JollyGood, my bad, JollyBad deserves to be removed from DT

[Revolution2025]

It is disheartening to see that a forum that the administrator has worked so hard to protect for many years is at the jeopardy of being ruined because of lunatics, impostors, and tyrants like JollyGood aka JollyBad who abuses DT power by tagging accounts unnecessary to the extent that if you do not agree to what they say, it results to tags immediately without hesitation.

I ask that the forum administrator and other well meaning members of the forum who wants to see the progress of the forum should review the tags incessantly being given to members of the forum by this so called tyrant called JollyBad. He gives tags at the slightest provocation and disagreement without reaching to the nitty-gritty of a case before finding it worthy of a tag.

It will interest you all to know that some members of the DT are now acting like demi God just because they have the privilege to tag and destroy accounts of members of the forum especially the innocent and genuine members.

What will be the future of this forum if people like JollyBad keeps showing tyranny all in the name of trying to sanitize the forum from cheaters and scammers.

When i reviewed the situations that are worthy of a tag, it is mostly for those who cheats and scam others or attempt scam in the forum but what JollyBad and his cohorts are doing is to intimidate people who doesn't have DT power as they do.
 
I plead with the genuine members in the DT with integrity to please take their time and review most of the profiles that JollyBad has tagged so far and see if they are all worthy of those tags. I know that in the respect of trying to keep a forum clean, innocent ones can also be harmed but when it gets excessive, it becomes questionable. I now agree to @dkbit98 neutral tag in his profile which states and i quote ''With all due respect to scam busting past of this member, but his recent actions of giving negative feedbacks to easy is highly questionable''

It will also interest you all to know that this lunatic known as JollyGood has distrusted over 3000 users judgement in the forum. Probably he is the only one worthy of trust. As a matter of fact, he earns most of his merits in the reputation board which are being given to him by his cohorts who also does same work of fake FBI in the forum as though they are all saints. If the real essence of awarding merits is to be checked which is for quality posts, i doubt if JollyGood can reach a full member rank if we are to count the merits he received for the gabbages and generic posts he makes to fulfill signature posts quota. Very poor dude he is and most likely to end up being poor for the rest of his life because someone with that level of hatred for members of this forum cannot really meet people who can help and assist him to become wealthy.

SAVE THE FORUM NOW BY REMOVING JOLLYGOOD FROM THE DT and i also ask the head administrator to review the mode of operation of those who are in the DT.


Thank you all for reading and am looking forward to a proactive decision that will checkmate the activity of DT Members. As far as i know the head administrator is devoted to see a forum where everyone can explore freely without intimidation from anyone, just same freedom that bitcoin has come to give to us all. At this juncture, i rest my case.

[Vod]

I ask that the forum administrator and other well meaning members of the forum who wants to see the progress of the forum should review the tags incessantly being given to members of the forum by this so called tyrant called JollyBad. He gives tags at the slightest provocation and disagreement without reaching to the nitty-gritty of a case before finding it worthy of a tag.

I ask that the forum administrator and other well meaning members of the forum should ignore such anonymous cowards.

[yahoo62278]

SAVE THE FORUM NOW BY REMOVING JOLLYGOOD FROM THE DT and i also ask the head administrator to review the mode of operation of those who are in the DT.

Whether Jollygood is or isn't in DT does not determine the future of this forum lmao. The forum will go on regardless of either scenario. Let's say he was ~ by a bunch of us DT users, what then? You'll start complaining about another person you feel is fucking up your agenda.

Unlike you I am going to just give my opinion of what I think is happening, with my account(NO alt), you were accused in the latest round of alt accounts connected and cheating sig campaigns right? It's messing with your ability to earn money by cheating campaign right? Maybe you're a banned account who was hiding behind an alt and now are in fear of another account being banned if JG keeps digging.

Regardless, be a man and stand up for yourself if you're not in the wrong. Otherwise, quit cowering behind an alt account because you have no balls. FYI, the admin won't be doing shit. They don't interfere in these sort of issues usually.

[logfiles]

It is disheartening to see that a forum that the administrator has worked so hard to protect for many years is at the jeopardy of being ruined because of lunatics, impostors, and tyrants like JollyGood aka JollyBad who abuses DT power by tagging accounts unnecessary to the extent that if you do not agree to what they say, it results to tags immediately without hesitation.

Can you man up and show us how he unnecessarily tagged your account(s)? I mean, it makes no sense to complain about something you are not showing us. How are we supposed to make judgment, then?
Also, trying to troll while making a complaint makes you look unserious and a number of members will just think you are just a big joke.

[Woodie]

If our our very own MVP Satoshi Nakamoto is m.i.a and the forum has continued to exist ever since, I think continuity/existence isn't the topic here...seems it's personal ties with JB and you want to use the Forum against him, if you need a revision from JB am sure reach out to him has his said his open to revising some of the tag's after some time...keep hope alive.

GL  

[Despairo]

I think if someone is really an innocent, they will not afraid if someone wrongly accused them.

Since you have to create an alt account to voice your opinion (nothing wrong to create an alt account for this), but I'm thinking you did something wrong either you're a cheater or abuser.

Anyway not all campaign managers will react instantly when they see a negative feedback, some of them didn't take action after JG left a negative feedback. I said this because I'm sure your reason is due to signature campaign.

[babo]

I ask that the forum administrator and other well meaning members of the forum should ignore such anonymous cowards.

I'm not going into the merits of OP's discussion, I'm not judging, that's not where I want to put the point.
I want to make the point that he is a coward and created an account just for this reason

Cowards disgust me, either you have something to say or if you don't have the courage to do it, keep quiet.

+1 credit to you Vod because I think exactly like you

[ABCbits]

I ask that the forum administrator
--snip--

i also ask the head administrator to review the mode of operation of those who are in the DT.

Good luck with your request.

Trust ratings aren't moderated. There are no hard rules, and you can't objectively say that someone is engaging in trust abuse. But if someone thinks that you are giving negative trust unreasonably, then they will remove you from their trust list.

I don't expect admin will take any action unless there's indication DT manipulation.

I see no particular evidence of Bazinga442 being an alt, but the other six five (edit: zin-zang may not be part of this circle) are all the same person. They will be blacklisted from the DT selection system in the future. Haven't decided whether this abuse warrants a forum ban.

How did they get 10 merit? (I don't have time to look into this right now.)

10 merit is difficult enough IMO. I don't want it to be too difficult. Any other suggestions? We could just keep an eye on it and respond reactively to cases like this.

Edit:

After some investigation, this is a circle of 58 accounts, most of which have 10+ merit. IDs:
--snip--
They're all now excluded from the DT selection process, so if the goal was to manipulate DT, someone blew ~580 sMerit in order to ultimately fail doing so.

[Xiestar]

Stop this BS.

Only Jollygood has the steel balls to bust this untouchable MF fresh blood merit whore.

Now they operate slowly and stop the merit whoring that only means Jolly campaign is effective. You are blatantly cheating on a campaign using bunch of accounts just because you are proud that you don’t have blockchain connections, only merit abused to rank fast and gain number for easy campaign acceptance.

[lovesmayfamilis]

OP, fold your revolutionary flag and run to check your accounts for further discoveries and inventing new stories about broken phones, poor health, or a dozen relatives. Better yet, raise a white flag to signal that you surrender, along with your farm.

[Quickseller]

It is disheartening to see that a forum that the administrator has worked so hard to protect for many years is at the jeopardy of being ruined because of lunatics, impostors, and tyrants like JollyGood aka JollyBad who abuses DT power by tagging accounts unnecessary to the extent that if you do not agree to what they say, it results to tags immediately without hesitation.

I would suggest providing specific examples of this. If he does this regularly, you should have many examples.

I looked at his recent sent trust ratings, and I don't see any obvious examples of the abuse you describe. I also believe that he genuinely believes his recent ratings are appropriate, and regardless of whether you agree with the underlying reasons why he left his ratings, I don't think they are the abuse you describe.

JollyGood has excluded a lot of people from his trust list. But there is nothing inherently bad about this. If anything, that is funny. I haven't looked closely, but I doubt his exclusions will affect many forum member's trust ratings.

[NotATether]

I ask that the forum administrator and other well meaning members of the forum should ignore such anonymous cowards.

Now you've reminded me of Slashdot. I still miss it. 

[osasshem]

Hmmm... Questionable. How did you know JollyGood if you're not a member with an existing account in the forum, and don't want to use your actual account to make this post? This is your first and only post (to a point might be the last) and it's used to dent a DT member. It would have been much better you used your main account and point out your grievances towards JollyGood than creating a fresh new account to do this.

[Xiestar]

Hmmm... Questionable. How did you know JollyGood if you're not a member with an existing account in the forum, and don't want to use your actual account to make this post? This is your first and only post (to a point might be the last) and it's used to dent a DT member. It would have been much better you used your main account and point out your grievances towards JollyGood than creating a fresh new account to do this.

Hmmm nice shit posting. Stating the obvious. Congratulations with the +1 post.

This is the reason why I try to suggest before on removing signature display on this board.

[lovesmayfamilis]

Hmmm nice shit posting. Stating the obvious. Congratulations with the +1 post.

This is the reason why I try to suggest before on removing signature display on this board.

Especially reading his tag.

[Revolution2025]

I ask that the forum administrator and other well meaning members of the forum should ignore such anonymous cowards.

I respect you a lot Vod and i accept the coward you called me, thank you. I rather remain a coward than fall prey to these carnivorous animals called JollyGood and his cohorts who will rather put you in their radar and in their watch list when they found out that you have nothing questionable to hide in your cupboard.

Regardless, be a man and stand up for yourself if you're not in the wrong. Otherwise, quit cowering behind an alt account because you have no balls

I also respect you a lot, but sorry i won't fall for this even though my account is as clean as air, am only asking for you guys to review the tags that are being given to members of this forum by JollyGood, AM I ASKING FOR TOO MUCH?

Can you man up and show us how he unnecessarily tagged your account(s)? I mean, it makes no sense to complain about something you are not showing us. How are we supposed to make judgment, then?

SORRY MY LOVE, but i won't also fall for this because you are also one of the cohorts that tags accounts without strong evidence. The only reason why you are not as bad as JollyGood is probably because you don't spend much time here as JollyGood who has  no real life job, his life earning depends on this forum that is why he is doing a fake FBI job to complete signature quota and earn in campaigns, earn merits and also gain trust by members who are blinded by his atrocities. BECAUSE SOMEONE HAS A GOOD PAST DOES NOT MEAN THEIR PRESENT WILL BE ALSO GOOD. most of you believes JollyGood just because of the trust he wrongly earned in the past, nobody have cared to look into his present and see if he is still same person as he was years ago.

Since you have to create an alt account to voice your opinion (nothing wrong to create an alt account for this), but I'm thinking you did something wrong either you're a cheater or abuser.

I can never fall for that bastard called JollyGood who was not loved during his childhood.

Cowards disgust me, either you have something to say or if you don't have the courage to do it, keep quiet.

I accept the coward sir, thanks for airing your opinion

Trust ratings aren't moderated. There are no hard rules, and you can't objectively say that someone is engaging in trust abuse. But if someone thinks that you are giving negative trust unreasonably, then they will remove you from their trust list.

I don't expect admin will take any action unless there's indication DT manipulation.

We are in digital time now, every activity in a forum deserves to be moderated. There should be a review in some of the things said by the head admin. He said this is 2015, remind me what year we are now; 2025, 10 years is enough to review some rules and all that.

trashed post

I don't interact with alt accounts please, reply me with your main account and i will interact with you.

This is the third time of mine seeing someone crying about Jolly's work again.

It would be better to realize sooner that Jolly has 5 foot long hands and still digs 10 feet deeper to drag merit whores and account farmers out of their holes.

Another alt account, please reply me with your main account.

I looked at his recent sent trust ratings, and I don't see any obvious examples of the abuse you describe.

Are you that lazy to review his feedbacks? Now i understand why you have many negative feedbacks, you deserve more of it.

Hmmm nice shit posting. Stating the obvious. Congratulations with the +1 post.

This is the reason why I try to suggest before on removing signature display on this board.

Especially reading his tag.

Must you enter in every conversation to fulfill signature post quota?

You should stop interacting to yourself too. This dumbass is on insane level.

Get behind me, you merit farmer and alt account. since 2016 you registered your account you have woke up 5 times and only has about 116 activity. Very unserious animal, go get a life outside this forum.

ALL I ASK FOR IS FOR YOU GUYS TO REVIEW HIS SENT FEEDBACKS, IS THAT SO DIFFICULT FOR YOU ALL TO DO? OH MY GOSH THIS FORUM IS DOOMED

[Xiestar]

trashed post

I don't interact with alt accounts please, reply me with your main account and i will interact with you.

You should stop interacting to yourself too. This dumbass is on insane level.

[ABCbits]

ALL I ASK FOR IS FOR YOU GUYS TO REVIEW HIS SENT FEEDBACKS, IS THAT SO DIFFICULT FOR YOU ALL TO DO? OH MY GOSH THIS FORUM IS DOOMED

Are you really asking all forum member to review all 2000+ feedback sent by him? If yes, here's my response.



If no, you may want to mention which feedback that you want to get review.

[Shishir99]

I don't interact with alt accounts please, reply me with your main account and i will interact with you.

Irony of the year. An obvious alternative account says they do not interact with alternative accounts. How do you expect people to interact with your thread then? You did not need to create a dedicated account to criticize JollyGood. Everyone knows how he is, and some of his feedback is controversial. It is known that he is too aggressive in handing out negative tags. But in most cases, he was proved right.

I myself do not hand out negative feedback, but I tagged some accounts because I learned a lot of information about a gang. I am not in the DT network, and my tags won't affect them at all.

[Free Market Capitalist]

I am sure that JG has done much more for the good of the forum than the OP, who, if we looked at his main account, would surely have some tags.

He is one of those who understands trust from the “aggressive” side, perhaps the most aggressive of all, but sometimes he has removed his feedback or changed it to neutral when it has been proven that he was wrong or that there was not enough justification for the red tag, and other times his investigations have uncovered alts and farms.

His controversial style has led some DTs to distrust him, but I check now and see that he is in DT1, which means he has the majority support of the DT network.