Our analysis determines our fate.

[giammangiato]

I did a personal analysis on the lottery game, both manually and relying on AI calculations.
According to which the lagging numbers (which the site already suggests as it has the historians of the extracted numbers) and probable combinations to obtain a pair or a triple have been calculated.
Doing some probability calculations looking at the history of the numbers released does not match the calculation I obtained with AI.
But this is not the point, I may have been wrong with my mathematical calculations, the point that there are series of numbers that come out more often by probability, other numbers also come out less often by probability, they do not have a temporal cadence and this leads to an imprecise calculation.
Basically any calculation we make, both for numbers and for matches is totally random, I don't want to be presumptuous but I would dare say also impossible.
There are so many achievable results and even worse variables in the case of matches that it is a utopia to think of predicting the results of a game based on AI alone.
It can certainly help you with your reasoning, but it can never give the exact answer for any reason.

[nara1892]

Each game in the casino has its own uniqueness. There are games that requires the gambler to depend solely on luck, there are also those that demands the gambler to depend solely on their skills with a little to no bit of luck and there are those that combines both skill and luck in order to the gambler to be successful in those games. So the first thing would be to discover which you should apply in the game you’re playing and apply it accordingly.

That's very true, things are like that when they are games that depend on skills, for example poker. Poker is one of the games that requires a lot of skill and strategy, but consequently , it does have something to do with having some luck.,That depends on the player's perspective, on what they want to develop and how, whether it's with skills or playing games that are only based on luck.

The case is almost exactly the same as sports betting where to get the results as expected, a gambler must combine strategy, skill and luck, if the problem of skills and strategy maybe it can be tried but if luck is something difficult because it is beyond our control, this is the reason why caution and limits must still be applied.
But as for the problem of choosing a game, of course it goes back to each person, the point is to understand how it works and not to exceed the limits.

[Fredomago]

I think it's viable to use the data processing power of AI to assist you in your own betting analysis. Just don't overexpose yourself financially; if your opinion differs, follow it and see what happens. The tools are available to help us and should be used, but they will never replace human judgment.

It is true that AI has been updated a lot and can analyze a lot of data, but I still give more priority to my own research, no matter how many updated tools we use, human decisions are the most acceptable for making any decision and AI can never take that place, it is never possible, no matter how much technology is updated. I think gambling based on AI is not the right decision at all, you have to depend on luck to win the bet, so your own research is better for gambling.

Your own decision making is the one that fits for your gambling though AI may help in finding those information and data about the game, and how the players or the team will have their advantages, those details might be useful but in terms of relying your bets from AI aside from very risky decision it's also no longer enjoyable, taking your own decisions ads up to the fun that you gained each time your session ended and the outcome turned to your favor.

[Dunamisx]

Its better that we make the analysis by ourself than waiting on the use of AI to do them for us, not that because they cant do or suggest for us, but the level of accuracy we may have cannot be to the satisfaction needed, therefore, every gambler should learn to make his own research and do things by himself for the better opportunity of himself and enjoy the best of his ability to play and predict in gambling.

[Betwrong]

I'm not sure what it is, but I think that in order for AI to function flawlessly in some ecosystems, some concepts still need to be improved, and also added.
When I research the use of AI for online sports betting, I find that most people who say they get good results using AI for sports betting it dont use ChatGPT and Google Assistant.
They use a special AI website, which seems to be created for sports betting prediction, and I'm not really sure how good the outcome is.

That's interesting. Can you provide a link? Because I think it costs a lot to create a specific AI not only for sports betting, but for anything. What can be done easy, though, is just creating a title promising some special abilities when there's none. I personally think that ChatGPT is enough to help you in making good analysis, but even in sports betting a lot depends on chance still.

Alright. To the best of my knowledge, certain AIs are superior to others in a particular field. It is just like simply using ChatGPT to produce an image when there's another AI that can produce a high quality image for you than using ChatGPT.
Back the question you ask me. I've never used the AI for sports betting predictions before, but I discovered it through a Reddit sports discussion subreddit group. It's called Betsync.

Thanks for your reply! I just checked and indeed there's such an AI called Betsync that, according to some gamblers, help them in making bets. At first I thought Betsync was created only for Apple users, and since have no products by Apple I couldn't use it, but then I thought there's a hope for me, and later, again, I found out that Betsync runs only on iOS (iPhone, iPad) and on macOS. So, probably, not for me, but I'd definitely try it if I were an Apple user.

[swogerino]

I always used to think like that any time I lost a parlay bet of 3 or more games in it. I come to realize later though that this is not because we lack to fully analyze an event, I have seen people analyzing an event for a full day before deciding to bet on it and I assume they have gotten all the data for the event, only to see that they also have a very high failure rate. Further thinking brought me to the same conclusion I have shared sometimes here which is there will always be an "outside" factor that will make things go bad and in popular sports like football there is always the referee impacting a game and making it end with a surprise result. So I would say that analysis does not determine our fate, luck does as always.

[eisen33]

It is true that AI can only be used as a tool to find additional information more quickly, but it cannot be used to make decisions. AI does not have feelings, so it cannot understand a team ambitions, mentality, or factors such as player fatigue. In addition, AI only presents a team performance based on available data, and if you forget to instruct it to review the history of rivalries, AI will not take that into account when providing information.

I agree that AI cannot be fully relied upon. If there are gamblers who frequently bet on sports, they must learn to analyze odds on their own. I think relying entirely on AI analysis is almost the same as trusting someone else analysis and then following their betting patterns. Therefore, it is better to sharpen one own skills without depending too much on AI or other people.

Have you tried selecting a few matches, analyzing them, and choosing a bet, and then asking the AI ​​to do the same for the same match? Something tells me it will mostly favor the favorite based on previous game statistics. I'm just judging by my own experience, and I almost never bet against favorites. But I'm not a successful gambler who can make money from gambling, so maybe other players have different approaches and choose their bets differently.

[Myleschetty]

I'm not sure what it is, but I think that in order for AI to function flawlessly in some ecosystems, some concepts still need to be improved, and also added.
When I research the use of AI for online sports betting, I find that most people who say they get good results using AI for sports betting it dont use ChatGPT and Google Assistant.
They use a special AI website, which seems to be created for sports betting prediction, and I'm not really sure how good the outcome is.

That's interesting. Can you provide a link? Because I think it costs a lot to create a specific AI not only for sports betting, but for anything. What can be done easy, though, is just creating a title promising some special abilities when there's none. I personally think that ChatGPT is enough to help you in making good analysis, but even in sports betting a lot depends on chance still.

Alright. To the best of my knowledge, certain AIs are superior to others in a particular field. It is just like simply using ChatGPT to produce an image when there's another AI that can produce a high quality image for you than using ChatGPT.
Back the question you ask me. I've never used the AI for sports betting predictions before, but I discovered it through a Reddit sports discussion subreddit group. It's called Betsync.

Thanks for your reply! I just checked and indeed there's such an AI called Betsync that, according to some gamblers, help them in making bets. At first I thought Betsync was created only for Apple users, and since have no products by Apple I couldn't use it, but then I thought there's a hope for me, and later, again, I found out that Betsync runs only on iOS (iPhone, iPad) and on macOS. So, probably, not for me, but I'd definitely try it if I were an Apple user.

You're welcome. Since iOS is the problem. Why not search their website on similarsites platform, which will provide you with alternative websites or their competitors in the AI sports prediction ecosystem.

[Aanuoluwatofunmi]

Try your best in making the necessary analysis, don't be too dependent, know that after everything has been made, it all takes risk and we cant just avoid such in gambling, we should also not depend on AI, though they may be useful in some aspect of information needed, but we have to know that they may not deliver to us as expected, therefore, we have to be deliberate in what we know or learnt, because they will all tell from how we gamble.

[dunfida]

Each game in the casino has its own uniqueness. There are games that requires the gambler to depend solely on luck, there are also those that demands the gambler to depend solely on their skills with a little to no bit of luck and there are those that combines both skill and luck in order to the gambler to be successful in those games. So the first thing would be to discover which you should apply in the game you’re playing and apply it accordingly.

That's very true, things are like that when they are games that depend on skills, for example poker. Poker is one of the games that requires a lot of skill and strategy, but consequently , it does have something to do with having some luck.,That depends on the player's perspective, on what they want to develop and how, whether it's with skills or playing games that are only based on luck.

The case is almost exactly the same as sports betting where to get the results as expected, a gambler must combine strategy, skill and luck, if the problem of skills and strategy maybe it can be tried but if luck is something difficult because it is beyond our control, this is the reason why caution and limits must still be applied.
But as for the problem of choosing a game, of course it goes back to each person, the point is to understand how it works and not to exceed the limits.

Sports betting is something that you would be needing up some skills for you to be able to have at least a worthy bet or something that you can say or would be confident that you had made out the right choice, but since we do know that gambling/betting will still be needing up some luck because no matter how good your analysis would be but if luck wont be at your side then you would definitely lose, but in the best approach when dealing up with sports betting and some strategic based games like poker on which skills and experience will really count on which this will be that also adding up on the probability that you will be able to win up a particular bet. Speaking about fate then you shouldnt be going into that serious matter about fate or what because everything will be just that depending into your self control specially on gambling spending.

Dont make yourself that being too naive about making yourself a constant winner because it cant be just that possible because that will be causing up that kind of greedyness and desperation on which we know that this would really be very bad for you.

[WhoYouCantKill]

Sports betting is something that you would be needing up some skills for you to be able to have at least a worthy bet or something that you can say or would be confident that you had made out the right choice, but since we do know that gambling/betting will still be needing up some luck because no matter how good your analysis would be but if luck wont be at your side then you would definitely lose, but in the best approach when dealing up with sports betting and some strategic based games like poker on which skills and experience will really count on which this will be that also adding up on the probability that you will be able to win up a particular bet. Speaking about fate then you shouldnt be going into that serious matter about fate or what because everything will be just that depending into your self control specially on gambling spending.

Dont make yourself that being too naive about making yourself a constant winner because it cant be just that possible because that will be causing up that kind of greedyness and desperation on which we know that this would really be very bad for you.

People tend to focus so much on winning that they often forget about not losing. Like we know, as far as gambling is concerned, losses are inevitable and we can’t control that part,  it what we can control how much we lose, whether a gambler lose more or less is completely dependent on them, when you focus more on winning then you kind of make yourself vulnerable to losses. But when we also prepare for the losses, by having the consciousness that we tend to lose more than we win, even when the losses comes, we won’t feel it that much because we were already expecting it and is already prepared for it.

[Youngrebel]

I've always been interested in some posts/discussions that relate AI can help us in betting especially in sportsbetting because some of us even quite confidently say that AI predictions can be greater than our own analysis in terms of percentage. like some post This which is got me interested do some steps testing.

Can AI really predict the outcome of a sports match?
If personal prediction is failing you try AI prediction it works 65%

because I'm participating in a contest on Sportsbet.io's English Premier League Pools So this could be something that encourages me to get a test whether the AI analysis is that good or not.
Last week in week 16 of the EPL I tried asking several AIs such as google assistant and Chat GPT (I also tried deepseek but the data became less meaningful so I didn't enter it) and this is what I got.

Predictions for week 16 EPL chat GPT                                                
 


Predictions for week 16 on google assistent


My personal analysis on Superbru

I tried to compare with the system in superbru where when the score is correct it will be assessed with 3 points, if the score is close it will count 1.5 points and if it is wrong then it is 0 points.
and here are the results of the whole.



From this I have concluded that in the end AI is still AI where it cannot be used as a benchmark for making decisions and can only be an auxiliary reference rather than a direct decision.

Although my personal analysis is also not very good because from 10 matches only 11 points (which should be if the perfect point means 30 points) but my personal analysis is slightly better than the predictions made by several AIs where there are only 5 and 7.5 points if I calculate with the format that superbru does.
So from this even though in the end AI becomes an important element for now but we should not make this too much as a benchmark because in the end in gambling especially in betting of course our own decisions determine our fate.

Does it really matter who gives a prediction before you play that can affect it positively or negatively? Regardless of your analytical skills when placing your bet, if youare not lucky on tuat day onthe game played then its certainly not your day for a win and as such we should give it a quite for that day or time and ty again some other time..

[xenomorfo]

I don't believe so much in using AI for prediction because I add a little bit of my personal sentiment in my analysis which make me completely ignore some teams irrespective of what the data says. For instance, I will never bet on Borussia Dortmund, Manchester United and Liverpool now irrespective of who they place. If you put these teams in AI, they will give clear signals but in reality, they are super inconsistent to me and have caused me more losses than I have won with them. In this case, avoiding them is the best decision to take.

Look, I will never be able to understand the use of artificial intelligence in a game, a game, let's talk about a game, even dependent on luck, also because, precisely, we must use gambling as a pastime, not as a way to make money. Anyone who claims to use AI to win and make money is making a huge mistake.

[martinom]

From this I have concluded that in the end AI is still AI where it cannot be used as a benchmark for making decisions and can only be an auxiliary reference rather than a direct decision.

Although my personal analysis is also not very good because from 10 matches only 11 points (which should be if the perfect point means 30 points) but my personal analysis is slightly better than the predictions made by several AIs where there are only 5 and 7.5 points if I calculate with the format that superbru does.
So from this even though in the end AI becomes an important element for now but we should not make this too much as a benchmark because in the end in gambling especially in betting of course our own decisions determine our fate.

Thanks for your analysis, this confirms what I already thought: that AI is absolutely useless when it comes to sports and betting.

I thought so but I wasn't sure, with your fantastic experiment we are now certain that AI is absolutely useless in this sector.