Yes. Well, this is the real question. In all fairness I think it would be beneficial to hear from all campaign managers on the issue as there seems to be a wide difference in takes among them when it comes to the issue of employing accounts that are alts, purchased, or hacked. I think on one hand a manager would want sufficient proof of connection, and I know they don't always see things like I see them.
Well then, organize a discussion and let's try to do something. Obviously this should be initiated by senior hunters, preferably those who are also in Default Trust. My practical view is that any reasonable attempt is going deliver better outcomes. No measure or proposal needs to be perfect, benefits will accumulate.
I encountered some users with a feedback that said spammer blacklist or something. That would be another alternative. Users such as the ones that are presented here, but also those that just write complete shitposts, could be added to such an organized list. As long as there is support by managers this would work well, even with neutrals.
Campaign managers don't have the time to investigate the past of everyone they accept, I understand this, but if your campaign endorses dishonest behavior by continuing to employ accounts that belong to cheaters or were stolen, I don't think its an overall good for the forum, and these managers don't have Bitcointalk's interest at heart.
Yes, and if nobody is going to do anything at all against them what of it? Constantly writing about it and hoping for a miracle of altruism on the side of those who are malicious is not going to get anyone anywhere.
What is no coincidence is that you have the comprehension skills of an amoeba when it comes to things that do not suit your agenda. And what is also no coincidence either is that you are in no position to lecture anyone on how to use the trust system, as the facts speak for themselves. If you think there is something wrong with that thread, you can report it and/or tag me for it.
This kind of overreaction pretty much confirms you are involved son, another Dunning Kruger example. Next time try to write something on topic, no wonder your merit to post ratio is that of a classic shitposter.
