MoBit.Exchange — NO KYC/AML Crypto Swap | Fast | Secure | 0.25 BTC Escrow

[Bitcoin_Arena]

Welcome to the forum.

Observations that need to be worked on

1. I know reserves can be seen below, but will you please set maximums and minimums on the exchange page? I just entered 1M BTC, and the figure was accepted for exchange.

2. You do not specify which network one is receiving after exchanging specifically for those stablecoins. For example, is it USDT TRC20, USDT ERC20, or USDT BEP20?

3. Please improve on your CAPTCHA challenge. Sometimes it's hard to tell if it's a "plus" sign or "multiplication" sign or letter "X"

[As-Soon-As]

First of all, I welcome this MoBit.Exchange exchange to the forum, I entered this Mobit.Exchange and I looked around everything well and I liked it very much. But I was really surprised by the support, there is online support here and great support on Telegram. If a person faces danger, then he can easily get help from online support here.
But this whole exchange system is really great and the fees are very low enough to attract customers.

[cLoazyL]

Something doesn't seem right here.

Code: (https://mobit.exchange/faq)

Will MoBit hold or freeze my funds? 

No, MoBit is a non-custodial exchange. Our goal is to provide our users with a safe, fast, and reliable experience.

But then,

Code: (https://mobit.exchange/terms-of-service)

4.6 In limited circumstances, MoBit may hold User funds for up to 12 months.

Your words contradict each other, so what’s the deal here?

You say you’re non-custodial, but then you’re still able to hold people’s money? In what way are you non-custodial? Who do you get your API from if you’re non-custodial?

[MoBitExchange]

Something doesn't seem right here.

Code: (https://mobit.exchange/faq)

Will MoBit hold or freeze my funds? 

No, MoBit is a non-custodial exchange. Our goal is to provide our users with a safe, fast, and reliable experience.

But then,

Code: (https://mobit.exchange/terms-of-service)

4.6 In limited circumstances, MoBit may hold User funds for up to 12 months.

Your words contradict each other, so what’s the deal here?

You say you’re non-custodial, but then you’re still able to hold people’s money? In what way are you non-custodial? Who do you get your API from if you’re non-custodial?

Thank you for the reply. This is a fair question.

We understand why the FAQ and Terms may look inconsistent at first glance, so let us clarify the distinction.

MoBit does not function as a custodial exchange in the conventional sense. We do not keep user accounts, hold ongoing balances, or retain customer funds as part of an account-based platform model. Our role is to process swaps: after a deposit is received and the required confirmations are met, the order is moved into the sending queue and completed against available reserves.

Section 4.6 is not referring to KYC-related freezes, manual compliance holds, or the discretionary blocking of legitimate user swaps. It is included to address limited exception cases, particularly where a user sends less than the required minimum amount. In that scenario, the funds may still reach our wallet, but the order cannot proceed through the normal processing flow because it does not satisfy the swap requirements. The clause exists so that such funds can remain available for the user to reclaim within a defined period.

So to state it clearly: MoBit does not hold funds because of KYC, account verification, or trade-size reviews. The hold language applies only to exceptional operational cases such as under-minimum deposits or similar unresolved transaction issues.

We appreciate you pointing this out, because it shows the wording should be clearer, and we will improve it so the distinction is stated more precisely.

[MoBitExchange]

First I would want to welcome you to the official Bitcointalk.org.
You have made the right decision and choice to choose here as a starting point which I know that you are already at the right place to do your marketing and also sell yourself. Thus, there is actually a little thing that is boiling on my mind which I would want to hear from their representative over here.

Here is my question:
What do you do when you noticed that a fund that is swap on your site is directly received from a mixer what would you do?
To cease the funds or, to asked for additional key information before you would allowed them swap or something similar?
What is the maximum capacity of fund show someone be allowed to swap at a time?
Most someone have to connect their wallet before they could proceed with their swapping process? If yes, what is the safety of their wallet that they are linking to your platform?
Of course, I can see that there are some funds already escrowed  with your manager, but what if the amount that being compromised from your site is actually higher than what you escrowed what would be your fate over there?

Thanks for the welcome and for the questions — they’re fair ones.

On the mixer point, MoBit does not base standard swaps on trying to psychoanalyze a coin’s past life. We are an exchange service, not a blockchain morality tribunal. People come to swap assets efficiently, and we think too many platforms forget that. So no, our model is not built around interrogating users over where a coin may have been before it arrived.

On size limits, there is no hard maximum in the simple sense people often assume. Visible reserves are just the part currently shown; we also keep additional funds on the sidelines and can move more into reserves when needed. So if someone opens a larger swap than what is publicly visible at that moment, that does not automatically mean the trade cannot be fulfilled.

On wallet connection, no — users do not need to connect a wallet to MoBit. We prefer the cleaner model: the user sends funds from their own wallet to the deposit address generated for the swap, and provides the payout address for the asset they want to receive. No wallet linking, no extra permissions, no unnecessary attack surface.

As for escrow, that is there for exactly the reason many experienced forum users would expect: confidence-building. If someone wants to be cautious, they can start with an amount that sits comfortably within the escrowed range, observe how the service performs, and then scale up if they’re satisfied. That is a sensible way to approach any newer platform in this space.

[TokenTikas]

Little Mouse is acting as escrow. We have sent 0.25 BTC to him. Details on this will be posted by him. We will update this post with the escrow terms.

It is quite encouraging to see a new member showing trust in a respected forum manager. Although I have not used this exchange before, I regularly use B1exch. I plan to try this exchange very soon because I am interested in seeing how the swapping process works. I hope you will remain active in terms of customer service and attend to users’ issues quickly whenever they arise. Wishing you all the best.

[cLoazyL]

Something doesn't seem right here.

Code: (https://mobit.exchange/faq)

Will MoBit hold or freeze my funds? 

No, MoBit is a non-custodial exchange. Our goal is to provide our users with a safe, fast, and reliable experience.

But then,

Code: (https://mobit.exchange/terms-of-service)

4.6 In limited circumstances, MoBit may hold User funds for up to 12 months.

Your words contradict each other, so what’s the deal here?

You say you’re non-custodial, but then you’re still able to hold people’s money? In what way are you non-custodial? Who do you get your API from if you’re non-custodial?

Thank you for the reply. This is a fair question.

We understand why the FAQ and Terms may look inconsistent at first glance, so let us clarify the distinction.

MoBit does not function as a custodial exchange in the conventional sense. We do not keep user accounts, hold ongoing balances, or retain customer funds as part of an account-based platform model. Our role is to process swaps: after a deposit is received and the required confirmations are met, the order is moved into the sending queue and completed against available reserves.

Section 4.6 is not referring to KYC-related freezes, manual compliance holds, or the discretionary blocking of legitimate user swaps. It is included to address limited exception cases, particularly where a user sends less than the required minimum amount. In that scenario, the funds may still reach our wallet, but the order cannot proceed through the normal processing flow because it does not satisfy the swap requirements. The clause exists so that such funds can remain available for the user to reclaim within a defined period.

So to state it clearly: MoBit does not hold funds because of KYC, account verification, or trade-size reviews. The hold language applies only to exceptional operational cases such as under-minimum deposits or similar unresolved transaction issues.

We appreciate you pointing this out, because it shows the wording should be clearer, and we will improve it so the distinction is stated more precisely.

It says “hold money” there, so how can you not hold the user's funds even for a second if you have to process the exchange somehow? Non-custodial doesn't mean there are no accounts or no KYC

[internetional]

MoBitExchange, I really respect your approach to dynamic rate. I know that many swapping services determine the final rate at the moment they actually process the swap on their side, rather than when the user has completed all required actions and the transaction is confirmed. Your approach feels much fairer.

That said, I would appreciate some clarification on one point regarding the flat rate.

For how long is the flat rate fixed? What happens if I send a BTC transaction, set a high fee to ensure it gets into the next block, but then no new blocks are mined for an entire hour, during which the rate drops by 10%, and only after that my transaction finally gets included in the very first block? Will you wait for that block and complete the exchange at the pre-agreed fixed rate, or will you return my bitcoins, meaning I would have paid a high fee for nothing?

So in the scenario you described, if your BTC transaction takes longer than expected to be included because no blocks are mined for some time, we would still wait for the required confirmations and process the swap at the flat rate associated with that order, rather than repricing it simply because the market moved during that period. We will hold the rate for 20 min

As I understand it, there seems to be a contradiction between two statements in your response.

On one hand, you said: "if your BTC transaction takes longer than expected to be included because no blocks are mined for some time, we would still wait for the required confirmations and process the swap at the flat rate associated with that order."

On the other hand, you mentioned: "We will hold the rate for 20 min."

The scenario I described was specifically about a situation where no blocks are mined for an hour, which is longer than 20 minutes. So it is unclear which rule would apply in this case: holding the rate for 20 minutes, or honoring the originally agreed flat rate even if the confirmation takes longer.

Could you please clarify how this would be handled?

[snowpega]

This is one of the simplest exchanges I’ve seen, no KYC, nothing fancy, just straight to the point.

What you really need to do is build a good reputation in the forum, and I think it’s a good step that you started running a campaign with one of the most reliable campaign managers here. Hope you stay around for a long time.

These days it’s honestly hard to trust exchanges that keep asking for our information, that’s why no KYC fits crypto much better for me.

There is no doubt that the team is moving ahead in the best way, like at the start of this thread, you can see that the project team has transferred funds into the Little Mouse wallet, and he is acting as an escrow, and this act will boost the trust in the community as they sent funds to the most trustworthy campaign managers.

Other than this, the platform is really very simple, and every crypto user can use it without any difficulty or problem. Most crypto space users want a no-KYC platform because they don't feel good about sharing personal information, which MoBit.Exchange is offering to its users, and I really appreciate it.

[freedomgo]

Other than this, the platform is really very simple, and every crypto user can use it without any difficulty or problem. Most crypto space users want a no-KYC platform because they don't feel good about sharing personal information, which MoBit.Exchange is offering to its users, and I really appreciate it.

That’s what I noticed too when I tried to explore it. Maybe the reason is because they don’t require an account to open, it’s anonymous, you just put the address where the funds will be sent and that’s it.

I haven’t fully tested it yet, but even just from the first part that needs to be filled out, it already looks very simple. Even a grade school student could probably understand it easily. And that actually fits well, if it’s supposed to be anonymous, then it should be simple too.

Good luck to them. Running a campaign and promo is a good way to get exposure, especially if it’s a long term campaign.

[uchegod-21]

We appreciate you pointing this out, because it shows the wording should be clearer, and we will improve it so the distinction is stated more precisely.

Can you consider to rephrase the ToS 4.6 to read this;

4.6 In limited circumstances, MoBit may temporarily hold User funds only in cases where a transaction fails to complete—such as when the amount sent is below the required minimum for a swap or similar processing issues. In such cases, funds may be held for up to 12 months. After this period, MoBit cannot guarantee the security of unclaimed funds. Upon User request, MoBit will make reasonable efforts to return such funds, but is not liable for the final outcome.

In the FAQ, you stated that some regions are restricted. Can you be kind to list those few restricted countries?

MoBit is available in many countries, but some regions may have restrictions due to regulations. Please check your local laws and regulations to maintain compliance.

[tbct_mt2]

That’s what I noticed too when I tried to explore it. Maybe the reason is because they don’t require an account to open, it’s anonymous, you just put the address where the funds will be sent and that’s it.

It's great if they don't require people registering any account to use their exchange and products there. By this, they are truly No KYC/ AML exchange for anonymous swaps for people who dislike KYC, AML, no logs, and don't want to register account by any way like with email, telegram accounts or anything else.

Their exchange is accessible with Tor, and for swaps, they only require Sending address and Refund address (that is optional), so it's truly no account required.

Their exchange provides two optional rates for users: flat and dynamic.
https://mobit.exchange/faq?rt=1

What are the different rate types?

Flat Rate: A flat rate guarantees the exchange rate at the time of order creation. This means that even if the market fluctuates, the rate you agreed upon will remain the same.

Dynamic Rate: A dynamic rate is subject to market fluctuations. The rate you receive will be based on the current market conditions at the time your transaction is processed.

[sergiorus]

Welcome to the forum.

Observations that need to be worked on

1. I know reserves can be seen below, but will you please set maximums and minimums on the exchange page? I just entered 1M BTC, and the figure was accepted for exchange.

2. You do not specify which network one is receiving after exchanging specifically for those stablecoins. For example, is it USDT TRC20, USDT ERC20, or USDT BEP20?

3. Please improve on your CAPTCHA challenge. Sometimes it's hard to tell if it's a "plus" sign or "multiplication" sign or letter "X"

I'd like to bump this one as it hasn't been answered and I'm interested as well, particularly about the stablecoins. on which network would they be received?
I reckon it's Ethereum Mainnet but need to be sure.
Also is it possible to receive them on other chains like Tron/Solana/Base?

[freedomgo]

That’s what I noticed too when I tried to explore it. Maybe the reason is because they don’t require an account to open, it’s anonymous, you just put the address where the funds will be sent and that’s it.

It's great if they don't require people registering any account to use their exchange and products there. By this, they are truly No KYC/ AML exchange for anonymous swaps for people who dislike KYC, AML, no logs, and don't want to register account by any way like with email, telegram accounts or anything else.

Their exchange is accessible with Tor, and for swaps, they only require Sending address and Refund address (that is optional), so it's truly no account required.

That really gives more privacy, so better take advantage of it while it’s there. There are only a few exchanges now that still offer this kind of service for anonymous users, so in a way it feels like going back to the old days when regulations were not yet heavily forced on exchanges.

Now it’s really more of a reputation game. Hope they can keep it that way for a long time, just like the others that are still offering the same setup.

[masulum]

I'd like to bump this one as it hasn't been answered and I'm interested as well, particularly about the stablecoins. on which network would they be received?
I reckon it's Ethereum Mainnet but need to be sure.
Also is it possible to receive them on other chains like Tron/Solana/Base?

The dropdown menu on the website now includes the (ERC-20) tag, which means Mobit currently only processes the Ethereum network. Support for other networks may require more development time. As the service gains more exposure from the community, the team will definitely consider adding other networks (like Tron, Solana, or Base) in the near future.

[MoBitExchange]

MoBitExchange, I really respect your approach to dynamic rate. I know that many swapping services determine the final rate at the moment they actually process the swap on their side, rather than when the user has completed all required actions and the transaction is confirmed. Your approach feels much fairer.

That said, I would appreciate some clarification on one point regarding the flat rate.

For how long is the flat rate fixed? What happens if I send a BTC transaction, set a high fee to ensure it gets into the next block, but then no new blocks are mined for an entire hour, during which the rate drops by 10%, and only after that my transaction finally gets included in the very first block? Will you wait for that block and complete the exchange at the pre-agreed fixed rate, or will you return my bitcoins, meaning I would have paid a high fee for nothing?

So in the scenario you described, if your BTC transaction takes longer than expected to be included because no blocks are mined for some time, we would still wait for the required confirmations and process the swap at the flat rate associated with that order, rather than repricing it simply because the market moved during that period. We will hold the rate for 20 min

As I understand it, there seems to be a contradiction between two statements in your response.

On one hand, you said: "if your BTC transaction takes longer than expected to be included because no blocks are mined for some time, we would still wait for the required confirmations and process the swap at the flat rate associated with that order."

On the other hand, you mentioned: "We will hold the rate for 20 min."

The scenario I described was specifically about a situation where no blocks are mined for an hour, which is longer than 20 minutes. So it is unclear which rule would apply in this case: holding the rate for 20 minutes, or honoring the originally agreed flat rate even if the confirmation takes longer.

Could you please clarify how this would be handled?

Thank you for the follow up. Let me clarify the flat-rate process more precisely.

For a Flat Rate order, the 20 minute window applies only to order initiation and deposit submission. Once the exchange is created, the quoted rate is reserved for 20 minutes to allow the user to broadcast the deposit transaction.

If no deposit transaction is detected within that 20 minute period, the order expires and the quoted rate is no longer valid.

However, if the user broadcasts the transaction within that 20 minute window and the transaction is detected by our system, the rate remains locked. From that point onward, we will wait as long as necessary for the required blockchain confirmations before executing the swap at the agreed flat rate.

So in the example you gave, if the BTC transaction is sent within the 20 minute window but confirmation is delayed because block production is unusually slow, that would not affect the quoted flat rate. Even if it takes an hour or longer for confirmations to complete, the swap would still be processed at the original locked rate, provided the deposit was sent in time.

So the distinction is:

- 20 minutes to send the deposit transaction
- unlimited waiting time for confirmations once the deposit has been detected

[noorman0]

1. It seems like you don't support legacy BTC addresses, right?
2. After I enter the address and click "calculate," the address field is blank again.
3. I suggest rearranging the fields according to the input order. I think the "to address" field is placed below the "Calculate" button, and the "Exchange" button is below the captcha field.

[sergiorus]

I'd like to bump this one as it hasn't been answered and I'm interested as well, particularly about the stablecoins. on which network would they be received?
I reckon it's Ethereum Mainnet but need to be sure.
Also is it possible to receive them on other chains like Tron/Solana/Base?

The dropdown menu on the website now includes the (ERC-20) tag, which means Mobit currently only processes the Ethereum network. Support for other networks may require more development time. As the service gains more exposure from the community, the team will definitely consider adding other networks (like Tron, Solana, or Base) in the near future.

Thanks, I see now.
No rush though, ERC-20 are the most secure and liquid ones and in the early stages it's better to
focus only on such options.
As long as the rates are competitive and the UX is smooth.

[b1ack]

Best wishes and good luck from team b1eXch.
Happy to see an good promising peer.

[tbct_mt2]

No rush though, ERC-20 are the most secure and liquid ones and in the early stages it's better to
focus only on such options.
As long as the rates are competitive and the UX is smooth.

ERC20 is the stronger altcoin blockchain and it's most secured for users compare to many available altcoin blockchains. However with latest drama on Tether freezing stablecoins wrongly on some addresses, it's still risky when using ERC20 and swapping your coins to coins or tokens on ERC20 chain.

Best wishes and good luck from team b1eXch.
Happy to see an good promising peer.

Your two exchanges look to have very similar privacy products and features for users and it's good to know about both your exchanges, and your signature campaigns in the forum. It's good to see the forum becomes more lenient towards privacy exchanges like yours especially after forum policy change and crackdown on all advertisements of mixers years ago.