WWIII has started!

[hellflame]

China would not attack USA with hydrogen bomb. If they start they would lose more. Its population is very condense. China has the advantage without using HBombs.

I was only talking about the reason United States cannot attack China. Countries that build nuclear weapon are using it as an umbrella.

Who is the fool to dare attacking China, the factory of the world? It would be a big mistake to play with the dormant satan by attacking China in its land. In addition to be exposed to Chinese response (nuclear power, modern weapons, huge number of soldiers) he will face a chronic economic crisis because every power you see today is somehow depending on Chinese products in one way or another.

However this doesn't mean there are no ongoing war against China. But not all wars are similar. While the military option is available against Iran or other third world countries, there are other options with giant powers like China or Russia. The USA uses the ttading war against China and practice pressures over China allies in a try to reduce Chinese influence arround the world, but never think to eliminate it in full. It's almost the same situation with Russia as no one wants to get involved in a losing war against the Russian bear. Instead that it's more efficient to push its neighbors to a proxy war (Ukraine) or fight its allies arround the world.

Note that that actual war on Iran isn't isolated from the main fight against China. Stop cooperation with China was one of the major topics during the last negotiations between Iran and the USA.

The dream of satans minions is to have 10 kingdoms ruled by the one born with the name alex from either the seat of his adversary St Peter from either rome or have his seat brought to Jerusalem and a new temple and who is today directing proceedings to these politican puppets and he is extremely clever. His 2 brothers are mighty warlords today. He will use the situation in gaza to elevate his power among the masses. The death of the Iranian leader is a major catalyst for global strife and both the US and Israel in their current state are being deceived also by him. He is loyal to no country or humankind only his father who is satan and those who serve him upon this earth who work in every nation and corridor of power spreading their false universal gospel on mankind.

[Uhwuchukwu53]

The facts is while do Iran prefer this kind of confrontation rather than diplomatic tide? I stand to be corrected whenever one has any battle with one who is stronger you must position well before any kind of confrontation, hearing the death news of their supreme leader for me, it seems they are deceived my their weapon without proper accessment of what their opponent can do, loosing the heads is like lossing everything because it's very easy to put the citizens in fear to accept anything that comes to the tables as deal. If the leaders hard planned well diplomatic means would have keeps their life and protect more interest of their citizens and Nation at large. WW111 as mentioned can be just a mere dream only few will think this can easily start just like that many economy is down going into war in an unstable economy is ignorant of burying the nation in totality, Russia, war with Ukraine has not stabilize them and so many to mentioned it's error that diplomatic measure would have done but failure to apply it lead to the level of escalation.

[hellflame]

To the great Iranian people. Do NOT allow these marxist antiChrists to rule over your country! They are communists customised for the muslim world and serve the powers of satan. DO NOT BE DECEIVED!

If the US allows these communists to take control of Iran it will be clear that they all serve satan and the antichrist.



https://x.com/Maryam_Rajavi


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maryam_Rajavi
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Mujahedin_of_Iran



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People's_Mojahedin_Organization_of_Iran
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Shariati#Shariati_and_socialism



The People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI), also known as Mojahedin-e-Khalq (MEK) or Mojahedin-e-Khalq Organization (MKO; Persian: سازمان مجاهدین خلق ایران, romanized: Sâzmân-e Mojâhedin-e Khalgh-e Irân), is an Iranian dissident organization. It was an armed group until 2003, afterwards transitioning into a political group. Its headquarters is currently in Albania. The group's ideology was influenced by Islam and revolutionary Marxism;

This is very important for the Iranian people

[LTU_btc]

After it was announced about death of Ayatollah lot of people of Iran went to streets to celebrate, some were releasing fireworks. It's understandable reaction when this regime just in recent years killed tens of thousands Iran people. But question now what's going to happen next, how things will developp further.

iran’s supreme leader is now dead. this seems like war to me. i wonder which countries would side with iran and which ones will side with us or israel. middle eastern countries will definitely take sides because they are the ones most affected by the attacks.

can china take this as an opportunity to side with usa’s enemies?

I doubt that there will be many who will pick side of Iran. By picking side I mean taking real actions, not just some empty words. Look at desperate Iran response - they tried to attack US bases in half of Middle East countries. But probably they did more damage for civilian objects than USA military. None of these attacked countries isn't going to pick side of Iran.
China? No, they're not going to get involved. Russia? They have enough their problems in Ukraine that they would get involved into another conflict.

I doubt if Donald Trump can come for any of the BRICS countries especially Russia and China because it would be like fighting against the 10 countries that makes up the BRICS alliance so he is choosing his fight diplomatically. I think the US government is a catalyst because forming allegiance with Israel to fight Iran is a stupid thing to do because at the end of the day, Israel will bear the brunt while the US remains unharmed. Anyway, i'm not surprised because the US and Israel share a strong bond and the US has always lent a helping hand each time Israel is in trouble.

LOL, BRICS. Do you really believe that all BRICS countries is going to stand for attacked country? Yeah, yeah. But I don'yt see Trump doing same thing with Putin as he did with Maduro or Ayatollah. It looks that he don't see Putin as enemy, unlike these dictators.

[hostm]

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) attacked the US Navy aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln with four ballistic missiles, Tasnim reports, citing the IRGC's press service.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tE4OQc3gb1Q

[JackMazzoni]

After it was announced about death of Ayatollah lot of people of Iran went to streets to celebrate, some were releasing fireworks. It's understandable reaction when this regime just in recent years killed tens of thousands Iran people. But question now what's going to happen next, how things will developp further.

iran’s supreme leader is now dead. this seems like war to me. i wonder which countries would side with iran and which ones will side with us or israel. middle eastern countries will definitely take sides because they are the ones most affected by the attacks.

can china take this as an opportunity to side with usa’s enemies?

I doubt that there will be many who will pick side of Iran. By picking side I mean taking real actions, not just some empty words. Look at desperate Iran response - they tried to attack US bases in half of Middle East countries. But probably they did more damage for civilian objects than USA military. None of these attacked countries isn't going to pick side of Iran.
China? No, they're not going to get involved. Russia? They have enough their problems in Ukraine that they would get involved into another conflict.

I doubt if Donald Trump can come for any of the BRICS countries especially Russia and China because it would be like fighting against the 10 countries that makes up the BRICS alliance so he is choosing his fight diplomatically. I think the US government is a catalyst because forming allegiance with Israel to fight Iran is a stupid thing to do because at the end of the day, Israel will bear the brunt while the US remains unharmed. Anyway, i'm not surprised because the US and Israel share a strong bond and the US has always lent a helping hand each time Israel is in trouble.

LOL, BRICS. Do you really believe that all BRICS countries is going to stand for attacked country? Yeah, yeah. But I don'yt see Trump doing same thing with Putin as he did with Maduro or Ayatollah. It looks that he don't see Putin as enemy, unlike these dictators.

This actually happen, but this happens in a city where the Kurdish majority lives.  This people was simply trap in a country not their own kind.

[Hispo]

Posting this historial thread.
What a way to escalate things in the middle east ...
I wonder who this will eventually affect the stability of the Islamic Republic of Iran...

Something is safe to say, tho... It seems Trump wants to go down on history as the president who got rid of how many regimes as possible on the world: first Maduro and now this... I wonder whether he would dare to go out for Putin (unlike, considering how Russia still have access to nuclear weapons).

I doubt if Donald Trump can come for any of the BRICS countries especially Russia and China because it would be like fighting against the 10 countries that makes up the BRICS alliance so he is choosing his fight diplomatically. I think the US government is a catalyst because forming allegiance with Israel to fight Iran is a stupid thing to do because at the end of the day, Israel will bear the brunt while the US remains unharmed. Anyway, i'm not surprised because the US and Israel share a strong bond and the US has always lent a helping hand each time Israel is in trouble.

You are quite mistaken there.
BRICS+ is not a military alliance in the same manner NATO is, BRICS+ is merely a commercial alliance between the biggest surging economies of the developing world, but attacking one of those countries does not necessarily mean they rest will take arms and defend their allies.

Look at the war in Ukraine as an example, Russia is not getting direct assistance from South Africa or Brazil, even though those are countries which are members of the organization.

When comes to Israel and the United States, it is obvious that USA is up to defend Israel at all cost, because of the geopolitical interest and Israeli nationalism which is common in the region.

[Akbarkoe]

I'm back to the political thread on the forum...

And I'm still curious about why the US keeps interfering in the Middle East?
What did Israel give Trump that made him support the attack on Tehran? Is there something complex that makes Trump continue to support Netanyahu?

A few days ago, I watched a podcast by an American citizen and they said, "Why should they continue to support Israel?" Without any feedback, even direct support, this is a question for a small number of Americans.

It might be a bit off topic, but I think we'll have a deeper understanding of the wars that are taking place and understand the underlying causes of political relations. Although I doubt that World War III has started, we can only talk about the potential for escalation.

[Tonimez]

Israel has attacked Iran.   They are now in a state of war.  Since I started typing this the US has attacked as well.  

This is a very important question as it stands now. The world is already facing the wave secretly or sectionally and still claiming that we're not on world war 3. Trump is teaming up with Israel to attack Iran in which he (Trump) referred to the operation as "Moving along Rapidly" and claiming that their joint strikes has killed at least 48 Iranian leaders as of today. Now we have to admit that this is standing as a tiny stretch that can boomerang any moment. Another publication before now claims that the world war 3 depends on who wins the Russian -Ukraine war. Should Russia win, the next attack could be  China which will then escalate beyond Taiwan and Asia. Israel and Iranian war is still regional but it's possible to spread sooner. World powers are set and care not about the impact on the world.

[Emjay24]

... I wonder whether he would dare to go out for Putin (unlike, considering how Russia still have access to nuclear weapons).

He wouldn't even try it because it wouldn't end well for him, not that US would not win, but there would be daring consequences to such a careless action. Weakening then further with sections and their allies are a better option than a direct confrontation. If would be easier for the US to directly covering China that fit them to care pick on Russia as their next target, of course Trump knows better than having a direct confrontation with Russia.

[Btcdeybodi]

Posting this historial thread.
What a way to escalate things in the middle east ...
I wonder who this will eventually affect the stability of the Islamic Republic of Iran...

Something is safe to say, tho... It seems Trump wants to go down on history as the president who got rid of how many regimes as possible on the world: first Maduro and now this... I wonder whether he would dare to go out for Putin (unlike, considering how Russia still have access to nuclear weapons).

I doubt if Donald Trump can come for any of the BRICS countries especially Russia and China because it would be like fighting against the 10 countries that makes up the BRICS alliance so he is choosing his fight diplomatically. I think the US government is a catalyst because forming allegiance with Israel to fight Iran is a stupid thing to do because at the end of the day, Israel will bear the brunt while the US remains unharmed. Anyway, i'm not surprised because the US and Israel share a strong bond and the US has always lent a helping hand each time Israel is in trouble.

You are quite mistaken there.
BRICS+ is not a military alliance in the same manner NATO is, BRICS+ is merely a commercial alliance between the biggest surging economies of the developing world, but attacking one of those countries does not necessarily mean they rest will take arms and defend their allies.

Look at the war in Ukraine as an example, Russia is not getting direct assistance from South Africa or Brazil, even though those are countries which are members of the organization.

When comes to Israel and the United States, it is obvious that USA is up to defend Israel at all cost, because of the geopolitical interest and Israeli nationalism which is common in the region.

I understand you, let's just say that the US can't attack Russia's government as they are attacking other minor countries because Russia has a strong military intelligence and nuclear arsenal and in the global firepower review they are ranked second after the US so it will be difficult for US to invade Russia and harm Putin. However, it's high time that Donald Trump stopped harassing countries if not a time will come when those countries will form alliance which will be very disastrous and if such thing happens, world warIII might be inevitable.

[programmer3666]

US is targeting Venezuela then Iran, This is major cheap oil supplier of China. Oil suppliers like Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Canada and Qatar are under direct control of USA.  The real target is China. War with China could be in 2027 or later half of 2026.  There are no later date to defeat China,  China is growing strong each year. While Us is becoming less powerful each year. After 2027 it is very hard to defeat China.

Honestly, this whole hitting Iran during negotiations is just unwarranted if you ask me, all the United States cares about is hurting China's economy so any country in the global setting that does any form of business to boost the economic status of China will be a soft target for the US. So all the talks of nuclear bombs are just to justify the illegal war that they started along with Israel, well I just hope they end it soon because at the end of the day, only the innocent citizens suffer the aftermaths.

[Sexylizzy2813]

no its not started yet

as it would only last a day and no one would be on the internet asking

We should start running but to where? My  confusion about this is that, the countries involved are still negotiating and the next thing boom... they started attacking each other. Well, I think all these countries that are creating or developing new weapons are some how flexing their muscles, warming up for a war that might not happen.

[trendcoin]

There won't be a world war because there is no such polarization in the world.

If fascism grows more, socialism rises again, or other ideologies gain strength, we can talk about polarization, but today there is no such polarization in the world.

Russia invaded Ukraine, and Europe couldn't do anything about it. The US kidnapped the president of Venezuela and bombed Iran, and no one will do anything about it.

Because there is no united force anywhere that can respond to these actions.

[hostm]

Most US troops have been withdrawn from their bases in the Middle East, and now their soldiers have taken refuge in hotels, using human shields for cover. This is their standard tactic. But we must not forget that everyone understands who started the war.

In the past, troops were hastily withdrawn from Afghanistan due to terrorist attacks. US soldiers, although they consider themselves Christians, fear death. But Muslims do not fear death. They will avenge the death of their spiritual leader by any means necessary.

Trump shouldn't have gotten involved in this war.

[Masinisa]

There won't be a world war because there is no such polarization in the world.

If fascism grows more, socialism rises again, or other ideologies gain strength, we can talk about polarization, but today there is no such polarization in the world.

Russia invaded Ukraine, and Europe couldn't do anything about it. The US kidnapped the president of Venezuela and bombed Iran, and no one will do anything about it.

Because there is no united force anywhere that can respond to these actions.

Both USA and Russian protection promises cost nothing when it comes to business. Just talks.

[LimPinks]

I doubt that there will be many who will pick side of Iran.

Many countries may not take military action, but some will still support Iran diplomatically or criticize the US. As we can see most governments want to avoid escalation rather than openly choose sides especially if it's against USA/Russia/China

[hostm]

A Senegalese migrant opened fire at a bar in Texas, killing two people and wounding 14. The New York Post (NYP) reported this on March 1, citing a law enforcement source.

"Two victims and the shooter died at the scene. Another 14 people were taken to nearby hospitals," the publication said.

[_Miracle]

Billionaires: Looks like the Epstein Files are finally coming out.

Politicians: Any Ideas?

Governments: ...



    

1-27-26 85 seconds to midnight

Iron Maiden - 2 Minutes To Midnight
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qbRHY1l0vc

Black Sabbath - War Pigs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bc5Nk1DXyEY


Orwell Key Views on War:
*Purpose of War: In 1984, war is a way to consume the products of human labor without increasing the standard of living, thus keeping the population dependent.
*Perpetual Conflict: The goal is not victory over an enemy, but keeping the social structure and ruling class intact.
*Propaganda and Truth: Orwell argued that war propaganda, characterized by lies and hatred, is usually spread by those not fighting. He noted that "every war... is represented not as a war but as an act of self-defense".

                                 "War is Peace": This phrase from 1984 signifies that a continuous, stable war creates domestic stability for the ruling party.


                                  
 Guess who's children won't be going to war?

[Wakate]

A Senegalese migrant opened fire at a bar in Texas, killing two people and wounding 14. The New York Post (NYP) reported this on March 1, citing a law enforcement source.

"Two victims and the shooter died at the scene. Another 14 people were taken to nearby hospitals," the publication said.

Could this be as a result of the attack on Iran? I don't think Senegal has any tie with Iran to make make the shooter to take justice by attacking American people in their own land. Maybe this should be seen as a meer scenerio where someone is trying to act abnormal by attack innocent people perhaps as a result of a revenge that might have happened long time.