"A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator." This with whole thread. No rule was broken there, I would love to know why it was deleted.
Moderators don't just delete threads out of the blue especially in the scam accusations board. You must have repeatedly broken the forum rules that you refuse to admit. I have looked up your post in the archive -
https://bitlist.co/topic/5582037, and it's very clearly that you repeatedly made consecutive posts even when mods tried to merge some of them.
Apparently, more people than you assume. Otherwise, they wouldn’t bother posting fake positive reviews, just like they don’t bother replying here.
Let's say I don't like a certain service. I create so many truspilot accounts but instead of sending them negative feedback, I send positive feedback to make it appear like they are trying to manipulate their ratings. Trustpilot deletes the fake feedback and then states that the service is trying to manipulate the rating. That's just one way it is to manipulate whatever you see on trustpilot. The other is obvious.
I’m not refusing to admit anything lol. I could have made consecutive posts when replying to several people, since I couldn’t find the multiquote feature and I’m manually copy-pasting Ryzaadit’s quote.
When I wasn’t replying, I was updating the post with enough time between updates, except on 7/5. If you check the latest posts before they were deleted, several days had passed between them. If you think that is enough to justify deleting a Scam Accusation thread, that’s fine, but I disagree.
About the reviews, yes, that is a possibility. Of course, an external actor could post either negative or positive reviews to hurt your reputation. But since they are replying to those reviews, it looks like they do care about the company’s public image. So the possibility that they themselves are posting some positive reviews is no less plausible than that.
Apparently, more people than you assume. Otherwise, they wouldn’t bother posting fake positive reviews, just like they don’t bother replying here.
Majority a service just want to looks nice for the SEO page.But for normal people using a review site for looking a casino are pretty low. Winna is being aware due Goobr are promoting them and they giving him a marker as well.
Its majority from the stream, but trust me even they got marked for those they don't care at all. Even Stake.com the bigger one are ignoring a bad bad review on TrustPilots.
So they do care, at least to some extent. In my Google search results, Trustpilot is the second result, right after their official domain. I agree that their marketing is aimed at other areas, but they are still doing shady things, even with the reviews lol.