BC.GAME Fake accusation and suspicouis behavior

[Lillominato89]

I'm not defending BC.game because I endorse them with my signature space, but you've provided little evidence to make any accusations against them. They blocked you in PMs and I don't see anything wrong with that, they just don't want to collaborate with you.

[xLays]

BC.GAME looked like reputable casino to me, so I contacted them and asked if they are interested in sponsoring one of community competitions.

I hope you don't mind me sharing my opinion, but I feel that this wouldn't have caused any issue if you hadn't asked them whether they were interested in sponsoring one of the community competitions.

[Free Market Capitalist]

I also see no reasonable grounds for supporting the OP. You wanted their money, they said no, and the fact that they blocked you, well, that can happen. This thread seems to me like a little kid throwing a tantrum after not getting what they want.

Otherwise, I do not see any reason why they would blame a DT1 member for suspicious behaviour.

Wrong. BC.GAME is DT2 with only one net inclusion.





And I don't know what DT status has to do with it. I think the positive feedback they have is much more relevant.

[notblox1]

I'm not defending BC.game because I endorse them with my signature space, but you've provided little evidence to make any accusations against them. They blocked you in PMs and I don't see anything wrong with that, they just don't want to collaborate with you.

They accused me, I just reveled how they are dealing with community members.
But to know that you would first have to read the topic content  

It is clear that anyone who is wearing BC.GAME signature or has any association with them is not neutral.

I hope you don't mind me sharing my opinion, but I feel that this wouldn't have caused any issue if you hadn't asked them whether they were interested in sponsoring one of the community competitions.

Really you think so  
And there would be no issue if they didnt accuse me before that.

I also see no reasonable grounds for supporting the OP. You wanted their money

Since you are so intelligent please tell me how much money exactly I wanted to get from them?  
This is valid for everyone else who wrote before you with similar accusation against me.


Dont worry guys, EFL Championship competition will run again with better sponsors, so stay tuned

Big thanks to everyone for free advertisement and promotion  

[crwth]

They accused me, I just reveled how they are dealing with community members.
But to know that you would first have to read the topic content 

What is the basis of the accusation? That you cannot answer simple questions? Where is the link to the accusation made by BC.GAME? Or how did they imply that to you?

It is clear that anyone who is wearing BC.GAME signature or has any association with them is not neutral.

I'm looking at it at an observer point of view with no bias. Can you provide a summary of why you cannot answer and why you think it's complex? Based on what I read, it's an estimate and a request for information about the possible return they will receive for sponsoring you. They want to know about your experience, and you can simply retrieve your previous sponsorship information and extract the relevant data from there. It's doable.

Since you are so intelligent please tell me how much money exactly I wanted to get from them?   
This is valid for everyone else who wrote before you with similar accusation against me.

I get where you are coming from, it's not going to you, but the community. You need to understand that they are a business, and they want metrics to determine if it's worth investing in your competition or not. It's that simple. Since YOU cannot answer, they won't invest. That's not going to be suspicious behavior and an accusation. IMO.

Maybe BC.GAME's criteria for sponsoring aren't in line with yours. Don't take it personally. Just like this post.

[notblox1]

What is the basis of the accusation? That you cannot answer simple questions? Where is the link to the accusation made by BC.GAME? Or how did they imply that to you?

It is in my personal messages.
I can answer a simple question but maybe some people cant understand English language or my simple answer.

I'm looking at it at an observer point of view with no bias.

You are wearing their signature, therefor you clearly have some bias.
I already answered, but I didnt have diploma for exactly predicting future events.

Maybe BC.GAME's criteria for sponsoring aren't in line with yours. Don't take it personally. Just like this post.

I really dont care about them, and it is not like I am a kid who got rejected by gf for the first time  
I dont understand why some members think I was angry or hurt by them, but I guess they are just projecting what they would do in similar situation.
My position is very calm and I moved on to something better, it was just a short one night stand with BC, and it is not my loss.

[Free Market Capitalist]

Since you are so intelligent please tell me how much money exactly I wanted to get from them?  
This is valid for everyone else who wrote before you with similar accusation against me.


Dont worry guys, EFL Championship competition will run again with better sponsors, so stay tuned

Big thanks to everyone for free advertisement and promotion  

The fact that you're showing off by making it personal just proves what I said before. You wanted their money, regardless of whether it was for you personally or to sponsor an event. There are several references to successfully sponsoring events in the positive feedback from BC.GAME. In other words, if they had no problem sponsoring through other people, don't blame the world if they didn't sponsor you. They have already explained it to you, briefly and clearly, and I wouldn't be surprised if they don't make any further comments in this thread because it's like arguing with a small child having a tantrum who there's no way to calm down.

[Lillominato89]

I'm not defending BC.game because I endorse them with my signature space, but you've provided little evidence to make any accusations against them. They blocked you in PMs and I don't see anything wrong with that, they just don't want to collaborate with you.

They accused me, I just reveled how they are dealing with community members.
But to know that you would first have to read the topic content  

It is clear that anyone who is wearing BC.GAME signature or has any association with them is not neutral.

Actually, you're wrong. If you had provided concrete evidence, I could have supported you, but without evidence, we're talking about cosmic nothingness.
So, since you've gotten what you wanted, there's no point in continuing this discussion! Good luck with your business.

[lovesmayfamilis]

Dale Carnegie said that if you want to achieve something from a person, you need to make him believe that your idea is his. It's just psychology. You offered to sponsor, but BC.GAME had no such desire, and it did not appear in the process. Not everyone is obliged to check a profile that is certainly worthy of respect, especially if there is no desire for this at all. All that remains is to wish them success and move on without stirring up a scandal. Your pride was hurt, and by opening this topic, you could expect feedback from those who advertise this casino and a corresponding reaction from BC.GAME, because they were not the ones who brought this whole scandal to the public.

[God Of Thunder]

Otherwise, I do not see any reason why they would blame a DT1 member for suspicious behaviour.

Wrong. BC.GAME is DT2 with only one net inclusion.

And I don't know what DT status has to do with it. I think the positive feedback they have is much more relevant.

You got me wrong, buddy. I was talking about notblox1!
He is a reputed guy and a DT1 member, and I think he carries some weight. Right?
Regardless of what the BC game says about him, I don't think he is suspicious. I believe this is a pure misunderstanding on both sides. BC game expected some estimate, but they were unsatisfied with notblox1's answer. I also oppose the statement that he looks beggarly when he reaches them for a sponsorship deal. He reached the BC game because he knows they often sponsor many events on this forum. I would personally reach the campaign manager of a particular casino instead of reaching the casino directly. I believe the campaign manager knows me better than the company. The company is not regular on the forum, and they might have minimal to no idea about me.

[notblox1]

small child having a tantrum who there's no way to calm down.

Thank you again for showing support and bumping this topic, you proved that you are much smarter and more mature than mini me  
I think that changing your username to some capitalist word increased your brain size and made you look much smarter.

You got me wrong, buddy. I was talking about notblox1!
He is a reputed guy and a DT1 member, and I think he carries some weight. Right?

No, I am just anti-capitalist kid having fun
I dont care about reputation and all that stuff.

Best of luck to BC and all their followers.

[God Of Thunder]

No, I am just anti-capitalist kid having fun
I dont care about reputation and all that stuff.

Best of luck to BC and all their followers.

Please don't get mad. I know it's not your usual behavior. Sometimes, you have to control yourself and ignore these things. It is obvious that the casinos do not know much about the forum members. They don't see any difference between you and a newbie if they do not know you already. So, I would suggest keeping it personal and moving on. I don't like the BC game for one reason, and that is communication. They have been criticized hundreds of times because of their poor support. But yeah, we were talking about something else here. Yet, I would request you to lock this thread and move on. Just a friendly request, not an advice.

[examplens]

Otherwise, I do not see any reason why they would blame a DT1 member for suspicious behaviour.

Wrong. BC.GAME is DT2 with only one net inclusion.

And I don't know what DT status has to do with it. I think the positive feedback they have is much more relevant.

What is more interesting to me is that they ^BC.GAME has the same member on both the trust list and the blocked list.
They don't want to hear him, but still trust his judgment.

[alani123]

I'd blame it to whoever manages their PR.

A casino operation has many good people behind it but surely whoever answers messages sets to be the face of the operation for the greater public.

On the other hand, they also have a right to refuse communication and of course to not sponsor something. If the accusation was not widely shared I'd consider this a private exchange and since no money or significant resources were spend by either party, it's basically a nothingburger other than the meh behavior.