Strait of Hormuz now open?

[Ayers]

International nuclear agencies and US intelligence agencies have not been able to provide any reliable evidence against Iran, which is close to developing nuclear weapons. Donald Trump has attacked Iran by relying solely on Netanyahu and at his instigation. Kamala Harris the leader contesting the US election from the Democratic Party, has called the Iran war a "bullshit". Israel and the US administration have long tried to confront Iran's influential religious leaders politically. As part of that, they killed many influential leaders. They selectively killed military leaders and nuclear scientists. But in no way could these two powerful countries remove Iran from its nuclear program. Although they promoted that they had no option but to use force, Israel and America started the war mainly because they could not confront Iran politically.

Well, they did not provided any proof back in Iraq times either. About 20-25 years ago give or take, they did attacked Iraq, and killed or wounded over a million people, A MILLION PEOPLE! and create a vacuum so big after they left that ISIS actually took over and destroyed thousands of years worth of artifacts, enslaved people, and killed everyone.

So it is not a shock that USA would attack a nation, for no reason, make up a lie, take their oil, and leave behind a much worse place. They have done this multiple times, and it is not a news to me. The first bomb was dropped when I realized they have no interest regards to nukes, or regime, or anything, all they wanted was oil, that's it. And that is why do not EVER consider USA as good guys, they never are.

In fact, the US has accused Iran of wanting to possess nuclear weapons since 1980, not just recently. But interestingly, after decades, they have never provided any evidence to substantiate their accusation

Or just as they intervened in Venezuela under the pretext of combating drug trafficking. But then, as the whole world know, after successfully capturing Maduro, what they really did was exploit oil and make billions of dollar.

It can be said that these are all just excuses. The primary objective of the US in most of its invasions of other nations has been oil and natural resources. Or protecting the petrodollar empire, nothing more.

In reality, they are the terrorist and dictator of this world, not the nations they invaded.

[Compromise me]

In fact, the US has accused Iran of wanting to possess nuclear weapons since 1980, not just recently. But interestingly, after decades, they have never provided any evidence to substantiate their accusation

Yes almost everyone has the same opinion about U.S. that's why majority of the countries now raise their voice against this war. However the war has taken a new turn, Strait of Hormuz now become challenging for both countries. Basically the war is not about the nuclear weapons but indirectly a way to get control over  the resources of Iran. Looking current scenario it feels like war prospective shift from resources to Strait of Hormuz now. Because no one knows it's value before the conflicts. Every day new prices of oil create stress globally.Their conflicts disturbed other countries economy badly especially India  Pakistan,Japan or China because their economy heavily depends the oil that pass through this way. Now high risk is involved in crossing this path . Because Iran and U.S both has  imposed restrictions on the transportation of ships. No one knows how and when this conflict will be resloved.

[DrBeer]

It looks like the U.S. and China are about to reach an agreement and exchange favors-China will hand over the Iranian regime in exchange for the opening of the Strait of Hormuz and the ability to continue receiving oil through the Strait, as well as chips from the U.S., without which "Chinese AI" isn’t developing very well for some reason.
There will also clearly be a slew of trade deals-China needs to export its products, or else its economy will simply grind to a halt. Maybe they’ll find a solution regarding Taiwan at the same time...
 
Trump needs to bring home at least some "victories"; otherwise, his approval rating will plummet to zero, the Republican Party will lose seats in Congress, and Trump will likely lose his seat in the White House.
 Also, in the absence of "victories", the Epstein case-where Trump has clearly gotten himself into hot water-will be brought up again. In a word-it’s going to be "fun"!

[AmaGold70]

Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said on Telegram that the strait “is open to everyone, except American ships and those of its allies.”

US is demanding for their ships and that of Israel's or other allies to be passed through the strait but Iran is standing on their ground. This might anger US even further and since they have threatened to further cause destruction in Iran, we might not see this war end soon. If the strait was opened, this could offer some relief for other countries not really part of this war. But will it really be successful? Can they really pass through the strait with this chaos ongoing?

Even with this statement, it still feels that we are stuck doomed and keep expecting oil prices to keep rising.

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/03/15/world/iran-war-trump-oil-israel

I think this war is not ending soon because Americans will not watch Iran do this to them, and succeed. And concerning the shipping of petroleum products through strait of Hormuz, Hormuz seems to be a vicious circle for now, since Americans, and it's allies are battling Iran in other to have access. I think not all matters are followed with violence, America and it's allies can resolve this matter without even violence, and they can do this through dialogue. Somehow Iran is equally gaining some benefits by granting access to America, and it's allies, stopping them from gaining access through Hormuz is equally depriving Iran from certain benefits they would have enjoyed from US, and it's allies.

[Coyster]

Trump needs to bring home at least some "victories"; otherwise, his approval rating will plummet to zero, the Republican Party will lose seats in Congress, and Trump will likely lose his seat in the White House.

Donald Trump will openly not admit it, but this is a critical period for his administration and they have to find a solution to this situation in the Strait of Hormuz and the war in general. Obviously we don't have specific details of his high-stakes meeting with Xi, but it definitely had to do with their economic relations, the Iranian war and maybe Taiwan would come in too.

Trump is under a lot of pressure. Quite a lot of Americans (particularly from the opposition) think that the war was unnecessary and they are piling up the pressure in response to the economic implications (high energy prices) of the war in the U.S., so Mr president also has that to think about. China has a good relationship with Iran, but they obviously do not control their affairs, so their influence in reopening the Strait might be limited, but we'd see how things progress.

[Cookdata]

Yes almost everyone has the same opinion about U.S. that's why majority of the countries now raise their voice against this war. However the war has taken a new turn, Strait of Hormuz now become challenging for both countries. Basically the war is not about the nuclear weapons but indirectly a way to get control over  the resources of Iran. Looking current scenario it feels like war prospective shift from resources to Strait of Hormuz now. Because no one knows it's value before the conflicts. Every day new prices of oil create stress globally.Their conflicts disturbed other countries economy badly especially India  Pakistan,Japan or China because their economy heavily depends the oil that pass through this way. Now high risk is involved in crossing this path . Because Iran and U.S both has  imposed restrictions on the transportation of ships. No one knows how and when this conflict will be resloved.

Has there been a day US interest has ever been for the people. If they are not getting anything in return, you not be in their league. Didn't you see what happened recently in Venezuela? After the government was change under the leadership of US control have you heard anything negative from there. It now seems the media has even forget about them and that's because US own the global media and they push wrong narrative and feed the eyes and ears with what they want.

Didn't you see many times they were asked why Iran was attack? The word "imminent" threat is the only answer they had, no evidence of nuclear, no physical process to proved that this is exactly what is going on in Iran and they think Iran is the problem. As it looks, there is nothing to leverage on anymore, the missile didn't help and even Iran grew more wings because they loss more than enough, they don't care about what he world even think again and nobody can justify their actions.

[RockBell]

Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said on Telegram that the strait “is open to everyone, except American ships and those of its allies.”

US is demanding for their ships and that of Israel's or other allies to be passed through the strait but Iran is standing on their ground. This might anger US even further and since they have threatened to further cause destruction in Iran, we might not see this war end soon. If the strait was opened, this could offer some relief for other countries not really part of this war. But will it really be successful? Can they really pass through the strait with this chaos ongoing?

Even with this statement, it still feels that we are stuck doomed and keep expecting oil prices to keep rising.

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/03/15/world/iran-war-trump-oil-israel

I think this war is not ending soon because Americans will not watch Iran do this to them, and succeed. And concerning the shipping of petroleum products through strait of Hormuz, Hormuz seems to be a vicious circle for now, since Americans, and it's allies are battling Iran in other to have access. I think not all matters are followed with violence, America and it's allies can resolve this matter without even violence, and they can do this through dialogue. Somehow Iran is equally gaining some benefits by granting access to America, and it's allies, stopping them from gaining access through Hormuz is equally depriving Iran from certain benefits they would have enjoyed from US, and it's allies.

And Americans should also consider the consequences that comes along side the blockage of Hormuz, Hormuz because it has only made things worse because the price of gas have refused to come down and thisnis something government would have addressed instead of allowing the poor citizens suffer for it life is already hard so why make things more difficult because now the government always think they are right without proper consideration of things, I just hope this thing is solved because the price at which gas is going is not longer funny. I even stopped following because the only thing I want to see at this point will be for the war to be resolved that is the only way I will be better.

[DrBeer]

Trump needs to bring home at least some "victories"; otherwise, his approval rating will plummet to zero, the Republican Party will lose seats in Congress, and Trump will likely lose his seat in the White House.

Donald Trump will openly not admit it, but this is a critical period for his administration and they have to find a solution to this situation in the Strait of Hormuz and the war in general. Obviously we don't have specific details of his high-stakes meeting with Xi, but it definitely had to do with their economic relations, the Iranian war and maybe Taiwan would come in too.

Trump is under a lot of pressure. Quite a lot of Americans (particularly from the opposition) think that the war was unnecessary and they are piling up the pressure in response to the economic implications (high energy prices) of the war in the U.S., so Mr president also has that to think about. China has a good relationship with Iran, but they obviously do not control their affairs, so their influence in reopening the Strait might be limited, but we'd see how things progress.

Whether he acknowledges it or not, or whether he denies reality-it won’t change the reality!
Needless to say, their meeting is clearly not about a tea ceremony, but clearly about GEOPOLITICS, since China objectively plays one of the key roles in global geopolitics right now.
I actually have my own personal take on Trump’s position-he’s decided that the U.S., and the whole world for that matter, is like a business, just like it was for him in the U.S., where you can do whatever you want, ignoring laws, rules of decorum, established traditions, and so on. He views the entire world as his “personal business,” and China, for example, as a market competitor with whom he must somehow “settle matters.” All while ignoring the interests of everyone else. For him, MONEY comes first, not POLITICS. You can’t apply standard business methods to politics, especially GLOBAL politics. I’m sure Trump will hand Taiwan over to Xi Jinping in exchange for some contracts for his cronies, not giving a damn about anything else.
Iran. China’s relationship with Iran isn’t a friendly one; it’s a relationship between a MASTER and a sort of “guinea pig” that does certain work and receives some support or supplies in return, but nothing more. China has no friends at all-this must be understood. There are benefits, and there are those who can provide them right now.

[DrBeer]

Before Trump decided to launch a preemptive strike against Iran and US supporters also believed that. They believed that Iran would surrender immediately because the US had overwhelming military superiority. But the result is that 60 day have passed, and the US is still unable to subdue Iran

Similarly, they are shifting to an economic lockdown strategy because Trump 60 day commander-in-chief authority has ended under the constitution. This time they are also boasting that Iran would soon surrender and cave. But let's wait and see what happen instead of just dreaming.

I suppose the U.S. could resolve this issue through military force. But... that would have a host of negative consequences.
Total war is no longer just precision strikes on factories, bases, and military groups; it involves the destruction of cities, the mass killing of civilians, the global destruction of infrastructure, and a humanitarian catastrophe-for example,  as Russia has been doing in Ukraine for many years.
Trump doesn’t need this; his approval ratings aren’t in the best shape anyway.
Many in his inner circle and politicians from other countries said, “The war must be stopped,” and he did just that... The active phase of the war has ended; now it’s purely an economic blockade.

P.S. By the way, Iran isn’t stopping its terror and today once again shelled a neighboring country, the UAE, which has never shown any aggression toward Iran. Doesn’t it seem that Iran is now provoking all the surrounding countries into harsh retaliatory measures?
 

The US has a significant military advantage over Iran, but saying that they can solve the problem by force alone, I doubt it.

The Trump administration stopped using force and declared the war over because they realized that the strategy was ineffective and more costly than anticipated. If the war dragged on any longer, they would only suffer more losses and lose face internationally. Furthermore, the 60 day deadline had expired, and the decision of whether or not to continue the war now rested with Congress
The Trump administration is not as noble as you think, and stopping the war was not because they were afraid of causing civilian casualties. Because if they were truly kind, they would not have started the war and let it drag on for almost 2 month.

The US and Israel are the real terrorist.

You’re all right:
Trump, just as everyone wanted, "stopped the war".
And yes, this isn’t a victory, as he’s trying to portray it; it’s an attempt to extricate himself from a situation where he was counting on a "quick, victorious war" to boost his approval ratings with voters. But "things didn’t go as planned", and as a result, the desired outcome wasn’t achieved. Plus, without congressional approval, he  can’t conduct military operations for more than 60 days. He’s following the law, and… on the 60th day, he halts active combat operations and simply starts "mirroring" the actions of the Iranian military junta.
 

To assess who is a terrorist, one should not look at a specific isolated incident, but rather at history and causal relationships. Otherwise, we might end up concluding that, for example, the anti-Hitler coalition and the USSR were terrorist states, looters, and destroyers of entire cities, their leaders were criminals, and Hitler was a nice guy

P.S. Yes, let me clarify right away-power in Iran has now been seized by the military, and that is precisely why it is called a junta. Civilian authority is effectively isolated from governing the country, both in domestic and foreign policy

[logfiles]

<...>

1. If you are too dumb to even look up some of this information, then I do think you are doing you mind some big injustice.
Read my response here, and it just might make more sense to you if you still have any cognitive dissonance left in you

Example 1
A neighbor hosts a rogue violent criminal who keeps shooting at your house, damaging your property and endangering the lives of your family, but the neighbor won't tell the violent criminal that what he is doing is wrong. In fact the neighbor gives the criminal a room to reside in, some food and a store for more stockpiles of ammo for his next attacks. The rogue criminal can't attack you directly from his home that is several kilometers away from your town but has to come to the neighborhood to launch his attacks. What do you do?

Example 2
Police is hunting out for a criminal that decided to terrorize your community and the criminal is taken in by one of the neighbors who hosts him for several months. The criminal then uses the neighbors home to continue terrorizing the community. According to the law we all know, where do you think the neighbor lies?

Ooh, wait

• The U.A.E. Has Been Secretly Carrying Out Attacks on Iran
• Netanyahu made secret visit to UAE to meet with country's president, Israel says

2. Make a reference to my number one point so you are able to connect the dots

3. Is there US Military presence in the countries that were hit or not? I even provided you with a link. Figure it out.

4. After reading looking through this information in the link, tell me if what the US has done in most of those wars in terrorism or not. Look at the sheer numbers of people that have died! - https://www.davemanuel.com/us-military-interventions-invasions-coups-complete-list.php
Don't even get me started of Israel.
  
5. This is not based on propaganda fairy tales. The problem with people like you who can't read and have been consuming on a lot of the US lies is that you can't reason beyond the lies. Please here is another link to help you understand where it all started https://www.history.com/articles/us-iran-conflict-key-moments.

6. Typical slow kid that won't even read a page or two of the search results and only relies on AI summaries. Why don't you complete the whole quote and also try to reason for once? 

[Iranus]

...

If I remember correctly, DrBeer is from Ukraine, a country currently embroiled in another war. He spends most of his time propagating the idea that Russia is a terrorist state, and automatically assumes that any country friendly to Russia is terrorist and evil. Conversely, he would call those who support the EU and the US the righteous cause.

Therefore, it is not surprising that he attempts to deny and ignore data and evidence unfavorable to the US. Those who dragged Ukraine into an endless war and exploited them as pawns on a political chessboard.

[logfiles]

If I remember correctly, DrBeer is from Ukraine, a country currently embroiled in another war. He spends most of his time propagating the idea that Russia is a terrorist state, and automatically assumes that any country friendly to Russia is terrorist and evil. Conversely, he would call those who support the EU and the US the righteous cause.

Therefore, it is not surprising that he attempts to deny and ignore data and evidence unfavorable to the US. Those who dragged Ukraine into an endless war and exploited them as pawns on a political chessboard.

Thanks for the context. It now makes more sense and to be honest, it's hard to reason out with people who have a rigid kind of mindset that has been fed with decades and decades of Western propaganda. They always think that what happens in their jurisdictions is righteous while the rest does not matter. That any aggression towards their country counts as terrorism while any similar aggression to another country outside their circle doesn't count as terrorism.

Regardless, the straight of Hormuz is still not the same again as it used to be thanks to the war the United States of America orchestrated and the stupid pseudo blockade they imposed because Iran has tried to challenge their imperialistic tendencies. Oil prices around the world are still going crazy as reserve dry up and so will commodity prices. This is all happening because a certain country thinks it's the only one that is in charge of the global affairs. Sad!

[DrBeer]

<...>

1. If you are too dumb to even look up some of this information, then I do think you are doing you mind some big injustice.
Read my response here, and it just might make more sense to you if you still have any cognitive dissonance left in you

Example 1
A neighbor hosts a rogue violent criminal who keeps shooting at your house, damaging your property and endangering the lives of your family, but the neighbor won't tell the violent criminal that what he is doing is wrong. In fact the neighbor gives the criminal a room to reside in, some food and a store for more stockpiles of ammo for his next attacks. The rogue criminal can't attack you directly from his home that is several kilometers away from your town but has to come to the neighborhood to launch his attacks. What do you do?

Example 2
Police is hunting out for a criminal that decided to terrorize your community and the criminal is taken in by one of the neighbors who hosts him for several months. The criminal then uses the neighbors home to continue terrorizing the community. According to the law we all know, where do you think the neighbor lies?

Ooh, wait

• The U.A.E. Has Been Secretly Carrying Out Attacks on Iran
• Netanyahu made secret visit to UAE to meet with country's president, Israel says

2. Make a reference to my number one point so you are able to connect the dots

3. Is there US Military presence in the countries that were hit or not? I even provided you with a link. Figure it out.

4. After reading looking through this information in the link, tell me if what the US has done in most of those wars in terrorism or not. Look at the sheer numbers of people that have died! - https://www.davemanuel.com/us-military-interventions-invasions-coups-complete-list.php
Don't even get me started of Israel.
  
5. This is not based on propaganda fairy tales. The problem with people like you who can't read and have been consuming on a lot of the US lies is that you can't reason beyond the lies. Please here is another link to help you understand where it all started https://www.history.com/articles/us-iran-conflict-key-moments.

6. Typical slow kid that won't even read a page or two of the search results and only relies on AI summaries. Why don't you complete the whole quote and also try to reason for once? 

You may be funny, but you're stupid 
1. Responses like "everyone knows that", "it's easy to find", and the like just show that you have nothing to say.
2. You have another major problem that exposes your stupidity every time and reveals that you assume "everyone else is an idiot". You don’t understand chronology or cause-and-effect relationships. It’s very easy for me to prove this, especially since you’re openly displaying your own stupidity.
We were talking about how Iran was the FIRST to launch strikes against neighboring countries, and that it had no reason to do so. And here you’re posting links to articles that, judging by everything, you haven’t even read The first article with news from... May 11, 2026, much LATER, i.e., AFTER Iran launched terrorist attacks on neighboring countries. The second article is about Netanyahu visiting Israel-what does this information have to do with anything?
Oh! Let me explain simply and clearly why Israel and the U.S. did not strike the Iranian regime:
"On October 26, 2023, a Hamas delegation and an Iranian representative arrived in Moscow: the terrorists’ meetings were not publicly announced
Abu Marzouk, a member of the political bureau of the Palestinian movement Hamas, arrived on an unannounced visit with a delegation, as did Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Ali Bagheri Kani"-they were there planning strikes against Israel and the US. That’s it, case closed!
Or does that answer not suit you? 

[Webetcoins]

https://www.ishormuzopenyet.com

If any of you ever want to check , there is a website. I am not owner of it, do not know who the owner is, and can't possibly make a dime out of this, so I am not here to shill.

I think it could also be wrong at times, I would not know, I am not a politician or a journalist so I can't possibly know if they are saying the truth or not. But so far, this website is saying that it is still not open, so we can use that to discuss.

[Oluwa-btc]

https://www.ishormuzopenyet.com

If any of you ever want to check , there is a website. I am not owner of it, do not know who the owner is, and can't possibly make a dime out of this, so I am not here to shill.

I think it could also be wrong at times, I would not know, I am not a politician or a journalist so I can't possibly know if they are saying the truth or not. But so far, this website is saying that it is still not open, so we can use that to discuss.

They're spot on, I also checked on that professor in iran who always comes our to debunk whatever fake news and propaganda being dished out by the Us government and media team.

The strait of hormuz remains closed and it stays in control by the Iranians and not by any other nation. Donald Trump and his boys are jokes,  there's no way they're saying they are in control when they are clearly not. Iranians are also ready to retaliate immediately if they're being attacked by the US.

[DrBeer]

...

If I remember correctly, DrBeer is from Ukraine, a country currently embroiled in another war. He spends most of his time propagating the idea that Russia is a terrorist state, and automatically assumes that any country friendly to Russia is terrorist and evil. Conversely, he would call those who support the EU and the US the righteous cause.

Therefore, it is not surprising that he attempts to deny and ignore data and evidence unfavorable to the US. Those who dragged Ukraine into an endless war and exploited them as pawns on a political chessboard.

Do you have any arguments to show that Russia isn’t a terrorist state? I’m ready to discuss this-no problem! I’m waiting for your arguments and facts!
I also affirm that regimes that aid terrorists are terrorists themselves!
For example, Iran and North Korea, which, as the "third army of the world", supply UAVs and missiles that the terrorist state uses to shell peaceful Ukrainian cities every day, destroying residential buildings, schools, hospitals, and civilian infrastructure… Or is that not terrorism in your view? I’m also waiting for your arguments.

Yes, I’m from Ukraine, and I see all this with my own eyes. Are you from Iran?  Or are you ashamed to admit where you’re from?

Let’s go back to your statement: "and automatically assumes that any country friendly to Russia is terrorist and evil". I didn’t make that up-you’re the one who wrote it, right?
Give me an example where I accuse countries like Hungary, Slovakia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Uzbekistan, Armenia, and others-which have very friendly relations with Russia and the Kremlin regime-of terrorism. Either provide such links, or you’re a crude liar, and you should correct your statement


P.S. I’m guessing there won’t be a reply, or it’ll be "nonsense" and a lot of text and "sold out to the US" and similar nonsense
 

[Oluwa-btc]

If I remember correctly, DrBeer is from Ukraine, a country currently embroiled in another war. He spends most of his time propagating the idea that Russia is a terrorist state, and automatically assumes that any country friendly to Russia is terrorist and evil. Conversely, he would call those who support the EU and the US the righteous cause.

Therefore, it is not surprising that he attempts to deny and ignore data and evidence unfavorable to the US. Those who dragged Ukraine into an endless war and exploited them as pawns on a political chessboard.

The US helped plant a puppet government and then wage war against Russia since they couldn't do so directly. I don't know why they hate Russia so much for thriving. Why though?!
Now, lets turn it around, the Ukrainian government are they any better?! We also saw them funding terrorism in the Sahel regions of Africa are they not terrorist for pulling that up? As African, we know Russians have their own personal interests, but we all know who help and support us against our colonial rulers suppressing us in all ramifications. The west lost themselves a long time, we know what they're bunch of barbarians likewise children rapers and eaters.

[Minor Miner]

If I remember correctly, DrBeer is from Ukraine, a country currently embroiled in another war. He spends most of his time propagating the idea that Russia is a terrorist state, and automatically assumes that any country friendly to Russia is terrorist and evil. Conversely, he would call those who support the EU and the US the righteous cause.

Therefore, it is not surprising that he attempts to deny and ignore data and evidence unfavorable to the US. Those who dragged Ukraine into an endless war and exploited them as pawns on a political chessboard.

The US helped plant a puppet government and then wage war against Russia since they couldn't do so directly. I don't know why they hate Russia so much for thriving. Why though?!
Now, lets turn it around, the Ukrainian government are they any better?! We also saw them funding terrorism in the Sahel regions of Africa are they not terrorist for pulling that up? As African, we know Russians have their own personal interests, but we all know who help and support us against our colonial rulers suppressing us in all ramifications. The west lost themselves a long time, we know what they're bunch of barbarians likewise children rapers and eaters.

To be fair, no great power is truly benevolent, and all of them act in pursuit of their own national interest. Likewise, smaller nations also prioritize their own interest, and what they do is choose to side with those nations whose interests conflict the least with their own.
Therefore, we should not be surprised that Ukrainians are increasingly angry and hateful towards Russians, even when they know full well this war would not have happened without the US pulling the strings.

However, to understand which superpowers are truly terrorist, let's look at world history. Who initiated and participated in the most wars in the world? Which country has invaded, plundered oil and resources, and killed the most innocent people?

[Swordsoffreedom]

https://www.ishormuzopenyet.com

If any of you ever want to check , there is a website. I am not owner of it, do not know who the owner is, and can't possibly make a dime out of this, so I am not here to shill.

I think it could also be wrong at times, I would not know, I am not a politician or a journalist so I can't possibly know if they are saying the truth or not. But so far, this website is saying that it is still not open, so we can use that to discuss.

They're spot on, I also checked on that professor in iran who always comes our to debunk whatever fake news and propaganda being dished out by the Us government and media team.

The strait of hormuz remains closed and it stays in control by the Iranians and not by any other nation. Donald Trump and his boys are jokes,  there's no way they're saying they are in control when they are clearly not. Iranians are also ready to retaliate immediately if they're being attacked by the US.

Although there are many rumors that they are close to reaching an agreement, there has still been no official announcement from either side. So it is understandable that the Strait of Hormuz remains closed.

However, the truth is that this route is blockaded at both ends by Iran and the US Navy

I also believe that the Iranians will not surrender and will fight back to the end. However, do not expect a larger conflict to occur, as that would only lead to the deaths of more innocent people. Instead, let's hope they reach a peace agreement.

[Iranus]

Do you have any arguments to show that Russia isn’t a terrorist state? I’m ready to discuss this-no problem! I’m waiting for your arguments and facts!
I also affirm that regimes that aid terrorists are terrorists themselves!
For example, Iran and North Korea, which, as the "third army of the world", supply UAVs and missiles that the terrorist state uses to shell peaceful Ukrainian cities every day, destroying residential buildings, schools, hospitals, and civilian infrastructure… Or is that not terrorism in your view? I’m also waiting for your arguments.

Yes, I’m from Ukraine, and I see all this with my own eyes. Are you from Iran?  Or are you ashamed to admit where you’re from?

Let’s go back to your statement: "and automatically assumes that any country friendly to Russia is terrorist and evil". I didn’t make that up-you’re the one who wrote it, right?
Give me an example where I accuse countries like Hungary, Slovakia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Uzbekistan, Armenia, and others-which have very friendly relations with Russia and the Kremlin regime-of terrorism. Either provide such links, or you’re a crude liar, and you should correct your statement


P.S. I’m guessing there won’t be a reply, or it’ll be "nonsense" and a lot of text and "sold out to the US" and similar nonsense
 

So I guessed right, you are Ukrainian. And yeah, no more replies or explanation from me. As I said before, you are living in a country at war and automatically label anyone attacking you a terrorist, while anyone pumping in weapons to prolong the war is righteous, regardless of the reason behind it. Arguing with overly stubborn people usually leads nowhere.

Besides, logfiles already said everything that needed to be said and you still did not get it. I do not think I need to say anything more, and everything that needed to be said has already been said.