Does sign campaign payments directly to the casino make you to gamble?

[len01]

What about you?

Sure, I use my signature payment to gamble. When else can we double our weekly paycheck for a small profit? But I don't use it all at once, just 50%, and I always use it for sports betting to enjoy the thrill of football betting and try my luck. And sometimes I use it to bet on poker to make a small profit.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

Why not? I personally use it for betting or playing slots, hoping to win more when I withdraw but of course I only use a few cents. Essentially before I start playing, I'll withdraw the weekly payout from the campaign early to avoid the temptation to gamble longer. Ultimately it's your decision whether to withdraw it all or use it for gambling, as the payer gives you that flexibility.

I am just like you too, if I want to spend some bucks on gambling after receiving pay, I will have to withdraw the amount that I don't wish to spend on gambling and after doing so, that is when I can start gambling with amount I left behind and the reason for doing that is to avoid the temptation of spending all. It's not bad if someone is allocating some bucks for gambling every week if they want but it depends on how frequent the person gambles too.

[Fiatless]

I am just like you too, if I want to spend some bucks on gambling after receiving pay, I will have to withdraw the amount that I don't wish to spend on gambling and after doing so, that is when I can start gambling with amount I left behind and the reason for doing that is to avoid the temptation of spending all. It's not bad if someone is allocating some bucks for gambling every week if they want but it depends on how frequent the person gambles too.

This is a smart move to avoid the temptation of gambling off all of your campaign payments.  The challenge might be the discipline to withdraw it after receiving the money. You might just want to try how lucky you are and it might lead to using all the funds. I gamble mostly during weekends, and from my personal experience, getting paid from a casino has not affected my gambling activity negatively.

[rachael9385]

Motivation behind this thread:

...So i can say that i started gambling right from when i got some signature payment made i to my casino account like stake is paying it participants into their stake account and i started gambling from that place.

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

I withdraw my payments immediately I receive It because I know that if I leave it for longer durations I might be tempted to try out some casino games, it's possible that in the process of exploring you might even end up making more money but I don't joke with my campaign payments. I always write out the list of things that I need to settle, seeing this always reminds me that I don't have to joke with even a penny that comes

[Davidvictorson]

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

Yes, that's my own answer to the question. I would be prompted to gambling more if that were the case with my signature campaign. Would it have been worth it, well I guess not but it would require stoic discipline to not use some portion of it every week for gambling. But I am glad it isn't. That gives me freedom to choose when to gamble.

[panjul07]

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

For several years, I used most of my payment from signature campaign as my main fund source for my gambling habit and there was so low amount that I have spent from my own wallet.
Whether I received the campaign payment directly to casino account or to my own wallet, I used to use it for my gambling most of the time.
However I have changed since last year since I reduced my gambling activity a lot for a reason, so it is rare now for me to use my payment from the campaign to gamble.

[Tmoonz]

If you are promoting a casino signature campaign and they are paying into your account in their casino, you don't know what they have done for you. You are being saved lots of stress and paying unnecessary charges of adding money into your account to gamble. They want to make things very easy for you, and you shouldn't see it as a strategy from the casino to lure you into gambling. Fine and good you are a gambler and you are going to gamble one way or the other. Why not remove the amount you will gamble with and withdraw the balance. Or would you prefer promoting another casino and gambling elsewhere? I think it's more like practice what you preach.

Hahaha you have just hit the nail on the head i mean what you said have a deeper meaning to those who understood the language of gambling too well, there is no point going else where when you are already in a place and position of getting what you want unless maybe the casino doesn't display the kind of games you want and that is a different stories entirely and secondly gambling is never mandatory it is still your choice to gamble or not even the campaign payments are made to your casino account, it is individual decision to gamble even when the pay doesn't reach the minimum withdrawal there is nothing wrong waiting to get to the minimum withdrawal amount and withdrawal you payments if you don't want to gamble that's so simple.

[Hispo]

...

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

I gambled before joining the signature campaign I am currently in, though I had not gambled in a long time before joining into it.
Yes, I would say belonging to a signature campaign indeed influences on the chances of one becoming an active gambler in those casinos one is advertising in a passive way with our signature.

In general I also like to test whatever I promote, so I took the initiative to break my hiatus and gamble on stake to see how good is was, right after getting into their signature campaign, so far I am satisfied with my experience with them, I would be quite hypocritical of me to recommend something I had never touched with my very own hands. I think it is better this way.

[Smack That Ace]

yeah for me campaign payment that is directly deposited into my casino account is a powerful inducement to play.  most often prepaid & raindrop balances encourage hedonistic spending, windfalls & designated funds are given a feeling like house money & can be spent more freely. when i get payment directly to my casino account it lessen the pain and hassle of depositing by my own, which also encourages me to gamble more & more quickly.  In essence, depositing a signature payment into a casino account is giving temptation a free pass.

Duke Khan

[icebar]

If gamblers see money on their casino platform, I can definitely say that they can gamble there for some time. Even if they don't play today, they will play at some time. But for those who don't gamble, it's a completely different matter. But casino platforms, I think, use their own platforms for two reasons. That is, the convenience of paying and the interest of gamblers in gambling will be created there. It will completely depend on the gambler himself. But in general, if we see that if there is money on a casino platform, the gambler can be ready to bet. He can easily participate in the bet. I think the casino prefers to pay for the convenience of doing it on their own platform rather than profit.

[|MINER|]

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

I think the issue of payment to the casino site account does not matter much here, I myself am constantly receiving signature campaign payments from jackclub to my jacklcub account, but I have wagered very rarely here with this account. Rather if there is any need for that I have created another account but I have wagered very little with this one.

And besides, I think it's also a matter of self-control, and at the same time I also think that gambling is not a crime, most of us here gamble more or less. But we have to remember that it should be beyond our control to lose, then whether it is given as a signature payment or in some other way, it doesn't matter.

[goldkingcoiner]

Motivation behind this thread:

...So i can say that i started gambling right from when i got some signature payment made i to my casino account like stake is paying it participants into their stake account and i started gambling from that place.

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

I am not touching my signature pay because I am trying to set an example that it is better to hodl your coins. I would rather use my fiat to gamble because unlike Bitcoin, it will go down in value over time. So I would rather not have fiat than not have Bitcoin is basically my motivation.

Also I have my own rules in place to prevent myself from spending too much money on gambling. They also prevent me from touching my Bitcoins. I would rather use other crypto or better yet, as I said, fiat.

[skarais]

~~~

Sure, I use my signature payment to gamble. When else can we double our weekly paycheck for a small profit? But I don't use it all at once, just 50%, and I always use it for sports betting to enjoy the thrill of football betting and try my luck. And sometimes I use it to bet on poker to make a small profit.

It's okay to gamble when you have a balance in your casino account from your signature campaign payout, but you shouldn't forget the risk of losing when your motivation is to double it. A loss can result in a partial or complete loss of your balance, but if you're really lucky, you could double it. My motivation is not about doubling my balance, but to have fun and this keeps me in control.

[Wiwo]

Motivation behind this thread:

...So i can say that i started gambling right from when i got some signature payment made i to my casino account like stake is paying it participants into their stake account and i started gambling from that place.

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

I am not touching my signature pay because I am trying to set an example that it is better to hodl your coins. I would rather use my fiat to gamble because unlike Bitcoin, it will go down in value over time. So I would rather not have fiat than not have Bitcoin is basically my motivation.

Also I have my own rules in place to prevent myself from spending too much money on gambling. They also prevent me from touching my Bitcoins. I would rather use other crypto or better yet, as I said, fiat.

At some point one definitely will spend the bitcoin you holdling the basic thing is to make sure that you spend it doing thebright thing, i understand that decipline is very important, bit then also avoiding the temptation that comes with having  a large balance on your casinos account is quite risky to start with, that the reason i avoid signatures campaign that make direct deposit into your casino account like stake.

[lionheart78]

What about you?

It is tempting to play on the platform when there is a fund in it so yeah, payment in the platform makes me play at the casino but I make sure that I withdraw the needed fund first before playing.

I know from experience that sometimes even if we think that we will just play a certain percentage of the payment, we sometimes do not follow it and eventually empty out our bankroll.  So to be on the safer side, just leave the amount we wanted to spend and withdraw the rest.

[Justbillywitt]

If you are promoting a casino signature campaign and they are paying into your account in their casino, you don't know what they have done for you. You are being saved lots of stress and paying unnecessary charges of adding money into your account to gamble. They want to make things very easy for you, and you shouldn't see it as a strategy from the casino to lure you into gambling. Fine and good you are a gambler and you are going to gamble one way or the other. Why not remove the amount you will gamble with and withdraw the balance. Or would you prefer promoting another casino and gambling elsewhere? I think it's more like practice what you preach.

Hahaha you have just hit the nail on the head i mean what you said have a deeper meaning to those who understood the language of gambling too well, there is no point going else where when you are already in a place and position of getting what you want unless maybe the casino doesn't display the kind of games you want and that is a different stories entirely and secondly gambling is never mandatory it is still your choice to gamble or not even the campaign payments are made to your casino account, it is individual decision to gamble even when the pay doesn't reach the minimum withdrawal there is nothing wrong waiting to get to the minimum withdrawal amount and withdrawal you payments if you don't want to gamble that's so simple.

Of course what the casino is doing is just an invitation t treat. It's just like someone standing in a bus stop, commercial vehicles will stop for you trying to offer their services to you, they won't force you enter their bus but they are willing to serve you if you decide to use their service. That's what the casino is just doing. Since you are a gambler let's make it more easy for you to gamble but it is not mandatory to gamble with us, if you don't  want to gamble with us at the end of the day, you can still withdraw your money no offence. I don't know of others, but I would definitely like the idea of working with such casinos that offer such services in the future, because I know what I go through in funding my online gambling account. Sometimes I lose the urge of gambling when I remember the process I will have to go through just to fund my account.

[summonerrk]

Motivation behind this thread:

...So i can say that i started gambling right from when i got some signature payment made i to my casino account like stake is paying it participants into their stake account and i started gambling from that place.

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

Recently I discovered that the Stake signature campaign actually pays its participants directly to their online casino accounts.
And although these guys can easily withdraw this money, nevertheless the casino helped them go halfway to making a bet, because there is no need to look for a reliable casino and no need to figure out how to deposit money into the balance, because it is all already done.
And Stake is one of the oldest signature campaigns on our forum, which is clearly a reliable representative of the online casino.

[rachael9385]

Just like in the content of OP, I am a stake participant and I do receive my pay in my stake account but never have i used it to gamble. The thing is, I am more of a sports bettor and I'm comfortable betting in local sportsbook using fiat.

At the same time, gambling with your signature pay might force you to go against your bankroll management. Which is one mistake I wouldn't want to do.

Same thing for me as well, even if I decide to gamble I only use a little percentage that won't mean much to me when I lose it. Gambling with your signature pay is very risky because especially if your pay in your casino account, once you start it's going to be difficult to stop and at the long run you might not achieve anything after receiving those amounts of money on a weekly basis. Your budget should be separate from this

[mak013]

~
What about you?

I don`t see any problem to deposit money to casino i prefer.
When casino give you money to your bankroll in this casino it is not fair as for me. I made the job, they paid me for it. I decide how to spend these money myself. To be fair, mostly i can withdraw money, but it is one additional step i have to do. For somebody it would be more easier to spend money right now in this casino.
But the same time, everybody of us can read the campaign description and if we participate it means that we agree with such conditions.

[beveryu778]

Motivation behind this thread:

...So i can say that i started gambling right from when i got some signature payment made i to my casino account like stake is paying it participants into their stake account and i started gambling from that place.

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

They do not give any wagering requirement to withdraw the money from the signature campaign, so anyone can withdraw it immediately. Now if someone starts gambling with that money, it is their own personal matter. I myself received a payment from a site of $30, I played Dice with them on their site and there I withdrew the balance by 2x. This is everyone's personal matter. I myself am not against it. I also have such an experience that I received the money from the signature campaign and gambled with it. But I was lucky that I was able to withdraw my balance by doubling it.