Additionally, if you’re actively suing someone for defamation/slander, it’s probably best not to publicly engage with them in a hostile way, as this could complicate legal proceedings, escalate tensions, or undermine your case by providing more material for scrutiny.
Most forum members have experience limited to small claims court. This is big boy court - both Oggy and I signed something similar to "Other than the records listed in Schedules 1, 2, and 3, I do not have and never had any other relevant and material records under my control." He is limited to raising issues in his defence and will need to sue me if he cannot remember what he did.
I've said this before - my case is boosted anytime Oggy posts. Look at
this thread - desperate story raising awareness of stroke victims, then he "relaxes" a bit and makes a post claiming his small auction failure was worth more than the lifetime needs of such a victim. Then he sobers up and deletes it. That's what this topic is about. I won't need to post in Collectibles if Oggy keeps my name out of his fucking mouth. (whoops, wrong bad boy character)...
Not a joke, It's available online, recorded, archived. I read it personally. I am too good not to share it with anyone else, after all it will bring bad name to our community.
Weren't you given a temporary ban for trying to share it?

We've all read the weird jokes OgNasty made up about me over the years. They were malicious and actionable, yet they encouraged him to offer me merit, give design advice and give me part of his ponzi in exchange for "a banner or something promoting nastyfans" on BPIP. But I don't understand
your fascination with sexualizing children, BitcoinGirl.club.
On top of being a thief a pervert and a
possible drunk,
OgNasty has loose lips - everyone up to speed now?