🎰 Dustbit.com - The New Crypto Casino & Sport 🥇| Super Rakeback 🚀| Privacy 🔏

[BlackBoss_]

England isn’t the favorite against France in the bronze medal match—it’s not that France is the underdog, based on the odds I saw yesterday: England at @3.71 and France at @1.91. Don’t get me wrong.

France is the favorite to win the bronze medal match; perhaps France’s strength in many areas is seen as superior to England’s, and for those who chose France, that was a good decision based on their own analysis. I watched the France vs. Spain match—very few would have bet on Spain—but during the game, France lost control and didn’t play like the France we’ve come to admire.
In my opinion, England’s weakness lies in their defense.

England are weaker than France, and if they meet France at and phase in World Cup 2026, they are always a weaker team. The bronze medal match contains uncertainty because of players who will play the match. France are stronger, have more star players and have better quality but it's hard to know how their players will perform in this match.

It's almost the same with England but if their players start this match with more motivation to win than French players, perhaps it will help England creating advantage and win the match, but I really doubt that England can win this match.

[mitchr4]

England isn’t the favorite against France in the bronze medal match—it’s not that France is the underdog, based on the odds I saw yesterday: England at @3.71 and France at @1.91. Don’t get me wrong.

France is the favorite to win the bronze medal match; perhaps France’s strength in many areas is seen as superior to England’s, and for those who chose France, that was a good decision based on their own analysis. I watched the France vs. Spain match—very few would have bet on Spain—but during the game, France lost control and didn’t play like the France we’ve come to admire.
In my opinion, England’s weakness lies in their defense.

England are weaker than France, and if they meet France at and phase in World Cup 2026, they are always a weaker team. The bronze medal match contains uncertainty because of players who will play the match. France are stronger, have more star players and have better quality but it's hard to know how their players will perform in this match.

It's almost the same with England but if their players start this match with more motivation to win than French players, perhaps it will help England creating advantage and win the match, but I really doubt that England can win this match.

Both France and England were favorites before their matches. France had lower odds against Spain, and England had lower odds too against Argentina. So that kind of analysis can make sense, but based on what happened before it is hard to predict the result. Team strength cannot always be measured by who looks stronger or weaker on paper. It is more about who can defend and attack better during the actual match.

[suzanne5223]

Has anyone compared DustBit’s bonuses with some of the bigger crypto casinos? I’m curious whether it’s worth sticking with longterm or just trying it for the welcome offer.

It is hard to compare every gambling platform with each other since we'll have different preferences, but if you like instant access to games with no KYC, fast withdrawals, and bonuses, then you'll like the bonus of DustBit, especially if you're a VIP player.
What is the reason why you ask this question?

[yudi09]

-snip-

England are weaker than France, and if they meet France at and phase in World Cup 2026, they are always a weaker team. The bronze medal match contains uncertainty because of players who will play the match. France are stronger, have more star players and have better quality but it's hard to know how their players will perform in this match.

It's almost the same with England but if their players start this match with more motivation to win than French players, perhaps it will help England creating advantage and win the match, but I really doubt that England can win this match.

The final result showed that France wasn’t as strong a team as people had imagined.



It was completely unexpected. France’s midfield received a red rating, and both players stayed on the field until the end of the match. Even though France had Kante, who could have played in the middle, that’s just Deschamps for you.
Maignan, Konate, and Hernandez also received very poor ratings after conceding four goals in 45 minutes.

England, considered to be of lower quality than France, proved all that wrong. One thing I liked about Tuchel in that match was that he played Rice alone and left Anderson on the bench.

[tbct_mt2]

The final result showed that France wasn’t as strong a team as people had imagined.



It was completely unexpected. France’s midfield received a red rating, and both players stayed on the field until the end of the match. Even though France had Kante, who could have played in the middle, that’s just Deschamps for you.
Maignan, Konate, and Hernandez also received very poor ratings after conceding four goals in 45 minutes.

England, considered to be of lower quality than France, proved all that wrong. One thing I liked about Tuchel in that match was that he played Rice alone and left Anderson on the bench.

France have problems with their defense and midfield areas but such issues only shown when they faced with strong opponent like Spain. In previous matches, French attacking players dominated matches and weakness in midfield and defense areas were covered quite well. In a match with Spain, France had one or two opportunities first but Spanish players defended well, and after Spain scored a first goal, the match changed entirely. It's how big match goes, one moment can change the whole match after that.

In the match with England, France collapsed in the first half but after that they came back quite strong. Anyway four-goal difference is very hard to equalize and it's not too surprising that France failed to do that. It's a bad goodbye from Deschamps but during the last 14 years, he actually gained some success with the team, even only won one title in World Cup 2018, two final matches in Euro 2016 and World Cup 2022.

[emmarlemar]

Has anyone compared DustBit’s bonuses with some of the bigger crypto casinos? I’m curious whether it’s worth sticking with longterm or just trying it for the welcome offer.

It is hard to compare every gambling platform with each other since we'll have different preferences, but if you like instant access to games with no KYC, fast withdrawals, and bonuses, then you'll like the bonus of DustBit, especially if you're a VIP player.
What is the reason why you ask this question?

Normally, I'm wary of new casinos, but when I looked at DustBit, the selection of games was better than I had anticipated, and everything loaded fast. I also like it when a casino makes the registration/withdrawal process easy. I want to know if DustBit's bonus is worth trying out because it was simple to get started with, and I didn't have to spend a lot of time figuring out where everything was.

[BALIK]

France have problems with their defense and midfield areas but such issues only shown when they faced with strong opponent like Spain. In previous matches, French attacking players dominated matches and weakness in midfield and defense areas were covered quite well. In a match with Spain, France had one or two opportunities first but Spanish players defended well, and after Spain scored a first goal, the match changed entirely. It's how big match goes, one moment can change the whole match after that.
In the match with England, France collapsed in the first half but after that they came back quite strong. Anyway four-goal difference is very hard to equalize and it's not too surprising that France failed to do that. It's a bad goodbye from Deschamps but during the last 14 years, he actually gained some success with the team, even only won one title in World Cup 2018, two final matches in Euro 2016 and World Cup 2022.

I don't think France's problem were limited to defense or midfield. Real problem was tactical setup of entire team. Against Spain I saw them completely lose control of midfield. Pressing didn't work and Spain played the match at their own pace. Mbappe also admitted after the match that they let Spain control the tempo and that's where match got out of hand.

hmm, against England, same weakness manifested itself more horribly. I won't put all the blame on player though. Des himself took responsibility for the firsthalf performance as unacceptable. But despite being such an experienced coach he was very slow to change plan in big matches. He has done a lot for France in the last 14 years, so his contribution cannot be denied, so his contribution cannot be denied. But as last few big matches have shown, modern football is not all about star studded squads.

[suzanne5223]

Has anyone compared DustBit’s bonuses with some of the bigger crypto casinos? I’m curious whether it’s worth sticking with longterm or just trying it for the welcome offer.

It is hard to compare every gambling platform with each other since we'll have different preferences, but if you like instant access to games with no KYC, fast withdrawals, and bonuses, then you'll like the bonus of DustBit, especially if you're a VIP player.
What is the reason why you ask this question?

Normally, I'm wary of new casinos, but when I looked at DustBit, the selection of games was better than I had anticipated, and everything loaded fast. I also like it when a casino makes the registration/withdrawal process easy. I want to know if DustBit's bonus is worth trying out because it was simple to get started with, and I didn't have to spend a lot of time figuring out where everything was.

Ok. Now I understand you. I tried DustBit a few days ago mostly because they accept crypto deposits. The interface is pretty clean, and I didn’t run into any issues during registration. So far, the experience has been smooth.

[Taskford]

Has anyone compared DustBit’s bonuses with some of the bigger crypto casinos? I’m curious whether it’s worth sticking with longterm or just trying it for the welcome offer.

It is hard to compare every gambling platform with each other since we'll have different preferences, but if you like instant access to games with no KYC, fast withdrawals, and bonuses, then you'll like the bonus of DustBit, especially if you're a VIP player.
What is the reason why you ask this question?

Normally, I'm wary of new casinos, but when I looked at DustBit, the selection of games was better than I had anticipated, and everything loaded fast. I also like it when a casino makes the registration/withdrawal process easy. I want to know if DustBit's bonus is worth trying out because it was simple to get started with, and I didn't have to spend a lot of time figuring out where everything was.

This is the first impression to have before playing on the casino, because that can make you do more researching to know if they are reliable or not, Also it seems that you made a great assessment after you experience playing on their casino.

On bonuses matter if you are really interested to know more about it, I guess the only thing you could do is to spare some time trying to avail those offers that can catch you attention then try it. Because with that you would know if its worth of your time or not.

[Cryptmuster]

It is hard to compare every gambling platform with each other since we'll have different preferences, but if you like instant access to games with no KYC, fast withdrawals, and bonuses, then you'll like the bonus of DustBit, especially if you're a VIP player.
What is the reason why you ask this question?

There are now many casinos that don't require mandatory KYC, pay out on time, and have a more or less similar interface. Therefore the choice is quite large. As for bonuses, I don't think you should pay too much attention to them when choosing a casino, as the wagering requirements for welcome bonuses are very high, and few of us will bother to claim them. However, Dustbit is a truly good casino with a reputable reputation, where you can play without worrying about KYC and payouts.

[Cointxz]

-

There are now many casinos that don't require mandatory KYC, pay out on time, and have a more or less similar interface. Therefore the choice is quite large.

That’s correct specifically casino with license from Anjouan license provider which is why new casino preferred to acquire it over Curacao nowadays that becomes more stricter.

Dustbit is a truly good casino with a reputable reputation, where you can play without worrying about KYC and payouts.

I only notice this casino after some user try to shill this on other casino ANN thread.

What specific feature that makes this casino good casino? I might interested to try this if there’s something good that will benefit us gamblers in the long run.

[michellee]

It is hard to compare every gambling platform with each other since we'll have different preferences, but if you like instant access to games with no KYC, fast withdrawals, and bonuses, then you'll like the bonus of DustBit, especially if you're a VIP player.
What is the reason why you ask this question?

There are now many casinos that don't require mandatory KYC, pay out on time, and have a more or less similar interface. Therefore the choice is quite large. As for bonuses, I don't think you should pay too much attention to them when choosing a casino, as the wagering requirements for welcome bonuses are very high, and few of us will bother to claim them. However, Dustbit is a truly good casino with a reputable reputation, where you can play without worrying about KYC and payouts.

As long as you don't doing suspicion things, the casinos will not ask you to do KYC. But I just guess that someday when online gambling explode, more than today, KYC will be mandatory and will be ask immediately when someone register. But no need to worry with that and think much as you can pay without worrying about KYC. Just make sure you follows their rules and no problem will happens.

[suzanne5223]

It is hard to compare every gambling platform with each other since we'll have different preferences, but if you like instant access to games with no KYC, fast withdrawals, and bonuses, then you'll like the bonus of DustBit, especially if you're a VIP player.
What is the reason why you ask this question?

There are now many casinos that don't require mandatory KYC, pay out on time, and have a more or less similar interface. Therefore the choice is quite large. As for bonuses, I don't think you should pay too much attention to them when choosing a casino, as the wagering requirements for welcome bonuses are very high, and few of us will bother to claim them. However, Dustbit is a truly good casino with a reputable reputation, where you can play without worrying about KYC and payouts.

I agree with what you said, and i never pay much attention to welcome bonuses either unless it's a fair bonus, but I wasn't the one who wanted to claim the bonus; it was someone else, and I'm just providing an assistant to the user's question since everyone seems to ignore the question, maybe because it was asked by a newbie member.

-

There are now many casinos that don't require mandatory KYC, pay out on time, and have a more or less similar interface. Therefore the choice is quite large.

That’s correct specifically casino with license from Anjouan license provider which is why new casino preferred to acquire it over Curacao nowadays that becomes more stricter.

You have a point, but the Curaçao license will be stricter soon (next year); they are working on a license reform with new LOK rules, removing the master license holder (sublicenses), and providing a direct license for all gambling platforms.

[SilverCryptoBullet]

You have a point, but the Curaçao license will be stricter soon (next year); they are working on a license reform with new LOK rules, removing the master license holder (sublicenses), and providing a direct license for all gambling platforms.

Not only license, the full compliance will be in July 2027 and there is about one year till full compliance.

Full compliance is expected by June 2027. By that stage, operators must have implemented complete wallet segregation systems, blockchain analytics tools, transaction reconciliation processes, and audit-ready recordkeeping systems capable of regulatory review.

With LOK, there will be mandatory presence locally there, rather than paper setup which will no longer be allowed in the future. Local presence will be expected to help for things like KYC, AML and meet any further requirements as well as help the local economy, according to this.

[SuperBitMan]

It is hard to compare every gambling platform with each other since we'll have different preferences, but if you like instant access to games with no KYC, fast withdrawals, and bonuses, then you'll like the bonus of DustBit, especially if you're a VIP player.
What is the reason why you ask this question?

There are now many casinos that don't require mandatory KYC, pay out on time, and have a more or less similar interface. Therefore the choice is quite large. As for bonuses, I don't think you should pay too much attention to them when choosing a casino, as the wagering requirements for welcome bonuses are very high, and few of us will bother to claim them. However, Dustbit is a truly good casino with a reputable reputation, where you can play without worrying about KYC and payouts.

You are right I think almost all the casinos that I’m seeing right now don’t have a mandatory KYC and the reason is because a lot of people don’t like casinos that use KYC, as a casino if you want to have a lot of customers, you should not be making KYC mandatory because a lot of people will stop using your casino when they notice KYC is mandatory.
I don’t really care too much about bonus in casino, all I care about is honesty and transparency from a casino because this day’s we have a lot of scam casino.
Yeah so far Dustbit has been doing well, I have not had any issues with them since I started using them.

[SilverCryptoBullet]

You are right I think almost all the casinos that I’m seeing right now don’t have a mandatory KYC and the reason is because a lot of people don’t like casinos that use KYC, as a casino if you want to have a lot of customers, you should not be making KYC mandatory because a lot of people will stop using your casino when they notice KYC is mandatory.

Casinos know that, and they know how to satisfy gamblers by advertising their casinos as no KYC. Like our casino does not have mandatory KYC but it does not mean there is no KYC for users. They mostly write terms in casino ToS, that in given situations, they will request KYC on users, that's time when the KYC card will be pulled out against users.

"No KYC mandatory" needs to be understood accurately and very carefully.

I don't know but I feel like the times of no KYC on casinos and exchanges has comes to ending. It's not because exchanges and casinos don't want to provide what need by customers, it's only their compliance to law and regulations from governments.

[Cryptmuster]

You are right I think almost all the casinos that I’m seeing right now don’t have a mandatory KYC and the reason is because a lot of people don’t like casinos that use KYC, as a casino if you want to have a lot of customers, you should not be making KYC mandatory because a lot of people will stop using your casino when they notice KYC is mandatory.
I don’t really care too much about bonus in casino, all I care about is honesty and transparency from a casino because this day’s we have a lot of scam casino.
Yeah so far Dustbit has been doing well, I have not had any issues with them since I started using them.

But it's also important to remember that if a casino doesn't require KYC at the outset, that doesn't mean they can't do so later. I think that if you have small wins and withdrawals, this will almost never lead to mandatory KYC. But if you manage to win a large sum and want to withdraw it, I think the likelihood of being required to KYC increases significantly. I think a player should be prepared for this in the event of a large win. But I also see in various casinos reporting large wins without any verification. So, this is likely due to the casino's security system, as it's all likely automated.

[mitchr4]

You are right I think almost all the casinos that I’m seeing right now don’t have a mandatory KYC and the reason is because a lot of people don’t like casinos that use KYC, as a casino if you want to have a lot of customers, you should not be making KYC mandatory because a lot of people will stop using your casino when they notice KYC is mandatory.

Casinos know that, and they know how to satisfy gamblers by advertising their casinos as no KYC. Like our casino does not have mandatory KYC but it does not mean there is no KYC for users. They mostly write terms in casino ToS, that in given situations, they will request KYC on users, that's time when the KYC card will be pulled out against users.

"No KYC mandatory" needs to be understood accurately and very carefully.

I don't know but I feel like the times of no KYC on casinos and exchanges has comes to ending. It's not because exchanges and casinos don't want to provide what need by customers, it's only their compliance to law and regulations from governments.

I also think this no KYC era is slowly starting to disappear, which makes sense when looking at how much stricter government regulation is getting. I really agree that even if a casino does not require KYC or advertises itself as no KYC, that does not mean users are fully free from it. Casinos still have rules, either their own internal rules or pressure from outside regulation. I have personally seen a few casinos change from no KYC to KYC, so it should not be a surprise if someone gets asked for it someday too, and sooner or later the no KYC claim from a casino will likely fade away.

[Catenaccio]

I also think this no KYC era is slowly starting to disappear, which makes sense when looking at how much stricter government regulation is getting. I really agree that even if a casino does not require KYC or advertises itself as no KYC, that does not mean users are fully free from it.

We can not stop it because the power is in governments but we can choose what are best in each era to do. Before no KYC platforms completely disappear, we can still use them but there will be more requirements on us: as we must do things more carefully, privately and don't leave traces so that governments can get our digital traces.

A Call to Action: Stop the FCC's KYC Regime

Casinos still have rules, either their own internal rules or pressure from outside regulation. I have personally seen a few casinos change from no KYC to KYC, so it should not be a surprise if someone gets asked for it someday too, and sooner or later the no KYC claim from a casino will likely fade away.

All businesses have own terms for their companies but they have to change, adapt to new regulations from governments. If governments say KYC is mandatory, most companies will obey it, comply to new AML and KYC regulations. No founders want to bet that governments will arrest him or not arrest him, it's too risky.

[SuperBitMan]

You are right I think almost all the casinos that I’m seeing right now don’t have a mandatory KYC and the reason is because a lot of people don’t like casinos that use KYC, as a casino if you want to have a lot of customers, you should not be making KYC mandatory because a lot of people will stop using your casino when they notice KYC is mandatory.
I don’t really care too much about bonus in casino, all I care about is honesty and transparency from a casino because this day’s we have a lot of scam casino.
Yeah so far Dustbit has been doing well, I have not had any issues with them since I started using them.

But it's also important to remember that if a casino doesn't require KYC at the outset, that doesn't mean they can't do so later. I think that if you have small wins and withdrawals, this will almost never lead to mandatory KYC. But if you manage to win a large sum and want to withdraw it, I think the likelihood of being required to KYC increases significantly. I think a player should be prepared for this in the event of a large win. But I also see in various casinos reporting large wins without any verification. So, this is likely due to the casino's security system, as it's all likely automated.

You are right, I have been involved in that situation before, the casino said no KYC and when I registered and deposited, there was no KYC and when I won small amount of money and decided to withdraw, there was no KYC however, after few months of using the casino I won huge amount of money and I decided to withdraw that was when they asked for KYC, to be honest I was really annoyed but I did the KYC and then withdraw and that was how I stopped using the casino till date.

If a casino wants to introduce a KYC when you win huge amount of money and wants to withdraw it, then they should make it known in their rules and regulations, I don’t like a situation where they say it’s NO KYC and later they bring up a KYC process is really annoying.