A hero member who owns at least 5 more accounts is cheating signature campaigns

[hosemary]

The following accounts are all owned by the same person.

• peter0425 (hero member)
• kotajikikox (sr. member)
• rodskee (full member)
• bitterguy28 (full member)
• btc78 (full member)
• Reatim (sr. member)

The last one was discovered by Minor Miner. Click here to see his post.



peter0425 and kotajikikox are both participating in Rainbet signature campaign.
rodskee is participating in Betpanda signature campaign.
btc78 and Reatim are participating in Bitsler signature campaign.



Let's get to the proof.

bc1qt5kz5ctya23z59upv3d7wv6chmsls5lza0lphd which has been posted by peter0425 in this post is a deposit address belonging to a custodial service.

kotajikikox who owns bc1q5azy3du85rlxr78rl2s83wvktwkgu6hpr46cuf has sent funds to the same deposit address in this transaction.
bitterguy28 who owns bc1q078655q2n0an3xt6hrj3ghjcd9k9hazrnxgv4k has sent funds to the same desposit address in this transaction.
btc78 who owns bc1qhvq09swzfe866vag6l9p337mwhw5xl3pc7hm99 has sent funds to the same deposit address in this transaction.


rodskee who owns bc1qeg29q8v254n4kr22s9ltmsg3krg4lxw7q7tq4u has sent funds to 1HGAN3HPG2eEkZQWyg24LH4985dKeK5ncf (which is another deposit address belonging to a custodial service) in this transaction.
This deposit address has also been funded by kotajikikox in this transaction.


Proof of addresses:

Segwit BTC address-  bc1qt5kz5ctya23z59upv3d7wv6chmsls5lza0lphd

Segwit BTC address-  bc1q5azy3du85rlxr78rl2s83wvktwkgu6hpr46cuf

bech32 BTC Address: bc1q078655q2n0an3xt6hrj3ghjcd9k9hazrnxgv4k

BTC address: bc1qhvq09swzfe866vag6l9p337mwhw5xl3pc7hm99

bech32 BTC Address: bc1qeg29q8v254n4kr22s9ltmsg3krg4lxw7q7tq4u

There are other addresses and other transactions that prove these accounts are all owned by the same person.

[Little Mouse]

rodskee is participating in Betpanda signature campaign.

I will hold payment for this user. If he can explain everything convincingly, I'll send his last week's pay and get him back in the campaign.

[have_peace_]

Let's get to the proof.

bc1qt5kz5ctya23z59upv3d7wv6chmsls5lza0lphd which has been posted by peter0425 in this post is a deposit address belonging to a custodial service.

kotajikikox who owns bc1q5azy3du85rlxr78rl2s83wvktwkgu6hpr46cuf has sent funds to the same deposit address in this transaction.
bitterguy28 who owns bc1q078655q2n0an3xt6hrj3ghjcd9k9hazrnxgv4k has sent funds to the same desposit address in this transaction.
btc78 who owns bc1qhvq09swzfe866vag6l9p337mwhw5xl3pc7hm99 has sent funds to the same deposit address in this transaction.


rodskee who owns bc1qeg29q8v254n4kr22s9ltmsg3krg4lxw7q7tq4u has sent funds to 1HGAN3HPG2eEkZQWyg24LH4985dKeK5ncf (which is another deposit address belonging to a custodial service) in this transaction.
This deposit address has also been funded by kotajikikox in this transaction.

this is complete bull shit

i am an exchanger I buy bitcoin for fiats from multiple users of this forum

@nutildah
don't you know how real world btc transactions work? lost your fucking head?


it is shame on this community, adding idiot to your trust list who does not know what proves altaccounts


do not ask why I use a new account if you have failed to learn the privacy practices

[ABCbits]

bc1qt5kz5ctya23z59upv3d7wv6chmsls5lza0lphd which has been posted by peter0425 in this post is a deposit address belonging to a custodial service.

rodskee who owns bc1qeg29q8v254n4kr22s9ltmsg3krg4lxw7q7tq4u has sent funds to 1HGAN3HPG2eEkZQWyg24LH4985dKeK5ncf (which is another deposit address belonging to a custodial service) in this transaction.

Based on the TX history, i agree it has common history done by custodial service once the deposit address receive Bitcoin. Although i wonder whether there are ways to know which custodial service was used. Anyway, i put all of the account to my ignore list for now.

--snip--

this is complete bull shit

i am an exchanger I buy bitcoin for fiats from multiple users of this forum

Exchange usually assign one or more address to one customer. I never see any exchange assign one address to multiple customers.

[Swordsoffreedom]

Is he evading the ban?

I could see he cheated on many campaigns by inserting multiple IDs. He applied with a newly generated BTC address but didn't stake his original BTC address. Once he got accepted into the campaign, then he changed the payment address manually by requesting the campaign manager privately. This is how he avoids the ban cause mods will not ban anyone until he stakes the same accused address between multiple IDs.





Moved all of his campaign payments to the Banned user Siren [Banned]

Btctalk name : Siren
Rank : Senior Member
BTC Address : 3LmcQ9FhZDkKd3hahCgvQEtWXaV8MJ7Ljz

[yahoo62278]

I'm curious as I am managing Bitslers campaign, but I am not going to with hold funds from a user based on this proof. You could be 100% right but the only bad thing is the 2 accounts, peter and kotajikikox, whom if connected are in the same campaign. You need to have stronger proof that those accounts are connected and then connected to the rest as well.

I'll tag em all if more proof is provided but not with what's presented so far. It is possible that the have peace accounts story could be true.

Is he evading the ban?

I could see he cheated on many campaigns by inserting multiple IDs. He applied with a newly generated BTC address but didn't stake his original BTC address. Once he got accepted into the campaign, then he changed the payment address manually by requesting the campaign manager privately. This is how he avoids the ban cause mods will not ban anyone until he stakes the same accused address between multiple IDs.





Moved all of his campaign payments to the Banned user Siren [Banned]

Btctalk name : Siren
Rank : Senior Member
BTC Address : 3LmcQ9FhZDkKd3hahCgvQEtWXaV8MJ7Ljz

More like this. Follow the money as JollyGood would say.

[hosemary]

yahoo62278, I have provided enough evidence and as I said in the OP, there are other addresses and many other transactions that prove all those accounts are owned by the same person.


bc1qt5kz5ctya23z59upv3d7wv6chmsls5lza0lphd is owned by peter0425 and here is the proof.

Segwit BTC address-  bc1qt5kz5ctya23z59upv3d7wv6chmsls5lza0lphd

This address is a deposit address on a custodial service and as I said, kotajikikox has sent funds to that in this transaction

You want more proofs?
OK. peter0425, kotajikikox and rodskee have all sent funds to 1HGAN3HPG2eEkZQWyg24LH4985dKeK5ncf.

peter0425: from bc1q5kzcr0lrjpy56um4hwgt6y6n4l9csgr27adpst in this transaction
kotajikikox: from bc1q5azy3du85rlxr78rl2s83wvktwkgu6hpr46cuf in this transaction
rodskee: from bc1qeg29q8v254n4kr22s9ltmsg3krg4lxw7q7tq4u in this transaction

These are just some examples. You can find many other transactions made by these users to the same address, if you check their trasaction history.


Proof of addresses:

BTC {Segwit} Address: bc1q5kzcr0lrjpy56um4hwgt6y6n4l9csgr27adpst

Segwit BTC address-  bc1q5azy3du85rlxr78rl2s83wvktwkgu6hpr46cuf

bech32 BTC Address: bc1qeg29q8v254n4kr22s9ltmsg3krg4lxw7q7tq4u

Now, let's get to bitterguy28.
This user owns bc1q078655q2n0an3xt6hrj3ghjcd9k9hazrnxgv4k and has made many transactions to bc1qt5kz5ctya23z59upv3d7wv6chmsls5lza0lphd which has been already posted by peter0425 and is a deposit address on a custodial service. Click here to see one of them.

And now btc78:
btc78 owns bc1qhvq09swzfe866vag6l9p337mwhw5xl3pc7hm99. Just check the post history of this address and see how many times btc78 has sent funds to bc1qt5kz5ctya23z59upv3d7wv6chmsls5lza0lphd (an address which has posted by peter0425 and is deposit address on a custodial service). Click here to see one of them.


Again, these are not the only transactions. I can share many many more transactions that prove all those accounts are owned by the same person.



Now, let's take a look at posting behavior of these accounts.
Just see how they quote posts when they want to quote two different parts of someone's posts separately. The first quote contains a link and the second doesn't.


peter0425:

I’ve been looking at sportsbook lines lately, and I noticed most of us usually pick odds around 1.80 or 1.90 when we feel confident about a team. But I started wondering if we’re that confident they’ll win, why not go for 2.00 or higher so our stake has a better return?

Lower odds means higher probability. Higher odds means lower probability and a lot of gamblers actually base their “confidence” on these odds. They will not be betting on anything with high odds especially if they want to play it safe.

Do we really know by how many points they can win, or are we just being safe with the lower odds? Sometimes it feels like we settle for smaller profit instead of trusting our read on the game. What do you guys think, better to stay safe or always aim for value odds above 2.00?

I wouldn’t say we should always aim for odds above 2.00 because those odds are there for a reason. Usually from previous performances of the team or how the market perceives the team that’s why they have those odds

kotajikikox:

Why would their religious beliefs command them to forbid gambling operations in their areas? But it doesn't prohibit them from collecting financial allocation realised from gambling taxes.

The government is being hypocritical. Their religious beliefs shouldn’t be allowing them to collecting finances from gambling so if their reason for not allowing gambling then it’s hypocritical.

Is it just?

We know it’s not, but there is nothing to do because that is the government that you are stuck with.

rodskee:

This is a massive safety hazard for everyone.

even if he wasn't gambling it is still extremely dangerous because one shouldn't be on his phone or distracted with something else when driving we have seen many road incidents this year and it can be frustrating to see some drivers be irresponsible

Is this something you've seen?

i do remember there was someone who shared how he saw a jeepney driver place bets on his phone while he is driving for those who do not know jeepneys are public vehicles in the philippines used for commuting so there's a lot of passengers riding the jeepney but he was still distracted

it is not just about gambling but the fact that they are distracted while driving that is concerning

bitterguy28:

I saw a news story about a guy who lost his savings because of online gambling.
Sad story, but honestly, we can’t put the blame on the casino.

the casino is there and it’s tempting but he wouldn’t have lost had he not played so we had a choice to ignore the casino but instead he decided to succumb into his own greed

Gambling isn’t the problem, it’s how people use it. If you play without control or treat it like a job, you’ll lose. But if you gamble responsibly, set limits, and know when to stop, it stays fun and harmless.

The issue isn’t the game. It’s the player.

governments think that people won’t be tempted anymore if there weren’t any casinos around but people will always find a way if they really wanted to

btc78:

A couple of years ago, I read that an entire family had moved to Portugal, sold everything, and invested in Bitcoin. That topic was even discussed on this forum...

yes i have heard of this i think. is it that one family that vlogged their entire moving journey which they eventually stopped because it was getting harmful for their family?

So, many countries can be friendly, but it always has to do with individual criteria, professional aspirations, quality of life, culture, how much does the existence of cryptocurrencies change that?

well if crypto is such a huge part of your life now then it should be taken into consideration when moving into a different country

[Minor Miner]

I'm curious as I am managing Bitslers campaign, but I am not going to with hold funds from a user based on this proof. You could be 100% right but the only bad thing is the 2 accounts, peter and kotajikikox, whom if connected are in the same campaign. You need to have stronger proof that those accounts are connected and then connected to the rest as well.

I'll tag em all if more proof is provided but not with what's presented so far. It is possible that the have peace accounts story could be true.

Bitcointalk Username:Reatim
BSC wallet address :
0xf08ec7c87551834151fadaf16e2440c5ce4c5309

https://loyce.club/archive/posts/6463/64632204.html

Rank- Senior
Segwit BTC address: bc1qes0laa9qvqvpsmhrgs4j0tddem88200hztdnue

https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/7511037802519bcc45880b6b4e1ce6f81f93feff8fe14479cab9a81940f44a6a


I got a new one,, what do you think about this one from your campaign?
@Reatim and @rodskee both used the same BSC wallet address
Also, he sent his campaign payment to @Siren account

[hosemary]

I got a new one,, what do you think about this one from your campaign?
@Reatim and @rodskee both used the same BSC wallet address

It's clear that Reatim is also owned by the same person. Good find.

Reatim also has the same posting behavior and does the same thing as above users when quoting two different parts of someone's post separately.

As the topic said, the question just came to mind and I decided to know more reasons. Casinos make profit than losing to gamblers, yet they stopped operation. Sometimes they even stopped operating with gamblers funds which they win. I know that government policies can make a casino to stopped their operation, and that is understandable but whereby everything is good for them to operate, yet they stopped operation. Why? Was it that they were not making profit or workers were not faithful to them for accountability or what?

you actually don’t know if they are making profit or what they could actually be losing money because there’s not enough gamblers using their platform and they can’t cover the capital they had used to build the casino

I have also seen some casinos going offline with exit "scam". What I mean by exit scam. Gamblers wins were not paid but they stopped operation. No contact again and the site offline. What is the caused? Because Initially they made profit.

as i said, they could just be losing money

unless they released their data of funds you don’t know if they actually made profit or maybe they just really wanted to scam people and go out with their funds in their pockets

I added Reatim to my list in OP and also tagged him.
6 accounts so far and there are probably more.

[yahoo62278]

I got a new one,, what do you think about this one from your campaign?
@Reatim and @rodskee both used the same BSC wallet address

It's clear that Reatim is also owned by the same person. Good find.

Reatim also has the same posting behavior and does the same thing as above users when quoting two different parts of someone's post separately.

As the topic said, the question just came to mind and I decided to know more reasons. Casinos make profit than losing to gamblers, yet they stopped operation. Sometimes they even stopped operating with gamblers funds which they win. I know that government policies can make a casino to stopped their operation, and that is understandable but whereby everything is good for them to operate, yet they stopped operation. Why? Was it that they were not making profit or workers were not faithful to them for accountability or what?

you actually don’t know if they are making profit or what they could actually be losing money because there’s not enough gamblers using their platform and they can’t cover the capital they had used to build the casino

I have also seen some casinos going offline with exit "scam". What I mean by exit scam. Gamblers wins were not paid but they stopped operation. No contact again and the site offline. What is the caused? Because Initially they made profit.

as i said, they could just be losing money

unless they released their data of funds you don’t know if they actually made profit or maybe they just really wanted to scam people and go out with their funds in their pockets

I added Reatim to my list in OP and also tagged him.
6 accounts so far and there are probably more.

Just to be clear I am 100% fine with you guys busting scumbags.

I'm curious as I am managing Bitslers campaign, but I am not going to with hold funds from a user based on this proof. You could be 100% right but the only bad thing is the 2 accounts, peter and kotajikikox, whom if connected are in the same campaign. You need to have stronger proof that those accounts are connected and then connected to the rest as well.

I'll tag em all if more proof is provided but not with what's presented so far. It is possible that the have peace accounts story could be true.

Bitcointalk Username:Reatim
BSC wallet address :
0xf08ec7c87551834151fadaf16e2440c5ce4c5309

https://loyce.club/archive/posts/6463/64632204.html

Rank- Senior
Segwit BTC address: bc1qes0laa9qvqvpsmhrgs4j0tddem88200hztdnue

https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/7511037802519bcc45880b6b4e1ce6f81f93feff8fe14479cab9a81940f44a6a


I got a new one,, what do you think about this one from your campaign?
@Reatim and @rodskee both used the same BSC wallet address
Also, he sent his campaign payment to @Siren account

Keep em coming so i can open up some slots for others.

[Satofan44]

This is always worth rewarding with merits. Perhaps campaigns could incentivize finding cheaters with a small portion of their budget. Excellent work.

[JollyGood]

Excellent work. I hope all campaign managers involved decide to take action and remove the accounts from their campaigns otherwise it defeats the object of the efforts volunteered by those exposing the accounts. I will leave appropriate tags for all of the accounts.

The following accounts are all owned by the same person.

• peter0425 (hero member)
• kotajikikox (sr. member)
• rodskee (full member)
• bitterguy28 (full member)
• btc78 (full member)
• Reatim (sr. member)

The last one was discovered by Minor Miner. Click here to see his post.

[lovesmayfamilis]

I once saw an account that raised suspicions. Great job, hosemary, you've unraveled this mess. I didn't have the time to look into it at the time, and later I forgot about them.

I would like to ask you, nutildah, would this be an evasion of the ban?

Siren's account has been banned from the forum since July 26, 2019. However, transactions from his wallet 3LmcQ9FhZDkKd3hahCgvQEtWXaV8MJ7Ljz are now being processed from another account.
Siren
https://bpip.org/Profile?p=Siren  7/26/2019 8:32:34 PM   Changed to Archived status   Autoban user

https://ninjastic.space/addresses?address=3LmcQ9FhZDkKd3hahCgvQEtWXaV8MJ7Ljz

Btctalk name : Siren
BTC Address : 3LmcQ9FhZDkKd3hahCgvQEtWXaV8MJ7Ljz

https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/address/3LmcQ9FhZDkKd3hahCgvQEtWXaV8MJ7Ljz

https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/d13a3a1056ca9b9b84b564a2e9e38e203515c6315c7a5e5468ec2995ba423078




https://ninjastic.space/addresses?address=3GJWSCeQmh1wjw6eefCnQYKGfizc9ajgo9
bitterguy28

[YOSHIE]

Again, these are not the only transactions. I can share many many more transactions that prove all those accounts are owned by the same person.

You have eyesight like an eagle, good eyesight.

Yes, there is no doubt that they are all under the same roof, aka Alts who act fraudulently.

Several other pieces of evidence can also be felt and can be presented to those who cheat.
Another possible piece of evidence that they are connected.

bech32 BTC Address: bc1qm5zakx60wa2cdaetuxnny2xckz3uxfyl6cvmas

https://archive.vn/wip/wyPxr

btc78 send to peter0425, proof of transaction:
https://bitcoin.atomicwallet.io/tx/fcdea499f76e8b3284600b774d8180bad8732ea5cb28bf811e162b8c1f448f99
bc1qhvq09swzfe866vag6l9p337mwhw5xl3pc7hm99
To
bc1qm5zakx60wa2cdaetuxnny2xckz3uxfyl6cvmas

Likewise with other Alts, they send btc and transactions to this address: 1AGqfEpj9cEBbj7Ui4PvRZzKjpzayANFpw
Proof:

- BTC address for payouts - bc1q5kzcr0lrjpy56um4hwgt6y6n4l9csgr27adpst   

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5501254.msg64263608#msg64263608

Address belonging to @peter0425 to one destination.

https://bitcoin.atomicwallet.io/tx/37c03432eb261f0c64038fd5def8498b45199ba4c7d4d8a9a09eaab671b402a5
bc1q5kzcr0lrjpy56um4hwgt6y6n4l9csgr27adpst
To
1AGqfEpj9cEBbj7Ui4PvRZzKjpzayANFpw

@bitterguy28's address to one destination.

https://bitcoin.atomicwallet.io/tx/a485fcbf242953f9c63b9cfcee7ea641fea0ff6301ad694ff0f96c6c63c85d04
bc1q078655q2n0an3xt6hrj3ghjcd9k9hazrnxgv4k
To
1AGqfEpj9cEBbj7Ui4PvRZzKjpzayANFpw

@kotajikikox's address to one destination.

https://bitcoin.atomicwallet.io/address/1AGqfEpj9cEBbj7Ui4PvRZzKjpzayANFpw
bc1q5azy3du85rlxr78rl2s83wvktwkgu6hpr46cuf
To
1AGqfEpj9cEBbj7Ui4PvRZzKjpzayANFpw

With the evidence found by OP and additional evidence from different addresses, it's pretty sure they are Alt controlled by one person, aka Alt.

OP they cheated in two campaigns: BITSLER AND Rainbet. Report to manager.

[hosemary]

I hope all campaign managers involved decide to take action and remove the accounts from their campaigns otherwise it defeats the object of the efforts volunteered by those exposing the accounts.

Little Mouse and yahoo62278 have already removed the accounts from their campaigns.
Hhampuz probably hasn't seen this topic yet. I sent him a message.

OP they cheated in two campaigns: BITSLER AND Rainbet.

Right. They have cheated at least two signature campaigns and according to lovesmayfamilis' post, the user is evading ban too.
I edited the title. At first, it was only Rainbet campaign because I hadn't discovered Reatim which was revealed by Minor Miner later.

[lovesmayfamilis]

Right. They have cheated at least two signature campaigns and according to lovesmayfamilis' post, the user is evading ban too.
I edited the title. At first, it was only Rainbet campaign because I hadn't discovered Reatim which was revealed by Minor Miner later.

Please check the links in this transaction, I think there are several additional accounts.
https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/c37a95c78cb14012aee1f84f6c7324c2c57578fa4fa051503749016ae5305778

[Comeacross]

Perhaps record is about to be broken 
Some years back, nutildah made a shocking discovery on this thread Long-time sig campaign farm ID'd via single wallet transaction involving 9 accounts and today at least 5 (and more coming) accounts is caught using similar patterns. Isn't it a shame to be caught this way? I mean they care about the money but they don't care to know about blockchain. Greed does not allow them to realise transactions are transparent in blockchain.

This is always worth rewarding with merits. Perhaps campaigns could incentivize finding cheaters with a small portion of their budget. Excellent work.

If I remember correctly, AB de Royse777 has stated it somewhere that the payment for the cheat account will be given to anyone that caught the cheating account in his campaign.
Having multiple accounts is fine as per forum rule since the forum is not against it but it's stated clearly in every campaign thread never to enroll multiple accounts.
My question is, does this people have life outside the forum at all? How do they cope making posts in every accounts involve to earn weekly payments? Is it that they hire people to make post for them? I'm just curious because I don't think anyone who has life outside the forum would survive operating multiple accounts like 3,4,5 and more.

I feel embarrassed on behalf of them for failing to come here to defend themselves. What a coward attitude 

[hosemary]

Please check the links in this transaction, I think there are several additional accounts.
https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/c37a95c78cb14012aee1f84f6c7324c2c57578fa4fa051503749016ae5305778

According to this transaction (and its parents), there may be some connection between Siren, Reatim and three other accounts, but I'm not sure of that. Two out of those three accounts are already tagged by DT members for abusing signature campaigns.
I won't share the names publicly until I am completely sure they are owned by the same person. I need more evidence, because they have different posting behavior and it's possible that they have sent the funds to the same exchange.

[Awaklara]

Please check the links in this transaction, I think there are several additional accounts.
https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/c37a95c78cb14012aee1f84f6c7324c2c57578fa4fa051503749016ae5305778

That transaction leads to this case: Possible cheating in Betpanda campaign

I just want to add a little evidence besides the transactions to strengthen the OP's evidence.

Bitcointalk Username: peter0425
BSC Wallet Address: 0x4835410A7b0Ebb731ea631D0827EA56362A62490

[ Archive ]

PROOF OF AUTHENTICATION
Bitcointalk username : rodskee
Participated in website registration
Polygon Address : 0x4835410A7b0Ebb731ea631D0827EA56362A62490

[ Archive ]

[KingsDen]

This is always worth rewarding with merits. Perhaps campaigns could incentivize finding cheaters with a small portion of their budget. Excellent work.

I think Royse had that rule in a few of his campaigns in the past, I don't know if he is still sustaining the rule.
I haven't gone into the business of connecting accounts before, but I wonder why someone will know that enrolling alts in the same campaign is cheating and the will continue doing that.
It's been long we last heard the news of enrolling alts in the same campaign. Maybe there has been deficiency of campaigns. Now that some campaigns hire more than 100 participants, it's an easy landing ground for the cheats. Every quality poster can make cool bucks weekly if they wish without cheating the system.