Dominant forces in the sport

[Solodoski]

In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?

In gambling, I believe everyone engaging in it wants to win, so I don't think anyone would like to lose their money on purpose, at least I will not want to do that to myself. Although sometimes I bet on the underdog, but I only do that based on the history of such game, probably the underdog are known for winning such dominant team. With this logic of mine, I still will not advice anyone to put their money on underdogs,  because most times you end up losing your money.
In conclusion I think it's better you put your money on the dominant team, because your chances of winning is way higher than betting on an underdog.

[Fortify]

In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?

There are too many variables involved in this to ever get an accurate answer. Taking Max Verstappen as an example, he was dominating last season and you must take a determination on value when it comes to whether you choose to bet on him. If he has won the last four races but is being offered at 1.10x odds, frankly I'd skip over the bet because it is not worth the risk for a 10% gain on my "investment". Sure, he might win that particular race, but you'd have to make 10 of these calls correctly in order to double your money and then you have to start thinking - if I doubled my money after 10 bets, but then lost the 10th and 11th bet, I could potentially have wiped out any potential earnings from this low profit analysis. You can see this season that he has turned from a pretty reliable bet into a weak one. Be careful when betting on dominant forces because it can change quickly.

[SATWAT]

In football especially from major league the dominant teams not always win for each game but they have high chances to be the winner from their opponents and if people were consistent to bets on dominant teams for whole season i am sure those people will have good winning rates from sport betting but don't expect about the odds because most likely they will have low odds to bets even sometimes the odds 1.1x or even low than that which it is not worth but this option is good to those bets for fun only and not targetting the profit

It's not about Major League in many other leagues also happen top teams or better teams not always have high winning chances because underdogs can do their work anywhere which is always exciting because these give huge profit and good excitement to winner.
I usually love to go with teams which have low chances ow win because things always not works like they needed sometime its happen but for these results always needed to have good search about event with stats and history these always works and give better view.
Currently, soccer and tennis both are events which have good underdogs options for punters because its never been problem for peoples those can do some work and have better results from these events but always needed to do some work without this its never been easy.

[Hyphen(-)]

In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?

I am sure you are making reference to what just happened to PSG yesterday on the Club World Cup final, but what do we have to say about the whole game, they did well same as Chelsea did, but Chelsea was well prepared just as PSG do prepare against Real Madrid, they took Chelsea for granted and expected an easy game, that is why they lose the match in my opinion.

Back to your discussion; I think always weighing the opponent will be very important despite how the team is dominating at that moment because there is an end to everything and no one knows when.

Betting on teams that are on form or a team that is winning consistently is very good, but there odds always reduce which makes the return smaller than expected that’s why gamblers are always looking for wins offsets that will give them high returns. I don’t also like to see one team dominating always just PSG is doing in the League1, I don’t like betting on them due to smaller odds, I prefer challenging matches that will be fun to watch and to predict as well.

[r_victory]

It's true that the favorites are the best-prepared teams, with an unquestionable winning record, but favorites don't always win. Sometimes, I like to bet on underdogs, or even draws. I don't always win, but when I win, it's a worthwhile bet. I bet enough so that the loss isn't significant, and if I win, it can be considered a profit.

[Su-asa]

In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?

The dominant side cannot always deliver because they are still humans they can get tired. There are times that I just decide to bet on the underdogs especially when the favorites have had a lot of winning streaks. Maintaining a winning streak can be very difficult and when a particular team keeps winning there might be a loss around the corner. But to be on the safe side I always stake low on the underdogs

[letteredhub]

In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?

This unbeaten pattern do happen regular in the hose leagues which are referred to as farmer's league because one or two dominant teams dominate the league with high winning chances than any opponent they meet. I think we all know that such situations are usually boring because it's like we all know the ending of the game's result from the beginning before the end. Something about those clubs in such leagues, their odds are very low that you can't make a good profit from picking them.

[Makus]

In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?

Sometimes the odds for the favorite to win the games becomes so small that I ignore better on those games because it won't add any significant value to the bet. And I've  had several cases where those bet end up being the bad egg among several selections, and that opend my eyes really to a clear understanding that gambling is all bout being lucky and there's no certainty no matter there passed head to head or performance with other teams. Most especially in football, there are several instances where the underdogs end up beating the favorite do bad. Take for instance the final between Chelsea and PSG, Chelsea was so underrated that they were given 5 odd yet they won in clean sheets 3:0

[Rockstarguy]

In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?

Why will you be tired of betting on the dominant team when you know dominant teams stand a better chance of winning? A gambler who is interested in winning would never be tired of going for the dominant; nobody wishes to lose in gambling, which means people who go for the best do so to ensure they win. It could even cost one to repeat the same pattern of gambling as long as it ends up winning. The way in which one plays, leading to a win, can also be considered fun; it doesn't make it boring or uninteresting, even if the same pattern is used in gambling.

[Agbe]

Normally in sport betting once a team wins up a a particular amount of games and becomes more dominant in in any particular sporting events the odd of such a team in any sport drops to the bearest minimum which I personally finds difficult to bet on such teams because betting on such odds will not yield anything tangible

[red4slash]

Such things are always there but in the end not everything that indicates the favorite can be used as a reference to continue to win because after all even though they are favorites but of course the match is determined in 90 minutes and for us gamblers clearly know that in the end things like this cannot be swallowed raw because we must be able to see previous statistics.

I will take the case of Manchester City in the recently completed season in every match in the EPL or in the Champions League. Most of the matches they run they are favorites and it is rare that Mancheester City is not favored in a match especially for the EPL but in the end when we try to force a bet in the last season then the situation will clearly not match the expectations where we will probably lose a lot of money instead of getting a profit.
This is another condition where the favorite club will not always continue to win because of course statistics and unexpected situations must also be considered.

[sunsilk]

I think no continuous winning is boring. If that's the kind of boredom that we'll have, it's totally good. For as long as I am in that shed that I am continually winning, that's more than enough

And the typical bettor will continue to bet on that team if they have been winning a lot. So, the odds for those teams that have been considered the dominant ones will be lower.

It won't matter to the eyes of others if you are winning and they're likely to copy your strategy once they're already see how effective it is to stay.

[Asiska02]

In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?

Why would I get bored of winning, it is never going to get bored and until I don’t see them winning again before I will change my opinion on them and then bet on the opposite team who also looks more likely of winning. Most of the people gambling are doing it for profit making sake and not for the pleasure they derive from it and would never want to change their choice of team winning even when they know the opposite team doesn’t stand a chance against them. The only time this options are explored by gamblers is to risk more with the hope of winning big because the odds will always favor those that have a low tendency of winning over the ones with high tendency.

[lienfaye]

In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?

The odds for favorites are low, but chances to win is high. But despite this, many of us prefer to take the safe side even with small profit. If you bet often on favorites, consistent winning is possible, it's not boring but more on it's not exciting.

I tried to bet on underdogs too, though the profit is way better, there's a slim chance to win. Thus i'd rather win consistently with favorites than take risk to underdogs. Winning is the goal here btw.

[Orpichukwu]

In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?

I gamble with intentions and hope of winning, not just to kill boredom. If there has always been one team showing their strength in a particular season and it's always a known fact that all of the legs will be won against their opponents, I won't bet against them to lose; I will still place my bet in their favour, and to make it more fun, I will choose options like predicting how many goals they can win with and in which half.

[promise444c5]

Although it mixture when it comes to betting even though favourite to win doesn’t mean such team is dominating, it’s could just be performance comparison to their opponent that made them favourite to win (could be underdog vs another underdog) but thats just a little count, gamblers need to look beyond that.
Betting means taking risk on its own, betting on underdogs is a risk in a risk so don’t expect much from them but when you finally hit  it, could yield good amount depending on the amount wagered (if low expect a low return or vice versa)
However, in most cases since there’s low expectancy the wagers are always low except it’s done deliberately so I don’t think it’s worth it for so many gamblers as it could take a while to hit a luck and comparing it with the loss accumulated it could be just a little win(a win is a win anyways  )

[mcdouglasx]

In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?

That's why I like sports betting. Generally, a top team ends up winning the vast majority of matches. We only have to look at last season and see on average how much they won and lost. I am fully convinced that most of the time we lose it is because we want to win more, with mixed bets or betting on many matches with the intention of maximizing our own profits.

I don't think people get bored, it's just that if they change their strategy it's with the intention of making more money.

[BITCOIN4X]

In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?

It's normal for me to bet on a team with a high chance of winning rather than taking a big risk on a team with a low chance, even if they lose, which is common in gambling. Nothing is certain in any sport or game; even teams with a high chance of winning can lose, as in PSG's defeat to Chelsea. I didn't want to take a big risk on Chelsea because PSG was so convincing, but sometimes our expectations never match reality.

PSG's defeat yesterday left many bettors who had backed them devastated, but this should be accepted as a normal part of gambling, preventing us from feeling deeply disappointed. Hoping for a win is certainly fine, but it shouldn't make us forget the risks or possibility of losing.

[Ever-young]

In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?

In gambling, I believe everyone engaging in it wants to win, so I don't think anyone would like to lose their money on purpose, at least I will not want to do that to myself. Although sometimes I bet on the underdog, but I only do that based on the history of such game, probably the underdog are known for winning such dominant team. With this logic of mine, I still will not advice anyone to put their money on underdogs,  because most times you end up losing your money.
In conclusion I think it's better you put your money on the dominant team, because your chances of winning is way higher than betting on an underdog.

You're very correct. I don't think there's anyone who'd wanna just lose his money on purpose to Gambling. It can be exciting to bet on underdog teams, especially when you feel they've got a good shot judging from their past performances. Yeah, it can equally be quite a risk because the dominant team sometimes can break all odds and unexpectedly come on top of the game, I mean that's what we see all the time in sports.

If you ask me, I'd say it'll be a much better option to  bet on the dominant team too, I mean, the odds are actually in their favour and you'll likely come out ahead with that option.

[JunaidAzizi]

Gamblers are finding the best ways to earn a lot of money consistently, and here you are saying it's boring to win excessively. I know what you are saying,gambling is for fun, but now it's a source of earning and winning again and again. Sometimes, this can make gamblers bored, and they want something different. It's true that excessive winning can sap the thrill, and you will lose your interest. You have to change your position sometimes to make betting more thrilling and exciting. So, do one or two bets on the weaker team, but remember you will face losses, so do it when you are clear that the stronger teams are losing and the weaker teams are winning. In this way, you will change your pattern and will not face any loss.