SINGLE BETTING IS WITH LESSER RISK THAN ACCUMULATED GAMES

[Fivestar4everMVP]

The mindset of be coming rich overnight will not allow ourselves see that there are a better opportunity to win if not everyday but every week if we eventually single our games than accumulating so many games in one stake, and i noticed that the poor Masses are the one staking so many games just to win millions in a ticket and while the rich men will just be interested in a single game that he can put money and he will eaten as much he can single, while to is fews ones that has making through so much accumulating of games, so there are so many risky in accumulating many games than a single game, we should reduce the ambition of winning big money from gambling but constantly winning with singles.

Even with single games, it's still sometimes very hard to maintain constant winning, and this simply mean that it is very possible to accumulate a lot of loss even while focusing on betting on single games..

The only disadvantage I see with betting on multiple games in one ticket is that the bettor end up losing every game on that ticket including the ones he or she could have won if only the games where separated and placed as single bets.
But on the other hand, disregarding the disadvantage of multi-betting, I still prefer multi-bet because this is high profitable, though risk is much higher but when done with money one can easily afford to lose, I see no problem at all.

[rachael9385]

The mindset of be coming rich overnight will not allow ourselves see that there are a better opportunity to win if not everyday but every week if we eventually single our games than accumulating so many games in one stake, and i noticed that the poor Masses are the one staking so many games just to win millions in a ticket and while the rich men will just be interested in a single game that he can put money and he will eaten as much he can single, while to is fews ones that has making through so much accumulating of games, so there are so many risky in accumulating many games than a single game, we should reduce the ambition of winning big money from gambling but constantly winning with singles.

With good analysis and risk management single bets would be a lot more profitable in the long term than accumulated games in the long run. accumulated games comes with a lot of risks, combining more than four games in a bet slip reduces the chances of winning that bet. The only downside about single games is that you would have to stake high because this is the only way to benefit from iy

[Muba20]

The mindset of be coming rich overnight will not allow ourselves see that there are a better opportunity to win if not everyday but every week if we eventually single our games than accumulating so many games in one stake, and i noticed that the poor Masses are the one staking so many games just to win millions in a ticket and while the rich men will just be interested in a single game that he can put money and he will eaten as much he can single, while to is fews ones that has making through so much accumulating of games, so there are so many risky in accumulating many games than a single game, we should reduce the ambition of winning big money from gambling but constantly winning with singles.

Accumulator bets have a golden opportunity to get more reward for less money. But that opportunity will not be easily grasped, that is the reality. There are very few gamblers who win in such bets. It is completely foolish to rely on such bets. Single bets are comparatively quite good. The bettor can be a little more confident. Those who understand better usually choose single match bets, as their chances are much higher. I will never be interested in placing Accumulator bets with the aim of winning big. Even if the win is small, it is much safer to place bets on single matches. Those who think realistically will be more interested in single bets.

[Mrbluntzy]

People that usually go for accumulated games are deceived by the massive potential wins that they are expecting win if peradventure all the games are successful and because they are already overwhelmed by such high expectations, they won't realize that the risk of losing the bet is also very high than betting on single game, I only bet on single games because I'm very confident with it than accumulating so much games that one bad lose can destroy the bet. I always have double thought each time I bet on accumulated games, I don't know how others manage it very well.

[Bigjoe33]

Offcourse, single bet offers somewhat more opportunities of winning, but it's a two way thing. When you decide you reduce your games in a ticket, and then bet on a single match, you should also know that the odds will be very minute, and then, for you to win something tangible, you have to stake high, I mean very high. And at this point, if you loose, you have lost something too big. And on the other hand, when you stage on multiple bets, you can easily reduce your stake and still stand a chance to win something good enough. So, for me, staking a single bet is good, is it really worth it, I mean to stake very high since the odd is very small? What if you loose the bet, can you stand the loss? It's still gambling remember,, nothing is promised at all? It still remains at, wether it's a single bet or multiple bets, you must bet what you can afford to loss

[ShowOff]

Offcourse, single bet offers somewhat more opportunities of winning, but it's a two way thing. When you decide you reduce your games in a ticket, and then bet on a single match, you should also know that the odds will be very minute, and then, for you to win something tangible, you have to stake high, I mean very high. And at this point, if you loose, you have lost something too big. And on the other hand, when you stage on multiple bets, you can easily reduce your stake and still stand a chance to win something good enough. So, for me, staking a single bet is good, is it really worth it, I mean to stake very high since the odd is very small? What if you loose the bet, can you stand the loss? It's still gambling remember,, nothing is promised at all? It still remains at, wether it's a single bet or multiple bets, you must bet what you can afford to loss

I think it all comes down to each individual. Some people who enjoy taking risks but do not have large capital will tend to choose multi bets. It cannot be denied that single bets offer a higher chance of winning, but bookmakers often provide odds that are too low. If examined more closely, bookmakers have actually calculated all possible outcomes, and they are in a more advantageous position.

Indeed, choosing between single or multi bets both involve risk, and there is no guarantee of winning, it all depends on luck. Surprises can happen at any time, an undefeated team can sometimes cause many bettors to suffer huge losses.

[SOKO-DEKE]

The mindset of be coming rich overnight will not allow ourselves see that there are a better opportunity to win if not everyday but every week if we eventually single our games than accumulating so many games in one stake, and i noticed that the poor Masses are the one staking so many games just to win millions in a ticket and while the rich men will just be interested in a single game that he can put money and he will eaten as much he can single, while to is fews ones that has making through so much accumulating of games, so there are so many risky in accumulating many games than a single game, we should reduce the ambition of winning big money from gambling but constantly winning with singles.

Yes, single game stakes should be less risky than accumulating many games stake. The chances of winning multiple selections are always high but they also have their own risks. If someone wants to bet on a single game, they have to stake with large amount of money just to win a reasonable amount, and there is still no guarantee that the game will go as predicted. So staking higher is also risky.

Let just believe that gambling is all about luck and no matter how many strategies someone uses, if someone is lucky, they will win the game. There are many people who stake on multiple games and get big winnings, and there are also those who bet on a single game and still lose. An example is Drake: he has bet on single games and has lost many times before. So no game is guaranteed.

[Dunamisx]

On a normal day, when we play single bet, we are going to have more higher chances of winning because the bet is a single one and we are not playing a multiple bets slip, which may have more risk of winning because the number of bets is more higher in this situation, but also, the amount of staking is also important to balance up with the bets.

[xLays]

The mindset of be coming rich overnight will not allow ourselves see that there are a better opportunity to win if not everyday but every week if we eventually single our games than accumulating so many games in one stake, and i noticed that the poor Masses are the one staking so many games just to win millions in a ticket and while the rich men will just be interested in a single game that he can put money and he will eaten as much he can single, while to is fews ones that has making through so much accumulating of games, so there are so many risky in accumulating many games than a single game, we should reduce the ambition of winning big money from gambling but constantly winning with singles.

Yes, this is actually the reason why I’ve recently felt that I lose more money on parlays compared to single bets. Because of that, I’m planning next year to avoid parlays as much as possible and focus mainly on single bets.
I really wish casinos had a feature that shows separate statistics for single bets and parlay bets. If I could see those stats on my account, I’m pretty sure I’m not even winning 1% of my parlay bets. Unfortunately, I don’t think this feature will ever happen, since casinos probably don’t want players to realize how unprofitable parlays really are.

[AmoreJaz]

People that usually go for accumulated games are deceived by the massive potential wins that they are expecting win if peradventure all the games are successful and because they are already overwhelmed by such high expectations, they won't realize that the risk of losing the bet is also very high than betting on single game, I only bet on single games because I'm very confident with it than accumulating so much games that one bad lose can destroy the bet. I always have double thought each time I bet on accumulated games, I don't know how others manage it very well.

Of course, that's the reason why they are doing the multi-bets, for bigger profits. However, this type of betting is only good if you really know the sports very well and you are very familiar with all the betting lines in your line-up. Because the risk here is higher than single bet. One losing bet and you're done. This is why you need to be very careful in selecting those betting lines. Much better if you have actual knowledge of what you are betting with.

[livingfree]

The only disadvantage I see with betting on multiple games in one ticket is that the bettor end up losing every game on that ticket including the ones he or she could have won if only the games where separated and placed as single bets.
But on the other hand, disregarding the disadvantage of multi-betting, I still prefer multi-bet because this is high profitable, though risk is much higher but when done with money one can easily afford to lose, I see no problem at all.

That's simply the ratio about being 'high risk, high reward' and that's multi bets are.

While I am avoiding to get into multi bets, sometimes it gets exciting when many of these games have come at same time and you're interested to bet with all of them.

It's about winning all of the bets and there is no room for a single mistake and loss from all of those bets you've made.

[MRY]

People that usually go for accumulated games are deceived by the massive potential wins that they are expecting win if peradventure all the games are successful and because they are already overwhelmed by such high expectations, they won't realize that the risk of losing the bet is also very high than betting on single game, I only bet on single games because I'm very confident with it than accumulating so much games that one bad lose can destroy the bet. I always have double thought each time I bet on accumulated games, I don't know how others manage it very well.

Of course, that's the reason why they are doing the multi-bets, for bigger profits. However, this type of betting is only good if you really know the sports very well and you are very familiar with all the betting lines in your line-up. Because the risk here is higher than single bet. One losing bet and you're done. This is why you need to be very careful in selecting those betting lines. Much better if you have actual knowledge of what you are betting with.

There is accumulation strategies which promise good returns but the success rate is too poor that it is not accessible to people of average. It is a valid point that you require extensive knowledge of information to prevent being entangled in expensive uninformed conjectures. You have to lose all your capital because of one simple small mistake, and it is not a good reality to learn. With a strong base of knowledge we are able to make a more objective evaluation of every risk prior to investment in a very difficult combination of money.

[Raflesia]

Actually in this case for those people whose economic quality is below average they are not too much in spending money (if calculated nominally) but they often do it because it is not uncommon for them to continue playing when they have money that they can bet in the hope that they can get better returns to support their lives.

On the other hand adrenaline becomes a differentiating situation in this case because sometimes multi bets have more adrenaline that makes us sometimes more motivated than single bets even though the main reason is obviously back to money because in the end multi bets will be much more profitable than single bets.
But is that wrong? Of course not because every gambler must know the risks and when they are in multi which does provide a much greater return but the risks that will be faced are also clearly greater than single.

Our passion to find a quick way out of dismal financial situations is evidenced by the decision to make numerous profits by numerous bets. I believe that the massive heartbeat of being exposed to high risks is what makes this activity have more life. You demonstrate that every people always has their own calculations in calculating the boundaries of courage which it is ready to go in the name of its future. To the extent as we know of the possible rewards and losses, that course is a life choice.

It's just that in this case we also have to pay attention to our conditions, especially in terms of finances owned, especially with the allocation we give in gambling because not all bets can be done with multiple.

There are some moments where we also cannot be too aggressive in gambling that is done even in this case we know that the opportunity to get bigger money is definitely happening but in some moments we also have to be more able to relax with what we have and not be too ambitious in gambling.
Being in the multi is great for some people but those who can't afford the risk of course have to rethink about this so that it can be a consideration that we need to pay attention to before betting.