Corruption at the deepest levels? (The Mopar Cult)

[Kazkaz27]

Suspected Alt Accounts: MoparMiningLLC and anonymousminer Operated by the Same Individual

I believe the Bitcointalk forum accounts “MoparMiningLLC” (user ID 1478835, registered December 20, 2017) and “anonymousminer” (user ID 1668017, registered January 11, 2018) are operated by the same individual.[1][2][3][4]

Substantial evidence suggests this person has used these accounts to shill products, manipulate bids in auctions, discredit competitors, and engage in fraudulent activities—such as involvement in the Titan Mint scam—that have resulted in the theft of significant sums from community members.[5][6][7][8]

I believe MoparMiningLLC is used for more professional interactions, such as business promotions and sales in the collectibles and mining sections, while anonymousminer acts as an alt account to attack critics, defend the main account, and engage in more aggressive behaviors without directly risking the professional reputation.

Both accounts are active in the collectibles section, share interests in Bitcoin mining and physical crypto items, and exhibit overlapping patterns in trust ratings, merit distribution, and thread participation.[9][10]

The accounts were registered within weeks of each other and both achieved “Legendary” status with high activity levels—MoparMiningLLC has over 10,500 posts and 3,155 merit, while anonymousminer has around 3,300 posts and 1,363 merit.[1][2]

They frequently exchange merit, with documented instances where they exchange merit to each other on simple auction threads or discriminatory remarks which target members they deem as opposition. Both maintain strong trust ratings (dark green on BPIP), often from overlapping community members in collectibles and mining discussions.[3][4]

Notably, MoparMiningLLC’s profile includes an EIN attached to their account, which publicly reveals more information about the associated business and can be used to access additional public records.
Regarding corrupt actions, in the ongoing Titan Mint scam thread (spanning hundreds of posts since 2021), multiple users have accused MoparMiningLLC of being an accomplice, including one threatening to file a police report for “receiving stolen funds” in January 2024, and another labeling them a “shill wallet salesman” for promoting products amid scam discussions in October 2022.[6][7][8]

The thread details Titan Mint’s failure to honor 2FA coin redemptions, leading to estimated losses in the thousands, with calls to report to FINCEN under case #883150.[5][11][12]

Similar patterns appear in collectibles auctions, where shill bidding discussions highlight manipulative tactics, and MoparMiningLLC has been flagged in related merit exchanges and raffle/auction threads for potential bid inflation.

These behaviors have drawn community scrutiny, including accusations of discrediting critics through thread derails and retaliatory feedback. [13]

Sidenote: If this is true, we have a deep seated problem that’s been brewing for a long time which has caused tremendous harm. It explains why so many rivals are inside of our small community and the inside monopoly that’s eating away at our community.

Call to Action: My call to action is only that we as a community do our due diligence. Bitcoin is trustless but the system we have here is not. The power we give to people should not be abused and there behaviors reflect on our community as a whole.

Disclaimer: I recognize that the evidence outlined in this post is primarily circumstantial, drawn from publicly available forum activity, profiles, and discussions. It falls short of conclusive proof, and other interpretations—such as these accounts being run by close associates or entirely separate individuals with overlapping interests—are entirely plausible. To steer clear of doxxing, I’ve omitted certain details I wished to include. While I sincerely hope my suspicions are unfounded, my intuition—bolstered by observed patterns—points otherwise. I anticipate skepticism from many, as confirming this would represent a profound betrayal within our community. That said, I remain unconvinced by assertions that these are distinct people unless backed by solid evidence, given how it contradicts the trends I’ve identified. I urge those claiming personal knowledge of them as separate entities to provide verifiable proof for scrutiny. Ultimately, I’m posting this to encourage thoughtful community review, fact-checking, and dialogue to evaluate these claims. Please share insights or rebuttals respectfully. This is not meant to provoke hostility or harm—any suspicions of wrongdoing should be directed to official avenues like Bitcointalk moderators, law enforcement, or agencies such as FinCEN.

(I know publicly announcing this can lead to a cover up, anyone could claim anonymousminer’s account is theirs, I don’t put it past anyone who gets exposed in this manner to do everything in there power to discredit this.)




Above is a call to peace, met by more insults by anonymousminer admitting to being in a deep seated group that if he reflects acts unethical.

References:

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1478835 - MoparMiningLLC Profile

[2] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1668017 - anonymousminer Profile

[3] https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=1478835 - MoparMiningLLC BPIP Trust Page

[4] https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=1668017 - anonymousminer BPIP Trust Page

[5] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5369583.0 - Serious Issue- Titan Mint Bitcoin Coins Thread

[6] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5369583.280 - Post Labeling MoparMiningLLC as Shill Wallet Salesman (Oct 2022)

[7] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5369583.220 - Post Accusing as Known Accomplice (Oct 2022)

[8] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5369583.380 - Post Accusing as Scam Accomplice (Mar 2023)

[9] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=217.0 - Collectibles Board (Active Participation)

[10] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=217.200 - Older Collectibles Threads

[11] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5369583.360 - FINCEN Case #883150 Mention (Feb 2023)

[12] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5369583.380 - Additional FINCEN Reference

[13] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5557161.0 - Derails by MoparMining and anonymous

[Satofan44]

You have provided no proof at all for your claim and to make it worse, you've used AI to write this. If you are not willing to put effort to make a connection here, why should people believe you?

[Kazkaz27]

You have provided no proof at all for your claim and to make it worse, you've used AI to write this. If you are not willing to put effort to make a connection here, why should people believe you?

AI was used only partly. I fail to see how that makes this situation worse. If you stay on topic, disregarding the small use of AI, receive the message and dig for yourself, you’ll find correlations just as I have. I mentioned how I could not include certain information I had wished to because I wanted to avoid doxxing. Don’t believe me if you don’t want to. My evidence is primarily circumstantial, as noted. I’d love to see evidence that’s not circumstantial to support that they are separate individuals (anything less than that, and I will continue to believe they are the same person). The patterns I’ve seen unfold myself over the past 2 years suggest they are the same entity. It all began with a gut feeling. Which I decided to act upon, dig into and find more patterns. I’m not the only person who has had this thought which lead to a heightening of my awareness and confirmation that I wasn’t the only one to think it. I know the identity of one of the users, as it is public information. Digging into that, I found more correlations connecting to anonymousminer. The more you dig, the more revealing you may find it to be.

[anonymousminer]

In all honesty this was a treat to wake up to.  I wanted to post the conversation between us, but it was a private message so I kept it private like it's meant to be.  However, now that you bring it to the light of day, it proves 2 VERY important things about both you and me.  For me it proves that I'm consistent with you... I don't like publicly and privately.  It also proves that I can't be corrupted.  You came to me trying to play nice after being a complete dick to me in public for all this time asking me to remove my VERY relevant red trust against you with the deal being you'd remove the red trust of baseless opinions you placed on me.  This seems corrupt, no??  Kind of ironic you used corruption in the title eh??  The first thing we learn is that you are corrupt in this instance.  The second thing is that you have a vendetta.  I told you off... shortly thereafter this nonsense.

I think ALL members who read this and see this true vendetta that Kazkaz27 has for 2 Legendary members who may be brash but have been a very important part of the collectibles section leave him red trust for this witch hunt!  We have contributed in countless ways and hunted plenty of scammers.  We are still contributing today.  Mopar does LOTS of international reshipping and escrow work and I brought an old collector's collection to the forum offering a chance at some hard to find collectibles.  There have been well over 100 items sold in auction so far... is there a single user that did not receive their items??... including Kaz who won a book early on... I don't see a post from them stating they never received it.  Any and all recent red trust for me is obviously retaliatory.  Even from that howardsentell guy.  He won a couple items, received them, but red trust from them says i should be "removed from the forum."  Lol, just utter nonsense.

Kaz comes here to smear my name with bullshit theories and zero facts... to this I say FUCK YOU bitch, because here come the facts keyboard warrior!!  

Kaz only looks at my red trust... he never dared to look right under his nose.  My positive trust comes from likes of Charlie Lee who was integral in me getting my position as authenticator for ICG when I was living in Florida.  I don't think he would have recommended someone untrustworthy.  Charlie also put me into direct contact with Mike Caldwell so we could get approval to use the Casascius 10 Gilt image for the crypto logos when I was working with ICG.  I don't think just anyone is getting that access.  Charlie knows Mopar and I are not the same person.

Kaz could have asked polymerbit... Kaz holds him in the highest regard. Kaz could have reached out to poly, as I know they have met IRL, and asked "are Mopar and anon the same guy?"  polys response would have been "no, I have met them both."  The fact is he could have reached out to a number of people and asked.  Instead slander with a disclaimer is what we got.

Again, Kaz just has a vendetta and is here just trying to smear our names because we called him out.

Here is the icing on top to show how much of a fucktard Kaz really is... if Kaz had clicked "next" and went to page 2 of my trust he would have found my very first positive trust was from minerjones on 1/11/2018 stating "Very trusted trader. Known for over 20yrs."  This trust was posted the VERY same day i opened my account as I had just returned from a trip visiting guess who?? spoiler alert...  minerjones.  Maybe you can guess what he introduced me to on this visit??  spoiler alert... crypto collectibles.  This is a member held in the highest of regard by the community as a whole. 

Would Kaz now accusing 3 more prominent members of being part of the "cult" as well?

A few days ago it was the Mods that were in on the "cult" deleting posts... in the end, it was that the user Kaz was talking about was deleting their own posts, then typing the same words and re posting as a way to bump their WTB thread.    

@Kaz... you truly are an asshole and a waste of everyone's time.  I'm not sure how anyone will take you seriously ever again after this shitshow!!  I do love the amount of real estate I own in that fragile little mind of yours though. 

To be clear Mopar and I are not the same person and those 3 members are not the only ones who know us both.

I've copied Kaz's post in case he try to change or delete it.  

Honestly, I'm tired of having to defend myself from these attacks.  I hope the community does right by me and paint this guys trust as red as red gets for this!!  Screw his disclaimer, he knew what he was doing!!

Suspected Alt Accounts: MoparMiningLLC and anonymousminer Operated by the Same Individual

I believe the Bitcointalk forum accounts “MoparMiningLLC” (user ID 1478835, registered December 20, 2017) and “anonymousminer” (user ID 1668017, registered January 11, 2018) are operated by the same individual.[1][2][3][4]

Substantial evidence suggests this person has used these accounts to shill products, manipulate bids in auctions, discredit competitors, and engage in fraudulent activities—such as involvement in the Titan Mint scam—that have resulted in the theft of significant sums from community members.[5][6][7][8]

I believe MoparMiningLLC is used for more professional interactions, such as business promotions and sales in the collectibles and mining sections, while anonymousminer acts as an alt account to attack critics, defend the main account, and engage in more aggressive behaviors without directly risking the professional reputation.

Both accounts are active in the collectibles section, share interests in Bitcoin mining and physical crypto items, and exhibit overlapping patterns in trust ratings, merit distribution, and thread participation.[9][10]

The accounts were registered within weeks of each other and both achieved “Legendary” status with high activity levels—MoparMiningLLC has over 10,500 posts and 3,155 merit, while anonymousminer has around 3,300 posts and 1,363 merit.[1][2]

They frequently exchange merit, with documented instances where they exchange merit to each other on simple auction threads or discriminatory remarks which target members they deem as opposition. Both maintain strong trust ratings (dark green on BPIP), often from overlapping community members in collectibles and mining discussions.[3][4]

Notably, MoparMiningLLC’s profile includes an EIN attached to their account, which publicly reveals more information about the associated business and can be used to access additional public records.
Regarding corrupt actions, in the ongoing Titan Mint scam thread (spanning hundreds of posts since 2021), multiple users have accused MoparMiningLLC of being an accomplice, including one threatening to file a police report for “receiving stolen funds” in January 2024, and another labeling them a “shill wallet salesman” for promoting products amid scam discussions in October 2022.[6][7][8]

The thread details Titan Mint’s failure to honor 2FA coin redemptions, leading to estimated losses in the thousands, with calls to report to FINCEN under case #883150.[5][11][12]

Similar patterns appear in collectibles auctions, where shill bidding discussions highlight manipulative tactics, and MoparMiningLLC has been flagged in related merit exchanges and raffle/auction threads for potential bid inflation.

These behaviors have drawn community scrutiny, including accusations of discrediting critics through thread derails and retaliatory feedback. [13]

Sidenote: If this is true, we have a deep seated problem that’s been brewing for a long time which has caused tremendous harm. It explains why so many rivals are inside of our small community and the inside monopoly that’s eating away at our community.

Call to Action: My call to action is only that we as a community do our due diligence. Bitcoin is trustless but the system we have here is not. The power we give to people should not be abused and there behaviors reflect on our community as a whole.

Disclaimer: I recognize that the evidence outlined in this post is primarily circumstantial, drawn from publicly available forum activity, profiles, and discussions. It falls short of conclusive proof, and other interpretations—such as these accounts being run by close associates or entirely separate individuals with overlapping interests—are entirely plausible. To steer clear of doxxing, I’ve omitted certain details I wished to include. While I sincerely hope my suspicions are unfounded, my intuition—bolstered by observed patterns—points otherwise. I anticipate skepticism from many, as confirming this would represent a profound betrayal within our community. That said, I remain unconvinced by assertions that these are distinct people unless backed by solid evidence, given how it contradicts the trends I’ve identified. I urge those claiming personal knowledge of them as separate entities to provide verifiable proof for scrutiny. Ultimately, I’m posting this to encourage thoughtful community review, fact-checking, and dialogue to evaluate these claims. Please share insights or rebuttals respectfully. This is not meant to provoke hostility or harm—any suspicions of wrongdoing should be directed to official avenues like Bitcointalk moderators, law enforcement, or agencies such as FinCEN.

(I know publicly announcing this can lead to a cover up, anyone could claim anonymousminer’s account is theirs, I don’t put it past anyone who gets exposed in this manner to do everything in there power to discredit this.)




Above is a call to peace, met by more insults by anonymousminer admitting to being in a deep seated group that if he reflects acts unethical.

References:

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1478835 - MoparMiningLLC Profile

[2] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1668017 - anonymousminer Profile

[3] https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=1478835 - MoparMiningLLC BPIP Trust Page

[4] https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=1668017 - anonymousminer BPIP Trust Page

[5] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5369583.0 - Serious Issue- Titan Mint Bitcoin Coins Thread

[6] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5369583.280 - Post Labeling MoparMiningLLC as Shill Wallet Salesman (Oct 2022)

[7] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5369583.220 - Post Accusing as Known Accomplice (Oct 2022)

[8] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5369583.380 - Post Accusing as Scam Accomplice (Mar 2023)

[9] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=217.0 - Collectibles Board (Active Participation)

[10] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=217.200 - Older Collectibles Threads

[11] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5369583.360 - FINCEN Case #883150 Mention (Feb 2023)

[12] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5369583.380 - Additional FINCEN Reference

[13] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5557161.0 - Derails by MoparMining and anonymous

[MoparMiningLLC]

Wrong again- typical

a few things to add.


First: I think there might be at least 30 people on here who have met both me and anonymous and at the same time (no switcheroo disguises conspiracy theory necessary)

Second: there is no Mopar Cult - the forums are a community - and one you simply do not fit into with your greed, your flagrant disregard for how things are done. You compare yourself to the greats and you are not even a has-been.

[vizique]

Snipped cos that wall of manure was too much

Sit down and be quiet.
You're wrong.

Viz

[bitbollo]

Can you provide please one (literally one) proof of what you're claiming? Where is a single connection?
No. Your intuitions are not a proofs...  What are you saying as valid? Nothing. STOP USE AI!
 
Have you tried maybe to find some connection between wallets? The way the have posted in the forum?
Maybe they have mistakenly used their account for mistake? No of course no.

After the mistery DT gang (@fillippone amico mio ancora mi fa ridere sta roba )
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5277761.msg66138106#msg66138106

Now you're posting accusation of two accounts connected, with no proofs. Calling the topic " Corruption at the deepest levels? (The Mopar Cult)"
Well... I would just really close here any of these discussions. No one seems to sympathize with such crazy accusations... literally crazy.
Have you ever seen how people show connections?
Ok https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5565046.0 or https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5569174.0
there are many of these topics... blame people with no proofs is really bad.

[Kazkaz27]

Disclaimer: I recognize that the evidence outlined in this post is primarily circumstantial, drawn from publicly available forum activity, profiles, and discussions. It falls short of conclusive proof, and other interpretations—such as these accounts being run by close associates or entirely separate individuals with overlapping interests—are entirely plausible. To steer clear of doxxing, I’ve omitted certain details I wished to include. While I sincerely hope my suspicions are unfounded, my intuition—bolstered by observed patterns—points otherwise. I anticipate skepticism from many, as confirming this would represent a profound betrayal within our community. That said, I remain unconvinced by assertions that these are distinct people unless backed by solid evidence, given how it contradicts the trends I’ve identified. I urge those claiming personal knowledge of them as separate entities to provide verifiable proof for scrutiny. Ultimately, I’m posting this to encourage thoughtful community review, fact-checking, and dialogue to evaluate these claims. Please share insights or rebuttals respectfully. This is not meant to provoke hostility or harm—any suspicions of wrongdoing should be directed to official avenues like Bitcointalk moderators, law enforcement, or agencies such as FinCEN.

I already said that I could be wrong, backlash expected. 1 of 3 things. The same person, close associates or entirely separate individuals with overlapping interests. In my eyes the two accounts are rooted to each other as if they are the same person. Perhaps the assumption/gut feeling that you are the same individual is wrong. I’ve made that entirely clear that it’s plausible. I respect those of you who can acknowledge that.

[anonymousminer]

Disclaimer: I recognize that the evidence outlined in this post is primarily circumstantial, drawn from publicly available forum activity, profiles, and discussions. It falls short of conclusive proof, and other interpretations—such as these accounts being run by close associates or entirely separate individuals with overlapping interests—are entirely plausible. To steer clear of doxxing, I’ve omitted certain details I wished to include. While I sincerely hope my suspicions are unfounded, my intuition—bolstered by observed patterns—points otherwise. I anticipate skepticism from many, as confirming this would represent a profound betrayal within our community. That said, I remain unconvinced by assertions that these are distinct people unless backed by solid evidence, given how it contradicts the trends I’ve identified. I urge those claiming personal knowledge of them as separate entities to provide verifiable proof for scrutiny. Ultimately, I’m posting this to encourage thoughtful community review, fact-checking, and dialogue to evaluate these claims. Please share insights or rebuttals respectfully. This is not meant to provoke hostility or harm—any suspicions of wrongdoing should be directed to official avenues like Bitcointalk moderators, law enforcement, or agencies such as FinCEN.

I already said that I could be wrong, backlash expected. 1 of 3 things. The same person, close associates or entirely separate individuals with overlapping interests. In my eyes the two accounts are rooted to each other as if they are the same person. Perhaps the assumption/gut feeling is wrong. I’ve made that entirely clear that it’s plausible. I respect those of you who can acknowledge that.

Fuck your disclaimer!  You're a prick who knew exactly what you were doing!  Just stop talking... eat your shit sandwich... lock this thread and go fuck yourself!!

[Kazkaz27]

It also proves that I can't be corrupted.  

Well what’s already corrupt can’t be corrupted.

You came to me trying to play nice after being a complete dick to me in public for all this time asking me to remove my VERY relevant red trust against you with the deal being you'd remove the red trust of baseless opinions you placed on me.

You misunderstand. I asked for boundaries and respect towards each other which was met by more insults.

I’d like to see where I was anything but cordial with you.

NOT RELEVANT…
The sheets you and others have been completely wrong about and if you cared to read you would acknowledge that. They were never exposed keys. They had a tamper evident back hiding private keys. You’ve been wrong about the sheets and me the entire time.

(If you care to read) Here's the reference:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5543341.0

You attacked me for it not understanding it, gave me a read trust and claimed I was a scammer. Ever since then you have continued to attack, hurl insults and derail posts. (Same as Mopar but more insulting)

Polyermbit actually received a prototype of those sheets when we met in person. (Funny thing is he initially gave me a red trust as well regarding those sheets until we spoke about them and he understood and acknowledged what they were.)

This seems corrupt, no??  Kind of ironic you used corruption in the title eh??  The first thing we learn is that you are corrupt in this instance.  The second thing is that you have a vendetta.  I told you off... shortly thereafter this nonsense.

What I have is a two eyes, two ears and a brain. I see you attack so many members other than myself. It’s not coincidental. It’s very clear you are clicked into a group as you have admitted to that wants to squash others. At least that’s true if you are any reflection of that group.

I think ALL members who read this and see this true vendetta that Kazkaz27

I believe you want All members to see it your way. Although, my side to the story is valid and you won’t silence it. I attempted to create boundaries with you so that we could have peace. Respectful boundaries, like not derailing posts or throwing any accusations at each other. I believe your response was “FUCK YOU”.

We are still contributing today.  Mopar does LOTS of international reshipping and escrow work and I brought an old collector's collection to the forum offering a chance at some hard to find collectibles.  There have been well over 100 items sold in auction so far... is there a single user that did not receive their items??... including Kaz who won a book early on... I don't see a post from them stating they never received it.  Any and all recent red trust for me is obviously retaliatory.  

I have never had any issues with the good you have done. Just the lies and hate you have spread while being a shill and claiming you are only a positive contributor. Never won a book. minerjones gifted me a book, I raffled off a book to the community. I even bought a book from you while you took my money and called me a scammer!

Kaz comes here to smear my name with bullshit theories and zero facts... to this I say FUCK YOU bitch, because here come the facts keyboard warrior!!  

I came here to shine light. Your behavior was everything I expected. Spectacularly Revealing. You don’t disappoint.

Kaz only looks at my red trust... he never dared to look right under his nose.  My positive trust comes from likes of Charlie Lee who was integral in me getting my position as authenticator for ICG when I was living in Florida.  I don't think he would have recommended someone untrustworthy.  Charlie also put me into direct contact with Mike Caldwell so we could get approval to use the Casascius 10 Gilt image for the crypto logos when I was working with ICG.  I don't think just anyone is getting that access.  Charlie knows Mopar and I are not the same person.

I acknowledge the good you have done and expose the bad. If you didn’t target me or others unjustly to begin with or respect boundaries yourself maybe you wouldn’t have a mirror in front of yourself at the moment.

Kaz could have asked polymerbit... Kaz holds him in the highest regard. Kaz could have reached out to poly, as I know they have met IRL, and asked "are Mopar and anon the same guy?"  polys response would have been "no, I have met them both."  The fact is he could have reached out to a number of people and asked.  Instead slander with a disclaimer is what we got.

How about you ask Polymerbit about the sheets. Maybe give an apology and we both respect each other’s boundaries moving forward?

Again, Kaz just has a vendetta and is here just trying to smear our names because we called him out.

I have called you and Mopar out primarily when you have targeted other members. Not when you have targeted me. I have done this because I know how it feels to be targeted by members of your status who don’t care to understand and abuse their power.  

Here is the icing on top to show how much of a fucktard Kaz really is... if Kaz had clicked "next" and went to page 2 of my trust he would have found my very first positive trust was from minerjones on 1/11/2018 stating "Very trusted trader. Known for over 20yrs."  This trust was posted the VERY same day i opened my account as I had just returned from a trip visiting guess who?? spoiler alert...  minerjones.  Maybe you can guess what he introduced me to on this visit??  spoiler alert... crypto collectibles.  This is a member held in the highest of regard by the community as a whole.  

Would Kaz now accusing 3 more prominent members of being part of the "cult" as well?

Projecting of you to accuse other members for me. Never have I assumed or accused them. You use them as a shield.

A few days ago it was the Mods that were in on the "cult" deleting posts... in the end, it was that the user Kaz was talking about was deleting their own posts, then typing the same words and re posting as a way to bump their WTB thread.  

You never actually addressed the other issues I mentioned in regards to that post. You tend to only focus on parts that you feel can decredit or destroy a post. I’m totally okay with admitting to mistakes when they are made.

Feel free to address the other issues I mentioned

Reference:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5568889.msg66190864#msg66190864

@Kaz... you truly are an asshole and a waste of everyone's time.  I'm not sure how anyone will take you seriously ever again after this shitshow!!  I do love the amount of real estate I own in that fragile little mind of yours though.  

You keep saying that. Yet you are the one who hates me. Funny thing is hating often involves a whole lot of caring.

To be clear Mopar and I are not the same person and those 3 members are not the only ones who know us both.

I suggest that you were the same person from what I have gathered, I also said it was plausible you were close associates or entirely separate individuals with overlapping interests.

I've copied Kaz's post in case he try to change or delete it.  

Honestly, I'm tired of having to defend myself from these attacks.  I hope the community does right by me and paint this guys trust as red as red gets for this!!  Screw his disclaimer, he knew what he was doing!!

Don’t worry, I won’t delete it.

Honestly, now you know how I feel. At least we have that in common.

[Kazkaz27]

Wrong again- typical

a few things to add.


First: I think there might be at least 30 people on here who have met both me and anonymous and at the same time (no switcheroo disguises conspiracy theory necessary)

Second: there is no Mopar Cult - the forums are a community - and one you simply do not fit into with your greed, your flagrant disregard for how things are done. You compare yourself to the greats and you are not even a has-been.

So are you claiming that you are just close associates or entirely separate individuals with overlapping interests?

Snipped cos that wall of manure was too much

Sit down and be quiet.
You're wrong.

Viz

Wrong that they are the same person, close associates or entirely separate individuals with overlapping interests?

Can you provide please one (literally one) proof of what you're claiming? Where is a single connection?
No. Your intuitions are not a proofs...  What are you saying as valid? Nothing. STOP USE AI!
 
Have you tried maybe to find some connection between wallets? The way the have posted in the forum?
Maybe they have mistakenly used their account for mistake? No of course no.

After the mistery DT gang (@fillippone amico mio ancora mi fa ridere sta roba )
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5277761.msg66138106#msg66138106

Now you're posting accusation of two accounts connected, with no proofs. Calling the topic " Corruption at the deepest levels? (The Mopar Cult)"
Well... I would just really close here any of these discussions. No one seems to sympathize with such crazy accusations... literally crazy.
Have you ever seen how people show connections?
Ok https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5565046.0 or https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5569174.0
there are many of these topics... blame people with no proofs is really bad.

I gave the most accurate personal view I could in a professional manner. Testifying to the patterns I’ve witnessed and gut feelings that I’ve had. I’m not the only one who connects them together. If it’s not true that they are same person well I indicated that was totally plausible. Although my view of them has hardly changed. I acknowledge the good they have accomplished but I don’t give them a pass to do wrong by myself or others. Which they do when they bash, insult, insinuate, and derail members and their posts. They are guilty for the very same thing some my view this post as. Total hearsay. One man’s opinion. A discrediting suspicion or opinion.

[MoparMiningLLC]

Wrong again- typical

a few things to add.


First: I think there might be at least 30 people on here who have met both me and anonymous and at the same time (no switcheroo disguises conspiracy theory necessary)

Second: there is no Mopar Cult - the forums are a community - and one you simply do not fit into with your greed, your flagrant disregard for how things are done. You compare yourself to the greats and you are not even a has-been.

So are you claiming that you are just close associates or entirely separate individuals with overlapping interests?

we are 2 separate people - and yes, we have some overlapping interested - Bitcoin and collectibles. Have we met? Yes, over Bitcoin and collectibles.

all your "correlations" are AI generated trash - really, stop using it.

and if your gut feelings led you to make this post - then you really need to never trust your gut feelings again. They were so far off base and incorrect.

[Kazkaz27]

Wrong again- typical

a few things to add.


First: I think there might be at least 30 people on here who have met both me and anonymous and at the same time (no switcheroo disguises conspiracy theory necessary)

Second: there is no Mopar Cult - the forums are a community - and one you simply do not fit into with your greed, your flagrant disregard for how things are done. You compare yourself to the greats and you are not even a has-been.

So are you claiming that you are just close associates or entirely separate individuals with overlapping interests?

we are 2 separate people - and yes, we have some overlapping interested - Bitcoin and collectibles. Have we met? Yes, over Bitcoin and collectibles.

all your "correlations" are AI generated trash - really, stop using it.

and if your gut feelings led you to make this post - then you really need to never trust your gut feelings again. They were so far off base and incorrect.

There is still an underlying issue. I’ve wished to resolve it for some time. No more boundary crossing. A restart. Or Even better an understanding/apology. A smidge of respect because I believe you made up nonsense about me (if you want I can quote it), just as you believe I made up nonsense about you. Let’s end it. Mutual agreement.

Talk to polymerbit and acknowledge those keys on sheets were not exposed and the red trust given to me by you was out of your misunderstanding and everything following that is a wash.

[anonymousminer]

@Kazkaz27 a couple simple questions for you.

Did you buy your account?

Account opened in Nov 2019 no post activity until April 2022.  It's suspicious that someone as outspoken as you sat dormant for 2.5 years during the run up from 4k to 60k...

Secondly, do you speak Russian?

[minerjones]

They are 2 different people

In the words of Satoshi: "If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry."

[Kazkaz27]

They are 2 different people

In the words of Satoshi: "If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry."

I love that quote.

[MoparMiningLLC]

Wrong again- typical

a few things to add.


First: I think there might be at least 30 people on here who have met both me and anonymous and at the same time (no switcheroo disguises conspiracy theory necessary)

Second: there is no Mopar Cult - the forums are a community - and one you simply do not fit into with your greed, your flagrant disregard for how things are done. You compare yourself to the greats and you are not even a has-been.

So are you claiming that you are just close associates or entirely separate individuals with overlapping interests?

we are 2 separate people - and yes, we have some overlapping interested - Bitcoin and collectibles. Have we met? Yes, over Bitcoin and collectibles.

all your "correlations" are AI generated trash - really, stop using it.

and if your gut feelings led you to make this post - then you really need to never trust your gut feelings again. They were so far off base and incorrect.

There is still an underlying issue. I’ve wished to resolve it for some time. No more boundary crossing. A restart. Or Even better an understanding/apology. A smidge of respect because I believe you made up nonsense about me (if you want I can quote it), just as you believe I made up nonsense about you. Let’s end it. Mutual agreement.

Talk to polymerbit and acknowledge those keys on sheets were not exposed and the red trust given to me by you was out of your misunderstanding and everything following that is a wash.

I have had a talk with polymerbit and he supports my standing on this issue.  If you generated the keys, they were exposed - to at least you. and unless you cover them with a hologram, they face potential exposure to any number of sources thru shipping. There is no safe way to ever use keys generated by anyone else than yourself.

If one is not comfortable enough to generate their own keys, then they need to let the person generate and apply them - that way there is ever only one source to go to if funds are stolen. The only person that could have seen the keys. it is quite simple. you backpedaled many times in that thread - trying to recover - it matters not and is not worth re-hashing. that is what I gave you a red for. you even acknowledged that in your removal of your retaliatory red trust that you did simply out of spite.

You have made many false claims about me - such as saying you have as many first hand accounts of valued members who left the forums - more than I have positive trust - that would mean you have over 80 first hand accounts of people leaving the forums because of me. Good luck, I simply have not dealt with that many people.

You are pure retaliation instead of accepting your error and learning and moving on. You have earned no trust here. You could always buy another account and start over again. Maybe this time the admins will change the name for you unlike your prior request for the bought account you use now.

They are 2 different people

In the words of Satoshi: "If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry."

having known anonymous for 20+ years and me for only 5 or so - I would say Minerjones is knowledgable to say that this entire thread is a farce. Unless you wish to say he is in on on the conspiracy too?

[Kazkaz27]

I have had a talk with polymerbit and he supports my standing on this issue.  If you generated the keys, they were exposed - to at least you. and unless you cover them with a hologram, they face potential exposure to any number of sources thru shipping. There is no safe way to ever use keys generated by anyone else than yourself.

I don’t believe you, because you would know they had holograms and you would have acknowledged only I had seen them and shipping was no issue regarding them being exposed. You’ll have to do better to address the underlying issue. No more lies.

If one is not comfortable enough to generate their own keys, then they need to let the person generate and apply them - that way there is ever only one source to go to if funds are stolen. The only person that could have seen the keys. it is quite simple. you backpedaled many times in that thread - trying to recover - it matters not and is not worth re-hashing. that is what I gave you a red for. you even acknowledged that in your removal of your retaliatory red trust that you did simply out of spite.

That’s what the sheets were buddy.. you fail to understand and be held accountable.

You have made many false claims about me - such as saying you have as many first hand accounts of valued members who left the forums - more than I have positive trust - that would mean you have over 80 first hand accounts of people leaving the forums because of me. Good luck, I simply have not dealt with that many people.

Completely out of context, you might want to double check exactly what I said. In regards to this topic I didn’t claim anything less than I think you are the same person as anonymous but could be separate individuals with common interests.

You are pure retaliation instead of accepting your error and learning and moving on. You have earned no trust here. You could always buy another account and start over again. Maybe this time the admins will change the name for you unlike your prior request for the bought account you use now.

I’ve only shared my personal view. You like to throw accusations as opinions publicly so I shared with you some of my opinions publicly.

having known anonymous for 20+ years and me for only 5 or so - I would say Minerjones is knowledgable to say that this entire thread is a farce. Unless you wish to say he is in on on the conspiracy too?

Everything said here is okay.

[MoparMiningLLC]

so now that you acknowledge that your claim is false. this thread can be deleted.

[Kazkaz27]

so now that you acknowledge that your claim is false. this thread can be deleted.

I did/do not acknowledge a “false” claim regarding comments I’ve made. I acknowledge everything I’ve stated, not your accusations or assumptions

@Kazkaz27 a couple simple questions for you.

Did you buy your account?

Account opened in Nov 2019 no post activity until April 2022.  It's suspicious that someone as outspoken as you sat dormant for 2.5 years during the run up from 4k to 60k...

Secondly, do you speak Russian?

I will address this.

No, I did not buy my account.

Makes no sense to buy an account with no status or merit. Only a couple years “dormant”. I wasn’t active posting because I wasn’t educated enough to involve myself in discussions and I found the forum hard to navigate. I used it primarily to browse the forum. Initially getting involved with bitcoin in 2018.

You can think it is suspicious all you’d like. My email has never changed. My account is attached to my personal email.

Feel free to be suspicious as I too have my own suspicions.

No, I don’t speak Russian. Not sure why you and Mopar want so desperately to know if I speak Russian. (MAYBE ONE OF YOUR TIN CAP CONSPIRACY THEORYS) - I guess we have more in common now.