JollyGood, my bad, JollyBad deserves to be removed from DT

[JollyGood]

Show me one negative tag that is too aggressive or unjustified: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1016855

If you manage to find one negative tag that you disagree with, then try to find another. If somehow you manage to find a second one then proceed to see if you can find a third. List any negative feedback you think is "too aggressive", I would like to see it/them.

Let us first see if you find any aggressive negative tags and if you do, provide an explanation why that/those negative tags were too aggressive in order to compare with the reference link and justification I gave for the negative tag in question. If you can show me I was wrong, I will gladly consider revising the negative tag/tags.

I am waiting for you to show me, where are these "too aggressive" negative tags you refer to?

It is known that he is too aggressive in handing out negative tags. But in most cases, he was proved right.

[Free Market Capitalist]

I've also been labeled aggressive with tags. You could say it another way, like we have a preventive approach to the trust system, but I don't care. With the decline in testosterone over the last 50 years, if people call me aggressive, I wear it as a badge of honor.

[logfiles]

ALL I ASK FOR IS FOR YOU GUYS TO REVIEW HIS SENT FEEDBACKS, IS THAT SO DIFFICULT FOR YOU ALL TO DO? OH MY GOSH THIS FORUM IS DOOMED

How self-important you must really feel, Mr John Doe or Mrs Jane Doe. If you can't identify by your profile or show us the unjust feedback you are mourning about, then I suggest you rest this case and just shut it. No one is going to waste time playing your guessing game.

The forum is not doomed. It's you who is doomed for being a big coward.

[Revolution2025]

ALL I ASK FOR IS FOR YOU GUYS TO REVIEW HIS SENT FEEDBACKS, IS THAT SO DIFFICULT FOR YOU ALL TO DO? OH MY GOSH THIS FORUM IS DOOMED

How self-important you must really feel, Mr John Doe or Mrs Jane Doe. If you can't identify by your profile or show us the unjust feedback you are mourning about, then I suggest you rest this case and just shut it. No one is going to waste time playing your guessing game.

The forum is not doomed. It's you who is doomed for being a big coward.

You see how clumsy you are, one bad egg spotted. A policeman who disguises in mofty to gather information and monitor the activities of criminals is a wise policeman.

I've also been labeled aggressive with tags. You could say it another way, like we have a preventive approach to the trust system, but I don't care. With the decline in testosterone over the last 50 years, if people call me aggressive, I wear it as a badge of honor.

Of course you will wear it as a badge of honor because the labels was the reason why you slightly amended your ways recently, if not you used to have similar behavior as that tyrant JollyGood.

snipped trash

Probably if he manages to find the third one, he will need to find the fourth and bla bla bla. Retarded psycho

I am sure that JG has done much more for the good of the forum than the OP, who, if we looked at his main account, would surely have some tags.

He is one of those who understands trust from the “aggressive” side, perhaps the most aggressive of all, but sometimes he has removed his feedback or changed it to neutral when it has been proven that he was wrong or that there was not enough justification for the red tag, and other times his investigations have uncovered alts and farms.

His controversial style has led some DTs to distrust him, but I check now and see that he is in DT1, which means he has the majority support of the DT network.

Speak for yourself, maybe you know JollyGood outside this forum. Most of those that trusted him was because of his past not his present behavior. Even from his recent trusted feedbacks you will see that many people didn't give him a positive feedback as he did got in the past.

[Free Market Capitalist]

Of course you will wear it as a badge of honor because the labels was the reason why you slightly amended your ways recently, if not you used to have similar behavior as that tyrant JollyGood.

What you call "slightly amended your ways" I call getting bored with all this section drama. And no, I wear it as a badge of honor because my last testosterone test showed 900 ng/dL (natural). It has more to do with that. Lots of red meat and no soy.

Lately, I've been wondering if it would be worthwhile to allow multiple alts belonging to the same person to join the same campaign. After all, if you accepted those accounts' applications, it's because you believed they had the necessary quality to join them. Prohibiting those accounts to belong to the same person, I think, stems from a belief that they are “stealing” jobs from others. Besides, there has been a shortage of members for campaigns lately.

But that's a decision for the managers, and what I think doesn't really matter. Furthermore, in the highly unlikely event that a manager were to do to this, I am sure that many members of the community would be up in arms. My thinking on this matter is probably too capitalist for the average forum user.

Speak for yourself, maybe you know JollyGood outside this forum.

Great thought. Maybe or maybe not.

[lovesmayfamilis]

Besides, there has been a shortage of members for campaigns lately.

Nowadays, job cuts proportionally increase the wages of those who remain employed. Would such a decision be fair for the forum? Many would thereby give up their farming accounts and the large number of posts they publish.

[Shishir99]

Let us first see if you find any aggressive negative tags and if you do, provide an explanation why that/those negative tags were too aggressive in order to compare with the reference link and justification I gave for the negative tag in question. If you can show me I was wrong, I will gladly consider revising the negative tag/tags.

I don't want to go through all those hundreds of tags and point out which one you should revisit. You should check the tags by yourself and decide if they are still valid. There is some feedback that you provided based on your intuition rather than any actual evidence. You have left many questionable comments in the past and likely revised some of them; you will likely revise others in the future. I think the forum already accepted your behaviour. You have nothing to worry about. Be confident in your own judgement and take the criticism. You should accept their opinion and move on.

[JollyGood]

He is one of those who understands trust from the “aggressive” side, perhaps the most aggressive of all

Not true, it is just a story people fabricated  

With the decline in testosterone over the last 50 years, if people call me aggressive, I wear it as a badge of honor.

One tag here or there that could be deemed contentious does not constitute "aggressive".

Sometimes a member that takes a dislike to you starts a campaign against you in the hope of trying to get others to follow the propaganda. You know, in the hope they will lie and repeat it and then hope others start believing it.

I don't want to go through all those hundreds of tags and point out which one you should revisit.

This is the exact reply I expected from you. No substance, just rubbish.

Stop playing with semantics, stop twisting words to suit your ridiculous agenda.

I am not revisiting any tags, I am standing by each and every neutral and negative tag I left for others.

You unilaterally stated my tags were "too aggressive" therefore I challenged you to point out the tags you deemed were "too aggressive".

Furthermore, I clearly stated if you read the reference link and feedback context and then provide your justification for why the tags are wrong, I will gladly consider revising the tag/tags. You failed to provide an iota of a reason yet you made the claim.

You made a statement about me that you cannot back up. Forget about providing any evidence to back up your nonsense, you now claim you will not read through the negative tags. I suspect you already did and found nothing at all therefore you posted the expected nonsense reply.

You were the one claiming my tags were "too aggressive" but you failed to provide any evidence. Instead you opted for the coward excuse of "I will not go through the tags..."

If you cannot be bothered to point out any of the negative tags that you deem to be "too aggressive" then do not make statements you cannot back up by presenting evidence to support your allegation.

Stop spouting nonsense about me and forget your obsession with me. Move on and focus your attention back to the possible account farm thread you created to discuss: Massive alt farm of my country - 10+ accounts.

[logfiles]

<...>

Carry on with your mourning, then.

I can already tell that your alt account or accounts is/are from that one local board that recently had a number of cheating accounts uncovered and tagged. I am certain that some DT members must have sent negative feedback to one or a couple of your alt accounts, and now here you are thinking you are so wise.

[Shishir99]

Stop spouting nonsense about me and forget your obsession with me. Move on and focus your attention back to the possible account farm thread you created to discuss: Massive alt farm of my country - 10+ accounts.

Wow, JollyGood is talking about obsession  
I thought this did not exist in your dictionary. How about forgetting your obsession with people like Royse? How about forgetting your obsession with people who belong to Bangladesh? I know there are cheaters, and we should expose them. I wasn't talking about your negative feedback alone; it's the overall feedback. More than 50% of your neutral tags are negatively influenced. You do not have enough evidence against them, which is why they are neutral. It would have been negative if you had any evidence to claim your back. I see that you actually use feedback as a personal notebook.

BTW, are you talking about evidence? That is irony, mate, because you leave feedback based on your gut and not any evidence. You have revised many pieces of feedback in the past (which I should appreciate) because they were incorrect. You are a liar yourself, which I proved a few months ago. You just raised my blood pressure, but I learned how to control myself.

[lovesmayfamilis]

That is irony, mate, because you leave feedback based on your gut and not any evidence.

In a way, I also want to support you here, Shishir99. When I asked JollyGood a question in this thread, I was ignored, and I think it was because he didn't have any compelling evidence to accuse the two accounts of being alternative accounts.

Hmm. I'd like to ask you, JollyGood, to check these two accounts. Can you confirm that these wallets belong to alternative accounts?
https://ninjastic.space/address/bc1qq8fy0hlc4ahyeejyyammc0fzfn82r23djw2xt2

I see a lot of similarities. However, I'd really like to hear your opinion.
It is important for me not to make mistakes and to try to provide evidence.

 I don't know if he can conduct such an analysis or not, but the point where JollyGood is considering tagging someone, regardless of whether there's a specific reason for the tag, was made in this thread recently. I'll quote it. They said something like, "We need to leave the tag, no matter who the  @Cryptomultiplie account is linked to. The main thing is that the tag is needed!"

Look at the post history of Cryptomultiplier account and you will see this is not his only account therefore anything is possible. Unless something changes, I think for now at least a neutral tag with a reference link regarding the possibility of it being an alt-account (of "coaltin")  should more than suffice.

Yes, many of JollyGood's tags have subsequently been confirmed, but in any case, I don't think they should be applied to everyone who seems suspicious. I'm not sure this is how the trust system is supposed to work. Managers should rely on tags, but leaving tags with suspicions that this account isn't a newbie, or that another account isn't a newbie and has a farm, won't give them confidence. And that, in turn, devalues ​​the tag itself. After all, we have a lot of alternative accounts in many sections that don't post like newbies from their first posts, but without linking them to someone, it's simply pointless to mention.


That's why I asked if JollyGood could comment on the link I provided. Because the tag he left,  @Cryptomultiplier, is practically a mirror image of this link.
https://ninjastic.space/address/bc1qq8fy0hlc4ahyeejyyammc0fzfn82r23djw2xt2

Furthermore, I would like those who leave tags to also carefully check everything that is posted in the discussion of the topics started, and not rely on the first post without reading and conducting additional evidence.
I apologize for the links being provided from another thread, simply because the discussion concerns one person.

[Revolution2025]

<snip>

<snip>

Incredible! finally, seen people who are coming up with the truth that JollyGood gives most of his tags based on guts feeling and not because of strong evidence. So what will it profit him to tag numerous accounts wrongly without concrete evidence. It's high time his tags should not be taken seriously! and thanks to him for the role he played in bursting scams and cheaters which were actually correct in the past.

[nutildah]

Funny how the immediate go-to burn by trolls is "JollyBad," always flipping the second half of the name. But nobody ever thinks to flip the first half of the name. He could be "GlumGood" or "GlumBad".

It's high time his tags should not be taken seriously!

The thing is most of his tags are good. A lot of the time when he pre-emptively neutral tags some account deemed suspicious, his suspicions end up being correct. Neutral tags aren't so bad and negative tags should always require evidence, which Jolly brings to the table. I don't agree with his tags or methods all the time but I do more often than not, which is why it wouldn't be prudent to label all his tags as "unserious."

and thanks to him for the role he played in bursting scams and cheaters which were actually correct in the past.

He has a well above 50% hit rate. I think whatever inconvenience he causes some forum members is worth the overall good he contributes to the forum.

[JollyGood]

Firsts of all, congratulations on getting 10,000 merits. That takes some serious commitment to the cause as demonstrated by the fact not many have achieved it.

About the trolls, I had never thought about it until I read your post. There have been several trolls in the past creating names using 'Jolly' but disposing of 'Good'.

If in the coming days there is another assault by newbie accounts that were created for the specific reason to troll and they just happen to be called a name that ends in 'Good', the credit will be all yours  

Funny how the immediate go-to burn by trolls is "JollyBad," always flipping the second half of the name. But nobody ever thinks to flip the first half of the name. He could be "GlumGood" or "GlumBad".

[Vod]

Funny how the immediate go-to burn by trolls is "JollyBad," always flipping the second half of the name. But nobody ever thinks to flip the first half of the name. He could be "GlumGood" or "GlumBad".

Do you read what you write?   A troll being creative?      

[0x000369]

LOL this whole thread is wild
OP really made a burner account just to complain about tags and then has the audacity to say "I dont interact with alt accounts" 😂 Bro thats like a bank robber wearing a mask and then refusing to talk to anyone else wearing a mask because they might be suspicious
Also calling people "carnivorous animals" and saying JollyGood will "end up being poor for the rest of his life" is some next level salt energy like damn who hurt you
And then theres this gem: "A policeman who disguises in mofty to gather information and monitor the activities of criminals is a wise policeman"
MOFTY 💀
My guy you cant even spell "mufti" correctly but youre out here trying to lecture everyone about forum justice lmao
Real talk though if youre gonna make a complaint thread at least show us the receipts instead of just yelling into the void and expecting everyone to do your homework for you
This is peak forum entertainment right here somebody get the popcorn

[Shishir99]

Incredible! finally, seen people who are coming up with the truth that JollyGood gives most of his tags based on guts feeling and not because of strong evidence. So what will it profit him to tag numerous accounts wrongly without concrete evidence. It's high time his tags should not be taken seriously! and thanks to him for the role he played in bursting scams and cheaters which were actually correct in the past.

It should depend on the nature of the feedback, and people should review it carefully. You cannot simply ignore all the feedback he left for a reason. I must admit that he left some valuable feedback that should not be overlooked, despite some potentially controversial feedback. I don't know who you are, and which of your accounts got affected. You could have pointed that out so the community can revisit the feedback.

In most cases, if his feedback is correct, you are likely to get more feedback from the other DT members. I doubt he would revisit the tags he left if people do not confront him massively for the incorrect feedback.

[JollyGood]

I guess we all learn something new when we least expect it. I have never heard of the term mofty. Considering the post was made by a puppeteer OP I overlooked it as I skipped past most of his walls of text.

Here is what I found at Urban Dictionary, I think he referred to a mofty as "a waste person. doesnt deserve to be alive. swag people.".

The OP never declared the real reason he dislikes me. I suppose I tagged at least one of his accounts and maybe one or more account could have been removed from campaigns. Keeping that aside, I like the bank robber wearing the mask analogy.

LOL this whole thread is wild
OP really made a burner account just to complain about tags and then has the audacity to say "I dont interact with alt accounts" 😂 Bro thats like a bank robber wearing a mask and then refusing to talk to anyone else wearing a mask because they might be suspicious
Also calling people "carnivorous animals" and saying JollyGood will "end up being poor for the rest of his life" is some next level salt energy like damn who hurt you
And then theres this gem: "A policeman who disguises in mofty to gather information and monitor the activities of criminals is a wise policeman"
MOFTY 💀
My guy you cant even spell "mufti" correctly but youre out here trying to lecture everyone about forum justice lmao
Real talk though if youre gonna make a complaint thread at least show us the receipts instead of just yelling into the void and expecting everyone to do your homework for you
This is peak forum entertainment right here somebody get the popcorn

[logfiles]

And then theres this gem: "A policeman who disguises in mofty to gather information and monitor the activities of criminals is a wise policeman"
MOFTY 💀
My guy you cant even spell "mufti" correctly but youre out here trying to lecture everyone about forum justice lmao

Here is what I found at Urban Dictionary, I think he referred to a mofty as "a waste person. doesnt deserve to be alive. swag people.".

The OP never declared the real reason he dislikes me. I suppose I tagged at least one of his accounts, and maybe one or more account could have been removed from campaigns. Keeping that aside, I like the bank robber wearing the mask analogy.

I did a bit of research and the OP probably forgot and wrote it using his local board's native language or something like that. So the word mofty which is in Nigerian Pidgin English means;

Casual wear. Usually used when students in uniform are allowed to wear clothes of their choice. The clothes are referred to as mofty

I am quite certain a couple of OP's accounts are from that board, and it's likely part of the farms that were recently busted and tagged. Perhaps there might be more.

[Revolution2025]

<snipped trash>

I haven't been online for days now only to log in and see this trash