CryptoCasinos.ai - My new review project

[acroman08]

so your #1 site has only 10 game and no sports? uhhh

He did say that he uses "AI to search Reddit and forums to find which casino has the most trusted reputation online. Based on the reputation, I will sort casinos objectively". So, whether a casino has a sportsbook or not doesn't matter to him since it's not one of the criteria to be number 1 on his list.

Anyway, @OP, you shouldn't rely on AI, they are unreliable. Your reviews would hold more weight if you based them on your experience and not just because AI thought the casino is reputable.

[Kavelj22]

Hi Jake and welcome to bitcointalk community as a business user since you have declared that you are a veteran member using an alt. I invite you to use your main account because this will add more credibility to the business.

I didn't check the website but I would like to ask if you are the owner of that website or just using it to publish the reviews.

About the reviews, why I see only 8 casinos in your list? Since you are here since 2015, you should be able to mention more casinos in your list, as you already list good casinos and bad casinos. If you will lost only the casinos based on your own experience for one time playing, I doubt you will provide accurate ratings.

About the VPN mention in your reviews, I doubt that an honest casino will allow the use of VPN with users from restricted countries once they will detect this either by detecting tools or through KYC verification procedures later. If a casino pretend to be a VPN friendly, it's a suspicious service.

[bitmover]

So many new review services showing up recently!

I think you should add a space for user reviews, like other platforms. You would have your own score and the community score. Like metacritic.

[Ronsbit]

so your #1 site has only 10 game and no sports? uhhh

He did say that he uses "AI to search Reddit and forums to find which casino has the most trusted reputation online. Based on the reputation, I will sort casinos objectively". So, whether a casino has a sportsbook or not doesn't matter to him since it's not one of the criteria to be number 1 on his list.

Anyway, @OP, you shouldn't rely on AI, they are unreliable. Your reviews would hold more weight if you based them on your experience and not just because AI thought the casino is reputable.

Doing a review based on AI findings would not give something accurate, but rather a deep personal research and findings coupled with experience with the casinos would be better to go with, and I saw on the website where OP captured conversations from the bitcointalk platform, which is not bad, but does OP have a first-hand experience with the casinos he has itemised on his website list here? because first-hand experience could say much better than a generated AI review here for us as it would not be reliable and dependable.

[Questat]

So many new review services showing up recently!

I think you should add a space for user reviews, like other platforms. You would have your own score and the community score. Like metacritic.

I guess it’s normal. Just like in gambling sites, there are a lot of things being shown, but we’re the ones who decide what to believe. We can’t control what they write, so it’s really up to us to evaluate if it’s something we trust or not. Because whether we like it or not, most of those reviews are biased. The main goal of many of those websites is to monetize once they become popular.

[Jake_CCAI]

...
I didn't check the website but I would like to ask if you are the owner of that website or just using it to publish the reviews.
...

Yes, I am the owner, founder and 100% responsible for all the work on the site.

Thanks all for the comments! Some answers:
- I 100% agree that Stake should rank higher. Also Crypto.games seems to be trustworthy, but it shouldn't rank so high as they lack games, games look horrible and the UI sucks. I probably have a solution for this.
- About review counts, now the site has 8. Writing a review is a time consuming job, as I do all other things to the site also (design, UI, tech-side etc.). So this is more like a long term project. Hopefully in a year there will be 20-25 reviews online.
- I don't write the reviews with AI, if somebody got that impression. I use AI to crawl the sentiment, analyze it with AI and my own brain, and write the reviews myself.

I guess it’s normal. Just like in gambling sites, there are a lot of things being shown, but we’re the ones who decide what to believe. We can’t control what they write, so it’s really up to us to evaluate if it’s something we trust or not. Because whether we like it or not, most of those reviews are biased. The main goal of many of those websites is to monetize once they become popular.

This is the BIG QUESTION in affiliate sites.

I think the recent model is somewhat broken. Go to Google and search for "best crypto casinos". The top 10 results are from big crypto companies who have their crypto-side, but they have decided to monetize their site with crypto casino reviews (which I understand). Their domain rating & backlink strength is strong as their other non-casino pages get a lot of links.

Which option will these big companies rather choose:
a) Write 100% objective reviews -> Casinos get pissed off due to just average/bad reviews -> Review sites get only the basic 25% rev share deal. The review sites fear that average/bad reviews don't induce players to click their links -> Not so much affiliate revenue.
b) They write somewhat biased/a lot biased reviews -> Casinos are happy -> Review sites get very lucrative 45-50% rev share deals + CPA deals per each depositing player. -> Visitors click more affiliate links from good reviews -> A LOT OF AFFILIATE INCOME.

Of course no one knows the 100% sure answer for this and the true state may be somewhere between a) and b). And of course, it's a legit question to ask how my site does this. But the only way I can even succeed now in 2026 against these giants is to go fully a).

My project tries to be better than that. I try to offer an option to those bigger companies, with a lot of player data crunched into a (hopefully more trustworthy) review. I will probably add some personal insight to the reviews to balance them out.


But, you all had some great comments and insights about my site. Now I go to code the review model 3.0 which should be a better one.


I'll be back

[Kavelj22]

...
I didn't check the website but I would like to ask if you are the owner of that website or just using it to publish the reviews.
...

Yes, I am the owner, founder and 100% responsible for all the work on the site.

Great. Then I think you can explain what do you mean by saying that you use AI to crawl the sentiment and analyze it with AI. Do you mind sharing what AI tool you use for this task?

Btw, nothing wrong with building a review site from scratch using AI powered tools. Even the articles can be AI generated content as long as you don't hide this fact by mentioning it at bottom of every page article. Also don't miss to read what you will post officially because you should be able to understand and explain what is published in your website.

Since you are the owner, do you mind share info about your app monetization and how you are willing to generate profits from it? And what about listing fiat-based casinos as well.

[Zwei]

So many new review services showing up recently!

same with new casinos popping up everyday, everyone wants to get a piece of the cake, lol.

Think once again. Which option will these big companies rather choose:
a) Write 100% objective reviews -> Casinos get pissed off due to just average/bad reviews -> Review sites get only the basic 25% rev share deal. The review sites fear that average/bad reviews don't induce players to click their links -> Not so much affiliate revenue.
b) They write somewhat biased/a lot biased reviews -> Casinos are happy -> Review sites get very lucrative 45-50% rev share deals + CPA deals per each depositing player. -> Visitors click more affiliate links from good reviews -> A LOT OF AFFILIATE INCOME.

Of course no one knows the 100% sure answer for this and the true state may be somewhere between a) and b). And of course, it's a legit question to ask how my site does this. But the only way I can even succeed now in 2026 against these giants is to go fully a).

imo, a) is the better option if you want to build a brand that will be here after many years and have loyal followers.
review sites are supposed to be for the players, to give them the truth with 100% objective reviews, not to bootlick casinos so they can get better deals to make more money on the back of their users.

Since you are the owner, do you mind share info about your app monetization and how you are willing to generate profits from it?

it's an affiliate site, so it's monetized by players using their affiliate links to signup on casinos, and depending on the deals they have, they will either be making money from revshare or maybe CPA too.