Which do you trust more? Sports bettting or gambling games

[Emeraldo]

‎Well for me it's sporty betting that is more easy than casino games. It feels more straightforward. In sport betting, you can analyze the team you want to bet on, like their previous matches, head to head , injury update, team form. With that will know what to get because you will have some level of confidence in that team. Unlike Casino type of games where there's no analysis, everything depends on how Lucky you are. The chances of not winning is higher than that of sport betting. Sport betting looks more predictable, imagine betting on Arsenal to win teams like Leeds United. Arsenal are a big team and are in great form so, you are 80% likely to win. Both have their risks, so knowing how manage them is important.

Yes sports betting is easier like you said than any other forms of sports out there, and the excitement and fun derived from it makes it more impressive to people, even beginners are carried along in the fun in sports which makes it lively for all.
The choice of where to bet on depends on individual area of interest and what works for each persons, some likes casinos because there luck shine there compared to sport's, while some likes sports as it works better for them

[Cantsay]

None is free, but I will always go with sports betting... Even with the provably fair games, there's too much randomness in the system that I just don't see myself trusting them more than a game where I can see what is going on and how the players are doing.

Even if there is the issue of game fixing in sports betting, it will still be better than a system that just runs some computation that I know nothing about and then gives me a result.

I feel same way when I stand in my choice of sports betting,  because I used to love casino games before when I didn't fully understand how odds work in sportsbetting and lost so much funds before the games I selected even started.
Until I learnt how to read and understand odds and understand how different factors affected the outcome of games of my choice, I did prefer casino games, not until I changed to sportsbetting with full understanding and now can use different strategies to bet, hence I forsook casino games and settled for sportsbetting strictly at least I can be sure of the results I get before the games end, which is very different from casino games that depend on RNG model to get results.

I think a lot of gamblers have this same story when we started gambling. Those who entered into gambling and didn’t know much about odds and all those other complicated stuffs at the interface of bookmakers, but later on we got to learn and then saw tha casino games have been ripping us off.

[leonair]

I just (yeah, literally JUST now) had a random thought and it makes sense in my head.

So, the thing is do you feel that there is no manipulation when you make sports bets compared to when you play casino games? I mean, with former, you look at odds, and if you like you make a bet and sports is viewable by everybody, results are obvious, if you win the bet, you get the relevant amount back. See, everything is crystal clear, isn't it?

Now, question is same as title, so read the same and respond.

PS: I am not talking about match fixing and stuff like that. Please refrain from making comments about same.

I believe in both because I know that the risks are high in both places and we gamble with that risk, and the reason we take this risk is because we believe that nothing will happen there but if we are not lucky enough to win then we will not be able to win there. I believe in sports betting relatively more because it is a live game so there is no chance of cheating but in casino games anything can be done behind the scenes but since I am ready to take that risk I think I am believing in it

[Z_MBFM]

I just (yeah, literally JUST now) had a random thought and it makes sense in my head.

So, the thing is do you feel that there is no manipulation when you make sports bets compared to when you play casino games? I mean, with former, you look at odds, and if you like you make a bet and sports is viewable by everybody, results are obvious, if you win the bet, you get the relevant amount back. See, everything is crystal clear, isn't it?

Now, question is same as title, so read the same and respond.

PS: I am not talking about match fixing and stuff like that. Please refrain from making comments about same.

I believe in both because I know that the risks are high in both places and we gamble with that risk, and the reason we take this risk is because we believe that nothing will happen there but if we are not lucky enough to win then we will not be able to win there. I believe in sports betting relatively more because it is a live game so there is no chance of cheating but in casino games anything can be done behind the scenes but since I am ready to take that risk I think I am believing in it

Everyone who bets leaves it to luck except sportsbooks, so leaving it to luck can never be trusted. We could trust only when I could be sure of my winning there. I don't know how you think about it, but I always find sportsbooks trustworthy, but there is not as much fun here as there is in playing casino games, so despite believing in sports betting more, casino games are played at maximum time. However, I have played live blackjack at maximum time, which I think is enough for me because everything is live here.

[Mindyspace]

I also think sports betting seems more transparent because everyone sees the game and the result. We analyze the odds and decide whether to bet or not.

But in the end, the bookmakers still adjust the odds to make a profit. The difference is that in sports betting you can use more analysis, while in the casino it's almost all luck, that's how I imagine it.

[Furious 7]

I just (yeah, literally JUST now) had a random thought and it makes sense in my head.

So, the thing is do you feel that there is no manipulation when you make sports bets compared to when you play casino games? I mean, with former, you look at odds, and if you like you make a bet and sports is viewable by everybody, results are obvious, if you win the bet, you get the relevant amount back. See, everything is crystal clear, isn't it?

I think things like this are still a presumption just because when we play slots the results are not as expected so that presumptions like this where we will always feel that if we play slots we are always tricked by a different system with sports betting that allows when we play it to be more fair.

Whereas in this case why sportsbetting is different from casino games is because we can determine the probability so that we try to minimize the risk with the analysis and decisions we make in contrast to slots or other types of casinos on gambling sites that are based entirely on luck.
In sportsbetting we can make some decisions with our analysis but unlike slots, even if we will consider any strategy or superstition it will not mean much when we don't have luck when playing.
Things like this sometimes make us always have the presumption that sites always make slots as a way for them to outsmart the system even though from the beginning it was our luck that took part in this.

[Wiwo]

In gambling, nothing is impossible to manipulate. Even sports betting, which is considered the fairest and most open, still has ways to manipulate it. Sometimes, we are unknowingly directed to bet on something that is clearly a loser, so they (the bookies) have a greater chance of winning. This can happen in many ways, whether through attractive odds or other factors. So, stay alert and always analyze before placing a bet. Don't be gullible.

You are right but on another note you are likely to be also wrong and in as much as you can see that everything can be rigged event football games, but there is still some level of exception to some things in football games rigging.

Let take for instance, casino games like slot and blackjack are supplied through the casino games system or their third-party games providers These games are highly controlled.

But football games are highly exceptional since the viewers are always and actively following the live matches and teams' performances determine their overall experience.

[Versatile_choice]

There is no way to compare sports betting than slot games that more randomly, unlike sports that you would be working on your odds. And for sure, if you are that controllable you can actually works on your odds and earn so easily and even though it's definitely Chance based game but it's more controllable than slot or casino game that you wouldn't be sure of how the game would win thereafter. Of course, In slot or casino games it mostly favors the casino operators.

Sport betting is more trusted than slots no doubt, the reason why I said that is because in sport betting after making your bet you will also watch your games play and if there's any manipulation you can easily find out but in slot you just pick and within some seconds it start and also end within some seconds isn't that obvious that it is a program game and somehow manipulated? And while playing slot games like virtual there are some certain makes that those who are playing live will not make but it happens in virtual games and this makes me feel that they are the ones manipulating it, and due to this reasons I don't like betting on slot.

[Mr_Brilliant$]

‎Well for me it's sporty betting that is more easy than casino games. It feels more straightforward. In sport betting, you can analyze the team you want to bet on, like their previous matches, head to head , injury update, team form. With that will know what to get because you will have some level of confidence in that team. Unlike Casino type of games where there's no analysis, everything depends on how Lucky you are. The chances of not winning is higher than that of sport betting. Sport betting looks more predictable, imagine betting on Arsenal to win teams like Leeds United. Arsenal are a big team and are in great form so, you are 80% likely to win. Both have their risks, so knowing how manage them is important.

Yeah, sport betting kind of feel more easier because you can analyze stuff, compared to other gambling game.. but it still not guarantee anything too..
One small mistake your ticket will just cut. Haha..
 
But casino is more of pure luck, yes sport betting too is not safe..  At the end of the day both are still gambling, just that one gives kind of a little control than the other…

[Churchillvv]

Certainly, one of the reasons why sport betting is leading is because people participate in it globally so to some level especially when it has to do with big leagues the chance of it getting rigged is very low and for casino games it’s just something that is decided from over there which is not visible to you, but there us a fair play option where you can cross check if the outcome is actually correct but not all casinos have this feature, so the trust is definitely on sport betting than casino games.

[Makus]

Manipulation actually exists in sports betting but the chances of coming across such games are very low because majority of the leagues care about their reputation and this is something that would ruin it if it is discovered. I trust sports betting more or should i say i prefer it more because I know that my skills are not wasted, I can always apply the knowledge that I have on these games and increase my chances of winning. Gambling games on the other hand are only based on luck, applying skills won't give you any positive results

[Nothingtodo]

I prefer sports betting to casino games because I have some knowledge in this field and I bet on cricket and football.
Moreover, I have no experience or knowledge in casino games, it is completely dependent on luck, but there are some sportsbets that allow you to guess the results. And sometimes when betting on football, the stronger team or club has a higher chance of winning. For example, if there is a match between Real Madrid and Nottingham Forest, then of course Real Madrid has a higher chance. But it is not possible to guess what will happen in casino games.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

I just (yeah, literally JUST now) had a random thought and it makes sense in my head.

So, the thing is do you feel that there is no manipulation when you make sports bets compared to when you play casino games? I mean, with former, you look at odds, and if you like you make a bet and sports is viewable by everybody, results are obvious, if you win the bet, you get the relevant amount back. See, everything is crystal clear, isn't it?

Now, question is same as title, so read the same and respond.

PS: I am not talking about match fixing and stuff like that. Please refrain from making comments about same.

If it's about trust alone, then I would say that I trust both sports betting and gambling games exactly the same but concerning like, I would say I like sports betting more than I like gambling games and this is because of some reasons, and one of the reason is this one you already mentioned, game outcome in sports is always generally public, so it's basically impossible for any casino to try to play funny with a ticket that has clearly won.
Another reason is that sports betting is a type of game where the bettor or gambler is not completely dependent on luck alone, knowledge can improve and increase one's chances of winning bet and this is a very good advantage.

But for gambling games like slot and casino games, this type of games can easily be manipulated my the casino or game providers, though they are very fun to play and the chances of winning in thousands of odds here is much better and higher than the chances of achieving same in sports betting.
My level of trust on both sports betting and gambling games will depend on the casino where I am playing either of them on or both actually.

[Wiwo]

Certainly, one of the reasons why sport betting is leading is because people participate in it globally so to some level especially when it has to do with big leagues the chance of it getting rigged is very low and for casino games it’s just something that is decided from over there which is not visible to you, but there us a fair play option where you can cross check if the outcome is actually correct but not all casinos have this feature, so the trust is definitely on sport betting than casino games.

Asides from that global validation possibility in sport betting,  thee are other aspects we shouldn't forget, spirt betting is far easier for a gambler to win because anyone that is following the games can build a forecast to get a winning, alot tiime gambler's like to be in charge and feeling unheated.

Casino games on the other hand is not like that, there is alot of house influence and wagering requirements that limits gambler's chances of winning.

For those reasons, sport bet will always be the top choice of most gambler's a d even they winning rate in spirt bets is higher than in house games.

[Yamifoud]

Manipulation is always possible within these two, but I think casino games are seen more manipulated compared to sports betting.

And just like how the house should always gain an edge over its players, I think it makes sense, most particularly on shady casinos.

They can always control the possible outcome and leave the users at loss. That's why I don't trust 100% on casino games, even on reputable casinos, I still think that it can be possible at times. That answers why they can easily monitor us when we are mostly winning and set us betting limits.

[boyptc]

The casino games have the algorithm that ends up making the house wins. While for sports betting, it's hard to look for the manipulation there.

Especially, the official games from the top tier tournaments or from the usual sports that we follow. You barely see that in football, basketball and even in boxing if the names are reputable of the athletes involved in there.

So for me if what I trust more, I'll trust my guts and analysis through sports betting because we know that in casino games, the house always wins!

[Asiska02]

In sportbet, you have a certain percentage to determine the outcome of the game through your analysis and research based on the knowledge you have on the clubs playing. Even the bookies cannot get it all right when setting the odd, when you can use that to beat the bookie.

In sport betting, over the time, the bookies are more profitable than the bettors that are playing the games. In a scenario like this, it is not easy to manipulate the games since it’s publicly viewed, and the odds from the bookies being used by the casinos cannot be changed. You can be lucky to beat the bookies in this game but you can’t be lucky to beat them overtime because it’s a game of luck and not practical.

In casino games, it's different because whatever, the casino brings out as the outcome of your bet is what you accept without questions because you don't have any clue of how the casino algorithm works. I trust sportbet because everyone sees what's happening on the pitch.

Casinos that are accused of manipulation are always on the radar of losing their customers because their reputation is already damaged. Any game that comes out from them are going to be mostly tied to be rigged from them in their favour and since the bettors don’t have any proof for it, they accept the outcome and take their losses most of the time.

[Vaculin]

Since sports betting are played via live, I think that lessens the chances of getting the game rigged or manipulated, although manipulation can still happen but with a very rare chances.

However, with casino games, everything can be well manipulated and puts all the favor to the house. But of course, the casino will not admit this, no matter how obvious it is. They stand on the thought that they are running provably fair games so they will continue to lure us with this kind of standards.

And because we are greedy, we chose to set aside this kind of thought.

[Powerjumboo]

I just (yeah, literally JUST now) had a random thought and it makes sense in my head.

So, the thing is do you feel that there is no manipulation when you make sports bets compared to when you play casino games? I mean, with former, you look at odds, and if you like you make a bet and sports is viewable by everybody, results are obvious, if you win the bet, you get the relevant amount back. See, everything is crystal clear, isn't it?

Now, question is same as title, so read the same and respond.

PS: I am not talking about match fixing and stuff like that. Please refrain from making comments about same.

Between playing casino games (slots) and sports betting, I always like sports betting and I always like sports betting. Slot games always depend on luck, but in sports betting, winning can be ensured to a large extent through your own analysis and strategy. For example, when a strong team plays a cricket match or a football match with a weak team, it is always seen that the strong team wins the game and the weak team loses the game. So here, from such matches, it is seen and analyzed and understood that this is why I always prefer sports betting over games based on luck.

[TopT3ns]

In sportbet, you have a certain percentage to determine the outcome of the game through your analysis and research based on the knowledge you have on the clubs playing. Even the bookies cannot get it all right when setting the odd, when you can use that to beat the bookie.

In sport betting, over the time, the bookies are more profitable than the bettors that are playing the games. In a scenario like this, it is not easy to manipulate the games since it’s publicly viewed, and the odds from the bookies being used by the casinos cannot be changed. You can be lucky to beat the bookies in this game but you can’t be lucky to beat them overtime because it’s a game of luck and not practical.

In casino games, it's different because whatever, the casino brings out as the outcome of your bet is what you accept without questions because you don't have any clue of how the casino algorithm works. I trust sportbet because everyone sees what's happening on the pitch.

Casinos that are accused of manipulation are always on the radar of losing their customers because their reputation is already damaged. Any game that comes out from them are going to be mostly tied to be rigged from them in their favour and since the bettors don’t have any proof for it, they accept the outcome and take their losses most of the time.

Many customers have abandoned the casino due to the reputational loss that the casino exhibited after the allegation of rigging. The games provided seem to be fixed in order to make the most profits. Betters have to accept the outcomes without any obvious evidences and suffer multiple losses. This case exhibits the helplessness experienced by the majority of the participants. This has eventually had a severe economic impact on many of the operators. To have a fair industry, player protection is very vital.