AI Spam Buster Tools - for Bitcointalk

[seoincorporation]

Since this morning i started working on a control panel to verify full threads looking for AI posters, if we add a OpenAI Api Key we can let the AI do a fast check.

The tool can:
- Read a thread link and make a JSON from the thread
- Provide the data on a panel
- Optionally, analyze it with AI (OpenAI)
- Export the CVS

To Do:
- I would like to be able to provide a user profile to verify the last 10 or 20 posts from that user.
- Make the engine analyse with the main AI detectors API keys.

1. GPTZero - 70% probability to contain AI generated text or higher
2. Copyleaks AI Content Detector - 70% probability for AI or higher
3. Sapling AI Detector - 70% Fake or higher
4. Quillbot - 70% of text is likely to come from AI or higher
5. Zerogpt - 70% likely to include parts generated by AI/GPT or higher
6. StealthWriter - 70% AI probability or higher
7. Originality.ai - 70% confident that text is AI generated or higher

The code was made with PHP and it doesn't have databases or memory.

It has been a fun project to code, it only took 5 hours. And the goal is to make it public for anyone to use it when it gets done (Right now running in localhost).

@OP: here's a challenge for you: how about you report 42 chatbot verbal diarrhae spammers and get them banned? And not just newbies, that's easy. Find and report the Member+ Ranks who do this. It will give you some understanding of the effort put into cleaning the spam from Bitcointalk.
If you can list 42 "AI" spammers that you got banned, I'll add another neutral tag saying you made amends in my opinion

The challenge was to get 42 Spammers, and I promise my tools will help the community catch more than 1,000 AI spammers.

And from the community i need ideas, ¿what other tool should i build or integrate? And if you see a problem with my engine, please let me know. By the way, I made it forum-friendly, it has a cooldown time for each request to avoid any abuse.

[seoincorporation]

Here is the Beta version 0.1 of the tool.

https://lucky.lat/btc/

I added all the promised stuff.

- Incorporation with AI analyst tools.
- User's last posts Verify.
- Multiple tools analyses.

To use the AI tools, you will have to pay with your own tokens.

[robelneo]

Interesting, it will make things easy to catch AI spammers instead of manually checking every posts all the top AI checkers are integrated in one interface.
I disagree that it will only catch 1000 spammers, but every spammer in the forum, and the number could be higher than your assessment. Keep it up, brother.

[seoincorporation]

Interesting, it will make things easy to catch AI spammers instead of manually checking every posts all the top AI checkers are integrated in one interface.
I disagree that it will only catch 1000 spammers, but every spammer in the forum, and the number could be higher than your assessment. Keep it up, brother.

Chears mate!

Now let me explain how to use it to find spammers. We have 2 ways to find them:

- Looking on a thread.
- Verify the user profile.

We can even look to the users under patrol section: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=recent;patrol and directly view their profiles:



The next step is to notify the moderators to remove the spam, and then, if the user is a true abuser, report it to the AI Spam Busters. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.0)

[fullfitlarry]

Hi, I try to replicate everything and test it myself, unfortunately I'm not getting the same result.

Am I doing something wrong here?

Steps I did:

1. Enter this thread, (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5577220.0), just like in your post.



2. Click Analyze with Selected

And this is the result. No detection, but in your screen shot, it has detected % on it.



And nice tools by the way.

[ABCbits]

And from the community i need ideas, ¿what other tool should i build or integrate?

It's not tool. But for checking recent post from a user, consider add feature to combine multiple short post into a checker. There are some discussion the checker is less reliable on short post, so some member decide to combine multiple short post.

Hi, I try to replicate everything and test it myself, unfortunately I'm not getting the same result.
--snip--
And this is the result. No detection, but in your screen shot, it has detected % on it.

It's probably because you don't enter OpenAI or other checker API. I didn't check it, but i expect all of the API are paid.

[LoyceV]

What "AI detection" percentage do my posts get?

[aioc]

I have a hard time with the night mode screenshots its better to replace them with day mode screenshots for members to clearly see
the interface.
To use this tool and avoid abuse, you have to provide your own API key, which you can purchase on a subscription or pay-per-use basis, depending on the AI you are using. It is highly recommended for AI busters of the forum.
I'm looking forward to seeing more results posted here in Bitcointalk in the coming days.

[TypoTonic]

Hi, I try to replicate everything and test it myself, unfortunately I'm not getting the same result.

Am I doing something wrong here?

There's most likely an issue when connecting to the API. Hover your mouse above the AI detection results, a tooltip will show the error for each detector you used (OAI, SAP, ZGPT), and it should at least give you an idea of what went wrong.

[seoincorporation]

What "AI detection" percentage do my posts get?

Your profile looks like this:

Hi, I try to replicate everything and test it myself, unfortunately I'm not getting the same result.

Am I doing something wrong here?

Steps I did:

1. Enter this thread, (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5577220.0), just like in your post.

...

2. Click Analyze with Selected

And this is the result. No detection, but in your screen shot, it has detected % on it.

...

And nice tools by the way.

If the API key is invalid, then you will get that error:

[LoyceV]

What "AI detection" percentage do my posts get?

Your profile looks like this:

I know for a fact there's no "AI" content in my posts, so it's a good assessment of how accurate the detection is. Calling data dumps AI is incorrect, but not really surprising. It's more concerning that some of my other posts get a 35% "AI" score. That makes me think the entire scale should be shifted: what's currently 30%, should be 0%.

[examplens]

What "AI detection" percentage do my posts get?

Your profile looks like this:

I know for a fact there's no "AI" content in my posts, so it's a good assessment of how accurate the detection is. Calling data dumps AI is incorrect, but not really surprising. It's more concerning that some of my other posts get a 35% "AI" score. That makes me think the entire scale should be shifted: what's currently 30%, should be 0%.

Most tools offer a free check, and the result is almost always "critical,", i.e. recognized as written by AI. Most often, such tools also offer premium features that offer rewriting and 100% humanizing text. I'm pretty sure the purpose of these AI checker tools is just to sell premium subscriptions.
It seems that AI mania has been recognized as a serious addiction, the more you use it, the more you need it. OP is an obvious example, in a very short time, he went from being an AI spammer to catching an AI spammer using AI tools.