Does sign campaign payments directly to the casino make you to gamble?

[Odohu]

The answer is affirmative, signature campaigns paid to casinos actually make you to gamble.  There are some instances in which the payment for signature campaign is less than the minimum withdrawal, in that case one will be required to bet with it to aim for the minimum withdrawal to be able to make withdrawal.  Apart from this, the temptation to gamble when you have some balance is very high which is why payment of signature campaign into the casino actually make one to gamble more.

[Taskford]

Motivation behind this thread:

...So i can say that i started gambling right from when i got some signature payment made i to my casino account like stake is paying it participants into their stake account and i started gambling from that place.

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

Anything that give you easy access to play would provably attract you to gamble.

Especially if you see some nice promotion running around and you know how to play then there's available balance to use came from signature campaign earnings for sure that you will get tempted to use it then try to earn more bigger profit from the current money you have.

But still its up to the receiver if they want to use and play with those money they got since I believe the campaign manager or the owner didn't force them to gamble.

[qwertyup23]

Just like in the content of OP, I am a stake participant and I do receive my pay in my stake account but never have i used it to gamble. The thing is, I am more of a sports bettor and I'm comfortable betting in local sportsbook using fiat.

At the same time, gambling with your signature pay might force you to go against your bankroll management. Which is one mistake I wouldn't want to do.

I remembered, I used to gamble my funds when I still participated in the campaign signature of blackjack.fun given that they paid well during that time.

Back in those days, I would use like 50% of my signature campaign earnings to gamble at their website given that I receive their funds directly into our respective accounts in that website. It was both a fun and dangerous experience given that there were times where I used everything in one sitting.

The answer is affirmative, signature campaigns paid to casinos actually make you to gamble.  There are some instances in which the payment for signature campaign is less than the minimum withdrawal, in that case one will be required to bet with it to aim for the minimum withdrawal to be able to make withdrawal.  Apart from this, the temptation to gamble when you have some balance is very high which is why payment of signature campaign into the casino actually make one to gamble more.

I also remembered that there was a time that you couldn't withdraw your funds from that gambling website due to the minimum withdrawal requirement. When I was still Jr. Member many years ago, I had trouble withdrawing my funds and it took me like 2-3 weeks of pay in order to withdraw directly to my wallet.

[xenomorfo]

Ive been there before ive joined into a signature which requires to have your casino account and it will directly created to your wallet and reason why i played some little bit of my earnings to the casino and if it its win good because youve gained extra but if not feels bad at the same time because imagine you can just cashout immediately but again this depends to the player if you are active in playing gambling still good because no hassle to make transfer but if you are trader the same time for sure you will feel the market price movement specially if you are into BTC.

This way you can try the casino with peace of mind, that's what it's for
Maybe there are some games that you like and stay, some are definitely fun
i am old and i don't like playing computer games, i prefer real iterations and so they don't appeal to me much

[Charles-Tim]

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

I treat my signature earning earning like my real life earning. I only take 1% from it to gamble. This has been very helpful for me in life because signature campaign payment in my country is not a small amount of money. It can even higher than monthly salary here in my country. So I only use just 1% to gamble because the remaining 99% can be used to establish something good if saved.

[Shinpako09]

Actually, I’ve thought about this before. What if the payment went directly to a casino, just like Stake’s campaign? Would I be able to hold back, and for how long? As a gambler, that’s honestly very tempting. I’m thankful it’s not directly to 1win, because it’s already tempting enough to make a deposit, what more if it went straight into the casino? If you can’t hold back, it’s either you walk away with 2x or more of your payment, or you end up empty handed. To be honest, I’d rather not have my payment go directly to a casino, simply because I know myself very well. Lol.

[Gozie51]

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

I believe that is the body language of the casino for participants under their payroll to also patronize them instead of going to other casino to play. They do that also for marketing purposes but aside that, I like the part that it is not mandatory for you to use your payment to gamble on their platform. It is a choice to make. It is tempting however especially for a gambler who plays steady and online, you will always visit your pay master's business which is dangerous if you can't control your emotions because you will end up playing against the house edge. You don't need deposit or refilling of your account because you have the money there, very inimical.

[purple_sparkles]

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

I treat my signature earning earning like my real life earning. I only take 1% from it to gamble. This has been very helpful for me in life because signature campaign payment in my country is not a small amount of money. It can even higher than monthly salary here in my country. So I only use just 1% to gamble because the remaining 99% can be used to establish something good if saved.

I think it’s both interesting and right to try out what you advertise. I enjoy using casino services, it’s an entertaining pastime for me. And I consider the money from signature a legitimate source that I can spend on gambling, although the amount is usually much smaller than what I earn from sign.

[CryptSafe]

Some casinos signature campaign payment policy is that they would pay signature campaign participants directly to their casino account. Maybe that is a way to reduce the stress of paying for transaction fees and all of that.
Before one applies for such campaign, it is clearly stated on the terms and conditions to accept before applying for such a campaign and mind you some casinos do have standing policy with respect to wager and minimum withdrawal and in some cases they give participants free will to withdraw but from OP point of view here, I don't think payment to casino account would turn one a gambler depending on the casino withdrawal policy and if it requires that you gamble before you withdraw then you will have to do it because you saw, read and accepted the terms and conditions before applying for the campaign
However, if the casino give a special preference to campaign participants to withdraw without any commitment since they work to get paid for it then it is fine otherwise one would need to gamble so as to meet the requirements before they withdraw.

[ralle14]

If the campaign lasts for more than a few months, I do try them out to understand how their casino works, and it's one way to start a discussion in their announcement thread.

I don't mind spending a bit of time and coin playing as long as they have lower minimum withdrawals, but if the amount i'm getting from their campaign is just enough for the minimum, then I have to skip and wait it out.

[joeperry]

Definitely yes, I've been in countless campaign and I've been a participant to one campaign of a gambling site where they sent the rewards directly to the casino wallet and I can really say that on the first few weeks, I've managed to double or at least have some more by placing 1-2 bets, but on the latter part of the campaign, I think 1-3 weeks I've lost my reward by trying my chance to double or have some more by playing those rewards of mine.

I think this is also a strategy of the gambling sites, so users would be able tempted to play those rewards.  

[Akbarkoe]

The answer is affirmative, signature campaigns paid to casinos actually make you to gamble.  There are some instances in which the payment for signature campaign is less than the minimum withdrawal, in that case one will be required to bet with it to aim for the minimum withdrawal to be able to make withdrawal.  Apart from this, the temptation to gamble when you have some balance is very high which is why payment of signature campaign into the casino actually make one to gamble more.

Of course, most people will do it, especially those who gamble easily without good self-control, seeing that their account has a balance in the casino, they will gamble, at least they will be tempted by the game and think about trying their luck, this thought will come in passing after the signature payment is no longer in your casino wallet.

[KTChampions]

~
I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

Nope. If I remember correctly, I have about 6,000 dollars on my casino balance and I don’t touch it. I have a separate budget for gambling and I have no problems sticking to it. And I can’t say that I’ve disciplined myself too much or anything like that, it’s just that for me, not spending the money that I have on my balance is not difficult at all. I don't like gambling enough to spend unplanned money on it.

[HONDACD125]

Motivation behind this thread:

...So i can say that i started gambling right from when i got some signature payment made i to my casino account like stake is paying it participants into their stake account and i started gambling from that place.

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

I used to get paid in my casino account by signature campaigns in the past, but I would say it depends on an individual and what they have in mind in general. If you are someone who loves gambling, you might get tempted when you see the balance in your casino account, and then you might think of making a few bets with it while it's there because then if you want to gamble later anyway so you will have to make a deposit again and pay deposit fees, etc.

On the other hand, someone who has a clear vision for their money and they know they have to use it for something else, let's say someone is saving Bitcoin from their signature earnings, and they deposit the whole payment in a non-custodial wallet they have created only for this purpose. Such a person will never gamble with the money even if they are receiving it in their casino account.

Since I'm currently getting paid directly into my wallet, I don't do that, but in the past, I used to do both, gamble with a small amount, and withdraw the rest to keep it balanced.

[danherbias07]

Yes. But I only spent a few bucks betting. Before, I really spent a lot on slots, especially after winning a max win. I thought to myself that I might repeat the same thing, and as time flies by, I just use the money in sports betting and sometimes Plinko.

There's money available. It truly can urge you to gamble, and I think it's okay because we worked for it. As long as we don't badly need that money, then gamble it. In sports betting, it will take a while before I deplete the amount paid in the signature campaign.

[Iroh]

I think that's the idea. It is definitely more tempting to play when you get payments directly credited into your casino account. Obviously, the choice to play or not entirely rests on you, but for someone who gambles regularly, it would be a welcome relationship.
It's also a subtle way to get players to try out some of the services of the casino. Not exactly a bad idea too to try out some of the services offered by the casino as we're literally helping to market their services.

[internetional]

Several times it was mentioned here that the payout couldn't be withdrawn without placing a bet. But no one has named a specific casino that had such rules. Can you provide examples?

[Porfirii]

Paying directly to your account directly breaks an important entry barrier, and although it seems that some people here are immune to it, I have to admit that I've used a part of my payment to test the casino whose signature I was wearing, if not for pure curiosity. But just a little part, in my case, and it was several years ago.

[Zlantann]

The answer is affirmative, signature campaigns paid to casinos actually make you to gamble.  There are some instances in which the payment for signature campaign is less than the minimum withdrawal, in that case one will be required to bet with it to aim for the minimum withdrawal to be able to make withdrawal.  Apart from this, the temptation to gamble when you have some balance is very high which is why payment of signature campaign into the casino actually make one to gamble more.

There was a case in the forum where the minimum withdrawal was higher than the signature weekly payment, and many people frowned at it. The best option was to wait and receive more than one weekly payment before withdrawal ( if the campaign lasts more than one week).

Back to the topic, it is tempting for gamblers to receive payments in casinos. The temptation is even higher if it is a reputable casino that has many enticing offers. But if the forum is not a source of income, using just signature earnings for gambling is a smart move.

[Mr. Magkaisa]

Motivation behind this thread:

...So i can say that i started gambling right from when i got some signature payment made i to my casino account like stake is paying it participants into their stake account and i started gambling from that place.

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

I've been playing in casinos before and joining the signature campaign with casino make them provide my need for the bank roll.
In addition I joined several to many casinos just to join programs and contest. As for me is a bit successful not to deposit to gambling with my own money but the rewards from them