Why Trump is a threat to world peace today.

[beerlover]

Obviously Americans are fine with it, they were fine when they went to Libya, they were fine when they went to Iraq, they were fine when they had a war with Afghanistan, they were fine when they had a war with Vietnam, they never really bothered or cared. Americans have lived all their life in war, and all they know is war, so if any of their presidents ever open a war against another nation, they are not phased by it.

There are few other nations like that, but most of us do not live that. So we are shocked when there is a new war, and bothered by it, but they do not care because it's normal to them. Even in this topic, you get to see some Trumpers who are in love with him and defend him, even when he is causing hurt all over the world.

[Satofan44]

Since Trump's election, there have been many protests against him, but most of them have been in opposition to domestic policies. Similar to the riots currently taking place in Los Angeles as people protest against ICE. There has never been a notable protest by them against what their government has done to other countries and people around the world

It seems American are not too concerned about what their government does to the rest of the world. As long as their lives in the country are guaranteed and fully provided for. Therefore, I also think that the American people should bear some responsibility for what their government has done to the world.

You should not take any of that at face value. Most of the people in the protest are part of 2 groups. The first are paid agitators and protestors, yes there are actually companies and entities that pay you to come and falsely protest for something as a way to spread propaganda through physical appearance -- most people do not know this or are able to comprehend the scale on which this is happening. Second are people who are completely delusional, biased or derive benefit from illegals or whatever stuff is being abused. Think about it. If you create measures to stricter social aid, which will reduce corruption severely, you will have mass protests by people who are abusing these things or who have friends or family members that are abusing them. Should we listen to these people? No. Actually, swift and mass arrests for corruption is what would sort this thing out. This is where China is better than the west, even high level corruption is exterminated as soon as it is encountered.
The western world, Europe especially, is very corrupt from the bottom up.

According to my opinions Donald Trump represent a serious risk to global economy and peace. The reason is that during his government he seen very unpredictable and make decisions which are very uncertain for global economy especially when he used aggressive politics importantly in sensitive areas then its create trouble for many people around the world. But global politics not depends only on one individual and decisions are prepared by advisers and according to global demands. Its necessary to focus on long term stability rather than fear and blame and it can be important to understand that Worlds peace depends on balanced leadership. And also for expected worst outcomes open discussion and critical thinking is the key of solution.

This is a false reasoning that does not make sense. The inversion of this is that doing very predictable decisions is what guarantees stability and peace, really? If the main adversaries can predict what you will do and when you will do it, the battle is already lost. There may be a period of stability in the short-term but in the long term that leads to worse outcomes than this does.

Obviously Americans are fine with it, they were fine when they went to Libya, they were fine when they went to Iraq, they were fine when they had a war with Afghanistan, they were fine when they had a war with Vietnam, they never really bothered or cared. Americans have lived all their life in war, and all they know is war, so if any of their presidents ever open a war against another nation, they are not phased by it.

There are few other nations like that, but most of us do not live that. So we are shocked when there is a new war, and bothered by it, but they do not care because it's normal to them. Even in this topic, you get to see some Trumpers who are in love with him and defend him, even when he is causing hurt all over the world.

The last real war can be considered the Iraq war, and since then there have been only interventions in places like Libya, Syria and others but those are not wars. Actually we are in a prolonged period where the US has not started a new war surprisingly. Either something is changing or there is bound to be a problem soon. Don't blame Trump personally for the American war machine. It goes beyond both parties.

[r_victory]

I just want to ask, if the US and its allies had the right to possess nuclear weapons and use them to threaten other nations. Why is it that other countries such as North Korea and Iran attempting to acquire nuclear weapons are considered a threat to world peace? 


If I remember correctly, the US currently possesses over 5,000 nuclear warhead, ranking second only to Russia


Is the US the creator of this world, and does this world belong to them? Otherwise, why should we listen to them and believe that everything they say is the truth?

You're right, and I also don't advocate that the United States should have nuclear weapons while other countries don't. The problem isn't nuclear energy itself, but rather the weapons and the purposes for which they are used. Nuclear energy is beneficial and could be the solution for a future where natural resources become increasingly scarce or extinct, especially for electricity generation.

In my response, I wanted to cite countries dominated by tyrants, and even if Trump is one of them, the American people still have the democratic and legally established right to remove him from power if necessary, something that countries like Iran and North Korea don't have, where any disagreement with the government leads to death. If the United States is a threat, imagine countries dominated by extremists?

[JoyMarsha]

The first time coming of Trump as a president was like a sheep, he was prey upon by America's and the world, and this time around, the second time as US president, he came as a beast, not to prey upon again by anyone.

However, all these strong man acting of Trump was as the result of what he experiences in his first tenure, he didn't want it to repeat again for people to take his rulership as what they could do rubbish and get away with it. Being strict and unpredictable is how he chooses to rule his government

[Satofan44]

You're right, and I also don't advocate that the United States should have nuclear weapons while other countries don't.

You like to write illogical nonsense in every thread, don't you? What exactly is the alternative to this? There are only 3:
1) The USA does not posses nuclear weapons, this does not stop any adversary or malicious entity from having them. The result of this: One-sided catastrophe of the developed world or other innocent countries.
2) The USA does posses nuclear weapons and allows malicious entities to have them. The result of this: Nuclear winter.
3) The USA does posses nuclear weapons and prevents malicious entities from having them. The result of this: Maybe not a nuclear winter.

It seems to me that you want to cause death and destruction around the globe with your mistaken views. When some bad entity launches nukes and kills the people you love, don't come whining here and begging Uncle Sam to save you. Uncle should tell you to fuck off in this case, you got what you asked for.

The problem isn't nuclear energy itself, but rather the weapons and the purposes for which they are used. Nuclear energy is beneficial and could be the solution for a future where natural resources become increasingly scarce or extinct, especially for electricity generation.

Nuclear energy provides building blocks and infrastructure to build weapons, even allowing hostile countries to pursue nuclear energy is dangerous. While it is a big distance away from nuclear weapons, it would be better if those countries are not allowed this at all. As far as electricity generation is concerned, you wrote more false information. Nuclear energy also relies on natural resources which are scarce, therefore your argument makes absolutely zero sense.

In my response, I wanted to cite countries dominated by tyrants, and even if Trump is one of them, the American people still have the democratic and legally established right to remove him from power if necessary, something that countries like Iran and North Korea don't have, where any disagreement with the government leads to death. If the United States is a threat, imagine countries dominated by extremists?

Trump is no tyrant. Just because someone is rude and mean to you, that does not make him a tyrant. If it bothers you, it makes you a weakling and a loser, that is all.

[Shishir99]

But global politics not depends only on one individual and decisions are prepared by advisers and according to global demands. Its necessary to focus on long term stability rather than fear and blame and it can be important to understand that Worlds peace depends on balanced leadership. And also for expected worst outcomes open discussion and critical thinking is the key of solution.

I partially disagree.
It is true that global politics does not depend only on one individual. However, when the president is the leader of the world's strongest country and can use their power to do whatever they want, then it depends on that individual. Trump is a fucking retard who has made the world economy unstable for a while now. He is doing whatever he wants. Was it legal to kidnap Maduro from Venezuela? Is it legal to threaten other countries to capture that? He wants Greenland, and he does not care about international law. How do you see that actually?

[Minor Miner]

The first time coming of Trump as a president was like a sheep, he was prey upon by America's and the world, and this time around, the second time as US president, he came as a beast, not to prey upon again by anyone.

However, all these strong man acting of Trump was as the result of what he experiences in his first tenure, he didn't want it to repeat again for people to take his rulership as what they could do rubbish and get away with it. Being strict and unpredictable is how he chooses to rule his government

Before entering politics, Trump was a businessman and a billionaire. Do you really think someone like that could be naive? I think you are the sheep, not Trump

Trump initiated a trade war with China during his first term. He also maintained a hostile stance toward Iran when he withdrew US from the nuclear agreement during the 2017–2021 period

It could be said that everything was planned in advance by him, but what he did not expect was to lose to Biden in the 2021 election. This forced him to postpone his plans, and what he is doing during this term is simply a continuation of those plans that were interrupted earlier.

[Cheema02]

Obviously Americans are fine with it, they were fine when they went to Libya, they were fine when they went to Iraq, they were fine when they had a war with Afghanistan, they were fine when they had a war with Vietnam, they never really bothered or cared. Americans have lived all their life in war, and all they know is war, so if any of their presidents ever open a war against another nation, they are not phased by it.

There are few other nations like that, but most of us do not live that. So we are shocked when there is a new war, and bothered by it, but they do not care because it's normal to them. Even in this topic, you get to see some Trumpers who are in love with him and defend him, even when he is causing hurt all over the world.

America has participate in many wars buy all Americans are not comfortable with this and also a lot of protests are seen against wars like Iraq, Iran and Vietnam because in wars te is loss of both money and lives. wars make trouble everywhere like not only military sides and also families and economy are both affected. So the solution is that government should make discussion on peace and avoid to blaming each other's. the individuals point of view can help to build a safe future.As we know America has participate in many wars buy all Americans are not comfortable with this and also a lot of protests are seen against wars like Iraq, Iran and Vietnam because in wars there is loss of both money and lives. And wars make trouble everywhere like not only military sides and also families and economy are both affected. So the solution is that government should make discussion on peace and avoid to blaming each other's and the individuals point of view can help to build a safe future.