Sherman kept pushing on whether the government could step in, force banks to buy $BTC, or use taxpayer money.
Bessent’s answer was basically: no authority, no mechanism, no bailout.
Not sure what do you mean here?, you said it yourself, someone kept pushing for government intervention to buy and bail out BTC and secretary of the US treasury said NO, that should close the conversation, why is that an issue?
I'm pretty sure the big majority of the reasonable people of crypto community would agree with that decision as well...
Can we no say that trump controls bitcoin?
Again not sure how did you come out to that conclusion, government has some BTC and other top marketcap coins in its holdings which were mostly seized assets , but 200,000 Bitcoin is not nearly enough to be able to control anything really, unless you mean the price?, in that case sure, they can decide to dump it all at the market price and create a short-term bear.
For instance Microstrategy currently holds >700,000 BTC, it there ever was a concern to be had, it makes more sense to be towards Microstrategy, wouldn't you say?