Our analysis determines our fate.

[Myleschetty]

I'm not sure what it is, but I think that in order for AI to function flawlessly in some ecosystems, some concepts still need to be improved, and also added.
When I research the use of AI for online sports betting, I find that most people who say they get good results using AI for sports betting it dont use ChatGPT and Google Assistant.
They use a special AI website, which seems to be created for sports betting prediction, and I'm not really sure how good the outcome is.

[sompitonov]

Instead of asking AI to pick the answer for you, that can be used to make the analysis a lot easier, you can use the appropriate promt to get the data at ease and there you can compare and make your own analysis that is how one should use the AI tools in the sports betting instead of giving the answer and ask it to pick one for us because it does with the criteria we ask but it doesn't necessarily mean we will end up winning that bet.

You need to look for things in upcoming games, specifically the players' overall condition, their ability to play on flags, and other things, even things that most people don't think about, things that aren't obvious. I think this is important, and professional bettors do it, of course, by comparing and choosing the best odds on various platforms. I don't do that, but I remember a time when I realized a team wasn't playing the best in a championship, but the worst, so I looked at the odds and if they were too high for them, I simply bet on them to lose, and I ended up winning pretty well, which, of course, makes me happy. I don't even think it's luck, but rather something I noticed that others didn't.

[Pandu Geddon]

So from this even though in the end AI becomes an important element for now but we should not make this too much as a benchmark because in the end in gambling especially in betting of course our own decisions determine our fate.

What we need to understand is that AI can help us, but it does not provide an instant solution. I don’t know how bored gamblers feel to the point that they fully trust the predictions given by AI. 
Some students use AI to answer questions, which can be helpful because AI has data for answers that already exist in text. But for betting, which involves something that hasn’t happened yet and whose outcome is unknown, don’t use AI as a guide for making bets.

[Findingnemo]

Instead of asking AI to pick the answer for you, that can be used to make the analysis a lot easier, you can use the appropriate promt to get the data at ease and there you can compare and make your own analysis that is how one should use the AI tools in the sports betting instead of giving the answer and ask it to pick one for us because it does with the criteria we ask but it doesn't necessarily mean we will end up winning that bet.

You need to look for things in upcoming games, specifically the players' overall condition, their ability to play on flags, and other things, even things that most people don't think about, things that aren't obvious. I think this is important, and professional bettors do it, of course, by comparing and choosing the best odds on various platforms. I don't do that, but I remember a time when I realized a team wasn't playing the best in a championship, but the worst, so I looked at the odds and if they were too high for them, I simply bet on them to lose, and I ended up winning pretty well, which, of course, makes me happy. I don't even think it's luck, but rather something I noticed that others didn't.

You may think that you took an educated guess but what you really did was a brave call in the situation, and it paid off. This is what others call it lucky and this happens quite commonly in sports betting and we can't really find which one is the reason.

But no one can predict the future, any team can have a bad day even if they are on their peak form that is why there's set of people who wants to bet on the underdogs or least favorites.

[Wakate]

What we need to understand is that AI can help us, but it does not provide an instant solution. I don’t know how bored gamblers feel to the point that they fully trust the predictions given by AI. 
Some students use AI to answer questions, which can be helpful because AI has data for answers that already exist in text. But for betting, which involves something that hasn’t happened yet and whose outcome is unknown, don’t use AI as a guide for making bets.

It is true that using AI can help gamblers to get a good prediction from betting on sport games but we don't have to heavily rely on it because their is no way it can be profitable for us putting all hope on predictions from AI. It is better to match your predictions with the one AI is giving you so that you can be at a safer side without losing too much money because of wrong predictions.

[SFR10]

because some of us even quite confidently say that AI predictions can be greater than our own analysis in terms of percentage.

I haven't read every single comment on those two threads, but I'd be surprised to see the number of users who don't believe in AI predictions not to be two to three times the number of those who are praising AI.

From this I have concluded that in the end AI is still AI where it cannot be used as a benchmark for making decisions and can only be an auxiliary reference rather than a direct decision.
...
in the end in gambling especially in betting of course our own decisions determine our fate.

One of the biggest issues with AIs is that not everything in their database is accurate and considering its huge scale, it'd take a very long time to correct a lot of those, so the end result would usually be worse.
^{- BTW, we also need a lot of luck in sports betting}

Although my personal analysis is also not very good because from 10 matches only 11 points (which should be if the perfect point means 30 points)

If it makes you feel any better, your analysis has been way better than mine in the previous week ^{["you win some, you lose some"]}.

[Marvelockg]

From this I have concluded that in the end AI is still AI where it cannot be used as a benchmark for making decisions and can only be an auxiliary reference rather than a direct decision.

Can't agree less. Though AI might be a good option when it comes to fetching certain data that helps on every out his analysis before making any predictions, AI alone can not make a reasonable prediction that can give you a legit win no matter how good the AI is.  The best way to make use of AI is just as an aid and nothing more. Give allow it fetch data for you as a fast speed while you take your time to study the data and then make an informed decision from that. Even with that, gambling will still be unpredictable and making your prediction on your own or depending on an AI for your prediction can at the same time lead to utter failure because not an AI or your ability to do constructive analysis can give a thorough insight into the future which is what most games are all about.

[Akbarkoe]

What we need to understand is that AI can help us, but it does not provide an instant solution. I don’t know how bored gamblers feel to the point that they fully trust the predictions given by AI. 
Some students use AI to answer questions, which can be helpful because AI has data for answers that already exist in text. But for betting, which involves something that hasn’t happened yet and whose outcome is unknown, don’t use AI as a guide for making bets.

It is true that using AI can help gamblers to get a good prediction from betting on sport games but we don't have to heavily rely on it because their is no way it can be profitable for us putting all hope on predictions from AI. It is better to match your predictions with the one AI is giving you so that you can be at a safer side without losing too much money because of wrong predictions.

Dependence is a bad thing that makes everything bad in the long run, from the beginning no one recommends using AI for final decisions in gambling or any bet, maybe it is true that AI can only be used as another reference source or discussion partner, that is much more appropriate, I have also done a trial test like this and the results are bad, better than my instincts even though AI uses statistics they still cannot predict the future, don't depend on things like that is a wise choice that we can take in this modern era.

[Hispo]

I'm not sure what it is, but I think that in order for AI to function flawlessly in some ecosystems, some concepts still need to be improved, and also added.
When I research the use of AI for online sports betting, I find that most people who say they get good results using AI for sports betting it dont use ChatGPT and Google Assistant.
They use a special AI website, which seems to be created for sports betting prediction, and I'm not really sure how good the outcome is.

If people are serious about using Artificial intelligence in order to improve their chances of winning, then they should not go for Gemini, Chat GPT or other default AIs which do not specialize in sport betting and gambling, it would be more productive to code and train one's own AI specialized in a single sport, able to collect data and calculate chances accurately.
In the end, there are no AIs which could work flawlessly, as there are entropy involved in each match we bet in, such entropy cannot be calculated or anticipated, otherwise, there would be algorithms able to predicts sport outcomes with a complete and absolute accuracy, that does not happen in real life.

[JeffBrad12]

I'm not sure what it is, but I think that in order for AI to function flawlessly in some ecosystems, some concepts still need to be improved, and also added.
When I research the use of AI for online sports betting, I find that most people who say they get good results using AI for sports betting it dont use ChatGPT and Google Assistant.
They use a special AI website, which seems to be created for sports betting prediction, and I'm not really sure how good the outcome is.

The LLM is still being limited to the data gets supplied. It can't cover the real time even like player injury or something else. I'm wondering in what place you find many who said AI was good for sportbetting while the fact many said the opposite as its limitation to process the real time event often gave inaccurate prediction.
Especially when you also need a methodology to run it into a model that can processing your request to know what team to pick when you get trapped in the middle.

As far as i know there was no special AI website for sportbetting exist. Mostly of AI being trained by the creator through the data supplied, and it's important to remember different AI, different methodology used.

[Ryu_Ar1]

No matter how much you analyze using AI from different tools it still won't be a benchmark --- even when the results are worse than we think making your own decisions is best in sports betting coupled with a strong feeling can determine your betting confidence.

That's what I want to emphasize right now but it seems like some of us are overestimating AI. Even though this technology is amazing but in the end the decision is still our own to determine in any case including gambling and AI is just an auxiliary tool.

This is a good test to make a decent comparison, mate. In the end, nothing is certain in gambling. In week 16 of the PL, you were better than all the AI ​​predictions, but in week 17 or 18, it could be that the AI ​​predictions are better & more accurate, that's the reality. Personally, I'm not convinced by all the predictions I see. IMO, that's the stupidest way to lose money at sportsbook. I'd rather lose money based on my analysis & confidence, it gives me experience & lessons.

I actually wanted to do week 17 but time constraints (I've been working late at my real-world job lately) made this a bit of a distraction and it looks like I'll be adding week 18 later since week 17 has already passed.

When we lose with our own analysis it will be much more comfortable (although there is a sense of annoyance) but at least we burn our money with our own analysis but when we rely on AI as a benchmark and actually lose then in the end this may create new conflicts where we can blame third parties in the gambling we do which makes us even more stupid in the end.

AI is good for the past game research only, while it can't be used to determine the upcoming result as it's relied upon the past game data. So theoretically, using AI for the future prediction is possible, but it's gonna be less accurate caused by it used past game data. Meanwhile, game result determination involved so many variables that can happen anytime such as injury, gameplay change, subs, and etc.

This is the reason using AI for the sportbetting is just wasting of time.

Since the nature of AI is more based on retrieving existing data, it would be quite natural when this happens. The matches that have taken place they could be much better in terms of analysis than us because AI resources are clearly adequate as long as there is a good connection for their search engine then they can manage large data. But for the matches that will take place in the end, the situation will obviously be different so this should be a consideration that AI is only good as a helper, not as a benchmark and we let AI make decisions that we should do.

I have never used AI to predict it directly, because AI usually refers to big teams or clubs that are predicted to win, but if we analyze it directly, it is not too complicated to look at 5 matches and look at the main players, it is enough to be an idea.

This directly shows that in the end we can figure out and come to a conclusion for the decision we want to make. This is what I want to emphasize more for some people who still make decisions that only copy from AI, something like that might happen for some of us who are lucky like from some of the threads that I did this on but it's just pure luck.

So from this even though in the end AI becomes an important element for now but we should not make this too much as a benchmark because in the end in gambling especially in betting of course our own decisions determine our fate.

What we need to understand is that AI can help us, but it does not provide an instant solution. I don’t know how bored gamblers feel to the point that they fully trust the predictions given by AI. 
Some students use AI to answer questions, which can be helpful because AI has data for answers that already exist in text. But for betting, which involves something that hasn’t happened yet and whose outcome is unknown, don’t use AI as a guide for making bets.

That's why I said that this is still one of the important elements because AI for now is obviously very helpful but it doesn't mean that everything has to deal with AI because not everything can be solved with AI.

[Derekfunds]

I'm not sure what it is, but I think that in order for AI to function flawlessly in some ecosystems, some concepts still need to be improved, and also added.
When I research the use of AI for online sports betting, I find that most people who say they get good results using AI for sports betting it dont use ChatGPT and Google Assistant.
They use a special AI website, which seems to be created for sports betting prediction, and I'm not really sure how good the outcome is.

Absolutely correct, and even if they created those AI for that specific function or task I still think and believe it can not be 100 percent efficient and accurate because it is done by human and human being is not 100 percent accurate I mean there are lapses they can not fill and that is where deficiency will come out. And sometimes I wonder when people say they use AI to get a prediction and make a bet and to some extent we are better those AI and I can give myself a nice prediction than what AI can give and if this AI thing is that good I think a lot of people would have been using it.

[$crypto$]

No matter how much you analyze using AI from different tools it still won't be a benchmark --- even when the results are worse than we think making your own decisions is best in sports betting coupled with a strong feeling can determine your betting confidence.

That's what I want to emphasize right now but it seems like some of us are overestimating AI. Even though this technology is amazing but in the end the decision is still our own to determine in any case including gambling and AI is just an auxiliary tool.

Let's just say that AI is a sophisticated and fast tool --- don't overestimate it, let alone expect an absolute victory with the help of AI, if it fails you will be disappointed.
Until now I still continue to use AI only to find information, whether it's for betting, crypto markets and other news --- still don't fixate everything on AI alone.

[danadc]

Let's just say that AI is a sophisticated and fast tool --- don't overestimate it, let alone expect an absolute victory with the help of AI, if it fails you will be disappointed.
Until now I still continue to use AI only to find information, whether it's for betting, crypto markets and other news --- still don't fixate everything on AI alone.

It's true, we shouldn't get carried away by what seems supreme or very good this has its limitations,AI helps a lot, and the advantage of those that are paid for is that they are updated, but they are not the holy grail They are a great help, but they don't have the capacity to make exact predictions In fact, there is no one who can give exact predictions in games or in trading everything is a bet on our analysis.

[uchegod-21]

I can never rely solely on AI for anything. The kind of feedback or response AI gives depends solely on the kind of prompt you gave to it, which means that an inaccurate prompt will give inaccurate feedback. I once sought for answers to a crucial question I needed clarification on and I was disappointed to get answers that were not up to date. If that question was related to football, a bettor who trust AI 100% will form his decision base on that outdated information gotten from AI.

Op's analysis has already settled it all and it is now obvious that AI are not to be relied on when making betting decisions. Some of the data available to AI are not up to date. Just like op did, bettors should always compare their analysis closely before drawing conclusions.

[Mahiyammahi]

I hope op didn't placed any bets based on this prediction. So which prediction you made first? Your own prediction or AI prediction. Since human psychology and minds works differently than AI , if you have predict the match result with AI first it could have effect your personal analysis.

Your analysis score was good. But if you wants to try this on gambling I think a bit more accuracy is needed when the money is involed. Still congratulations for your such a great achievement. Sometimes AI statistics ain't the final result 😁

[Jatiluhung]

I'm not sure what it is, but I think that in order for AI to function flawlessly in some ecosystems, some concepts still need to be improved, and also added.
When I research the use of AI for online sports betting, I find that most people who say they get good results using AI for sports betting it dont use ChatGPT and Google Assistant.
They use a special AI website, which seems to be created for sports betting prediction, and I'm not really sure how good the outcome is.

Actually, I'm not sure the results will be any different, but it might be worth a try.  It's just that I personally prefer and trust my own analysis more than the analysis made by AI, because sometimes AI has limited information since they can only analyze updated information. But when they haven't updated the information, it can make their analysis less accurate. For example, in soccer, there are sometimes players who suffer minor injuries, accumulate red cards, or face other issues that can alter a club's structure or strategy for upcoming matches. AI doesn't always accurately capture the latest information. Some AI systems I've tried also have limitations due to this. This is especially true if we use free AI and haven't upgraded to a paid version.

[Bright0515]

No matter how much you analyze using AI from different tools it still won't be a benchmark --- even when the results are worse than we think making your own decisions is best in sports betting coupled with a strong feeling can determine your betting confidence.

I use AI only as a tool for analysis and some absent players, the rest is looking at h2h etc.
Sometimes I feel my own bets are better than AI.

people place too.much reliance on ai thinking that is capable of doing everything but that is not really how it works. Ai only gives results based on it's capabilities and what it was programmed for. I have used ai on few occasions and the results were not really as impressive as I thought it would be, I had multiple losses and using my instincts would have been far better than what I made use of. Ai cannot predict football accurately even if some have been able to get lucky from it

[Furious 7]

I'm not sure what it is, but I think that in order for AI to function flawlessly in some ecosystems, some concepts still need to be improved, and also added.
When I research the use of AI for online sports betting, I find that most people who say they get good results using AI for sports betting it dont use ChatGPT and Google Assistant.
They use a special AI website, which seems to be created for sports betting prediction, and I'm not really sure how good the outcome is.

This can happen because the centralization of the function of AI may only be an assistant for analysis and those who bet only use the analysis material for faster information gathering and can determine where they will bet.
For this condition, it is understandable when AI is a helper because after all, that is the job of AI.
I don't think there is a special AI to predict anything in betting because everything will be the same where AI only makes data on the internet as a reference for them to find references and make this as a basic conclusion which after that we are the gamblers who decide what we are looking for and assisted by AI.

AI analysis always looks very good and very easy compared to us looking for ourselves but still in the conclusion including to decide to bet we ourselves have to do this.

[HONDACD125]

I'm not sure what it is, but I think that in order for AI to function flawlessly in some ecosystems, some concepts still need to be improved, and also added.
When I research the use of AI for online sports betting, I find that most people who say they get good results using AI for sports betting it dont use ChatGPT and Google Assistant.
They use a special AI website, which seems to be created for sports betting prediction, and I'm not really sure how good the outcome is.

I wouldn't recommend using an AI to make sports betting predictions, even if it's an AI specifically crafted or programmed for that thing, because at the end of the day, it's an AI model, and AI models use data that has been fed to them to do their analysis, or even if they can access the internet, you can't always find all the updates on the internet, especially if something is very new, it comes later on the internet, so the AI model might miss important updates that might make a big impact on a game, and that could make the predictions go wrong.

So I think sports bettors shouldn't rely on such tools to make their predictions but they should use their own sources, their own understanding of the game they are making bets on, because a human can always stay more updated about things if they make some efforts for it, and a machine, no matter how advanced or fast it is, will usually get some updates later than humans, and that can be a disadvantage.