2UP.io | No-KYC Crypto Casino & BTC Sportsbook | Fast Withdrawals + 200% Bonus

[Minor Miner]

Bonus details:
- Bonus Code: TALK10
- Value: $10
- Availability: First 100 claimers
- Rollover: None, you can withdraw subject to the withdrawal rules on no-deposit bonuses below

Thanks to 2up.io for giving such a nice bonus.
Really Awesome Bonus.. claimed just right now..

After getting such a nice bonus, I didn't delay in placing bets on my favorite Premier League games.
I also shared my bet slips so anyone could follow the tips and win some bets for free.

Good luck & looking forward to the next bonus round.

2up.io/sports/home?betid=2025102213001330003&modal=sportsbet
2up.io/sports/home?betid=2025102213001480001&modal=sportsbet
2up.io/sports/home?betid=2025102213001180002&modal=sportsbet

[God Of Thunder]

I do not know why many of us here are so hooked on the word No KYC, are any of us planning to be dubious in playing on the platform?  As far as I understand it, as long as the account doesn't act suspiciously, the casino won't demand KYC, thus the word NO KYC for regular players.

That is the main point here. The title doesn't say No-KYC for regular players. It directly states 'No-KYC Crypto casino,' which is somewhat misleading, considering the casino reserves the right to request a KYC. As I said in my previous post, I had a client who did the same, and some abusers used this to back their arguments. They said the casino claims to be No-KYC, we placed bets on the sportsbook, and now they are asking for a KYC. They are scammers, bla bla bla.

So, I suggested that my client remove the No-KYC part, and they followed my suggestion. Even if you are not going to ask for a KYC from regular players, you cannot blame them for requesting the removal of the No-KYC part, as the title contradicts their own terms and conditions.

[Ojima-ojo]

I do not know why many of us here are so hooked on the word No KYC, are any of us planning to be dubious in playing on the platform?  As far as I understand it, as long as the account doesn't act suspiciously, the casino won't demand KYC, thus the word NO KYC for regular players.

That is the main point here. The title doesn't say No-KYC for regular players. It directly states 'No-KYC Crypto casino,' which is somewhat misleading, considering the casino reserves the right to request a KYC. As I said in my previous post, I had a client who did the same, and some abusers used this to back their arguments. They said the casino claims to be No-KYC, we placed bets on the sportsbook, and now they are asking for a KYC. They are scammers, bla bla bla.

So, I suggested that my client remove the No-KYC part, and they followed my suggestion. Even if you are not going to ask for a KYC from regular players, you cannot blame them for requesting the removal of the No-KYC part, as the title contradicts their own terms and conditions.

2Up is not the only casino that promote their services with the title no KYC crypto casino, few others are also using that term to introduce their casinos and what we should understand is that we can't entirely blame the casinos since in reality, for any gambler who is willing and operates within the acceptable roles of the casinos they will never have reason to go through KYC verifications.

Let move away from demanding for clarity from this casinos about their no KYC nature when we already know how they operate, what we need is to abide and act within the acceptable means to keep our account secured and safe.

[GxSTxV]

I do not know why many of us here are so hooked on the word No KYC, are any of us planning to be dubious in playing on the platform?  As far as I understand it, as long as the account doesn't act suspiciously, the casino won't demand KYC, thus the word NO KYC for regular players.

That is the main point here. The title doesn't say No-KYC for regular players. It directly states 'No-KYC Crypto casino,' which is somewhat misleading, considering the casino reserves the right to request a KYC. As I said in my previous post, I had a client who did the same, and some abusers used this to back their arguments. They said the casino claims to be No-KYC, we placed bets on the sportsbook, and now they are asking for a KYC. They are scammers, bla bla bla.

So, I suggested that my client remove the No-KYC part, and they followed my suggestion. Even if you are not going to ask for a KYC from regular players, you cannot blame them for requesting the removal of the No-KYC part, as the title contradicts their own terms and conditions.

I used to blame the casino owners for such misleading statements and titles, but after getting involved with the work inside online crypto casinos, I understood that it’s a bit hard to offer the No-KYC features when the casino is already running under license contracts with strict rules of asking player for the KYC whenever they suspect a violation of their rules or triggering the suspension of money laundering or cheating.
Either way, myself as a regular gambler before being involved in any casino, I rarely pass the KYC protocol just by deposit average amounts.

2UP casino is fun and I enjoyed playing with the free Bonus code. I will surely go back for a new test and share my experience. Everything looks good so far.

[liuka]

That is the main point here. The title doesn't say No-KYC for regular players. It directly states 'No-KYC Crypto casino,' which is somewhat misleading, considering the casino reserves the right to request a KYC. As I said in my previous post, I had a client who did the same, and some abusers used this to back their arguments. They said the casino claims to be No-KYC, we placed bets on the sportsbook, and now they are asking for a KYC. They are scammers, bla bla bla.

So, I suggested that my client remove the No-KYC part, and they followed my suggestion. Even if you are not going to ask for a KYC from regular players, you cannot blame them for requesting the removal of the No-KYC part, as the title contradicts their own terms and conditions.

You're right, sir. Sometimes we don't pay close attention, Believing what they say is real or doesn't require kyc. However, they can sometimes ask for kyc when there a problem.

So, anyone who wants to gamble with a casino that claim to be KYC free should carefully read their terms to avoid disappointment.
Therefore, a casino that offers advantages on Its platform must be able to defend them well, otherwise they won't violate their promises.
However, each casino has its own advantages, and we greatly appreciate what they offer, making it easy for us to gamble at their casino.

[lionheart78]

I do not know why many of us here are so hooked on the word No KYC, are any of us planning to be dubious in playing on the platform?  As far as I understand it, as long as the account doesn't act suspiciously, the casino won't demand KYC, thus the word NO KYC for regular players.

That is the main point here. The title doesn't say No-KYC for regular players. It directly states 'No-KYC Crypto casino,' which is somewhat misleading, considering the casino reserves the right to request a KYC. As I said in my previous post, I had a client who did the same, and some abusers used this to back their arguments. They said the casino claims to be No-KYC, we placed bets on the sportsbook, and now they are asking for a KYC. They are scammers, bla bla bla.

So, I suggested that my client remove the No-KYC part, and they followed my suggestion. Even if you are not going to ask for a KYC from regular players, you cannot blame them for requesting the removal of the No-KYC part, as the title contradicts their own terms and conditions.

I believe many of us misinterpret/misunderstand the concept of "NO KYC" in legal terms.  The No KYC policy is for the convenience of players who abide by the rules and ToS of the casino.  But once this players breach the contract of ToS they then be subjected to KYC.  It is legally right and does not override or contradict the No KYC policy of the casino. Since casino violators forfeit the protection of the No KYC  policy.

So as I said, NO KYC policy does not mean the casino will not follow the AML, its terms of service, and its fraud prevention policies.

[Minor Miner]

I opened an account on 2up.io yesterday, claimed the bonus without any deposit and played. Today I also made a deposit, the funds reached my account within 1 minute of depositing, very smooth.

So far, they have not asked me to provide any KYC-related data. I have placed some bets which are still unsettled. As soon as they are settled, I will withdraw and let you know how the withdrawal experience is without KYC.

I also talked to the support, and what I understood is that they do not ask anyone to do KYC except cheater bots. If someone opens multi accounts and abuses the bonus, they only ask for KYC as proof for those cheaters; besides this, it is a non-KYC casino.

[xLays]

[img https://www.talkimg.com/images/2025/10/22/UmX6AI.png
I opened an account on 2up.io yesterday, claimed the bonus without any deposit and played. Today I also made a deposit, the funds reached my account within 1 minute of depositing, very smooth.

Good thing you posted about the no deposit bonus if you didn’t, I wouldn’t have known about it.
Reading around really pays off blessings come when you least expect them.. lol

I already redeemed the free $10 and placed it on NBA market.. Too bad there’s no bet builder, but it’s fine since it’s no-deposit bonus. At least they have NBA player props, so it’s still good. Hoping to win something with that free $10.. GL to us.

[God Of Thunder]

Betpanda is not the only casino that promote their services with the title no KYC crypto casino, few others are also using that term to introduce their casinos and what we should understand is that we can't entirely blame the casinos since in reality, for any gambler who is willing and operates within the acceptable roles of the casinos they will never have reason to go through KYC verifications.

We were not talking about Betpanda; we are currently on the 2UP.io thread. You actually cannot even blame the abusers until they are proven. Anyone can question your business if you claim to be a NO-KYC casino, but later ask for a KYC. Probably the casino would ask for KYC only if they suspect anyone of abusing their platform. However, the reality is that those people will never admit to having violated any rules.

So, if they want to stay clean and avoid arguments, they should make everything clear and not give any chance to the abusers to talk about shit. But yeah, it is up to the casino how do they want to operate their business.

[Strongkored]

I made a deposit today, played some slot games, and when I wanted to withdraw, I was quite surprised to see a 6,000 satoshi withdrawal fee, and it's free for VIP Gold Level 1.
Very unfortunate for small players. Perhaps 2up could consider lowering the withdrawal fee, as this might be a factor for players considering playing here.

[gunhell16]

I do not know why many of us here are so hooked on the word No KYC, are any of us planning to be dubious in playing on the platform?  As far as I understand it, as long as the account doesn't act suspiciously, the casino won't demand KYC, thus the word NO KYC for regular players.

That is the main point here. The title doesn't say No-KYC for regular players. It directly states 'No-KYC Crypto casino,' which is somewhat misleading, considering the casino reserves the right to request a KYC. As I said in my previous post, I had a client who did the same, and some abusers used this to back their arguments. They said the casino claims to be No-KYC, we placed bets on the sportsbook, and now they are asking for a KYC. They are scammers, bla bla bla.

So, I suggested that my client remove the No-KYC part, and they followed my suggestion. Even if you are not going to ask for a KYC from regular players, you cannot blame them for requesting the removal of the No-KYC part, as the title contradicts their own terms and conditions.

Regarding the point you're making, I probably support your suggestion to just remove the NO-KYC rule. At the very least, if that term is no longer read by the gambling community
here on this forum, then perhaps we won't have any more arguments to debate about this matter.

Because honestly, it leads to misinterpretation here, which is bad for us, the community, and at the same time, it's also bad for the casino itself,
as it has a negative effect on the reputation it's building here, to be honest.

[God Of Thunder]

So, anyone who wants to gamble with a casino that claim to be KYC free should carefully read their terms to avoid disappointment.
Therefore, a casino that offers advantages on Its platform must be able to defend them well, otherwise they won't violate their promises.
However, each casino has its own advantages, and we greatly appreciate what they offer, making it easy for us to gamble at their casino.

Exactly, that is the point. You should always read the terms and conditions by yourself instead of hearing what others say about the casino. I personally feel like it is misleading if a casino claims to be a No-KYC casino, but later they say they reserve the right to ask for a KYC. It is very much legal and nothing wrong if a casino asks for a KYC. They reserve the right to ask for a KYC. But I do not like the misleading marketing strategies.

There are some casinos that claim to offer no-deposit bonuses. However, when you claim the bonus and play the free spins, they will require you to deposit to complete the wagering requirements. Most casinos actually allow players to wager with the bonus funds, but some require you to make a deposit. This is not a "NO deposit" bonus, right?

[salad daging]

Exactly, that is the point. You should always read the terms and conditions by yourself instead of hearing what others say about the casino. I personally feel like it is misleading if a casino claims to be a No-KYC casino, but later they say they reserve the right to ask for a KYC. It is very much legal and nothing wrong if a casino asks for a KYC. They reserve the right to ask for a KYC. But I do not like the misleading marketing strategies.

Although the title says NO-KYC, the casino's terms and conditions clearly state that “we reserve the right to request documents/KYC at any time.” This is common practice for most licensed casinos.

This isn't the first or second time an ANN title claims NO-KYC—it does seem misleading, but the product they initially offer doesn't require KYC.

Perhaps it's like this: even though the ToS isn't entirely NO-KYC, the casino still strives not to request KYC from anyone as long as they play safely without violating the ToS.

[Ojima-ojo]

Betpanda is not the only casino that promote their services with the title no KYC crypto casino, few others are also using that term to introduce their casinos and what we should understand is that we can't entirely blame the casinos since in reality, for any gambler who is willing and operates within the acceptable roles of the casinos they will never have reason to go through KYC verifications.

We were not talking about Betpanda; we are currently on the 2UP.io thread. You actually cannot even blame the abusers until they are proven. Anyone can question your business if you claim to be a NO-KYC casino, but later ask for a KYC. Probably the casino would ask for KYC only if they suspect anyone of abusing their platform. However, the reality is that those people will never admit to having violated any rules.

So, if they want to stay clean and avoid arguments, they should make everything clear and not give any chance to the abusers to talk about shit. But yeah, it is up to the casino how do they want to operate their business.

Thank you so much for pointing me to that mistake, I was carried away to mentioned betpanda instead of 2up casino, the reasons betpanda came to mind is because their also have same title as no KYC casino and have raisen similar concerns and questions as to why their ask for KYC when the title States no KYC.

Many times we need to accept the reality at hands that, some business use tearms that they feel is accommodating to potential customers, even though in reality it may hurt but them and the client if anything goes wrong along the line of business.

[suzanne5223]

[img https://www.talkimg.com/images/2025/10/22/UmX6AI.png
I opened an account on 2up.io yesterday, claimed the bonus without any deposit and played. Today I also made a deposit, the funds reached my account within 1 minute of depositing, very smooth.

Good thing you posted about the no deposit bonus if you didn’t, I wouldn’t have known about it.
Reading around really pays off blessings come when you least expect them.. lol

I already redeemed the free $10 and placed it on NBA market.. Too bad there’s no bet builder, but it’s fine since it’s no-deposit bonus. At least they have NBA player props, so it’s still good. Hoping to win something with that free $10.. GL to us.

That means you don't pay much attention to what is happening on this thread because I posted about claiming the no deposit bonus on 2UP last week, which I believe is an interesting offer for every gambler on this forum to feel the gaming service of 2UP before making a deposit.
Another thing i like about the casino is the playing now for a chance to be eligible for their upcoming airdrop, and the platform's automatic withdrawal.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

I made a deposit today, played some slot games, and when I wanted to withdraw, I was quite surprised to see a 6,000 satoshi withdrawal fee, and it's free for VIP Gold Level 1.
Very unfortunate for small players. Perhaps 2up could consider lowering the withdrawal fee, as this might be a factor for players considering playing here.

Definitely, a lot of potential users are definitely going to avoid this casino not for anything else but the for such minor things like the withdrawal fees, most especially those small gamblers who usually withdraw in small amounts of money..

This is a new casino still that is currently trying to gain some market share in the gambling industry, most gamblers who were already gamblers before now already have casinos they are gambling, and if they must leave that casino for 2up, there must be a good reason but when they can't find any good reason to ditch their old fav casino for this one, they are only going to come around here (probably), try this casinos with so small amount of money and then return back to their previous casino.

Most big casinos have almost withdrawals that is almost transaction fee free, it will do 2up a lot of good if they consider lowering their withdrawal fees.

[Strongkored]

This is a new casino still that is currently trying to gain some market share in the gambling industry, most gamblers who were already gamblers before now already have casinos they are gambling, and if they must leave that casino for 2up, there must be a good reason but when they can't find any good reason to ditch their old fav casino for this one, they are only going to come around here (probably), try this casinos with so small amount of money and then return back to their previous casino.

Most big casinos have almost withdrawals that is almost transaction fee free, it will do 2up a lot of good if they consider lowering their withdrawal fees.

This may be a new casino, but yesterday and also last night, checking this casino's activity seemed quite active, as I saw the list of top winners and last bets. I agree with you being active gamblers when you want to play at other casinos to see what you can get, hopefully there will be good developments not only about the withdrawal fee.

[God Of Thunder]

Although the title says NO-KYC, the casino's terms and conditions clearly state that “we reserve the right to request documents/KYC at any time.” This is common practice for most licensed casinos.

This isn't the first or second time an ANN title claims NO-KYC—it does seem misleading, but the product they initially offer doesn't require KYC.

Perhaps it's like this: even though the ToS isn't entirely NO-KYC, the casino still strives not to request KYC from anyone as long as they play safely without violating the ToS.

Yes, I know this because I have two clients who operate their businesses similarly. One of them came to the forum with the title NO-KYC, which created some chaos in the forum, and some abusers use this reason to justify the casino, and they argue that they saw the casino was NO-KYC. Later, with my suggestion, the casino removed the NO-KYC part from their announcement thread to avoid future forum drama regarding KYC.

I have another client who operates their business similarly, and the designer wanted to add No-KYC. But even before they launch their signature campaign, I asked them to remove the No-KYC part from the signature code. It's because I also think it is somewhat misleading, even though the TOS says the casino reserves the right to ask for a KYC.

[lionheart78]

I made a deposit today, played some slot games, and when I wanted to withdraw, I was quite surprised to see a 6,000 satoshi withdrawal fee, and it's free for VIP Gold Level 1.
Very unfortunate for small players. Perhaps 2up could consider lowering the withdrawal fee, as this might be a factor for players considering playing here.

Definitely, a lot of potential users are definitely going to avoid this casino not for anything else but the for such minor things like the withdrawal fees, most especially those small gamblers who usually withdraw in small amounts of money..

This is a new casino still that is currently trying to gain some market share in the gambling industry, most gamblers who were already gamblers before now already have casinos they are gambling, and if they must leave that casino for 2up, there must be a good reason but when they can't find any good reason to ditch their old fav casino for this one, they are only going to come around here (probably), try this casinos with so small amount of money and then return back to their previous casino.

Most big casinos have almost withdrawals that is almost transaction fee free, it will do 2up a lot of good if they consider lowering their withdrawal fees.

As a new casino, I think it is good to offer a promotional free withdrawal transaction fee for a limited amount of time.  This will not only prevent users from shying away from the casino service but will also attract player who has issues with withdrawal fees.

I agree that as an emerging casino, 2UP.io must offer something that players can't resist, and offering a free withdrawal is one of them.

Although the title says NO-KYC, the casino's terms and conditions clearly state that “we reserve the right to request documents/KYC at any time.” This is common practice for most licensed casinos.

This isn't the first or second time an ANN title claims NO-KYC—it does seem misleading, but the product they initially offer doesn't require KYC.

Perhaps it's like this: even though the ToS isn't entirely NO-KYC, the casino still strives not to request KYC from anyone as long as they play safely without violating the ToS.

Yes, it is the way I understand how the No KYC Policy is implemented. It is because the NO-KYC Policy does not override the TOS, the AML, and the anti-fraud system.  The No KYC Policy is offered for the convenience of the player, but is forfeited once the player is suspected of breaching the other policy.  I believe this is the best a licensed casino can offer to its players when it comes to no KYC procedures.

[kawetsriyanto]

This may be a new casino, but yesterday and also last night, checking this casino's activity seemed quite active, as I saw the list of top winners and last bets. I agree with you being active gamblers when you want to play at other casinos to see what you can get, hopefully there will be good developments not only about the withdrawal fee.

You're right. The activity in the casino site is quite active, it indicates large number of gamblers. It is a good indicator for a new casino that many people have big interest joining the casino site. I'm sure there will be always further development in the future. Just wait for the update of the development progress!

I have another client who operates their business similarly, and the designer wanted to add No-KYC. But even before they launch their signature campaign, I asked them to remove the No-KYC part from the signature code. It's because I also think it is somewhat misleading, even though the TOS says the casino reserves the right to ask for a KYC.

It may be caused the KYC will be required for a certain case only. So, they assume, they actually don't ask for KYC if it is not related to a certain case. I think there is no problem to put "No-KYC" in the title. But it should have an explanation about its possibility for certain cases. This explanation can be added in the thread.