Do you think placing 3 different bet on same game could make you win?

[Rockstarguy]

You will end up being in loss; let's assume you made 3 different bets on a particular game. 1 bet option is with 1.5 odds. The 2nd bet option is the same or a little bit above. And the 3 bets have the same odds or a little bit more. If you win one of the 3, there is no way your winning will be able to give you a profit that will cover up all the staked amount unless if one of your option is with 3 odds and above and that’s where the winning comes from; I will call that pattern an easy way to lose money, not a smart strategy.

Gambling is always unpredictable, even if you place three different bets on different devices. One of the advantages of gambling being unpredictable is that it helps gambling companies secure their money against gamblers who think they can outsmart them.

When you are thinking of outsmarting the gambling company, you may believe you will succeed with your plan, but in the end, it may result in you losing even more. Gambling is unpredictable, and you should never try to outsmart it. Gamble with an amount that you can afford to lose and just hope for luck.

[Slow death]

When you are thinking of outsmarting the gambling company, you may believe you will succeed with your plan, but in the end, it may result in you losing even more. Gambling is unpredictable, and you should never try to outsmart it. Gamble with an amount that you can afford to lose and just hope for luck.

And to add again, betting houses have prohibited this kind of thing if I'm not mistaken. For example, someone watches the Mexico vs. Portugal game. Mexico has odds of 3.80 to win, a draw is at 3.00, and a Portugal win is at 2.00. So in this case, those people who like to use the easiest way to win will deposit, for example, $10 in betting house 1 and bet on Mexico to win. By placing $10, the possible winnings will be $38.

Then they will deposit $10 in betting house 2 and bet on Portugal to win, and if they are right, they would get $20. So in this scenario, they need to pray that the game doesn't end in a draw, that the game ends with a Mexico victory. But if the game ends with a victory for Portugal, then that person will not lose money, because they will lose $10 at betting site 1 but will win $20 at betting site 2.

This type of betting yields a small profit when the person manages to correctly predict the underdog with odds of more than 3x and very close to 4x, but this is prohibited in many betting sites, according to what I've read in many comments. In my opinion, this is not worthwhile because the risk of losing still exists, and if you correctly predict an underdog, the profit is not greater, and with the high risk of having your account blocked, it's not worth it. I personally wouldn't do this; I prefer to use only one betting site, which is the stake, and place my parlays, which can give me very high odds.

[rezakurnia66]

You will end up being in loss; let's assume you made 3 different bets on a particular game. 1 bet option is with 1.5 odds. The 2nd bet option is the same or a little bit above. And the 3 bets have the same odds or a little bit more. If you win one of the 3, there is no way your winning will be able to give you a profit that will cover up all the staked amount unless if one of your option is with 3 odds and above and that’s where the winning comes from; I will call that pattern an easy way to lose money, not a smart strategy.

I think so, placing 3 different bet on the same games actually can't guarantee still profitable or win but its avoid will get draw and get back capital regarding if one match win but two matches left get loss. Firstly make speculation about odds each three placing bet balance or not before make this speculation, however if the same odds for three bet placing I think the final result only get back your capital.
I don't think good way for gambler placing until three bet at sport betting, why not choose with difference option like place bet for both team win the match or scoring the games. Its more interested and possibility will earn more for placing difference bet at sport betting.

[Strongkored]

What do you think?

You can only place three different bets on a same match if the bookmaker has a bet builder feature, and not all bookmakers do, and even if they do, the bet variations vary. I remember Sportsbet offering a wide variety because I've used it several times.
The results are certainly better if you win, but this isn't much different from a parlay, where one bad result is all it takes to lose.
You can place a bet builder on a team in a match whose statistics you believe will align with your picks.
However, sports betting is still influenced by luck, especially when the odds are high.

[Emeraldo]

Although, I think this is just for a test run, perhaps I haven't tried it before but I want to know if anyone out there has already tried this methods and it works for them.
For instance;
You can have a two powerful team playing match today, and you selected a single bet and places three different bet both teams with the mindset that they would definitely win at last.
Do you think this could boost the way we gamble, let say to give us more winning results.

What do you think?

Gambling is a game of risk and choice if you decide to split your game and play for both teams on a different game it's not a guarantee that the game will play out even if it's advantageous to some extent, for example of you play say Man U and Chelsea and you play Chelsea to win and Man U to win on another slip the game might end draw and you end up not winning on either slip so for me I feel like your instincts should be followed most of the times and then your betting skills too because you definitely needs some skills to get lucky.

[Royal Cap]

What do you think?

Well, I think it's not wrong to bet on three sides of a match, people do it to minimise their losses, That means they don't want to make a lot of money, they want to be safe but the issue is, there is no money in it, it's just covered, and many people try to disguise that uncertainty by placing bets on three sides, So I think if you know the match, then it is better to decide.  And if you are not sure, don't play. Because at the end if you want to be more smart in gambling, you will lose more.

[rachael9385]

What do you think?

Well, I think it's not wrong to bet on three sides of a match, people do it to minimise their losses, That means they don't want to make a lot of money, they want to be safe but the issue is, there is no money in it, it's just covered, and many people try to disguise that uncertainty by placing bets on three sides, So I think if you know the match, then it is better to decide.  And if you are not sure, don't play. Because at the end if you want to be more smart in gambling, you will lose more.

It's a way to play safe but in sports betting there is no such thing as being totally safe because at the end of the day everything is still risky. Betting on three sides might seem like a smart way to make profit but the chances of running into losses is also high but the thing about this is that if you stake the same amount equally you wouldn't lose everything completely but at the end of the day risking a lot for just a little profit isn't worth it

[Proty]

What do you think?

Well, I think it's not wrong to bet on three sides of a match, people do it to minimise their losses, That means they don't want to make a lot of money, they want to be safe but the issue is, there is no money in it, it's just covered, and many people try to disguise that uncertainty by placing bets on three sides, So I think if you know the match, then it is better to decide.  And if you are not sure, don't play. Because at the end if you want to be more smart in gambling, you will lose more.

It's a way to play safe but in sports betting there is no such thing as being totally safe because at the end of the day everything is still risky. Betting on three sides might seem like a smart way to make profit but the chances of running into losses is also high but the thing about this is that if you stake the same amount equally you wouldn't lose everything completely but at the end of the day risking a lot for just a little profit isn't worth it

placing the same bet on three sides doesn't change or reduce the chances of losing money . Infact it only increases the chances of losing money. It possible for the three bets to still fails leading to more losses. Without luck being on our side winning in gambling isn't possible even if we decide to bet on three sides. Therefore, no matter the pattern we may decide to used in placing our bet luck still plays a crucial part in winning.

[NurseHub]

Although, I think this is just for a test run, perhaps I haven't tried it before but I want to know if anyone out there has already tried this methods and it works for them.
For instance;
You can have a two powerful team playing match today, and you selected a single bet and places three different bet both teams with the mindset that they would definitely win at last.
Do you think this could boost the way we gamble, let say to give us more winning results.

What do you think?
[/quote
‎I understand this strategy and I have used it before. It's not a guarantee to win but has some passage depending on how you predicted it. Let's use Arsenal vs Man City as an example. May be a gambler has $10 to use for the game and he decides to divide it by double gambling with opposite predictions and stake in a single bet on Arsenal to win with some amount while placing Man City to win too in the other slip. In all the predictions, the gambler is still within what he can afford to lose. That's the kind of prediction I understand you are referring to. But this strategy is rare to see and it always comes to a gambler's mind when one is desperately chasing a win.

[libert19]

(I am surprised at this co-incidence that how relevant this topic is)

Yeah, it does. I mean, luck still has to favour you though, obviously. I made 3 bets to same game yesterday and did same in today's game as well and I won 2/3 in both games, and at the end of both games I was in profit.

[hedgeh0g]

(I am surprised at this co-incidence that how relevant this topic is)

Yeah, it does. I mean, luck still has to favour you though, obviously. I made 3 bets to same game yesterday and did same in today's game as well and I won 2/3 in both games, and at the end of both games I was in profit.

I believe this is all a coincidence and the influence of luck, because three bets is very small, and chance plays a huge role. With three bets, we simply won't understand how our strategy works; more precisely, the results can't be adequately interpreted because there are too few of them. Professionals make thousands of bets, even on different games, and still aren't sure they're successful. In any case, it's necessary to try different options. However, I want to make a lot of bets, but the bet size will be small, so I can make thousands of bets to evaluate the results.

[Bright0515]

You will end up being in loss; let's assume you made 3 different bets on a particular game. 1 bet option is with 1.5 odds. The 2nd bet option is the same or a little bit above. And the 3 bets have the same odds or a little bit more. If you win one of the 3, there is no way your winning will be able to give you a profit that will cover up all the staked amount unless if one of your option is with 3 odds and above and that’s where the winning comes from; I will call that pattern an easy way to lose money, not a smart strategy.

All that matters is the odds, so long as all the odds are above 3 odds if you are very lucky to win any of them you will not be at loss. The only want that the gambler will be at loss if when he bet on 1 odd, 2 odds and 3 odds, if he's lucky to win the 1 odd he's at loss even though he won the 3 odds he's still at loss. Well even 3 odds cma not give him profits, it's just a total waste of money and time. Unless he's lucky to bet on 4 odds and luckily for him he won (which is very rare). I don't think op idea is a good one.

[Joy- maker]

Although, I think this is just for a test run, perhaps I haven't tried it before but I want to know if anyone out there has already tried this methods and it works for them.
For instance;
You can have a two powerful team playing match today, and you selected a single bet and places three different bet both teams with the mindset that they would definitely win at last.
Do you think this could boost the way we gamble, let say to give us more winning results.

What do you think?

This type of strategy is called hedging or covering bets. The strategy look smart, because you will have a separate slip for team A, team B and two separate slips for their draws just in case they play draw.

But here is the reality, even though you spread your money across multiple options using your tow power team, bookmakers already include their profit margin for each bet. So even if you win one of your slip your payout won't still cover you lost.

Let's assume you stake $10 on each slip to win $20, the draw option option $10 to win $25 and your total stake is $40. If you end up winning only one slip you only recovered $20 out of  $40, for the  draw option you recover $25, so automatically you will either be recovering 20 or $25 out of $40 your total stake still bad market.

[LUCKMCFLY]

No, it won't work for the simple reason that betting isn't guesswork. Sports betting is much more than that; it's constant analysis, it's what you think plus other things you carry within you. That's why we shouldn't try to guess it would be wrong, and betting that way clearly shows it's just guessing Sports betting should be done calmly, thinking, researching a lot of technical information about the teams, and providing more details to generate a good prediction.

[Ziskinberg]

You win but at the same time you lose. That's because what you will earn is just a smaller amount compared to your total bet cost, so in the end, you aren't winning at all. The strategy is good, but majority would avoid taking this one because of the total cost, yet the winning amount cannot cover the total loss.

However, if you analyze well your bet and focus on a single bet, you can maximize its potential outcome as long as you also get lucky. Being wise and strategic about the game is ideal, but having luck is crucial in order to win and even create a winning streak.

[Anayochukwu]

Although, I think this is just for a test run, perhaps I haven't tried it before but I want to know if anyone out there has already tried this methods and it works for them.
For instance;
You can have a two powerful team playing match today, and you selected a single bet and places three different bet both teams with the mindset that they would definitely win at last.
Do you think this could boost the way we gamble, let say to give us more winning results.

What do you think?

Not at all, I don't think so but it's good that you call it a test because I don't think gamblers will be comfortable with that option. However, I think I have not tried it before too but it's obvious that this methods it's nothing but the easiest way to lose more and more so I don't it's necessary for a gambler to develop any methods, in fact I am sure that a responsible gambler that knows about the ways of the casinos won't going to have a lot of methods, rather he/she would be very much consign to have fun and entertainment.

[Sonia_123]

No it doesn't give more wins instead losses, your number of bets being placed does not determine your wins , winning is based on luck and not the number of bets, if you are luck, then you are likely to win.

I have seen some persons do that with the hope of winning, but they end up losing which make them frustrated because they feels that is the only way out to consistent winning in gambling, they think they are smart but gambling still remains smarter than them.

[yixichloro2xx]

I see what you are doing, it looks smart in the eyes but a very bad approach because it doesn't improve your winning chances. Imagine betting on Barcelona vs Villarreal (Barcelona to win is 1.09 odds, both teams to draw 3 odds, Barcelona to lose 2.45 odds) so you choose to bet on the three options, imagine Barcelona won and you got the payout for 1.09 odds. That doesn't even cover your initial capital you placed on those three bets. In summary you will lose more than you will profit in that kind of approach. Best thing to do is pick odds from different games and don't bet with money you can't afford to lose.

[PX-Z]

Although, I think this is just for a test run, perhaps I haven't tried it before but I want to know if anyone out there has already tried this methods and it works for them.
For instance;
You can have a two powerful team playing match today, and you selected a single bet and places three different bet both teams with the mindset that they would definitely win at last.
Do you think this could boost the way we gamble, let say to give us more winning results.

What do you think?

As long as you are sure that t will dover the loss (your first two previous bets) then you could do a 3rd bet. Tried this before, i bet smaller bet in the start of the game, then later on, i observed that my first bet could lose then i bet a second one on the  opposite team, and yes i won. Although i barely recover the loss from the first bet, so yes, that's what i call a recovery bet lol.

[STT]

I've tried similar in the past, hoping at least one guess would win.   The reality is that you end up confusing your purpose and best guess and its usually not helping you win.
   I've placed bets for and against a particular winning scenario, thinking I could manage it live bet to my advantage as often the odds will swing around according to how well the game is progressing.  However it mostly just ends up in a mess and you pay a premium for each bet also.
 I would advise against such strategies except when you are very bored then it can only be a win lol