overall betting.

[Aanuoluwatofunmi]

In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?

When things like happens, we should not be disturbed, instead ask ourself about the purpose to why we are gambling, if we can define it, then we have every right to continue gambling for that same reason, some will talk about house edge, we often lose in playing bets than we do win, which all these should be part of the reasons to why we are going to either continue to gamble for fun or choose to anticipate for winning opportunities in gambling.

[ajanwalker]

If a big team (I'm talking about football) has a crucial second leg, is in good league standings, and their opponent is a smaller team, I bet on the smaller team.

Other than that, I generally try to bet on goals. When I'm betting on goals, I adjust my goal bet accordingly if the team is likely to score against the bigger teams.

More precisely, if I'm betting on Over 2.5 goals, if I think the smaller team will score, I'll bet on Over 3.5 or 4.5 goals.