I was betting on our local basketball league, Finals series, Game 4. One team was already ahead 2–1, so I was thinking this might be an even game, maybe refs lean a bit toward the other side, the underdog.
The opening line was SMB -3.5, posted a day before the game. But then, about an hour before tip-off, something weird happened. The line suddenly flipped. TNT became -3.5. A full swing.
You rarely see this kind of movement in the NBA or other major leagues. But in smaller leagues, it happens. That’s what makes me wonder if syndicates already know what’s going to happen. Obviously, the public would still bet on SMB since they went from favorite to underdog, and they end up being the ones caught on the wrong side.
This is why line movement is something bettors really need to understand. It’s not just about which team looks better on paper, but about where the money is going and why.
Yes! Always there are an obvious sign of manipulation, but the tricky part is proving that the manipulation exists there.
At football, for example, this hapens when a penalty is awarded completely unnecessarily or when a player is unexpectedly sent off for a "non existent mistake"... the signs is very clear and quite obvious, but nothing conclusion can be drawn by the authorities based only on that. In other words... you do not even need to be a very attentive fan because the signs of manipulation are often quite obvious in any type of sport.
Unfortunately, I am someone who would like to bet more on smaller leagues and teams in my region, but I do not bet because the chances of these results being manipulated by the players themselves are significantly higher than in the larger leagues and teams.