https://talkimg.com/images/2026/03/20/UvuFfb.jpegWe would like to address this claim with full transparency.
The issue here is not about honoring agreements — it is about traffic quality and clear abuse of the CPA model.
After reviewing the data, the traffic delivered under this campaign shows a highly abnormal pattern that does not reflect genuine user behavior:
• Multiple users deposited nearly identical amounts (~$35–$36)
• Almost all users made only a single deposit (1 FTD)
• No meaningful gameplay activity or retention was observed
• Minimal or zero casino net activity (Casino NGR close to 0)
• Uniform behavioral patterns across different accounts and regions
From a statistical and operational standpoint, this is a classic example of incentivized or artificially generated traffic designed to trigger CPA payouts without delivering real value.
To put it simply:
This is not organic player acquisition — this is engineered traffic optimized to extract CPA rewards.
CPA deals are strictly based on:
✔ Genuine users
✔ Real gameplay activity
✔ Sustainable value generation
Not:
✘ One-time deposit patterns
✘ Uniform low-risk behavior
✘ Bonus/CPA exploitation setups
Additionally, the claim that “no evidence was provided” is incorrect. The decision was based on internal fraud detection systems, behavioral analysis, and traffic pattern consistency checks — all standard practices in affiliate programs across the industry.
We also want to clarify:
This is not related to the agreed CPA rate. Regardless of the rate, traffic that does not meet quality and compliance standards will not be eligible for payout.
We remain open to working with affiliates who deliver legitimate, high-quality traffic. However, we will not process commissions generated through traffic patterns that clearly violate the intent of CPA agreements.