virtual assistant/chatbots

[NotFuzzyWarm]

If you want to be private, in is better you do away with the AI that can easily collect information from you.
<snip>

There is no can about it.
AI/Chatbots DO collect information. While they are not allowed to collect personally identifiable information, what is collected is fairly general such as the nature of the inquiry, the structure of it and, if you accepted the bot's response, etc. Nonetheless, data IS being collected to be used for the AI training.

Personally, no way in hell would I want any sort of AI to automatically make ANY sort of financial transactions for me. Monitor market conditions etc and then make recommendations for me to decide what to do - sure.

[casey15]

As much as you'll fell it's convenient, it is highly not advisable.
Yes AI is intelligent even now the advancement has been mind blowing but I wouldn't recommend using them to make transactions. You should know that your use of AI is been recorded and stored somewhere with the opinion to be used for upgrades, analysis and to make the AI better.. imagine encountering a man in the middle attack. With you not manually observing the transaction, address can be changed. Giving your AI that much permission to handle financial transaction is risky as someone can control it to. You make think that the voice recognition will prevent that but these things can be bypassed.. do not use AI fir transactions

[Rustam Meraj]

Voice assistants and creative AI are enough alike, and tools such as Siri are increasingly useful in checking Bitcoin price in rush, but not making financial guesses, to avoid legal blame. However, according to me, their actual deal is huge security trap since now, fakes can create copies of your voice in 2026 with highest truth of 95 percent in order to beat body scans.

These devices (which are always-on and often keep voice records, which may be stolen by data leak) create risk of lasting blockchain mistake, or voice faking, which is much greater than ease, truly to be safe, I would always sign by hand to cold safe wallet not connected to internet.

[libert19]

...though when i asked siri whether or not bitcoin will rise, it didn’t say anything definitive.

I liked that.

when you are sending some bitcoin or making transactions, will you trust siri or any other virtual assistant to do it for you?

Nope.

how safe are we with them listening?

I have assistant disabled on my phone. IDK for sure, if it makes any difference though, I disabled it because I did not want it to hog phone resources and not for privacy reasons.

... All it takes is one little bug or glitch and all your money is gone. Why would you trust a piece of software, which was probably written by some random half baked "coder" from india?

Lol, why would these companies hire half baked coder though?

[Oluwa-btc]

I see virtual assistants more as convenience tools than intelligence tools. They’re very good at fetching information instantly because they’re plugged into the internet and databases not because they’re analyzing Bitcoin themselves. That’s why factual questions work well but opinion-based or predictive ones don’t.

Personally, I wouldn’t trust any assistant with something as sensitive as a Bitcoin transaction. Voice commands, background noise and privacy concerns introduce risks that don’t exist when you’re manually signing a transaction. For something as important as sending bitcoin or making transactions, manually doing them myself will always be the smartest approach.

I usually don't like the comparison given between Virtual Assistants and chatbots, because they're not the same thing.Firstly, virtual assistant is a name for a human remote worker.They can both handle the same tasks,but they're limited to certain roles and emotional intelligence.Which is why individuals or businesses hire more virtual assistants because of their abilities/skills.I believe Chatbots can't replace Virtual Assistants,they  only assist VA's with positioning and deeper support.