[TOOL] ⭐Bitcointalk BRDb score

[*Ace*]

I must say this tool is now part of my daily routine.
I am actively using it, and it gives me an idea of the situation of the person I am reading the post of.
Of course, as it is a tool from a very simple formula, it needs some caution, but I would say ballpark indications are well structured.

I’m really pleased to read these words; it means that what I’ve created is useful to someone.
The formula is still just a formula, and it can never tell you whether someone writes high-quality posts, but with the data available, it’s possible to gauge how much reputation that person has on the forum based on the sentiment of the whole community.
And that’s exactly what the tool does: it gives you a basic idea of who you’re interacting with.

@*Ace*, you have made quite an improvement over so short span of time.

Also, this time, the badges look more neat and clean and elegant, especially now the badges are in a readable format. I noticed you added a custom Bitcointalk community award badge to your profile, which looks great btw. Since you are doing so much, why not add the result link (source) as a reference as well? This should be included in all the other winners too.

A clickable link inside the badge or below it, where discovery is written. It's only a suggestion.

Thanks to you too, mate. You’ve been one of the best contributors to this project so far. I’d actually thought of that idea myself, but rather than linking to the discussion thread, I wanted to include a tooltip showing the results for each award. I have to say, though, that linking to the thread is actually easier.

[dkbit98]

*Ace* can you tell me who for many accounts there is no BRDb score shown?
I noticed this for some inactive accounts, and for members with negative feedback I can see this: Pending — will be available after next scrape cycle.
It would be interesting to have negative BRDb shown for scammers and cheaters, if that is possible.

[*Ace*]

*Ace* can you tell me who for many accounts there is no BRDb score shown?
I noticed this for some inactive accounts, and for members with negative feedback I can see this: Pending — will be available after next scrape cycle.
It would be interesting to have negative BRDb shown for scammers and cheaters, if that is possible.

To obtain a list of UserIDs, I used data from LoyceV and managed to gather around 18,000 UserIDs; I believe that list didn’t include many users, particularly the banned ones, whom I later found through other channels.
New registrants are obviously not included in that list, and to obtain their UserIDs, the tool relies on the userscript; if it doesn’t find them in the list, it adds them to the scraping queue. This is why you might see that warning for some users.
For banned users, we will obviously find the ‘banned’ tag and a score of 1, which is the minimum in the BRDb calculation, but I might make some adjustments for such cases.

[fillippone]

To obtain a list of UserIDs, I used data from LoyceV and managed to gather around 18,000 UserIDs; I believe that list didn’t include many users, particularly the banned ones, whom I later found through other channels.
New registrants are obviously not included in that list, and to obtain their UserIDs, the tool relies on the userscript; if it doesn’t find them in the list, it adds them to the scraping queue. This is why you might see that warning for some users.
For banned users, we will obviously find the ‘banned’ tag and a score of 1, which is the minimum in the BRDb calculation, but I might make some adjustments for such cases.

Data from LoyceV is regularly updated on a weekly basis. You should run some kind of auto update on a the same time span, so to keep the pace for new users.
Relying on the users to manually input the data they ask for might be bad in the long run, as someone would be discouraged to see a lot of missing values.