Kiki112
|
|
April 17, 2014, 06:50:28 PM |
|
of course they are, minimalist stuff is the future, except for our penises, troughout history mans penis is becoming bigger and bigger, do you think it's because females tend to pick the partner with the larger P?
Nowadays they pick the male with the larger W not P, dont you agree? that is true but how come a gorillas penis is in avg. 6cm and a human one depending from the country from 9-17 avg.? something had to cause such growth, I think it's the females
|
|
|
|
dogechode
|
|
April 17, 2014, 07:01:07 PM |
|
of course they are, minimalist stuff is the future, except for our penises, troughout history mans penis is becoming bigger and bigger, do you think it's because females tend to pick the partner with the larger P?
Nowadays they pick the male with the larger W not P, dont you agree? that is true but how come a gorillas penis is in avg. 6cm and a human one depending from the country from 9-17 avg.? something had to cause such growth, I think it's the females Why are you guys so interested in penises?
|
|
|
|
apsvinet
|
|
April 17, 2014, 07:11:53 PM |
|
What other thing would be as interesting and fun to discuss?
|
|
|
|
counter
|
|
April 17, 2014, 07:14:36 PM |
|
Is reality not worth discussing these days or have we moved past that need?
|
|
|
|
apsvinet
|
|
April 17, 2014, 07:15:20 PM |
|
Is reality not worth discussing these days or have we moved past that need?
But penis discussions give a lot more stimulation to the human brain, don't you agree?!
|
|
|
|
Kiki112
|
|
April 17, 2014, 07:18:07 PM |
|
Is reality not worth discussing these days or have we moved past that need?
But penis discussions give a lot more stimulation to the human brain, don't you agree?! yes! penises are reality, we are reality, therefore we're penises, we're dicks, do you agree?
|
|
|
|
apsvinet
|
|
April 17, 2014, 07:19:00 PM |
|
Is reality not worth discussing these days or have we moved past that need?
But penis discussions give a lot more stimulation to the human brain, don't you agree?! yes! penises are reality, we are reality, therefore we're penises, we're dicks, do you agree? I agree that a lot of people are dicks, but not all dicks are people. Interesting, isn't it?
|
|
|
|
Kiki112
|
|
April 17, 2014, 07:20:48 PM |
|
Is reality not worth discussing these days or have we moved past that need?
But penis discussions give a lot more stimulation to the human brain, don't you agree?! yes! penises are reality, we are reality, therefore we're penises, we're dicks, do you agree? I agree that a lot of people are dicks, but not all dicks are people. Interesting, isn't it? are you assuming animals can be dicks too?
|
|
|
|
apsvinet
|
|
April 17, 2014, 07:21:25 PM |
|
Is reality not worth discussing these days or have we moved past that need?
But penis discussions give a lot more stimulation to the human brain, don't you agree?! yes! penises are reality, we are reality, therefore we're penises, we're dicks, do you agree? I agree that a lot of people are dicks, but not all dicks are people. Interesting, isn't it? are you assuming animals can be dicks too? You came to the conclusion that "not people" referred to animals rather than actual penises (who evidently aren't people)?
|
|
|
|
Kiki112
|
|
April 17, 2014, 07:22:07 PM |
|
Is reality not worth discussing these days or have we moved past that need?
But penis discussions give a lot more stimulation to the human brain, don't you agree?! yes! penises are reality, we are reality, therefore we're penises, we're dicks, do you agree? I agree that a lot of people are dicks, but not all dicks are people. Interesting, isn't it? are you assuming animals can be dicks too? You came to the conclusion that "not people" referred to animals rather than actual penises (who evidently aren't people)? animals, didn't I say that in the first place?
|
|
|
|
apsvinet
|
|
April 17, 2014, 07:23:23 PM |
|
Is reality not worth discussing these days or have we moved past that need?
But penis discussions give a lot more stimulation to the human brain, don't you agree?! yes! penises are reality, we are reality, therefore we're penises, we're dicks, do you agree? I agree that a lot of people are dicks, but not all dicks are people. Interesting, isn't it? are you assuming animals can be dicks too? You came to the conclusion that "not people" referred to animals rather than actual penises (who evidently aren't people)? animals, didn't I say that in the first place? I don't know, isn't it impossible for me to hear what you're saying?
|
|
|
|
LostDutchman
|
|
April 17, 2014, 07:33:32 PM |
|
Is reality not worth discussing these days or have we moved past that need?
But penis discussions give a lot more stimulation to the human brain, don't you agree?! yes! penises are reality, we are reality, therefore we're penises, we're dicks, do you agree? I agree that a lot of people are dicks, but not all dicks are people. Interesting, isn't it? are you assuming animals can be dicks too? You came to the conclusion that "not people" referred to animals rather than actual penises (who evidently aren't people)? animals, didn't I say that in the first place? I don't know, isn't it impossible for me to hear what you're saying? But just exactly what is he saying?
|
|
|
|
Kiki112
|
|
April 17, 2014, 07:34:10 PM |
|
Is reality not worth discussing these days or have we moved past that need?
But penis discussions give a lot more stimulation to the human brain, don't you agree?! yes! penises are reality, we are reality, therefore we're penises, we're dicks, do you agree? I agree that a lot of people are dicks, but not all dicks are people. Interesting, isn't it? are you assuming animals can be dicks too? You came to the conclusion that "not people" referred to animals rather than actual penises (who evidently aren't people)? animals, didn't I say that in the first place? I don't know, isn't it impossible for me to hear what you're saying? But just exactly what is he saying? I'm saying what I'm typing, do you trust me?
|
|
|
|
apsvinet
|
|
April 17, 2014, 07:57:50 PM |
|
Why would I trust a complete stranger?
|
|
|
|
Kiki112
|
|
April 17, 2014, 08:05:41 PM |
|
Why would I trust a complete stranger?
let me answer with a counter question, why would you trust someone you know?
|
|
|
|
apsvinet
|
|
April 17, 2014, 08:07:13 PM |
|
Why would I trust a complete stranger?
let me answer with a counter question, why would you trust someone you know? When did I say that I did? :O
|
|
|
|
Kiki112
|
|
April 17, 2014, 08:12:04 PM |
|
Why would I trust a complete stranger?
let me answer with a counter question, why would you trust someone you know? When did I say that I did? :O you did not, but that means you trust no one do you believe God?
|
|
|
|
apsvinet
|
|
April 17, 2014, 08:12:54 PM |
|
Why would I trust a complete stranger?
let me answer with a counter question, why would you trust someone you know? When did I say that I did? :O you did not, but that means you trust no one do you believe God? I believe nothing that I have no reason to believe in. Isn't that a healthy attitude?
|
|
|
|
kuroman
|
|
April 17, 2014, 08:49:45 PM |
|
Why would I trust a complete stranger?
let me answer with a counter question, why would you trust someone you know? When did I say that I did? :O you did not, but that means you trust no one do you believe God? I believe nothing that I have no reason to believe in. Isn't that a healthy attitude? So you believe quantum mechanics or general reletavity and not god? isn't it the same
|
|
|
|
u9y42
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1071
|
|
April 17, 2014, 08:56:04 PM |
|
So you believe quantum mechanics or general reletavity and not god? isn't it the same
Isn't science's capacity to provide us with the ability to predict how the world around us works fundamentally different to believing in an invisible man in the sky that offers no answers we can use about the world?
|
|
|
|
|