✅ b1exch.to - Instant Auto Exchange | NO KYC | Escrow 0.2 BTC

[AakZaki]

I found an inconsistency regarding fees, currently the Est. Processing Fees (exchange + network) fees are back high compared to my previous transactions, with the same amount of coins now the fee is back up.

The current fee is the same as the fee the first time I used the swap.
Then several times after I swapped, I found a fee that was quite cheap for Est. Processing Fees (exchange + network), I was already happy about it. But now the fee is high again.

Mar 17, 2026

Mar 29, 2026

[OmegaStarScream]

I'm not sure if this has been discussed before but I'm curious to understand... AFAIK, b1exch uses Thorchain pools (not for all assets). What does that mean exactly when from my understanding, they are using their own liquidity? they added their liquidity to Thorchain pools, and now using those to process their users swaps? as opposed to build an instant-exchange type of setup?

[Peanutswar]

Do we have a temporary slowdown? seems takes me a couple of seconds to load the platform.

I just tried to swap USDC to Ethereum just right now, and of course, in just a minute, it delivered my exchange already.

I found an inconsistency regarding fees, currently the Est. Processing Fees (exchange + network) fees are back high compared to my previous transactions, with the same amount of coins now the fee is back up.

Mine got fixed upon quotation and until confirmation of the transaction, well, because it seems the page consistently reloads after 20s.

Edit: Forgot there is a date on it and it seems its a good catch you swapped early and pay less on the fees.

[Lakai01]

I'm not sure if this has been discussed before but I'm curious to understand... AFAIK, b1exch uses Thorchain pools (not for all assets). What does that mean exactly when from my understanding, they are using their own liquidity? they added their liquidity to Thorchain pools, and now using those to process their users swaps? as opposed to build an instant-exchange type of setup?

Yes, they used to use Thorchain pools (not for all assets), but they no longer do - according to a recent update here in this thread a few days ago. They now have their own liquidity pools, which can be viewed directly at https://b1exch.to/Liquidity (with visible balances).

Your assumption that they added their liquidity to Thorchain pools would indeed be a possible scenario (they would act as LPs themselves, and users would swap against their pool share) - but very few instant exchanges (to my knowledge) operate that way. Most of the time, they are simply users of the public pools. With b1exch, it’s a classic “proprietary liquidity setup”... they hold the capital themselves; swaps are processed internally and are therefore usually faster and cheaper.

Maybe b1ack could give us a little more insight here? It would certainly be interesting to know!

[SamReomo]

With b1exch, it’s a classic “proprietary liquidity setup”... they hold the capital themselves; swaps are processed internally and are therefore usually faster and cheaper.

Yes, after the update I also believe that they've their own liquidity setup and they can process the swaps internally but since they're still working on it and thus the fees won't be low at this time but surely in future they might reduce their fees if liquidity of each coin goes higher in their wallets. The might show liquidity is there but when it grows to high values then they might keep most of it in cold storage for security reasons. The best move they've done is to move from Thorchain to their own liquidity setup, in long term that will be very important step for privacy.

[Peanutswar]

Congratulations to our last event winner! sokani!


Now the b1exch.to would like to bring new event!

✅ b1exch.to | Bitcoin Price Prediction - Apr 14 | 🎁 Prize $75!

b1exch.to is a fully automated exchange that accepts .Bitcoin, Litecoin, Monero, Ethereum, DAI ' USDT. and exchanges take minutes. Financial privacy is not a crime, but rather a matter of basic common sense. No registration is required, and there are no logs or JavaScript. Welcome!

• Rules/Prizes

➥ Post Bitcoin price prediction for April 14th (once submitted, you cannot edit your post).
➥ Thread will be closed on April 12, 2026, 23:59 UTC
➥ The winner will be determined based on the Bitcoin price at 23:59 UTC, Apr 14(CMC). 🕐
➥ The one closest predictions will WIN $75. 🎁
➥ Double/Triple prediction if you've already tested the swap and left a comment on kycnot/b1exch or monerica/b1exch.

Good luck to all participants!

[internetional]

usdt erc20 to eth



bad aml from wallet who they send this eth i think...

please b1 contact me so fast.

Why have you concluded that the issue is specifically with this particular deposit? Was it the only transaction you made around that time?

Did you contact Bybit support as suggested in the message you shared? If so, did they explicitly confirm that they need clarification exactly for this transaction?

It has already been about five days. So have there been any updates? What has Bybit said so far, and has b1ack provided any response?

Also, what kind of assistance are you expecting from b1exch in this case? From what I understand, you should be able to provide Bybit with the b1exch wallet addresses (especially if they are publicly available), which would help clearly demonstrate the source of funds.

[Lakai01]

bad aml from wallet who they send this eth i think...

please b1 contact me so fast.

We recently wrote about a similar case here.

First things first: You should never deposit funds into a CEX from an address that doesn’t belong to you. Regulations for crypto exchanges are becoming increasingly strict; anti-money laundering guidelines, in particular, require you to prove that you own the address used for the deposit, and that’s simply not possible in this case.

If I were you, I would contact Bybit, explain your situation to them, and be sure to mention that you used b1eXch to make the deposit. If you’re lucky, support will release the deposited coins.

[dansus021]

usdt erc20 to eth
~SNIP~

Oh syiet is happen to me as well I know this was purely my mistake that directly send to Exchange address I didnt watch this too. Mannnnn

I also deposited to Bybit BTC -> USDT (ERC20) and I just got emailed to I opened a new ticket and didn't get a response just yet. They just freeze deposit, withdrawal, p2p access, and onchain WD too.

Thankfully I really didnt have lot asset there I just do deposit 100 to do futures trade

Let me know if there any update guys

@b1ack

[Lakai01]

Ouch, even though it was “only” $100, it still hurts a lot to know that the money is most likely gone.

I'm also afraid that b1ack can't really help here. The reason Bybit flagged the transaction is due to the so-called Anti-Money Laundering Law (AML). In addition to various KYC measures, this law also mandates the so-called Travel Rule, which requires the exchange to thoroughly verify the sender and recipient:

Crypto Travel Rule
The crypto travel rule is a regulation that requires customer due diligence every time crypto assets are moved. Companies can verify the identities of both the sender and receiver in a transaction, so they can spot red flags. Depending on the guidelines set up, a provider can choose to halt suspicious transactions before they even go through.

Source

As long as the verification hasn’t been successfully completed, the deposit will remain blocked. By the way, this isn’t just Bybit’s policy—as far as I know, it applies to all exchanges that offer a fiat interface.


@b1ack ... since this has already been mentioned several times in this thread ... could we perhaps display a warning message stating that under no circumstances should an exchange address be used as a deposit destination?

[PrivacyG]

@b1ack ... since this has already been mentioned several times in this thread ... could we perhaps display a warning message stating that under no circumstances should an exchange address be used as a deposit destination?

It is kind of common sense.  If you do not own complete access to the Address you are sending to the Exchange from nor do you own complete access to the Address you are depositing in to then why would you even consider that Transaction.  If any thing goes wrong, you own none of the two.

[summonerrk]

@b1ack ... since this has already been mentioned several times in this thread ... could we perhaps display a warning message stating that under no circumstances should an exchange address be used as a deposit destination?

It is kind of common sense.  If you do not own complete access to the Address you are sending to the Exchange from nor do you own complete access to the Address you are depositing in to then why would you even consider that Transaction.  If any thing goes wrong, you own none of the two.

In my opinion, a message like "Exchange addresses are highly undesirable because they are controlled by a third party" is a must-have service for b1exch. users. Ideally, it should be a pop-up message. And in fact, this practice is far from new, because long-time users of our forum may recall that during the ICO era, many projects that ran Bounty campaigns here used this exact wording in their campaign signatures, warning that their tokens should ideally be received by forum users to their own addresses rather than to centralized exchange addresses. In one campaign, a friend of mine lost 5,000$.

[examplens]

@b1ack ... since this has already been mentioned several times in this thread ... could we perhaps display a warning message stating that under no circumstances should an exchange address be used as a deposit destination?

It is kind of common sense.  If you do not own complete access to the Address you are sending to the Exchange from nor do you own complete access to the Address you are depositing in to then why would you even consider that Transaction.  If any thing goes wrong, you own none of the two.

It is now April 2026, and we still need a warning that exchanges are not wallets and that CEX addresses are not to be used as deposits with third-party services.

Has anyone recently done an AML check on coins received from b1exch (in this case, ETH)?
It would be interesting to identify what was the trigger for this reaction of Bybit

[dansus021]

Ouch, even though it was “only” $100, it still hurts a lot to know that the money is most likely gone.

@b1ack ... since this has already been mentioned several times in this thread ... could we perhaps display a warning message stating that under no circumstances should an exchange address be used as a deposit destination?

Yess 100 USD is still a lot, even for me haha, I have completed AML document like proof of fund and screenshot of my exchanged funds, but still no reply, they say need 48hours to check so let's see. Im gonna give my update about this one.

and yes @b1ack, I highly suggest mentioning in the thread as well.


This is just my theory, but this happened because the ThorChain smart contract address they received from multiple addresses and acts like a single pool, which is more like TornadoCash that is why there might be a tainted address that made deposit into ThorChain Router.

[Lakai01]

@b1ack ... since this has already been mentioned several times in this thread ... could we perhaps display a warning message stating that under no circumstances should an exchange address be used as a deposit destination?

It is kind of common sense.  If you do not own complete access to the Address you are sending to the Exchange from nor do you own complete access to the Address you are depositing in to then why would you even consider that Transaction.  If any thing goes wrong, you own none of the two.

It is now April 2026, and we still need a warning that exchanges are not wallets and that CEX addresses are not to be used as deposits with third-party services.

As unfortunate as it is, it’s probably still necessary. We’ve already had three different users report this issue in this thread within a very short time. That’s surely just a fraction of the users who deposited directly on an exchange and now no longer have access to their coins, but haven’t posted here.

I’m also certain that enough people would still do it despite the warning.

However, I find the idea of AML for coins from b1eXch quite intriguing, since b1eXch neither requires KYC nor is a traditionally regulated exchange. I can definitely imagine that major exchanges like Bybit or Kraken would ask for more details in this case.

[SamReomo]

@b1ack ... since this has already been mentioned several times in this thread ... could we perhaps display a warning message stating that under no circumstances should an exchange address be used as a deposit destination?

It's commonsense to not use an exchange's address and especially it's nothing new for the members of this forum. One should never use a centralized exchange's deposit address directly when receiving funds from decentralized non kyc instant exchanges or other platforms that increase privacy of coins. The exchanges will always flag those transactions, the better approach is to your own wallet to receive funds from exchanges like b1exch or other such exchanges and then if you want to swap those via p2p then sending those to centralized exchanges from your own personal account won't show the funds as suspicious. Also to check AML score of the received crypto asset first before sending to a centralized exchange.

[TokenTikas]

Maybe b1ack could give us a little more insight here? It would certainly be interesting to know!

I haven’t been seeing b1ack around for some days now. The last time he posted on the forum was on 24th March and his last active status shows 25 March. Right now, there is a lot of discussion going on about b1exch and these are things he is supposed to see and also help calm down the rumours spreading among people. He has been handling things in a very good way before but his current absence is making people worried. I just hope we will see him around again very soon.

[PX-Z]

... He has been handling things in a very good way before but his current absence is making people worried. I just hope we will see him around again very soon.

Which means he/she will can do it again. Let's wait, people are seems busy this holy week for christians, might as well, b1ack and his/er family or what. So until next week, we should wait till s/he actives again.

[PrivacyG]

In my opinion, a message like "Exchange addresses are highly undesirable because they are controlled by a third party" is a must-have service for b1exch. users. Ideally, it should be a pop-up message.

If a warning is really necessary then it could be as simple as 'Use an Address you own'.

-----

Has anyone recently done an AML check on coins received from b1exch (in this case, ETH)?
It would be interesting to identify what was the trigger for this reaction of Bybit

If that person used the Deposit Address as the destination then to Bybit it looked like b1exch themselves deposited some Ethereum.  It could be a reason as simple as 'what if this was a b1exch hack?'.  There are many reasons they could use to trigger Know Your Customer so there is that.

-----

I’m also certain that enough people would still do it despite the warning.

They could lock any button for two seconds once that message appears so the customer has time to at least take a look at it.  Although I would argue it may not do much other than making things unnecessarily annoying.

-----

I do not get how this happens.  What is the point of using b1exch if the final destination is a Know Your Customer enabled Centralized Exchange.  If Bybit can demand you any proof they want until they decide it may be time that you get your Money back under your own control, I would assume it is not a great idea to send them some Money coming from a place that stores no logs, asks for no Know Your Customer et cetera.

[examplens]

If that person used the Deposit Address as the destination then to Bybit it looked like b1exch themselves deposited some Ethereum.  It could be a reason as simple as 'what if this was a b1exch hack?'.  There are many reasons they could use to trigger Know Your Customer so there is that.

If it is on Bybit, then it has already passed the KYC check. It is mandatory on Bybit. Therefore, the only thing left to do is to check the source of funds.

In the meantime, I did a small swap to test the ETH address and coins from there. I assume that b1exch executes all swaps with funds from the same eth address. I first sent from swap to my wallet, then I would send the same coins to Binance. There are no restrictions
Basically, this is the AML result



Apparently, all DEX and no-KYC exchanges are marked as medium risk.

used one of the AML checkers from Bestchange