A good analyst may not mean a good trader

[Zaguru12]

Being a good analyst does not automatically make you a good trader, analysis is about probabilities but trading is about execution and emotions.

I will place my emphasis more on the Emotions which is heavily part of risk management strategy. Personally I think the issue regarding risk management takes broader view for been a successful trader than of the other things involved. I am of the opinion always that the success of a trader depends on his risk management, for me this takes 70% for a successful trader while the knowledge or how good of an analysts the trader is takes the remaining 30%.

So for example if the trader is actually good at Analyzing the market and has bad risk management I think such trader will actually be at risk on every trade because no matter how accurate you’re analyzing the market you can never be accurate all the time and as such it can actually take one trade to even go from profits to been liquidated.

[Dickiy]

Although the analysts may be reliable in terms of analyzing the market but in my opinion it does not mean they will never experience losses at all, the market is volatile and can never be predicted accurately every time and its nature is also always changing.

In addition there are still many other factors that can make someone experience losses such as emotions and psychological problems for example, even though the analysts may have more knowledge but that does not mean they will always be able to manage their emotions well when dealing with the market, mistakes in making decisions due to emotions due to losses, carelessness or because of other things it is very likely to happen.

[tvplus006]

Although the analysts may be reliable in terms of analyzing the market but in my opinion it does not mean they will never experience losses at all, the market is volatile and can never be predicted accurately every time and its nature is also always changing...

There are two types of analysts, those who trade and those who make money by publishing their forecasts. And if the former are practicing analysts, then the latter are essentially theorists who have no practice.

[Dickiy]

Although the analysts may be reliable in terms of analyzing the market but in my opinion it does not mean they will never experience losses at all, the market is volatile and can never be predicted accurately every time and its nature is also always changing...

There are two types of analysts, those who trade and those who make money by publishing their forecasts. And if the former are practicing analysts, then the latter are essentially theorists who have no practice.

Theory without practice in my opinion is tantamount to nonsense because it is not applied and proven, as the saying “the best teacher is experience”, so everything will only be more believable or sharper when practiced because there is real experience as a result as well as evaluation material.
This means that I don't really believe in people who are called analysts who sell their prediction signals if for example they don't show their track record transparently, honestly I have also been deceived by analysts on several group channels and this experience has made me more careful and thorough.

[Royal Cap]

Although the analysts may be reliable in terms of analyzing the market but in my opinion it does not mean they will never experience losses at all, the market is volatile and can never be predicted accurately every time and its nature is also always changing.

In addition there are still many other factors that can make someone experience losses such as emotions and psychological problems for example, even though the analysts may have more knowledge but that does not mean they will always be able to manage their emotions well when dealing with the market, mistakes in making decisions due to emotions due to losses, carelessness or because of other things it is very likely to happen.

I think analysts lose not only because of the market but also because they often rely too much on themselves. Having more knowledge brings confidence and from there, sometimes excessive risks are taken but the market does not spare anyone, whether experienced or new. And it is practically impossible to completely eliminate emotions. Just as people become reckless when they make a profit, they also make hasty decisions when they lose. I think analysis helps but in the end patience and self control are the biggest challenges.

[BlackBaron]

There are two types of analysts, those who trade and those who make money by publishing their forecasts. And if the former are practicing analysts, then the latter are essentially theorists who have no practice.

Theory without practice in my opinion is tantamount to nonsense because it is not applied and proven, as the saying “the best teacher is experience”, so everything will only be more believable or sharper when practiced because there is real experience as a result as well as evaluation material.
This means that I don't really believe in people who are called analysts who sell their prediction signals if for example they don't show their track record transparently, honestly I have also been deceived by analysts on several group channels and this experience has made me more careful and thorough.

In trading and even many things in this world, theorizing will always be easier than practicing, because when we go directly to the market we will definitely find many differences and sometimes in a short time the market will change direction because of an issue. So in this case I agree that without practicing it will just be nonsense.

Everyone can speculate on the market, but not everyone can execute the market well when trading for one reason or another. So it takes more effort for us to understand the market well when we are trading.

[Dickiy]

Although the analysts may be reliable in terms of analyzing the market but in my opinion it does not mean they will never experience losses at all, the market is volatile and can never be predicted accurately every time and its nature is also always changing.

In addition there are still many other factors that can make someone experience losses such as emotions and psychological problems for example, even though the analysts may have more knowledge but that does not mean they will always be able to manage their emotions well when dealing with the market, mistakes in making decisions due to emotions due to losses, carelessness or because of other things it is very likely to happen.

I think analysts lose not only because of the market but also because they often rely too much on themselves. Having more knowledge brings confidence and from there, sometimes excessive risks are taken but the market does not spare anyone, whether experienced or new. And it is practically impossible to completely eliminate emotions. Just as people become reckless when they make a profit, they also make hasty decisions when they lose. I think analysis helps but in the end patience and self control are the biggest challenges.

This means that there are other things that must also be considered and correct besides improving knowledge and strategies, namely self-management regarding emotions and also practicing responsibility for dealing with losses.
In most cases everything will usually fall apart when emotions are involved, as I said in my previous post but I am sure that analysts must already know about it and must also have more ways to minimize it than arrogant beginner traders, they only need to train patience and responsibility so that losses do not affect their mental and psychological.

[ChocolateBitcoinK]

Although the analysts may be reliable in terms of analyzing the market but in my opinion it does not mean they will never experience losses at all, the market is volatile and can never be predicted accurately every time and its nature is also always changing.

In addition there are still many other factors that can make someone experience losses such as emotions and psychological problems for example, even though the analysts may have more knowledge but that does not mean they will always be able to manage their emotions well when dealing with the market, mistakes in making decisions due to emotions due to losses, carelessness or because of other things it is very likely to happen.

I think analysts lose not only because of the market but also because they often rely too much on themselves. Having more knowledge brings confidence and from there, sometimes excessive risks are taken but the market does not spare anyone, whether experienced or new. And it is practically impossible to completely eliminate emotions. Just as people become reckless when they make a profit, they also make hasty decisions when they lose. I think analysis helps but in the end patience and self control are the biggest challenges.

This often happens, due to overconfidence, there are many who use more money than they can afford, but the result of this is a big loss. You are analyzing the market and you see that there are many good opportunities now, but still you have to stay within your means, if you exceed your means, the undisclosed changes in the market can cause you a lot of losses. And that is why you need to eliminate the tendency to take excessive risks, do not make decisions with confidence and emotion, because it does not take long for the market to change, and this is not unusual.

[Baki202]

I think analysts lose not only because of the market but also because they often rely too much on themselves. Having more knowledge brings confidence and from there, sometimes excessive risks are taken but the market does not spare anyone, whether experienced or new. And it is practically impossible to completely eliminate emotions. Just as people become reckless when they make a profit, they also make hasty decisions when they lose. I think analysis helps but in the end patience and self control are the biggest challenges.

Most of this Traders are always full of themselves and one thing about pride is when you are too full of yourself you will only fall, and they will even try to do unnecessary things just to keep up with there reputation and that is one of the mistakes the are making more complicated for there self. And just because the half knowledge about the market  they always I've decidology that they can lose money in the market while they are trading now what they're supposed to expect no matter our knowledgeable you are the crypto Market is dynamic and it can change within seconds so it is mostly based on luck most values than the charts so just because you are confidence in your analysis it does not guarantee that you are going to make money from the market so it is better to understand that it is a 50/ 50 situation it is said that you make money from the market or you lose your money in the process of trading.

[shawonngp]

I thought of this today few hours ago and I decided to also include it as one of the topics I will post today on this forum.

What if someone is good in analyses and he is an analyst, can such person be losing while trading?

Or a good analyst will prefer swing trading and holding than scalping and day trading which are the riskiest trading types?

If you can use some or more people as an example in your post, I will really appreciate that.

Even a good trading analyst will face losses because during trading, the market is volatile at times. Trading is not an easy task, it is very difficult, experience and skills are very important, analysis alone will not suffice. The market can move towards a decline in any situation and a good trading expert can face losses. So I think it is less risky to be a holder than to trade, moreover, I prefer holding for a long time. There is a risk of losing money in trading, but there is much less in investing.

If good and experienced analysts not suffered any losses in trading, they would become too rich man just do every successful trades, they don't necessary to sell their signals by opening private groups, good analyst can not give you guaranteed win signals, they also losing money in trading, but they didn't share of their lost history in publicly, because they targeted to sell paid signals to newbies traders.

[puloweh555]

I think analysts lose not only because of the market but also because they often rely too much on themselves. Having more knowledge brings confidence and from there, sometimes excessive risks are taken but the market does not spare anyone, whether experienced or new. And it is practically impossible to completely eliminate emotions. Just as people become reckless when they make a profit, they also make hasty decisions when they lose. I think analysis helps but in the end patience and self control are the biggest challenges.

This means that there are other things that must also be considered and correct besides improving knowledge and strategies, namely self-management regarding emotions and also practicing responsibility for dealing with losses.
In most cases everything will usually fall apart when emotions are involved, as I said in my previous post but I am sure that analysts must already know about it and must also have more ways to minimize it than arrogant beginner traders, they only need to train patience and responsibility so that losses do not affect their mental and psychological.

Every trader needs not only a strategy and accurate analysis, but also risk management and emotional control to achieve success and become a successful trader. Trading isn't just about analysis there are many aspects we must learn and master to succeed.

That's why many traders fail even though they have good analysis. But if they lack sound risk management and emotional control their efforts will be in vain during market volatility. The bottom line is the people we see as successful have also failed. So, don't give up now.

[Mame89]

I thought of this today few hours ago and I decided to also include it as one of the topics I will post today on this forum.

What if someone is good in analyses and he is an analyst, can such person be losing while trading?

Or a good analyst will prefer swing trading and holding than scalping and day trading which are the riskiest trading types?

If you can use some or more people as an example in your post, I will really appreciate that.

Every trader will inevitably experience losses, even with good analysis. Even professionals experience losses in trading. Trading is a difficult profession influenced by many factors not just analytical skills.

So in essence in trading being good at analysis doesn't necessarily mean being a good trader but a good trader will be a good analyst. While analysis is the foundation of trading emotional discipline and risk management are the keys to successful trading. So if you're good at analysis but can't control your emotions or master risk management your analytical skills will be useless. Make no mistake many people are good at analysis but fail when they put it into practice because they lack the ability to make practical decisions.

[EarnOnVictor]

Summarily, this is one of the distinctions between being a good speculator and practicing what you speculated. Due to many factors, especially psychology factors, many good analysts do not replicate what they analyse in their trading. They are no different from a gambler.

This has affected me many times, so I know that it exists. So, there is a huge difference between being a good trader and a good speculator. You have to do what you speculated without deviation to be a good trader.

[Achalugo BTC]

There are two types of analysts, those who trade and those who make money by publishing their forecasts. And if the former are practicing analysts, then the latter are essentially theorists who have no practice.

People should just be careful and be at alert because there are people who do deceive most people into losing their money, which is why its essential for them for people to be verify information or asks question, so that they can't be mislead by anyone who claims to be what they are not.
And having more research about crypto, they can be able to detect which one is good and which one is bad, which they can't fall into pitfalls or do any mistakes that will harm their lives or their plans, as such doesn't help one to grow in crypto and in order to prevent that from happening its by doing the important things, which will not cause more harm than good but instead more good than bad.

[Furball808]

From what I have seen, analysts lack the emotional maturity or intelligence that traders have. This stems from the fact that analysts aren’t really risking any capital the way traders do. They just make research and try to analyze what they’ve found which is not an easy task but this doesn’t automatically make them a good trader.

[tvplus006]

People should just be careful and be at alert because there are people who do deceive most people into losing their money, which is why its essential for them for people to be verify information or asks question, so that they can't be mislead by anyone who claims to be what they are not...

Of course, there are a lot of such cases when such analysts specifically disseminate information that entails a loss of money. But in most cases, this is due to the fact that such people are not analysts, and in simple terms, they are ignorant of trading.

[Dickiy]

This means that there are other things that must also be considered and correct besides improving knowledge and strategies, namely self-management regarding emotions and also practicing responsibility for dealing with losses.
In most cases everything will usually fall apart when emotions are involved, as I said in my previous post but I am sure that analysts must already know about it and must also have more ways to minimize it than arrogant beginner traders, they only need to train patience and responsibility so that losses do not affect their mental and psychological.

Every trader needs not only a strategy and accurate analysis, but also risk management and emotional control to achieve success and become a successful trader. Trading isn't just about analysis there are many aspects we must learn and master to succeed.

That's why many traders fail even though they have good analysis. But if they lack sound risk management and emotional control their efforts will be in vain during market volatility. The bottom line is the people we see as successful have also failed. So, don't give up now.

As the title says “a good analyst is not necessarily a good trader”, that is a fact and you have helped me to explain it above, I understand what you are saying and in essence trading is not just about analyzing the market, the reason is because however and whenever trading is risky and this means we must have something to prevent or minimize these risks in addition to preparing ways to profit, from many aspects in my opinion the most important thing is to be responsible because that is what can prevent us from emotions.

[cxtreenal]

Trading is a different kind of earning strategy. A trader does not become a good trader in just a few years to become experienced they need to be closely involved in the market for many years and trade regularly. An analyst predicts the needs of traders associated with the fluctuations of market indices and market related factors. They may be a good analyst but to be a good trader he must trade with his or her own funds and research the coins in the market.

An experienced trader may make mistakes in trading which will result in losses. An analyst may be knowledgeable about the factors associated with the fluctuations of market indices but if they do not have an understanding of the many underlying factors involved while trading, they are more likely to lose.