Strait of Hormuz now open?

[logfiles]

P.S. By the way, Iran isn’t stopping its terror and today once again shelled a neighboring country, the UAE, which has never shown any aggression toward Iran. Doesn’t it seem that Iran is now provoking all the surrounding countries into harsh retaliatory measures?

I believe they shelled the UAE because they are siding with the US or something in those lines. Any country at war would have done the same especially when they don't have much to lose.

What Iran is doing right now is "if the US tries to put pressure on us or move their military closer to our territory, we shall bomb their allies and infrastructure in the region"
To stop all this, the US knows what to do, but their ego is too inflated.

[batang_bitcoin]

P.S. By the way, Iran isn’t stopping its terror and today once again shelled a neighboring country, the UAE, which has never shown any aggression toward Iran. Doesn’t it seem that Iran is now provoking all the surrounding countries into harsh retaliatory measures?

I believe they shelled the UAE because they are siding with the US or something in those lines. Any country at war would have done the same especially when they don't have much to lose.

I agree, they have US bases there and that's why they're being targeted by Iran.

But it's unclear yet, because Trump didn't specify what steps the United States will take to help the ships exit the Strait. It's surprising that Bitcoin is rising amid such mildly positive news.

I am also confused with that but let's wait on how they will deescalate things from there. As they have blockaded the blockade there, now we'll have to see on what shall be the next move they'd do in the Strait. I'm also surprised with the news when it's not yet confirmed by Iran's side. But we love it when the market moves a lot although it still feels different knowing this war is still uncertain when to end.

[Just Say]

Your point is very realistic about Strait of Hormuz and its directly pet pressure on energy markets and also on world economy. So when oil shortage occurs then its leads the inflation which then directly collapse the stock market. But sometimes markets not directly response to these situations because the traders expects the alternative routes for trading or some diplomatic solutions so a little delay can be seen in trade market.

It is literally true that when there is a shortage of oil, it leads to inflation which directly collapse the stock market, we are seeing this now because Iran has been controlling this waterway since the war started more than two months ago and if I am not mistaken, hundreds of commercial ships and thousands of sailors are stuck there, in fact their main goal was to keep their country's economic wheels moving by supplying oil. However, you are somewhat right that sometimes the market does not respond directly to this situation because then traders expect a diplomatic solution but the current situation between Iran and the United States does not seem to be that this Strait of Hormuz can be opened very quickly through a diplomatic solution.

And governments use its reserves in this time and if conflicts continue for longer time then its also damage the liquidity assets like bitcoins but after some time Bitcoins recover easily. And also your point is valid and the conflicted countries trying to maintain the situation through general discussions on ceasefire talk and temporarily the market is going to stable.

One thing is true that Bitcoin has recovered easily even in this war situation as you notice Bitcoin has crossed the eighty thousand dollar range for the first time since the military war between Iran and the United States began.

[Minor Miner]

P.S. By the way, Iran isn’t stopping its terror and today once again shelled a neighboring country, the UAE, which has never shown any aggression toward Iran. Doesn’t it seem that Iran is now provoking all the surrounding countries into harsh retaliatory measures?

I believe they shelled the UAE because they are siding with the US or something in those lines. Any country at war would have done the same especially when they don't have much to lose.

What Iran is doing right now is "if the US tries to put pressure on us or move their military closer to our territory, we shall bomb their allies and infrastructure in the region"
To stop all this, the US knows what to do, but their ego is too inflated.

If I remember correctly, there were many rumor that the UAE played an active role in the war and was the starting point of the US attack on Kharg Island. If that is true, it means the US is using its military bases in the UAE, and the UAE helped the US attack Iran during the conflict. Then there is nothing wrong when Iran launches drone at the UAE.

The US and Israel were the initiator of the war. Therefore, the terrorist are the US and Israel. Iran is simply a country that has been invaded, and they are defending themselves.

[yixichloro2xx]

P.S. By the way, Iran isn’t stopping its terror and today once again shelled a neighboring country, the UAE, which has never shown any aggression toward Iran. Doesn’t it seem that Iran is now provoking all the surrounding countries into harsh retaliatory measures?

I believe they shelled the UAE because they are siding with the US or something in those lines. Any country at war would have done the same especially when they don't have much to lose.

What Iran is doing right now is "if the US tries to put pressure on us or move their military closer to our territory, we shall bomb their allies and infrastructure in the region"
To stop all this, the US knows what to do, but their ego is too inflated.

If I remember correctly, there were many rumor that the UAE played an active role in the war and was the starting point of the US attack on Kharg Island. If that is true, it means the US is using its military bases in the UAE, and the UAE helped the US attack Iran during the conflict. Then there is nothing wrong when Iran launches drone at the UAE.

The US and Israel were the initiator of the war. Therefore, the terrorist are the US and Israel. Iran is simply a country that has been invaded, and they are defending themselves.

You are somehow right, because we can clearly see that Iran didn't start the war nor did they attack any country. What Isreal and USA did requires international query and punishment, they have been telling us that Iran are just weeks away from get Nuclear weapons since the 90s and we never see any prove of them having it. They just want to destabilize the country more just like they did in Iran. If Iran was actually a threat to the world, other big countries would have join USA  and Israel in fighting, but they chose not to because they know the truth. UAE, Saudi Arabia, and other GCC countries has bad relations with IRan., so it will be a joy for them if they country is ruined. I see Iran blocking the strait of Harmouz as their own means of self defense. Because it was opened to everyone before the US attacked them.

[programmer3666]

Your point is very realistic about Strait of Hormuz and its directly pet pressure on energy markets and also on world economy. So when oil shortage occurs then its leads the inflation which then directly collapse the stock market. But sometimes markets not directly response to these situations because the traders expects the alternative routes for trading or some diplomatic solutions so a little delay can be seen in trade market.

It is literally true that when there is a shortage of oil, it leads to inflation which directly collapse the stock market, we are seeing this now because Iran has been controlling this waterway since the war started more than two months ago and if I am not mistaken, hundreds of commercial ships and thousands of sailors are stuck there, in fact their main goal was to keep their country's economic wheels moving by supplying oil. However, you are somewhat right that sometimes the market does not respond directly to this situation because then traders expect a diplomatic solution but the current situation between Iran and the United States does not seem to be that this Strait of Hormuz can be opened very quickly through a diplomatic solution.

And governments use its reserves in this time and if conflicts continue for longer time then its also damage the liquidity assets like bitcoins but after some time Bitcoins recover easily. And also your point is valid and the conflicted countries trying to maintain the situation through general discussions on ceasefire talk and temporarily the market is going to stable.

One thing is true that Bitcoin has recovered easily even in this war situation as you notice Bitcoin has crossed the eighty thousand dollar range for the first time since the military war between Iran and the United States began.

Right now the situation around the Strait of Hormuz is making things even worse. The latest news about Iran striking some US navy ships and the US responding by bombing Iranian fast boats is only adding more tension. At this point, the conflict is clearly having a negative effect on the global economy, oil prices, inflation and even crypto markets are all reacting to the uncertainty. Honestly, no matter which side anyone supports, the sad reality is that innocent people are the ones suffering the most. Many are dying or struggling because of a situation they never chose to be part of. We can only hope things calm down soon and a diplomatic solution is reached, because continuing like this will only make things worse for everyone.

[summonerrk]

Yesterday was a day full of escalatory moments: one action, then another. And markets reacted strongly, sometimes positively, sometimes negatively. Well, last night, as we know, the US and Iran exchanged fire in the Persian Gulf. Meanwhile, the US military repelled attacks by Iranian drones, missiles, and armed small boats, ensuring the passage of two US-flagged vessels through the Strait of Hormuz. And for the first time since the ceasefire between Washington and Tehran began almost a month ago, they issued a missile warning to their citizens. The violence has again sparked calls for the US and its ally Israel to resume attacks on Iran. Overall, Bitcoin is rising on this news and is now at 81.5k.

[DrBeer]

P.S. By the way, Iran isn’t stopping its terror and today once again shelled a neighboring country, the UAE, which has never shown any aggression toward Iran. Doesn’t it seem that Iran is now provoking all the surrounding countries into harsh retaliatory measures?

I believe they shelled the UAE because they are siding with the US or something in those lines. Any country at war would have done the same especially when they don't have much to lose.

What Iran is doing right now is "if the US tries to put pressure on us or move their military closer to our territory, we shall bomb their allies and infrastructure in the region"
To stop all this, the US knows what to do, but their ego is too inflated.

Wait, wait, wait! Is the UAE on the U.S. side? Are they carrying out strikes together? Who was the FIRST to launch strikes against the UAE, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Iraq, and Cyprus?
 
Question: Can other countries, any other countries, launch strikes against Iran simply because Iran maintains ties, for example, with terrorists who oppose those countries? Or does the rule of “striking those who seem to be on their side” apply only in one specific situation? And only if they are supposedly “allies against Iran”?
Next question-the US announced, just as the Iranian military junta wanted, a ceasefire, halting strikes on Iran. The US stopped the strikes, but Iran... CONTINUED.
When you try to justify the crimes of the Iranian military junta, don’t forget that anyone can play by these rules!
And let’s say then that Israel struck Iran completely legally, and brought in its ALLY, in response to the terrorist attack on Israel last year, when Hamas attacked Israel and Iran is... their ALLIES, sponsors, arms suppliers... Is that right? Did I get anything wrong?  

P.S. Please tell us, for example, about the U.S. military bases in  Oman and Cyprus; it would be very interesting to hear from you!

[Ayers]

Before Trump decided to launch a preemptive strike against Iran and US supporters also believed that. They believed that Iran would surrender immediately because the US had overwhelming military superiority. But the result is that 60 day have passed, and the US is still unable to subdue Iran

Similarly, they are shifting to an economic lockdown strategy because Trump 60 day commander-in-chief authority has ended under the constitution. This time they are also boasting that Iran would soon surrender and cave. But let's wait and see what happen instead of just dreaming.

I suppose the U.S. could resolve this issue through military force. But... that would have a host of negative consequences.
Total war is no longer just precision strikes on factories, bases, and military groups; it involves the destruction of cities, the mass killing of civilians, the global destruction of infrastructure, and a humanitarian catastrophe-for example,  as Russia has been doing in Ukraine for many years.
Trump doesn’t need this; his approval ratings aren’t in the best shape anyway.
Many in his inner circle and politicians from other countries said, “The war must be stopped,” and he did just that... The active phase of the war has ended; now it’s purely an economic blockade.

P.S. By the way, Iran isn’t stopping its terror and today once again shelled a neighboring country, the UAE, which has never shown any aggression toward Iran. Doesn’t it seem that Iran is now provoking all the surrounding countries into harsh retaliatory measures?
 

The US has a significant military advantage over Iran, but saying that they can solve the problem by force alone, I doubt it.

The Trump administration stopped using force and declared the war over because they realized that the strategy was ineffective and more costly than anticipated. If the war dragged on any longer, they would only suffer more losses and lose face internationally. Furthermore, the 60 day deadline had expired, and the decision of whether or not to continue the war now rested with Congress
The Trump administration is not as noble as you think, and stopping the war was not because they were afraid of causing civilian casualties. Because if they were truly kind, they would not have started the war and let it drag on for almost 2 month.

The US and Israel are the real terrorist.

[logfiles]

Wait, wait, wait! Is the UAE on the U.S. side?

Don't be dumb

Are they carrying out strikes together?

They don't need to. They are weak cowardly US ass lickers who provide assistance in another way.

 

Who was the FIRST to launch strikes against the UAE, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Iraq, and Cyprus?

Who was the first to strike Iran, and who provided bases for American planes or troops? You think the American War planes flew all the way from the US? WTF is in your head?
 

Question: Can other countries, any other countries, launch strikes against Iran simply because Iran maintains ties, for example, with terrorists who oppose those countries? Or does the rule of “striking those who seem to be on their side” apply only in one specific situation? And only if they are supposedly “allies against Iran”?

Define terrorism. Last I remember it has been the US and Israel terrorizing the countries around world most of the time. They even kill young kids and civilians, and they don't care.

Next question-the US announced, just as the Iranian military junta wanted, a ceasefire, halting strikes on Iran. The US stopped the strikes, but Iran... CONTINUED.
When you try to justify the crimes of the Iranian military junta, don’t forget that anyone can play by these rules!
And let’s say then that Israel struck Iran completely legally, and brought in its ALLY, in response to the terrorist attack on Israel last year, when Hamas attacked Israel and Iran is... their ALLIES, sponsors, arms suppliers... Is that right? Did I get anything wrong?  

You are clearly ignorant about how the US and the British tried to torment Iran for over half a century and why that beef has been there for long. When you are done educating yourself, come back here and try to lecture me about war crimes/Terrorism or do I need to provide you with some educational material to open your eyes?

P.S. Please tell us, for example, about the U.S. military bases in  Oman and Cyprus; it would be very interesting to hear from you!

You have the internet right before you, but you can't even see anything. How dumb you must be to back the Murican terrorists. When they used to joke about the America education system and literacy levels, I used to think people were so cruel to them. I am starting to think otherwise.

----

US Military bases by country because you don't want or know how to look them up - https://www.warcosts.org/bases/countries

[DanWalker]

Wait, wait, wait! Is the UAE on the U.S. side? Are they carrying out strikes together? Who was the FIRST to launch strikes against the UAE, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Iraq, and Cyprus?
 

The more accurate question is, who started this war first? Who launched the preemptive attack while negotiation were still ongoing?
Iran attacked those countries, but it was only a counterattack, not the initiator of the war. If the US does not attack Iran, Iran will not retaliate against US allies or military bases.

If you insist that Russia is a terrorist state for attacking Ukraine, then admit it, the US is also a terrorist state for attacking Iran. Please stop deceiving yourself, okay?

[Minor Miner]

P.S. By the way, Iran isn’t stopping its terror and today once again shelled a neighboring country, the UAE, which has never shown any aggression toward Iran. Doesn’t it seem that Iran is now provoking all the surrounding countries into harsh retaliatory measures?

I believe they shelled the UAE because they are siding with the US or something in those lines. Any country at war would have done the same especially when they don't have much to lose.

What Iran is doing right now is "if the US tries to put pressure on us or move their military closer to our territory, we shall bomb their allies and infrastructure in the region"
To stop all this, the US knows what to do, but their ego is too inflated.

If I remember correctly, there were many rumor that the UAE played an active role in the war and was the starting point of the US attack on Kharg Island. If that is true, it means the US is using its military bases in the UAE, and the UAE helped the US attack Iran during the conflict. Then there is nothing wrong when Iran launches drone at the UAE.

The US and Israel were the initiator of the war. Therefore, the terrorist are the US and Israel. Iran is simply a country that has been invaded, and they are defending themselves.

You are somehow right, because we can clearly see that Iran didn't start the war nor did they attack any country. What Isreal and USA did requires international query and punishment, they have been telling us that Iran are just weeks away from get Nuclear weapons since the 90s and we never see any prove of them having it. They just want to destabilize the country more just like they did in Iran. If Iran was actually a threat to the world, other big countries would have join USA  and Israel in fighting, but they chose not to because they know the truth. UAE, Saudi Arabia, and other GCC countries has bad relations with IRan., so it will be a joy for them if they country is ruined. I see Iran blocking the strait of Harmouz as their own means of self defense. Because it was opened to everyone before the US attacked them.

Another interesting fact that I guess many people do not know is Israel is the only country in the Middle East that possesses nuclear weapon, with an estimated 90 warhead. But ironically, the US has never publicly announced it, and Israel has never acknowledged it either.

Not only Iran, but even North Korea has never posed a threat to the world. They have never invaded and plundered any country like the United States has done.

Before the war, the Strait of Hormuz was a free shipping lane for decades .
https://mondoweiss.net/2026/04/a-brief-history-of-the-israeli-nuclear-program-the-open-secret-at-the-heart-of-the-iran-war/
https://jacobin.com/2026/03/israel-iran-war-nuclear-weapons

[DrBeer]

Wait, wait, wait! Is the UAE on the U.S. side? Are they carrying out strikes together? Who was the FIRST to launch strikes against the UAE, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Iraq, and Cyprus?
 

The more accurate question is, who started this war first? Who launched the preemptive attack while negotiation were still ongoing?
Iran attacked those countries, but it was only a counterattack, not the initiator of the war. If the US does not attack Iran, Iran will not retaliate against US allies or military bases.

If you insist that Russia is a terrorist state for attacking Ukraine, then admit it, the US is also a terrorist state for attacking Iran. Please stop deceiving yourself, okay?

I’m going to ask you a question, apologies in advance for the nature of it, but I’m curious to see if your answer reveals that you’re being hypocritical or if this is truly how you’d reason. So, two people got into a fight on the next street over. One of them runs into your house and starts threatening to shoot your family because…
well, because he has a conflict with the other person, and his bike is parked in your parking lot. Is that right? Is that fair and honest? No need for philosophy-just answer: would you accept this as a matter of course?

I hope you understand the essence of the situation-or is “this something else”?
 

[logfiles]

Another interesting fact that I guess many people do not know is Israel is the only country in the Middle East that possesses nuclear weapon, with an estimated 90 warhead. But ironically, the US has never publicly announced it, and Israel has never acknowledged it either.

Not only Iran, but even North Korea has never posed a threat to the world. They have never invaded and plundered any country like the United States has done.

The Hypocritical standards laid out by The United Stated of America, Israel and its backers keep surprising me and anyone with a sober mind to proportional heights.

I’m going to ask you a question, apologies in advance for the nature of it, but I’m curious to see if your answer reveals that you’re being hypocritical or if this is truly how you’d reason. So, two people got into a fight on the next street over. One of them runs into your house and starts threatening to shoot your family because…
well, because he has a conflict with the other person, and his bike is parked in your parking lot. Is that right? Is that fair and honest? No need for philosophy-just answer: would you accept this as a matter of course?

I hope you understand the essence of the situation-or is “this something else”?

Phrase it better, don't put it into a simple fist fight.

Example 1
A neighbor hosts a rogue violent criminal who keeps shooting at your house, damaging your property and endangering the lives of your family, but the neighbor won't tell the violent criminal that what he is doing is wrong. In fact the neighbor gives the criminal a room to reside in, some food and a store for more stockpiles of ammo for his next attacks. The rogue criminal can't attack you directly from his home that is several kilometers away from your town but has to come to the neighborhood to launch his attacks. What do you do?

Example 2
Police is hunting out for a criminal that decided to terrorize your community and the criminal is taken in by one of the neighbors who hosts him for several months. The criminal then uses the neighbors home to continue terrorizing the community. According to the law we all know, where do you think the neighbor lies?

[Oluwa-btc]

Example 1
A neighbor hosts a rogue violent criminal who keeps shooting at your house, damaging your property and endangering the lives of your family, but the neighbor won't tell the violent criminal that what he is doing is wrong. In fact the neighbor gives the criminal a room to reside in, some food and a store for more stockpiles of ammo for his next attacks. The rogue criminal can't attack you directly from his home that is several kilometers away from your town but has to come to the neighborhood to launch his attacks. What do you do?

Example 2
Police is hunting out for a criminal that decided to terrorize your community and the criminal is taken in by one of the neighbors who hosts him for several months. The criminal then uses the neighbors home to continue terrorizing the community. According to the law we all know, where do you think the neighbor lies?

Addition to example 1;
Meanwhile, there's been prior agreement established between your neighbour that this rogue and violent criminal will not be accommodated. But the neighbour still went ahead to do his deeds. First one I'd call it broad day light betrayal.

Example 2;
With the criminal and will face same fate as the criminal. This is broad day light conspiracy, accommodating a criminal for that long and also allowing the criminal to stay that extent with him.

[Olatundespo]

P.S. By the way, Iran isn’t stopping its terror and today once again shelled a neighboring country, the UAE, which has never shown any aggression toward Iran. Doesn’t it seem that Iran is now provoking all the surrounding countries into harsh retaliatory measures?

I believe they shelled the UAE because they are siding with the US or something in those lines. Any country at war would have done the same especially when they don't have much to lose.

What Iran is doing right now is "if the US tries to put pressure on us or move their military closer to our territory, we shall bomb their allies and infrastructure in the region"
To stop all this, the US knows what to do, but their ego is too inflated.

If I remember correctly, there were many rumor that the UAE played an active role in the war and was the starting point of the US attack on Kharg Island. If that is true, it means the US is using its military bases in the UAE, and the UAE helped the US attack Iran during the conflict. Then there is nothing wrong when Iran launches drone at the UAE.

The US and Israel were the initiator of the war. Therefore, the terrorist are the US and Israel. Iran is simply a country that has been invaded, and they are defending themselves.

You are somehow right, because we can clearly see that Iran didn't start the war nor did they attack any country. What Isreal and USA did requires international query and punishment, they have been telling us that Iran are just weeks away from get Nuclear weapons since the 90s and we never see any prove of them having it. They just want to destabilize the country more just like they did in Iran. If Iran was actually a threat to the world, other big countries would have join USA  and Israel in fighting, but they chose not to because they know the truth. UAE, Saudi Arabia, and other GCC countries has bad relations with IRan., so it will be a joy for them if they country is ruined. I see Iran blocking the strait of Harmouz as their own means of self defense. Because it was opened to everyone before the US attacked them.

International nuclear agencies and US intelligence agencies have not been able to provide any reliable evidence against Iran, which is close to developing nuclear weapons. Donald Trump has attacked Iran by relying solely on Netanyahu and at his instigation. Kamala Harris the leader contesting the US election from the Democratic Party, has called the Iran war a "bullshit". Israel and the US administration have long tried to confront Iran's influential religious leaders politically. As part of that, they killed many influential leaders. They selectively killed military leaders and nuclear scientists. But in no way could these two powerful countries remove Iran from its nuclear program. Although they promoted that they had no option but to use force, Israel and America started the war mainly because they could not confront Iran politically.

[DrBeer]

Wait, wait, wait! Is the UAE on the U.S. side?

Don't be dumb

Are they carrying out strikes together?

They don't need to. They are weak cowardly US ass lickers who provide assistance in another way.

 

Who was the FIRST to launch strikes against the UAE, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Iraq, and Cyprus?

Who was the first to strike Iran, and who provided bases for American planes or troops? You think the American War planes flew all the way from the US? WTF is in your head?
 

Question: Can other countries, any other countries, launch strikes against Iran simply because Iran maintains ties, for example, with terrorists who oppose those countries? Or does the rule of “striking those who seem to be on their side” apply only in one specific situation? And only if they are supposedly “allies against Iran”?

Define terrorism. Last I remember it has been the US and Israel terrorizing the countries around world most of the time. They even kill young kids and civilians, and they don't care.

Next question-the US announced, just as the Iranian military junta wanted, a ceasefire, halting strikes on Iran. The US stopped the strikes, but Iran... CONTINUED.
When you try to justify the crimes of the Iranian military junta, don’t forget that anyone can play by these rules!
And let’s say then that Israel struck Iran completely legally, and brought in its ALLY, in response to the terrorist attack on Israel last year, when Hamas attacked Israel and Iran is... their ALLIES, sponsors, arms suppliers... Is that right? Did I get anything wrong?  

You are clearly ignorant about how the US and the British tried to torment Iran for over half a century and why that beef has been there for long. When you are done educating yourself, come back here and try to lecture me about war crimes/Terrorism or do I need to provide you with some educational material to open your eyes?

P.S. Please tell us, for example, about the U.S. military bases in  Oman and Cyprus; it would be very interesting to hear from you!

You have the internet right before you, but you can't even see anything. How dumb you must be to back the Murican terrorists. When they used to joke about the America education system and literacy levels, I used to think people were so cruel to them. I am starting to think otherwise.

----

US Military bases by country because you don't want or know how to look them up - https://www.warcosts.org/bases/countries

1. You’re looking pretty foolish right now for failing to provide evidence of the UAE’s involvement in the special operation against Iran, and you look even more foolish for “forgetting” about the other countries that the Iranian junta has attacked.
2. Do you consider this smart and well-reasoned? Meaning, can I back up all my arguments in the same way?
3. By latching onto the phrase “U.S. bases,” you still failed to answer my question about the countries the Iranian junta struck that had no bases. And once again, so you don’t sidestep the issue-as is typical of those who deliberately try to distort information-tell me: were the strikes on MILITARY bases? Or on oil facilities, storage depots, residential neighborhoods, business centers? Provide statistics on the strikes: how many were specifically on military bases and how many on civilian infrastructure.
4. Of course I’ll give you the definition since you’re unfamiliar with it and see the U.S. everywhere
State terrorism - a term used to describe state violence against civilians.
Acts of state terrorism are usually understood to include illegal detentions, killings, abductions, torture, and executions of civilians without trial or investigation, carried out by law enforcement personnel (police and other law enforcement agencies). State terrorism also refers to terrorist acts committed by members of special state agencies. A distinction is also made between state-sponsored terrorism-a situation where the state, without participating in terrorism itself, finances and supports terrorist groups.
Oh! And then we take your own concept and draw the conclusion: the strike against the Iranian regime was carried out in response to the terrorist attack committed by the terrorist group Hamas against Israel last year. Hamas is fully supported and financed by the Iranian regime, in case you’ve forgotten. Is that fair? Do you agree? Or is “that not it”?
  
5. Don’t call sanctions for terrorism “torture,” and everything will fall into place. Name the reasons for the sanctions, and we’ll discuss them, but you won’t get away with telling propaganda fairy tales here

6. I went online, typed in “Cyprus U.S. military base,” and got the entirely expected answer: “As of April 2026, the U.S. does not have any sovereign military bases in Cyprus.” You should do a little studying, read some REAL data, learn some facts, and you wouldn’t look so foolish!

P.S. You remind me of Russian propaganda, which claims that one of the reasons for the terrorist war launched against Ukraine is the “destruction of American biolabs” and “NATO generals”

[Emitdama]

International nuclear agencies and US intelligence agencies have not been able to provide any reliable evidence against Iran, which is close to developing nuclear weapons. Donald Trump has attacked Iran by relying solely on Netanyahu and at his instigation. Kamala Harris the leader contesting the US election from the Democratic Party, has called the Iran war a "bullshit". Israel and the US administration have long tried to confront Iran's influential religious leaders politically. As part of that, they killed many influential leaders. They selectively killed military leaders and nuclear scientists. But in no way could these two powerful countries remove Iran from its nuclear program. Although they promoted that they had no option but to use force, Israel and America started the war mainly because they could not confront Iran politically.

Well, they did not provided any proof back in Iraq times either. About 20-25 years ago give or take, they did attacked Iraq, and killed or wounded over a million people, A MILLION PEOPLE! and create a vacuum so big after they left that ISIS actually took over and destroyed thousands of years worth of artifacts, enslaved people, and killed everyone.

So it is not a shock that USA would attack a nation, for no reason, make up a lie, take their oil, and leave behind a much worse place. They have done this multiple times, and it is not a news to me. The first bomb was dropped when I realized they have no interest regards to nukes, or regime, or anything, all they wanted was oil, that's it. And that is why do not EVER consider USA as good guys, they never are.

[puloweh555]

The US has a significant military advantage over Iran, but saying that they can solve the problem by force alone, I doubt it.

The Trump administration stopped using force and declared the war over because they realized that the strategy was ineffective and more costly than anticipated. If the war dragged on any longer, they would only suffer more losses and lose face internationally. Furthermore, the 60 day deadline had expired, and the decision of whether or not to continue the war now rested with Congress
The Trump administration is not as noble as you think, and stopping the war was not because they were afraid of causing civilian casualties. Because if they were truly kind, they would not have started the war and let it drag on for almost 2 month.

The US and Israel are the real terrorist.

Indeed, many people are still blind to geopolitics, easily falling for US and Israeli propaganda. However, if they objectively looked at the Middle East, they would understand who the terrorists really are.

Before the US attacked Iran, oil prices were stable, but when the war broke out the Strait of Hormuz impacted oil prices. A few weeks ago when the Strait of Hormuz was opened oil prices fell again, but after the US embargoed the Strait of Hormuz oil prices rose again. So, the fault lies with Trump who is overly ambitious in wanting to control the Strait of Hormuz which is clearly not his sovereign territory.

Does anyone here know what right the US has to embargo ships leaving the Strait of Hormuz?
Because based on the initial peace agreement Iran had already opened the Strait of Hormuz. But a few hours later the US arrogantly and arbitrarily embargoed the Strait of Hormuz. Clearly from this we can conclude that the US lacks good intentions and wants to end the war.

This raises further questions. Now America is asking the UN for help in pressuring Iran to open the Strait of Hormuz. Iran should be the one asking the UN to pressure America not to block ships leaving the Strait of Hormuz. I'm sometimes confused by Donald Trump's way of thinking he's the one in the wrong, but everyone else is being pressured.

[Patrol69]

International nuclear agencies and US intelligence agencies have not been able to provide any reliable evidence against Iran, which is close to developing nuclear weapons. Donald Trump has attacked Iran by relying solely on Netanyahu and at his instigation. Kamala Harris the leader contesting the US election from the Democratic Party, has called the Iran war a "bullshit". Israel and the US administration have long tried to confront Iran's influential religious leaders politically. As part of that, they killed many influential leaders. They selectively killed military leaders and nuclear scientists. But in no way could these two powerful countries remove Iran from its nuclear program. Although they promoted that they had no option but to use force, Israel and America started the war mainly because they could not confront Iran politically.

Israel and the United States have attacked Iran several times and destroyed important Iranian installations. The war between Iran, Israel and America seems to have the world's strongest countries on one side and Iran on the other.

Basically, Iran has more than 750 kg of uranium, which is a lot, and with this amount of uranium they can make several nuclear weapons, and relying on this alone, the United States and Israel have attacked Iran several times.

Because of this war, Iran has lost its highest religious leader and various important military officers, so it was natural for Iran to respond by closing the Strait of Hormuz. Although now there is only a war in name and occasionally such news is heard that the Strait of Hormuz has been opened or will be opened, but the Strait of Hormuz has not been opened yet and Iran is being blocked by the US Navy.

I don't know what the future of this war will be in the end, but some results should come in favor of Iran, otherwise it will be completely unfair to this country.