China taking over the world without military actions.

[Cheema02]

From what I observed by analyzing Chinese strategy during the last two decades, it is obvious that China is the number one beneficiary of all the conflicts made by the USA and the West around the globe. From this approach, it is not in its favor that the Iranian file gets closed by reaching an agreement with west power led by the USA. Lifting international sanctions on Iran means the end of a lucrative period for China and some other countries that have profited from Iran's limited resources and markets.

Trump is scheduled to make a state visit to China from 14 to 15 this month. There are expectations that the crisis in the Strait of Hormuz will reach a solution even if the war against Iran continues.

Your point describes the geo political situations of middle east. If we analysis China take benefits through trade and Iran makes the the alternative trade pattern due to sanctions but behinds this situations many factors are involved like domestic policies. currently the relations of China and US is complex and if a diplomatic talk is arranged among these countries then the main focus is Strait of Hormuz. Because Hormuz is a main oil trade route in middle east and if its closed then its effects the economies of many countries. geopolitical matter should be resolved very sincerely because media changes the talk way in different directions. the moderators should understands the incentives of each country through this mis guidenece becomes low. So the outcomes depends on continuous and peaceful talk between conflicted countries rather than fixed strategies.

[DrBeer]

Yes, the whole world is amazed by China and how, over forty years, they've managed to build their economy so well that they've shown incredible GDP growth. There are also many rumors about China, saying they constantly act in their own interests, without making friends. And that's the right approach. Trump, for example, constantly claims that everyone, even the president, is his friend, but then criticizes him the next day. He's an astonishing figure, saying one thing and doing another.

Everyone who has taken an interest in the history of China’s economic development knows the answer
These include investments by Western companies, opening the market to Chinese goods, the supply of technology and equipment, staff training, and education at Western universities. Without this, China would have remained an agrarian developing country.

The US and its allies are not foolish enough to provide China with technology, equipment, and education without ulterior motives.
The West wants to take advantage of Asia's abundant supply of cheap labor to serve its capitalist interest. They want to move all factories and production lines to China and Asia to minimize environmental pollution in the country. In this way,  they got cheap goods and kept the environment clean
Their mistake was underestimating the Chinese mindset and strategy. Instead of staying a hired hand for the West forever, China has quietly learned, copied, improved, and built its own industrial chain. Now, the West is paying the price for that miscalculation.

I do not really like China either, but I have to admit they are damn good.

Recall the “economic revolution” launched by Deng Xiaoping! He essentially “signed a deal” with the Western world and his own people, stipulating that the West would bring investment and technology to China, while China would begin mass-producing, at low cost, the goods needed by the Western market. At the same time, China developed its own industry by borrowing from this experience. It was precisely this event,and the mutual benefit it provided at the time,that led to the explosive growth of China’s economy. Some saved money and reduced production costs, while others gained a huge number of jobs and access to industrial technologies.

[Swordsoffreedom]

Trump is scheduled to make a state visit to China from 14 to 15 this month. There are expectations that the crisis in the Strait of Hormuz will reach a solution even if the war against Iran continues.

Yes, Trump and several CEOs of leading American technology companies arrived in Beijing today.

I still do not know what the purpose of Trump's trip is. However, I do not think they will be able to resolve the crisis in the Strait of Hormuz. This is a war between the United States and Iran, it has nothing to do with China.

By the way, how will the strait crisis be resolved as the war continues? Iran will never let that happen because it is their strategic bargaining chip to prevent the United States from continuing its invasion of their country.

[abhiseshakana]

Recall the “economic revolution” launched by Deng Xiaoping! He essentially “signed a deal” with the Western world and his own people, stipulating that the West would bring investment and technology to China, while China would begin mass-producing, at low cost, the goods needed by the Western market. At the same time, China developed its own industry by borrowing from this experience. It was precisely this event,and the mutual benefit it provided at the time,that led to the explosive growth of China’s economy. Some saved money and reduced production costs, while others gained a huge number of jobs and access to industrial technologies.

We can say, relation between The West and China were mutually symbiotic at that time. From China the west got cheap product, big margin, large profit and low inflation. In the other hand, China got rapid industrialization, technology transfer, foreign exchange accumulation and national development. But i think western elit did miscalculation, they believed if China getting richer, China will become liberal country but its totally wrong, what we see now, China gets stronger, more independent but still maintain its political system. Matter of fact Deng's strategy was not western style liberalization, but  a state controllled strategy to integrate with global capitalism, China opened up but  state control reamin very strong over bank, land, strategic industries and development direction.what China actually need at that time are technology transfer and upgrading its industry and manufacture, from low cost manufacturing to be high-tech and strategic industries. We see China purpose not to be a cheap factory forever, fullfilled today with its EV, AI, battery, 5G and chip.

I remember have a bad experience when my colleague did beverage product manufacturing in China, The factory where she do maklon sells her products directly globally with unlimited quantities and lower prices.

[DrBeer]

Recall the “economic revolution” launched by Deng Xiaoping! He essentially “signed a deal” with the Western world and his own people, stipulating that the West would bring investment and technology to China, while China would begin mass-producing, at low cost, the goods needed by the Western market. At the same time, China developed its own industry by borrowing from this experience. It was precisely this event,and the mutual benefit it provided at the time,that led to the explosive growth of China’s economy. Some saved money and reduced production costs, while others gained a huge number of jobs and access to industrial technologies.

We can say, relation between The West and China were mutually symbiotic at that time. From China the west got cheap product, big margin, large profit and low inflation. In the other hand, China got rapid industrialization, technology transfer, foreign exchange accumulation and national development. But i think western elit did miscalculation, they believed if China getting richer, China will become liberal country but its totally wrong, what we see now, China gets stronger, more independent but still maintain its political system. Matter of fact Deng's strategy was not western style liberalization, but  a state controllled strategy to integrate with global capitalism, China opened up but  state control reamin very strong over bank, land, strategic industries and development direction.what China actually need at that time are technology transfer and upgrading its industry and manufacture, from low cost manufacturing to be high-tech and strategic industries. We see China purpose not to be a cheap factory forever, fullfilled today with its EV, AI, battery, 5G and chip.

I remember have a bad experience when my colleague did beverage product manufacturing in China, The factory where she do maklon sells her products directly globally with unlimited quantities and lower prices.

If we look at China’s history following the onset of this positive revolution, we see that, under Deng Xiaoping’s leadership, China moved toward building socialism with a "capitalist face". True, there were still some domestic policy issues, but the regime could not be called a "bloody regime" or "absolutely totalitarian", and there was a sense that China would continue to develop along this path, becoming a strong and significant global player in the world economy on MUTUALLY BENEFICIAL terms.
Changes occurred with the change in leadership, with the arrival of Xi Jinping. It was he who "slammed the steering wheel to the side" and began steering China back toward totalitarianism and confrontation with the Western world, determined that he is already ready to become the second, if not the first, pole of the earth. Aggressive rhetoric, militarization, plans to seize foreign territories... all of this is Xi Jinping’s policy. Where this will lead-we shall see....

[Chilwell]

China rises on the global map as a leader without using any warfare or military support or involving them in any sort of war. Because of this the global strategy is started shifting from military dominance to economic integration. They have built infrastructures, railway, ports, power plant to connect them to different nations across the world. They have proven influence across the globe by building diplomatic loyality with other countries without using military power. They have achieved dominance by building global networks, controlling supply chains through investment rather than invasions and making their name as a global leader.

I like how China used their strategies to takes over the world, China have conquered all over the world without any chaos or dropping bombs, currently China is above United State of America, i mean when it comes to benefit from all over the world. This is what United state of America should do after gaining so much power but they believe that bombing and killing leaders of a nation will make them conquer the world. China did not use that strategies that is why they are successful today and they only believe that for them to enter war with any nation that means they have exhausted all their plans of making peace.