Connected Account Efforts that Sign Up for the Same Campaign.

[Satofan44]

Although according to the law, attempted murder is an offense on its own. But it’s also another thing to consider if the murder was successful or a failed attempt.

The rule here I believe is quite different, the rule is don’t use your alts to participate in the same campaign, and if that’s not what happened there, then I don’t see any actual offense there. Except the user has multiple accounts that is actively l participating in the same Signature Campaign and has actually received signature payments from that same signature campaign at the same time frame, then I honestly can’t see an offense there. Attempting to join a signature campaign isn’t same thing as working in a signature campaign.

You guys are being way too soft and are opening up countless vulnerabilities in this very fragile system for no good reason whatsoever. It should not be allowed to apply in the same campaign with multiple accounts at all. This solves any kind of "justified" abuse and bullshit excuses relating to "I wouldn't have enrolled the other account".

The argument I got when I questioned this back in the day was that people apply with all their accounts hoping 1 gets in. The issue is what if the manager selects multiple of a users accounts? There are alot of users that will not say a word and keep both accounts in the campaign hoping they don't get caught. IMO users should apply to a campaign with their best account if they have multiple accounts and not put themselves into situations that will turn out bad for them.

You are a signature campaign manager, be part of the change. Enough of these edge cases which create more avenues for abuse. Simply disallow applying from multiple accounts under any circumstances and any forms. Everything is solved then.

I think accusing me of applying with an alternate account and saying I definitely wouldn't give up my slot if both of my alternate accounts were accepted is still an assumption.

Fuck off, these are stories for children and naive adults who have not grown out of childhood.

Good work OP. I'm around, just the recent events have been quite boring -- as is the defense presented here.

[Tungbulu]

You guys are being way too soft and are opening up countless vulnerabilities in this very fragile system for no good reason whatsoever. It should not be allowed to apply in the same campaign with multiple accounts at all. This solves any kind of "justified" abuse and bullshit excuses relating to "I wouldn't have enrolled the other account".

Well that’s too bad that it’s in our place to make that decision or arrive to such conclusions. The persons in the best position to decide are the campaign managers, of course via the campaign rules. If the manager states that applying with multiple accounts is fraud and cheating, then anyone found in such act is automatically guilty. But if there are any kinds of exceptions, then who are you, (and I) to argue that?

[Satofan44]

You guys are being way too soft and are opening up countless vulnerabilities in this very fragile system for no good reason whatsoever. It should not be allowed to apply in the same campaign with multiple accounts at all. This solves any kind of "justified" abuse and bullshit excuses relating to "I wouldn't have enrolled the other account".

Well that’s too bad that it’s in our place to make that decision or arrive to such conclusions. The persons in the best position to decide are the campaign managers, of course via the campaign rules. If the manager states that applying with multiple accounts is fraud and cheating, then anyone found in such act is automatically guilty. But if there are any kinds of exceptions, then who are you, (and I) to argue that?

Why of course! What is the point of suggesting things that are better for the forum, let people do things the way that the want -- no matter how wrong those ways may be.  DT members can at any time collectively decide to view applying as wrong, regardless of what managers want to do and they can apply this without any backing of managers. You seem to believe that managers are experts in organization design and security and that they make the best decisions in accordance with that. They are not, and they do not. How many cases does it take for idiots like you to wake up?

It is time to stop shifting the blame to theymos for inaction. Most of the blame lies with most of the senior members that are here and part of DT. The average person always wants someone else to create the change that they want to see happen even if they could do it themselves.  
Stop providing scammers with ways to avoid accountability. It is the exact opposite of what should be happening -- there should be ever increasing scrutiny.

[Tungbulu]

Why of course! What is the point of suggesting things that are better for the forum, let people do things the way that the want -- no matter how wrong those ways may be.  DT members can at any time collectively decide to view applying as wrong, regardless of what managers want to do and they can apply this without any backing of managers. You seem to believe that managers are experts in organization design and security and that they make the best decisions in accordance with that. They are not, and they do not. How many cases does it take for idiots like you to wake up?

Say what you wanna say, point out what you wanna point out but I’ll not have you insult me.

What am I even saying? That’s what you’re known for isn’t it? You can’t express yourself without directly insulting others and I just keep wondering what your mother taught you, because it’s just pathetic how you look down on others and see yourself superior to them. Anyways, it’s a good thing that your opinion about others matters only to you.

And sure the DTs has the right to collectively decide on a specific issue, regardless of what the manager thinks or says, which is why it’s important for them to always critically evaluate and examine every little details before arriving at a conclusion, and also make sure that they’re not in anyway partial with their judgement, without making any kind of exceptions.

[Hanadawa]

1. Have I ever tried to apply to a campaign that explicitly forbids applying with an alternate account?

2. Have I ever cheated in any contest or challenge that prohibits participation using an alternate account?

3. Is a DT's assumption, such as "he definitely wouldn't have given up his slot if his alternate account had been accepted," valid and credible evidence?

4. I sent merit to my alternate account. Then, immediately afterward, I regretted my actions. I never did it again. Most, perhaps 99%, of the merit I received was sent to posts I deemed worthy.

5. My account was banned around 2020. That was two years after I became inactive on the forum. The reason was spam and low-quality posts. I was inactive on the forum for a long time because I was waiting for a response to an email I had sent. I have appealed several times to the email address provided, but in the past six years, there has been no response.

6. The tag with the description "5 connected accounts" sounds like an attempt to expose a large account farm. In reality, only two accounts are active. One account was banned due to a mistake I made while I was still a ranked member. I abandoned the other two accounts because I thought there was no point in having multiple accounts. After a few years of inactivity, I reopened my accounts, with only two accounts, and only one of them was truly active on the forum.

7. My Full Member account initially had many low-quality posts in the past. I deleted them and tried to create decent posts. At least I'm no longer spamming.

The argument I got when I questioned this back in the day was that people apply with all their accounts hoping 1 gets in. The issue is what if the manager selects multiple of a users accounts? There are alot of users that will not say a word and keep both accounts in the campaign hoping they don't get caught. IMO users should apply to a campaign with their best account if they have multiple accounts and not put themselves into situations that will turn out bad for them.

8. One account is a Senior Member and the other is a Full Member. I thought I could try applying at both ranks, hoping one would be accepted. However, if both are accepted, I would tell the manager using my Full Member account that I can't join your campaign because my other alternative account has already been accepted.
 

[yahoo62278]

5. My account was banned around 2020. That was two years after I became inactive on the forum. The reason was spam and low-quality posts. I was inactive on the forum for a long time because I was waiting for a response to an email I had sent. I have appealed several times to the email address provided, but in the past six years, there has been no response.


 

The bolded part is all we need to know. When an account is banned, you as a person are banned. That doesn't mean just make a new account and it's ok. Yes I know, others do it, and when caught they get their accounts tagged.

If people read and understood rules it would make this place so much better but unfortunately many just try to circumvent and still frequent this place hoping noone ever finds out. It might take weeks or a couple years but the truth comes out usually. If you followed the rules from the start you'd not have been in the ban wagon.

The only thing that might save ya would be if the ban wasn't perma banned and judging by the fact that you say you sent multiple appeals with no response we can deduce it was a perma ban. Then meriting yourself doesn't help. Taking shortcuts rarely does anyone any good.

[Free Market Capitalist]

The bolded part is all we need to know. When an account is banned, you as a person are banned. That doesn't mean just make a new account and it's ok. Yes I know, others do it, and when caught they get their accounts tagged.

That's right. I was going to spare the tag but self-confessed ban evading plus "a little" self confessed merit exchanging plus the reason for this thread (applying for the same campaign)—which wouldn't be that big of a deal—but the fact that it follows the same pattern is too much for me to ignore.

[Hanadawa]

-snip-

This isn't creating a new account. This is also my old account. Back when I didn't really understand forums, I did create 5 accounts. But it wasn't to cheat, as I was a beginner. I also didn't need to hide the fact that my account was banned. And since the reason was for low-quality posts, I no longer post spam or low-quality posts.
Is there any way I can unban other than waiting for an appeal response via email?
I remember requesting an unban in a thread started by Cyrus, but there was no response either.
There have been merit submissions, but only 3 or 4 in a month, two years ago. After that, I regretted it and never submitted any merit submissions again after reading and remembering the rules, and trying to be a member who doesn't violate the forum rules.

[yahoo62278]

-snip-

This isn't creating a new account. This is also my old account. Back when I didn't really understand forums, I did create 5 accounts. But it wasn't to cheat, as I was a beginner. I also didn't need to hide the fact that my account was banned. And since the reason was for low-quality posts, I no longer post spam or low-quality posts.
Is there any way I can unban other than waiting for an appeal response via email?
I remember requesting an unban in a thread started by Cyrus, but there was no response either.
There have been merit submissions, but only 3 or 4 in a month, two years ago. After that, I regretted it and never submitted any merit submissions again after reading and remembering the rules, and trying to be a member who doesn't violate the forum rules.

You aren't getting it at all. You could have 100 accounts created, if 1 account is perma banned all 100 of your accounts are banned. They may not have a message saying banned, but when you get 1 account banned and start posting on another that is ban evasion. DT will tag every account they find related to you and deem them useless basically.

[Hanadawa]

How can a moderator consider unbanning my account? I mean, if there's no response for years, what's the point of the appeal email provided in the account ban notification? I was still a beginner when my account was banned. Why isn't there a second chance?

You have been permanently banned by a forum moderator, probably due to spam or plagiarism. You may appeal here, but your chances are not good: banappeals...@bitcointalk.org

I thought after so many years, someone would be given another chance, or the ban would expire. Well, that's unlikely. But at least I could get a chance or a response from a moderator or someone who knows how to file an appeal so it gets answered quickly.

[Satofan44]

That's right. I was going to spare the tag but self-confessed ban evading plus "a little" self confessed merit exchanging plus the reason for this thread (applying for the same campaign)—which wouldn't be that big of a deal—but the fact that it follows the same pattern is too much for me to ignore.

You, like most DT members, are way too lenient with these retards. All it would take is 3-4 DT members to become rightfully strict to clean this place up faster, instead more means to evade consequences are being provided to scammers like the person in question here.

How can a moderator consider unbanning my account? I mean, if there's no response for years, what's the point of the appeal email provided in the account ban notification? I was still a beginner when my account was banned. Why isn't there a second chance?

You have been permanently banned by a forum moderator, probably due to spam or plagiarism. You may appeal here, but your chances are not good: banappeals...@bitcointalk.org

I thought after so many years, someone would be given another chance, or the ban would expire. Well, that's unlikely. But at least I could get a chance or a response from a moderator or someone who knows how to file an appeal so it gets answered quickly.

This is completely off-topic and has nothing to do with your case here. If you want to protest the situation regarding bans, then go ahead and make a thread about it in Meta. This is not the place to do this and in most likelyhood theymos will not read this thread let alone respond to it.

The facts are: You violated your ban and committed ban evasion, this means that you and all your accounts should be permanently banned -- this includes any past, current and future accounts. You may have tried to appeal, but if you received no response that means that your appeal has been denied or ignored. There is no going around this or using this as an excuse to commit ban evasion. You are not entitled to be unbanned or to be here, grow the fuck up.

[Hanadawa]

-snip-

Okay, I'll correct my mistake. First, I'll start by appealing the permanent ban I received back when I was a beginner and didn't know much about the forum. I'm not a smurf account who immediately understands all the rules clearly. I applied because there was no prohibition on applying with an alt account, but rather a prohibition on enrolling with an alternate account in the same campaign, which I never did. I abused merit. But I didn't intend to commit the crime because I regret it. Is there no room for forgiveness for my merit-related mistakes?

And thank you to Mr. Samsul Arifin, also known as Zaky Cell, also known as AakZaki, who gave me the red hashtag, assuming that I would "definitely" cheat the campaign if my two accounts were accepted. I can't blame AakZaki because he's a DT member. But can AakZaki answer, or at least respond to, my eight questions above? I've seen several reputable members simply berate me, even though I've never denied my mistake, which I did unintentionally.

[Hanadawa]

BUMP!
@AakZaki

[Satofan44]

And thank you to Mr. Samsul Arifin, also known as Zaky Cell, also known as AakZaki, who gave me the red hashtag, assuming that I would "definitely" cheat the campaign if my two accounts were accepted. I can't blame AakZaki because he's a DT member. But can AakZaki answer, or at least respond to, my eight questions above? I've seen several reputable members simply berate me, even though I've never denied my mistake, which I did unintentionally.

This kind of approach proves that you are hostile and malicious, therefore you are only making your already difficult case even harder on yourself. You are part of the same kind of cheaters, and those that know how people like this behave have a certain tell for it despite the delusions of many childish westerns who are currently in DT1. It has been established that you are an account farmer, and that you have evaded a ban. It would take extraordinary effort to recover from this, and being hostile and evil towards the one who exposed your wrongdoings is the opposite direction of what you should be doing.

BUMP!
@AakZaki

He does not need to answer anything, in fact I will advise him to put you on ignore. Learn your lesson and learn to behave, or don't but then deal with the consequences of this.

[Hanadawa]

I've never engaged in the malicious approach you accuse me of. I know AakZaki in real life, though he doesn't know me because I used Indodax as my first exchange when I first learned about crypto. I don't farm accounts like you accuse. I've never used Cinaka Omaro. The same goes for Skuderman and Karbitan. The last posts on all of those accounts were in 2018. They were banned in 2020, when I wasn't active on the forum. Essentially, I only use two accounts. I also fully respect the forum rules. Regarding merit violations, you can see in the BPIP that merit transfers occurred within a month, and that was my fault. That was a very long time ago, and didn't I have any room to correct my mistake? My defense is that I've never committed any further merit abuse violations since then, and over 99% of the merit I received has been sent to others.

[lovesmayfamilis]

When a connected account attempts to sign up for the same signature campaign, isn't that also part of campaign cheating?

I would like to ask AakZaki if this post has a similar behavior to your topic 🤔:

another account is, Spaceman1000$ join the same campaign as @Barikui1

https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/addresses/btc/bc1q7gu79nthccdugfdx9969jawf556hc7qps8vz70

BTC address (Segwit)-  bc1qgmhnkvnuleytcey0rl2tkh49fzhqr2uw9mqfff

bech32 BTC Address:  bc1q7en2hu93w39ppmlteznsrcrmte2axjph2s25dr

Both accounts sent BTC to the address bc1q7gu79nthccdugfdx9969jawf556hc7qps8vz70

https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/9cdd0061ec9af57f4f52381457facf68f466ab4a600b0657b71c6b532aad650a


https://ninjastic.space/post/63762052

Hello sir, please I want to change my  wallet address due to security breach I suspect on my end.

This is the new wallet to use now: bc1q94x7llttwwxa5qdq2uw4kac63gz8zssvtexue6

Should this be treated the same way as the accounts from your topic?
https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/b8f3a65025a57401726b235f21a05a09e653dcede8765d8fe26064ceb878a738

Wallet address: bc1qf9vm9mhw0w6a78tv7as0aww47h3zqj5g5zt8yr

Bech32 address: bc1q3wen33wcyejlqzamg7xu6xu954d8gzhk0h3dqv

Other evidence, such as Merit transactions, also links all the accounts. There is also the habit of posting 'reserve' when applying for campaigns and for posting reviews on local boards.

[Satofan44]

I've never engaged in the malicious approach you accuse me of. I know AakZaki in real life, though he doesn't know me because I used Indodax as my first exchange when I first learned about crypto.

It would be advisable to stop repeating this as I keep getting the impression that you are trying to make subtle threats towards him. By continuing to point out that you know his identity, you are essentially pushing him to make a choice between retracting this here or facing potential consequences. Whether you know him in real life or not has no other relevance here other than to make threats.

I don't farm accounts like you accuse. I've never used Cinaka Omaro. The same goes for Skuderman and Karbitan. The last posts on all of those accounts were in 2018. They were banned in 2020, when I wasn't active on the forum. Essentially, I only use two accounts. I also fully respect the forum rules.

You are ban evading, so you are not respecting the forum rules. It does not matter when they were banned or if you were active at the time of your ban.

Regarding merit violations, you can see in the BPIP that merit transfers occurred within a month, and that was my fault. That was a very long time ago, and didn't I have any room to correct my mistake? My defense is that I've never committed any further merit abuse violations since then, and over 99% of the merit I received has been sent to others.

You do not get to decide that for yourself, therefore the answer is no. That you are finally tagged for everything that you have done are the consequences of your actions finally catching up to you. Grow up, stop being a child and take responsibility for what you have done wrongly. You're basically just trying to dodge consequences by arguing that you didn't do additional wrongful activities in other times, which is a joke at best.

Sorry your honor, I only stole those 10 times and didn't steal any of the time in between. See, I am good person please let me go.  

[AakZaki]

I would like to ask AakZaki if this post has a similar behavior to your topic 🤔:

Interestingly, at first I didn't pay much attention to the details of what happened, since you brought up the case again, it was like a call to find out the facts that happened. and maybe this will be a new accusation from me for the Barikui1 account and other connected accounts.

Here's what I found, First: yes it's indeed a similar behavior.

Second: This will be a new accusation from me, because they are lying in their rebuttal here

First of all I have already responded to lovemayfamilis via pm from my futurexxx admitting that barikui1 is my main account, am not denying that fact. This was  before Pandu Geddon came with the addresses matter,

Why I responded further is for clarity of this your accusations because I want you to know that these are three different personalities. I was introduced to this forum by Lida93 whom I have already known for long time off the forum, I have bought Bitcoin from him and spaceman1000$  when I have no idea about Bitcointalk forum and even when I was a full member. Spaceman1000$ was someone who Lida93 according to him was running some crypto transaction for too, before he later directly introduced him to me.

And to address that cheating aspect you spoke of me and spaceman1000$, we are totally different, even from the way we write and where we often visit in the forum you can see that because we are different in knowledge and the way we see things. I am not a big fan of cheating because it's not fair, so I don't see myself engaging in such an activity now and in the future.

In the statement Barikui1 said that he bought Bitcoin from Lida93 and spaceman1000$, when he didn't know anything about this forum yet.
I will deny that statement is just nonsense based on the facts that I will present below:

Take a look at this:

Barikui1 - bc1q7en2hu93w39ppmlteznsrcrmte2axjph2s25dr
sent to
Deposit Binance - bc1q7gu79nthccdugfdx9969jawf556hc7qps8vz70

26/2/2024 - https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/e44eb61805bce623fa860376c505a42dd85c85240b19e8099b2a17d5062f363d

letteredhub - bc1qgmhnkvnuleytcey0rl2tkh49fzhqr2uw9mqfff
sent to
Deposit Binance - bc1q7gu79nthccdugfdx9969jawf556hc7qps8vz70

27/9/2023 - https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/4741a85f2b67881d0f4cd04e8587e75aa31500eccf81c2ab5717c771a635fc31

Remember, they are sending to the same Deposit address, logically it is not possible for different people to send to the same Deposit address. That means letteredhub and Barikui1 are the same person.

and that means they already have a Binance account as of 9/27/2023.

So where does the lie lie? take another look at the above statement that said to buy Bitcoin to Lida93 and spaceman1000$ and that said they don't know anything about this forum. The transaction occurred on 03/03/2024 02:23:42 based on this transaction

spaceman1000$ - bc1q94x7llttwwxa5qdq2uw4kac63gz8zssvtexue6
sent to
Barikui1 - bc1qgvsm8a2galp0ymhn4xms3vcjfjf4pucgr0x8nm

03/03/2024 - https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/9cdd0061ec9af57f4f52381457facf68f466ab4a600b0657b71c6b532aad650a

How can they say buying Bitcoin happened on 03/03/2024, when they have a Binance account in 2023. which on their Binance account they can buy Bitcoin at any time.

So in conclusion, the above statement is a lie that tries to deceive all members here, including DT. I think if they have been in the same campaign, they deserve to be marked RedTrust.

I think they will now have a hard time refuting my accusations. I'll try to wait for him to refute.

[Barikui1]

I would like to ask AakZaki if this post has a similar behavior to your topic 🤔:

Interestingly, at first I didn't pay much attention to the details of what happened, since you brought up the case again, it was like a call to find out the facts that happened. and maybe this will be a new accusation from me for the Barikui1 account and other connected accounts.

Here's what I found, First: yes it's indeed a similar behavior.

Second: This will be a new accusation from me, because they are lying in their rebuttal here

First of all I have already responded to lovemayfamilis via pm from my futurexxx admitting that barikui1 is my main account, am not denying that fact. This was  before Pandu Geddon came with the addresses matter,

Why I responded further is for clarity of this your accusations because I want you to know that these are three different personalities. I was introduced to this forum by Lida93 whom I have already known for long time off the forum, I have bought Bitcoin from him and spaceman1000$  when I have no idea about Bitcointalk forum and even when I was a full member. Spaceman1000$ was someone who Lida93 according to him was running some crypto transaction for too, before he later directly introduced him to me.

And to address that cheating aspect you spoke of me and spaceman1000$, we are totally different, even from the way we write and where we often visit in the forum you can see that because we are different in knowledge and the way we see things. I am not a big fan of cheating because it's not fair, so I don't see myself engaging in such an activity now and in the future.

In the statement Barikui1 said that he bought Bitcoin from Lida93 and spaceman1000$, when he didn't know anything about this forum yet.
I will deny that statement is just nonsense based on the facts that I will present below:

Take a look at this:

Barikui1 - bc1q7en2hu93w39ppmlteznsrcrmte2axjph2s25dr
sent to
Deposit Binance - bc1q7gu79nthccdugfdx9969jawf556hc7qps8vz70

26/2/2024 - https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/e44eb61805bce623fa860376c505a42dd85c85240b19e8099b2a17d5062f363d

letteredhub - bc1qgmhnkvnuleytcey0rl2tkh49fzhqr2uw9mqfff
sent to
Deposit Binance - bc1q7gu79nthccdugfdx9969jawf556hc7qps8vz70

27/9/2023 - https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/4741a85f2b67881d0f4cd04e8587e75aa31500eccf81c2ab5717c771a635fc31

Remember, they are sending to the same Deposit address, logically it is not possible for different people to send to the same Deposit address. That means letteredhub and Barikui1 are the same person.

and that means they already have a Binance account as of 9/27/2023.

So where does the lie lie? take another look at the above statement that said to buy Bitcoin to Lida93 and spaceman1000$ and that said they don't know anything about this forum. The transaction occurred on 03/03/2024 02:23:42 based on this transaction

spaceman1000$ - bc1q94x7llttwwxa5qdq2uw4kac63gz8zssvtexue6
sent to
Barikui1 - bc1qgvsm8a2galp0ymhn4xms3vcjfjf4pucgr0x8nm

03/03/2024 - https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/9cdd0061ec9af57f4f52381457facf68f466ab4a600b0657b71c6b532aad650a

How can they say buying Bitcoin happened on 03/03/2024, when they have a Binance account in 2023. which on their Binance account they can buy Bitcoin at any time.

I was notify by my telegram that I was mentioned, so when I checked, it was still this case that I thought that has been addressed, which lovesmayfamilis is aware of.
First of all, I never said that I didn't have a binance account before this transaction you pointed out, because I have been into crypto since 2020 or 2021 if am not mistaken. This transaction you pointed out is not the first transaction or exchange of BTC to naira I have done for them both because they were not too conversant on binance p2p as of then, and since you can easily be scammed while trying to exchange your Bitcoin to naira, they didn't want to take that risk, since they knows me in person that I can do it for them, which I did for them both on few occasions. When I started asking questions like how are they getting this BTC I am exchanging for them to naira is when I get to know of the forum, which I later registered my barikui1 account on November 3rd 2023.
I am not an expert in tracing transactions, but I think as I saw this accusation, I have to log into my binance account to recall back some of the transactions I done for them before I get to know of the forum.
a8e66d57476d67efd92fafe92b2fe52a05660dbda2b04a10c7b6ebb94c448570

4741a85f2b67881d0f4cd04e8587e75aa31500eccf81c2ab5717c771a635fc31

[AakZaki]

I was notify by my telegram that I was mentioned, so when I checked, it was still this case that I thought that has been addressed, which lovesmayfamilis is aware of.
First of all, I never said that I didn't have a binance account before this transaction you pointed out, because I have been into crypto since 2020 or 2021 if am not mistaken. This transaction you pointed out is not the first transaction or exchange of BTC to naira I have done for them both because they were not too conversant on binance p2p as of then, and since you can easily be scammed while trying to exchange your Bitcoin to naira, they didn't want to take that risk, since they knows me in person that I can do it for them, which I did for them both on few occasions. When I started asking questions like how are they getting this BTC I am exchanging for them to naira is when I get to know of the forum, which I later registered my barikui1 account on November 3rd 2023.
I am not an expert in tracing transactions, but I think as I saw this accusation, I have to log into my binance account to recall back some of the transactions I done for them before I get to know of the forum.
a8e66d57476d67efd92fafe92b2fe52a05660dbda2b04a10c7b6ebb94c448570

4741a85f2b67881d0f4cd04e8587e75aa31500eccf81c2ab5717c771a635fc31

What I understand from your first and second statements, you always divert the conversation related to the connection of your account with the letteredhub account.

At first I thought that the Binance Deposit address bc1q7gu79nthccdugfdx9969jawf556hc7qps8vz70 belonged to letteredhub, because according to the Blockchain data I showed above, letteredhub sent first to that address.

But after you showed me the picture, I knew that the address was yours. then how can letteredhub send to your Deposit address? Do you still want to argue that letteredhub is not yours?

Or are you going to say again that letteredhub doesn't understand Binance P2P either?
How many times will you keep lying?
Are you also indirectly saying that letteredhub, Lida93 and spaceman1000$ are stupid people who don't understand Binance P2P?

It looks like your mouth is foul, saying that they don't understand Binance P2P. I just stopped by your Local Board, there I found a lot of P2P discussions, there are Binance P2P, Kucoin P2P etc.

Like this thread:

https://bitlist.co/post/62508767

In fact, the thread was created long before your barikui1 account was created, while the accounts letteredhub, Lida93 and spaceman1000$ have been around since 2022.

Your statement is also inconsistent at first you said you bought BTC from Lida93 and spaceman1000$, then now you say that they don't understand Binance P2P and you do it for them.