✅ b1exch.to - Instant Auto Exchange | NO KYC | Escrow 0.2 BTC

[The Cryptovator]

I haven’t been seeing b1ack around for some days now. The last time he posted on the forum was on 24th March and his last active status shows 25 March. Right now, there is a lot of discussion going on about b1exch and these are things he is supposed to see and also help calm down the rumours spreading among people. He has been handling things in a very good way before but his current absence is making people worried. I just hope we will see him around again very soon.

Could you please tell us what the rumours exactly are against b1exch? I haven't noticed any allegations against them on the scam accusations board. The rumours were old, and still I have been active on the reputation board. Apart from this, are there any other complaints against them? It's true when he was active, then he handled everything very smoothly and professionally.

Representatives should be active around the forum to answer all the queries and support users. It's not necessary for the owner to always be active on the forum, but it's very important for one of the representatives to be present here. Not sure if b1ack is on vacation, but hope everything is fine and we will hear back from him.

[Big Dirams]

... He has been handling things in a very good way before but his current absence is making people worried. I just hope we will see him around again very soon.

Which means he/she will can do it again. Let's wait, people are seems busy this holy week for christians, might as well, b1ack and his/er family or what. So until next week, we should wait till s/he actives again.

You do have a point though, this week seems so busy for many Christians so maybe probably he has been busy and maybe some other stuffs got him down probably. We can tell though there are lives aside this forum so he might be doing some important stuffs or so let just have little faith and patience and stay calm but I do have that believe that he’s probably into something way important that takes his time.
 Just as you did said let give him this Holy Week and see what the outcome of the next week would be so we can know if he’s going to be back soon.

[internetional]

In my opinion, a message like "Exchange addresses are highly undesirable because they are controlled by a third party" is a must-have service for b1exch. users. Ideally, it should be a pop-up message.

If a warning is really necessary then it could be as simple as 'Use an Address you own'.

I have never seen such warnings anywhere. Although, in fact, they would be very useful.

On the contrary, on those CEXes where withdrawals are subject to the Travel Rule, you are required to specify who the custodian is and in whose name the deposit address is registered. And if there is a mismatch, no one ever warns you that if the deposit is not accepted, it will be returned not to your address, but to the exchange's address - and you will then struggle to prove that the cryptocurrency was intended for you.

I think many people only begin to realize the risks of using addresses whose true owners may refuse to accept a deposit when they personally face all the difficulties of getting a refund.

However, I repeat, I have never seen any warnings about this. Perhaps it would not be a bad idea if someone established such a practice. Why shouldn't b1exch be the pioneer?

[Ultegra134]

I haven’t been seeing b1ack around for some days now. The last time he posted on the forum was on 24th March and his last active status shows 25 March. Right now, there is a lot of discussion going on about b1exch and these are things he is supposed to see and also help calm down the rumours spreading among people. He has been handling things in a very good way before but his current absence is making people worried. I just hope we will see him around again very soon.

I was busy this week as well and haven't posted or logged in the forum for quite a while. b1ack's absense isn't necessarily a "red-flag" by itself. I would understand it if the exchange wasn't functioning or didn't have any liquidity, rendering it non usable. Easter holidays are here for Catholics, so we shouldn't so quick to jump into conclusions.

On the positive side, I'm seeing BNB in the upcoming coins, something which others and myself had mentioned a while ago, so it's nice to see it being implemented in the near future.

[TokenTikas]

Could you please tell us what the rumours exactly are against b1exch? I haven't noticed any allegations against them on the scam accusations board. The rumours were old, and still I have been active on the reputation board. Apart from this, are there any other complaints against them? It's true when he was active, then he handled everything very smoothly and professionally.

I’m not saying anything about the rumours against b1exch but I’m talking about the criticism going on. I have also seen the matter people are discussing on the reputation board. Still, when b1ack becomes active again, he should be able to handle everything properly. I haven’t been seeing him around for some days now and that's why I pointed out his absence. Aside from that, everything is running smoothly on the exchange and the coins that are active can be exchanged without any issue.

Hope that b1ack is active again. Also, since it's the time of Christian festivals (Easter 5 April), he might be busy with those too, so it's best to wait patiently.

[Lakai01]

I do not get how this happens.  What is the point of using b1exch if the final destination is a Know Your Customer enabled Centralized Exchange.  If Bybit can demand you any proof they want until they decide it may be time that you get your Money back under your own control, I would assume it is not a great idea to send them some Money coming from a place that stores no logs, asks for no Know Your Customer et cetera.

For me personally, the privacy benefit would probably be the biggest reason: You don’t want to link your (private) wallet addresses to a KYC account on an exchange, so you use other exchanges like b1eXch to avoid disclosing the address and linking it to your identity.

Of course, it could also be that certain exchanges simply don’t offer the currency I want to trade. For example, many exchanges had to take Monero offline; if you now want to convert your Monero to BTC and sell the BTC immediately, b1eXch would be a convenient way to do so... if it weren’t for the Travel Rule.

[joker_josue]

I do not get how this happens.  What is the point of using b1exch if the final destination is a Know Your Customer enabled Centralized Exchange.  If Bybit can demand you any proof they want until they decide it may be time that you get your Money back under your own control, I would assume it is not a great idea to send them some Money coming from a place that stores no logs, asks for no Know Your Customer et cetera.

For me personally, the privacy benefit would probably be the biggest reason: You don’t want to link your (private) wallet addresses to a KYC account on an exchange, so you use other exchanges like b1eXch to avoid disclosing the address and linking it to your identity.

Of course, it could also be that certain exchanges simply don’t offer the currency I want to trade. For example, many exchanges had to take Monero offline; if you now want to convert your Monero to BTC and sell the BTC immediately, b1eXch would be a convenient way to do so... if it weren’t for the Travel Rule.

But you don't actually need to link your personal wallet.
Use a swap to convert the address to a new one. After obtaining the new address, you send it to the exchange. You will never use that address again.

I believe that one of the security guidelines for crypto transactions is to never send money from locations you don't control. Doing so adds two layers of risk to the same transaction. The risk layer is that of something failing in the swap transaction, and the risk layer is that of something failing in the exchange transaction. I'm not even talking about the problems in this KYC case.

Imagine this: the swap is done correctly and the money is sent to the exchange's address. But, for some reason, there's an error on the exchange's end and it automatically returns the money to the address from which it was received. Since the address you sent it from is a swap address and not yours, you literally lose the money, as it may be difficult for you to prove that this credit limit is yours on platforms without logs or KYC.

Therefore, regardless of the type of transaction being made, it is never recommended to use a service where you lose control of your money as a gateway to access another service.

[NotATether]

Of course, it could also be that certain exchanges simply don’t offer the currency I want to trade. For example, many exchanges had to take Monero offline; if you now want to convert your Monero to BTC and sell the BTC immediately, b1eXch would be a convenient way to do so... if it weren’t for the Travel Rule.

Then just opt out of the travel rule. Stop using these centralized exchanges, who have periodically showed us time and time again that our funds safety is not their priority, but rather their profits... and start using P2P more often when you want to offramp to fiat.

It works fantastically for small amounts!

Large amounts obviously aren't very trivial, you would want to cash out using "acceptable" channels if it's a large amount.

[b1ack]

usdt erc20 to eth



bad aml from wallet who they send this eth i think...

please b1 contact me so fast.

I believe we're already in contact.

Just to clarify: this is a Source of Funds (SOF) check, not due to "bad coins."

Recommendation for using CEXs:

Always use your own personal wallet to receive exchanged coins from us. If you must use a CEX to receive:
- Tell the exchange the coins are from b1eXch
- Share the swap ID with them
- Explain it's from a legitimate no-KYC exchange

This helps them understand the source and may prevent SOF inquiries.

---

I found an inconsistency regarding fees, currently the Est. Processing Fees (exchange + network) fees are back high compared to my previous transactions, with the same amount of coins now the fee is back up. The current fee is the same as the fee the first time I used the swap. Then several times after I swapped, I found a fee that was quite cheap for Est. Processing Fees (exchange + network), I was already happy about it. But now the fee is high again.

Mar 17, 2026

Mar 29, 2026

The fees displayed are estimates and can differ from the actual final fees. We try to provide accurate estimates upfront, but they're not exact approximations.

Why fees vary:

The recent XMR price spike combined with consistently high trading volumes means we run low on XMR reserves frequently. This affects processing fees as we need to manage liquidity carefully.

Network fees also fluctuate based on blockchain congestion, which impacts the total processing cost.

The fees you see now reflect current network conditions and liquidity availability.

---

I'm not sure if this has been discussed before but I'm curious to understand... AFAIK, b1exch uses Thorchain pools (not for all assets). What does that mean exactly when from my understanding, they are using their own liquidity? they added their liquidity to Thorchain pools, and now using those to process their users swaps? as opposed to build an instant-exchange type of setup?

We use our own liquidity pools - controlled by us, seeded by us, and managed by us.

We do use other protocols for rebalancing crypto assets, and everyone in the industry does this for liquidity management. But the liquidity itself is ours, not THORChain's.

---

Do we have a temporary slowdown? seems takes me a couple of seconds to load the platform. I just tried to swap USDC to Ethereum just right now, and of course, in just a minute, it delivered my exchange already.

I found an inconsistency regarding fees, currently the Est. Processing Fees (exchange + network) fees are back high compared to my previous transactions, with the same amount of coins now the fee is back up.

Mine got fixed upon quotation and until confirmation of the transaction, well, because it seems the page consistently reloads after 20s.

Edit: Forgot there is a date on it and it seems its a good catch you swapped early and pay less on the fees.

We were facing heavy DDoS attacks during that time, which caused the slowdown you experienced.

---

usdt erc20 to eth
~SNIP~

Oh syiet is happen to me as well

I know this was purely my mistake that directly send to Exchange address I didnt watch this too. Mannnnn

I also deposited to Bybit BTC -> USDT (ERC20) and I just got emailed to

I opened a new ticket and didn't get a response just yet. They just freeze deposit, withdrawal, p2p access, and onchain WD too.

Thankfully I really didnt have lot asset there I just do deposit 100 to do futures trade

Let me know if there any update guys @b1ack

Can you explain exactly what happened in detail?

What did Bybit demand from you? Was your account already KYC verified before this incident?

This information will help us understand the situation better and provide proper guidance.

---

I haven't been seeing b1ack around for some days now. The last time he posted on the forum was on 24th March and his last active status shows 25 March. Right now, there is a lot of discussion going on about b1exch and these are things he is supposed to see and also help calm down the rumours spreading among people. He has been handling things in a very good way before but his current absence is making people worried. I just hope we will see him around again very soon.

Could you please tell us what the rumours exactly are against b1exch? I haven't noticed any allegations against them on the scam accusations board. The rumours were old, and still I have been active on the reputation board. Apart from this, are there any other complaints against them?

It's true when he was active, then he handled everything very smoothly and professionally. Representatives should be active around the forum to answer all the queries and support users. It's not necessary for the owner to always be active on the forum, but it's very important for one of the representatives to be present here. Not sure if b1ack is on vacation, but hope everything is fine and we will hear back from him.

We're keeping an eye on all discussions and everything happening in the community. Meanwhile, we've been making important updates behind the scenes.

Recent updates:

We've launched our on-site support system
Rebalanced liquidity pools to meet current demand properly
Been helping users and staying in touch with them through support channels

We've been working on improvements rather than posting updates constantly. Everything is operational and we're handling all user concerns through our support system.

Apologies for the reduced forum presence - we've been focused on development and user support. We're here and monitoring everything.


Edit:
we took back control of .io domains.
and added public api.
You can access them at /api

[SamReomo]

Always use your own personal wallet to receive exchanged coins from us. If you must use a CEX to receive:
- Tell the exchange the coins are from b1eXch
- Share the swap ID with them
- Explain it's from a legitimate no-KYC exchange

That's the most important thing to remember when doing any type of swaps at privacy exchanges like b1exch. Everyone should first receive the exchanged coins to their own wallets and then send those to CEX in order to be safe from those false flags.

Since b1eXch is a legit platform and they've been transparent on this thread about the platform, so there's no harm in telling bybit that the coins were received from a trusted platform like b1eXch, I know that'll somehow ruin the privacy part but there's no other option.

In future everyone should take care when depositing funds to centralized exchanges that were swapped on a legit no KYC platform like b1eXch or other reputable no KYC platforms. First step is to receive those coins on your own personal wallets and then send those to centralized exchanges to be on safe end. Also one should check AML of the coins before sending those coins to centralized exchange accounts.

[Numeral]

SamReomo, it’s highly debatable whether it’s safer to keep your money on centralized exchanges than in your own wallets. In my opinion, it’s best to avoid any correspondence with exchanges altogether, because it’s completely unclear where that might lead - CEXs can now request various documents, and you might have to wait a very long time for their responses and decisions. As for using your own transit wallet to transfer cryptocurrency from b1exch to a CEX, I completely agree with that - but I wouldn’t send any advance notifications to the CEX regarding the transfers. And it’s best to avoid direct transfers altogether, whether with or without notifications.

[PrivacyG]

SamReomo, it’s highly debatable whether it’s safer to keep your money on centralized exchanges than in your own wallets.

There is no thing to debate about whether it is Safer to keep your Money in your own Wallet or not.  The answer is clear with out even having to mention it.

[inspace]

💥 Hello, friends! Just a reminder about our active event. Join us—there are still slots available. We look forward to seeing you there. Let's close it already so we can move on to the next one

 ✅ b1exch.to 👾 TRADE WARS 👾 $30 in BTC

➫ The winner will receive a prize of $30 in BTC 🎁
 ➫ Publish proof - for every $100 exchanged, you receive 1 slot.
 ➫ After selecting a block, we will use the BitList tool to determine the winner.

[Lakai01]

Then just opt out of the travel rule. Stop using these centralized exchanges, who have periodically showed us time and time again that our funds safety is not their priority, but rather their profits... and start using P2P more often when you want to offramp to fiat.
[...]

I basically see it the same way you do; I use CEXs exclusively for larger crypto-to-fiat transactions and avoid them as much as possible otherwise—except for BTC savings plans for the kids; otherwise, it’s just too much of a hassle for me.

Unfortunately, for the majority of users, the convenience of a CEX is still significantly more important, and they’re willing to put up with a lot for it—including proving where their assets actually come from... you really have to stop and think about that...—as you can see from the examples discussed here, unfortunately.

[bitmover]

I basically see it the same way you do; I use CEXs exclusively for larger crypto-to-fiat transactions and avoid them as much as possible otherwise—except for BTC savings plans for the kids; otherwise, it’s just too much of a hassle for me.

You can use Bisq for crypto x fiat transactions. It works well.

I wouldn't make large orders at once. Just send in batches.

Bisq has a good liquidity for usd and eur pairs.

If only using crypto (no fiat) b1exch is a very good option

[The Cryptovator]

I believe we're already in contact.

Just to clarify: this is a Source of Funds (SOF) check, not due to "bad coins."

Yes, but exchanges often flag transactions when they've come from suspicious sources. Then they ask for the source of funds and more details; I believe this problem would be solved when the user informs them about swap details that the funds came from b1exch. However, make sure your exchange has a good relationship with other centralised exchanges.

Recommendation for using CEXs:

Always use your own personal wallet to receive exchanged coins from us. If you must use a CEX to receive:
- Tell the exchange the coins are from b1eXch
- Share the swap ID with them
- Explain it's from a legitimate no-KYC exchange

This helps them understand the source and may prevent SOF inquiries.

It's always preferable to use our own non-custodial wallet for receiving funds from any swap or clients. Then the user could explain these are their own funds from their wallet; they could even sign the message if necessary. I have suffered previously with Binance due to receiving funds into a Binance address, and my client sent funds from a mixer. However, later it was solved, and they released my funds. So I agree with you; we need to explain to Bybit about the funds; it's not a very hard task. But for the future, everyone should use their own address first to receive funds.

[PrivacyG]

I missed out on remembering the part where they took back the '.io' domain.  Today I wrote the address by myself and since I typically find the link through Bitcoin Talk, I could not remember if it was '.io' or '.to' so I accidentally entered the old '.io' and I was redirected.  This is good, the two domains were close enough to be confusing.

[examplens]

I missed out on remembering the part where they took back the '.io' domain.  Today I wrote the address by myself and since I typically find the link through Bitcoin Talk, I could not remember if it was '.io' or '.to' so I accidentally entered the old '.io' and I was redirected.  This is good, the two domains were close enough to be confusing.

Yes, they published the official info a few days ago. The redirection is ok, I assume they will use .io domains for other things, marketing, support contacts, API, as they stated.

Edit:
we took back control of .io domains.
and added public api.
You can access them at /api

After the return, we can be sure that the suspension of the domain came unilaterally from njal.la and there were no requests from third parties. so it seems that b1exch is clean. It is still unclear why njal.la reacted in this way

[inspace]

💥 Attention friends, a new raffle has just been announced. Reserve your slot now and take part in the raffle.

Don’t wait too long — slots are limited.

     ✅ b1exch.to 👾 TRADE WARS 👾 $30 in BTC

 ➫ The winner will receive a prize of $30 in BTC 🎁
 ➫ Publish proof - for every $100 exchanged, you receive 1 slot.
 ➫ After selecting a block, we will use the BitList tool to determine the winner.

Good luck to all participants!

[examplens]

Today, I noticed that the current rebranding of the DAI token is the new USDS. It was announced earlier https://forum.skyeco.com/t/sky-has-arrived/24959 but it's actually happening right now on Binance. Deposit and withdrawal of DAI are suspended, 1:1 conversion will be automatic.
Binance announcement: https://www.binance.com/en/support/announcement/detail/df2ce9c43b1d406ca2c4b14e4e34610a
As they announced this, or maybe it is already in the process with other major CEX, it would probably be recommended for b1exch to adapt to this change and include USDS in their listing.
It will still be possible to convert DAI to USDS on Sky, but it is an extra step for those who want to send their tokens to a third service.