WARNING!!! "Vigilante" RC 2021 Set 1 from RarityCheck SWEPT!

[PontiusTP]

after years of break from crypto i looked over my collection and the silver bat coin from raritycheck popped into my eyeballs for whatever reason. i had the gut feeling to check if it's all good and i found out the balance of one of my coins has been swept on the 14th of september 2025.

i'm talking about the coins sold here.

this is the address of the swept coin: https://blockstream.info/address/1FeFZ5kETBe1JPyV8HQHd6DKDR2iuvwLPw

the other coins still appear to be loaded. the compromised coin has intact hologram. it's in the exact state it was when i received it. i just recently found out the news about mrcrypthodl and i'm about to go into a long emotional rollercoaster checking every single collectible to see which has been funded and which hasn't... meanwhile i urge everyone who has this coin to check if yours has been emptied out or not.

[MoparMiningLLC]

can you share pictures of yours intact?

the one I have in my possession I did not purchase direct - it was originally someone elses that I auctioned off then the winner returned it due to scratches on the coin - having paid the seller and refunded the buyer it became mine.

it is still currently funded.

[Rymaster]

For some reason, collectible money's site doesn't seem to be accurately listing the status of all addresses currently
https://collectible.money/series/raritycheck-2021-set-1

Far as I can tell, RC's site seems to be updating accordingly.
https://crypto.raritycheck.com/2021-set-1

Are these coins seeing the same fate as their VIBGYOR series and being slowly swept?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5505399.0


List of redeemed addresses below, in the order of them being redeemed.


1BswYLP9siDDGo8KbRXbSECLPAeE3Q4Rdr on 8/7/24
1EpmvWaR5iPcaNE1kvgVoKXGN4BU4T5iMc on 9/30/24
1Nmg6do7BNssexuiqrLEmg5oecvqMAuHyq on 3/3/25
1AzTiECZTjaF234qkHZHagCbZnciuxRFt3 on 3/5/25
1Dc1crot85jqq4h5Nd5wXw5xKjFRzJ3kic on 3/5/25
1P9ZEhcgyvT83jso7ycR4KzLLs86d6ZzCv on 3/5/25
14rYcFuA3RbF8YGMZ8kQrhkYmpzM7dd6Yj on 3/5/25
156dB8JVcyw26Pb7gg7Vx6o6WmdGYkH1my on 5/29/25
1FeFZ5kETBe1JPyV8HQHd6DKDR2iuvwLPw on 9/14/25 (OP's coin)
1L2o6281TGzfa8fuoEMTgZ1cAfdAZe9HpJ on 9/22/25
1AybYiStsrMvfc7pHKveXRZUoDrfVSA7BJ on 9/25/25
1LNqxSgD389YFbzSJkFhLoXTUpEygAywSB on 10/9/25
1KtduSQWK8RwDGsuWKQwdvSR4dERwxa4nK on 10/23/25


Keep in mind, this set has 75 coins and 13 appear to be redeemed thus far.

No way RC used the same compromised key generator that they did in their compromised VIBGYOR series, correct? We may need @raritycheck to confirm this.

[MoparMiningLLC]

to be transparent - I peeled and redeemed the one in my possession - #75

[Rymaster]

to be transparent - I peeled and redeemed the one in my possession - #75

Well now we have another problem too. It appears the coin you just redeemed, does not line up with #75 according to RC's address list and the auction you hosted for it.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5555988.0

Coin #75's address
https://mempool.space/address/1AiLQJMCXYQXufUTZGaf4H8DnvedAFoZYg


Instead, it appears to have held the private key for coin #74
https://mempool.space/address/1D4nNdAtT2ncw6FamSDeq8UYVzkGuxuis

Hopefully it was just a mix-up in holograms and not a duplicate print of the same private key. I know RC did state in the sale thread there was a 100% refund guarantee if there is any issues redeeming any coins - but for how long is this offer good and does it translate to secondary buyers?

Raritycheck posted here, saying how they generated the keys for this series. It was done by 1 person on their team. Is this person still part of their team?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5325059.msg57213534#msg57213534

[MoparMiningLLC]

to be transparent - I peeled and redeemed the one in my possession - #75

Well now we have another problem too. It appears the coin you just redeemed, does not line up with #75 according to RC's address list and the auction you hosted for it.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5555988.0

Coin #75's address
https://mempool.space/address/1AiLQJMCXYQXufUTZGaf4H8DnvedAFoZYg


Instead, it appears to have held the private key for coin #74
https://mempool.space/address/1D4nNdAtT2ncw6FamSDeq8UYVzkGuxuis

Hopefully it was just a mix-up in holograms and not a duplicate print of the same private key. I know RC did state in the sale thread there was a 100% refund guarantee if there is any issues redeeming any coins - but for how long is this offer good and does it translate to secondary buyers?

Raritycheck posted here, saying how they generated the keys for this series. It was done by 1 person on their team. Is this person still part of their team?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5325059.msg57213534#msg57213534

you are correct - I swept it before going to bed but after getting up and reading you post I have confirmed that the coin was identified as 75 and yet the pk underneath did indeed match the address for coin 74

hopefully you are correct and they simply got 74 and 75 mixed up.

and if they got one mixed up, they have gotten more than one mixed up. And that could be why OP's coin shows intact yet the address they have shows it was redeemed, not that RC is sweeping funds but that the keys were mixed up.

[PontiusTP]

just snapped a picture of the intact hologram of coin 52. the address matches on the certificate with the redeemed: 1FeFZ5k...



maybe it's just a mixup like you guys say. weird...

[MoparMiningLLC]

just snapped a picture of the intact hologram of coin 52. the address matches on the certificate with the redeemed: 1FeFZ5k...



maybe it's just a mixup like you guys say. weird...

I would suggest peeling your coin just in case there is key duplication - if so, the first to redeem will be the lucky one.

[Rymaster]

Well if it’s a duplicate key, other holder already beat him to redeem. Hopefully just a mixup but now it makes me wonder if maybe all private keys got shifted by one coin? Like if PontiusTP peels and his #52 coins really holds the keys to #51?

RC posted a video showing themselves peeling a coin, I wonder if that one threw off the lineup somewhere.

It’s always painful to peel if you don’t have to

Worst case I suppose is you peel and if you can’t redeem, take RC up on their 100% guarantee on being able to redeem funds.

[raritycheck]

Hi

We just saw this message. No those coins are not compromised.

Please wait for us to check.

[raritycheck]

to be transparent - I peeled and redeemed the one in my possession - #75

Hi

Mopar.  . you redeemed #75 -> but # 74 shows as redeemed. our guess is that silver coins are shifted by 1

[raritycheck]

Well if it’s a duplicate key, other holder already beat him to redeem. Hopefully just a mixup but now it makes me wonder if maybe all private keys got shifted by one coin? Like if PontiusTP peels and his #52 coins really holds the keys to #51?

RC posted a video showing themselves peeling a coin, I wonder if that one threw off the lineup somewhere.

It’s always painful to peel if you don’t have to

Worst case I suppose is you peel and if you can’t redeem, take RC up on their 100% guarantee on being able to redeem funds.

No.. there are no duplicate keys. if you cant redeem, please ping us.

[raritycheck]

just snapped a picture of the intact hologram of coin 52. the address matches on the certificate with the redeemed: 1FeFZ5k...
 
maybe it's just a mixup like you guys say. weird...

I would suggest peeling your coin just in case there is key duplication - if so, the first to redeem will be the lucky one.

Dont redeem the coin, please. We can send you 0.001 BTC if it is ever found to be redeemed.

[raritycheck]

Ok!!

So we just checked number 30, number 30 is correct

1JpLM7u28N9vXjUXwtzbQ2AZLcBVjFQVnE

 
So it is a swap somewhere between 38 and 52

If you are an owner of any one of these, please ping us:

#38   
#40 
#42   
#43   
#45   
#46   


PontiusTP your coins is loaded https://crypto.raritycheck.com/2021-set-1

(clear browser cache)

[MoparMiningLLC]

to be transparent - I peeled and redeemed the one in my possession - #75

Hi

Mopar.  . you redeemed #75 -> but # 74 shows as redeemed. our guess is that silver coins are shifted by 1

well I had not wanted to redeem but with the issues being presented I saw no other option.

[owlcatz]

well I had not wanted to redeem but with the issues being presented I saw no other option.

Holy shit. How am I just reading this. Mr. RarityFuckIdiot - PLEASE STOP MAKING COINS AND JUST GTFO and stop fucking with peoples money, you clearly fucked in the head. How many mistakes and swept coins now? 

Oh well I did see you partnered with Ballet. I guess that makes you 100% reliable now.

Maybe I'm preaching to the dumb-ass choir as always, but buyers always beware. Take it from experience, not chance.

[raritycheck]

well I had not wanted to redeem but with the issues being presented I saw no other option.

Holy shit. How am I just reading this. Mr. RarityFuckIdiot - PLEASE STOP MAKING COINS AND JUST GTFO and stop fucking with peoples money, you clearly fucked in the head. How many mistakes and swept coins now?  

Oh well I did see you partnered with Ballet. I guess that makes you 100% reliable now.

Maybe I'm preaching to the dumb-ass choir as always, but buyers always beware. Take it from experience, not chance.

Firstly, stop using profanity. People like you should be blocked from the forum so it can be cleaner.  Secondly, using alts is not a good idea (don’t ask how we know)
Holyyyyyy sheee!!   .. just read all the trust you have sent others and the trust you have received!

PS: Happy New Year!!  Hopefully you feel better this year!  

[Rymaster]

All coins are loaded. Just the address had a mixup on the site. Not that the coins are redeemed.

RC, for clarity's sake, am I correct in saying you found the swap happened at coin #46? As I noticed coin #46 on your website now shows the public address that was previously listed as coin #75, so you swapped these two on your address list and shifted all coin addresses above #46 by -1

(MJ's master address as an original reference) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2022902.msg57266801#msg57266801

So basically, any coin above #46, is really the wallet address of the coin prior to it? Which should now be correctly reflected on your website's list.

[raritycheck]

All coins are loaded. Just the address had a mixup on the site. Not that the coins are redeemed.

RC, for clarity's sake, am I correct in saying you found the swap happened at coin #46? As I noticed coin #46 on your website now shows the public address that was previously listed as coin #75, so you swapped these two on your address list and shifted all coin addresses above #46 by -1

(MJ's master address as an original reference) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2022902.msg57266801#msg57266801

So basically, any coin above #46, is really the wallet address of the coin prior to it? Which should now be correctly reflected on your website's list.

Correct. Basically,  coin you hold is guaranteed to be loaded as there is no leakage of keys.

[MoparMiningLLC]

the point is still valid though - *clarification* - 2 coin series 2 different issues.  one series of coins did have had their keys compromised and another series had their numbers off (meaning one coin might look swept it was fine because the key to first bits to serial numbers are wrong.

Because of this second issue, I had to peel a coin that I had that I did not want to peel.