What’s an acceptable wagering requirement for you on Casino Bonuses?

[sompitonov]

It's good to get cashback without any conditions. But I never got much cash back, because I don't spend much money on gambling. As for as i know cash back is only given based on losing money on bets. But your friend will spend a lot of money in this case because the wagering of bonuses offered by the casino is comparatively high. But I never try if I have less money. Because the chance of winning the bonus is not even 10%.

It is true that this cashback is obtained according to the amount of loss we experience, the greater the loss we experience, the greater the amount of cashback but it is not ethical if we deliberately spend a lot of money just to pursue cashback.

With this cashback itself, it can be said that there are no requirements to get it, it only depends on the amount of our losses, in contrast to bonuses that sometimes have new rules that are different from the initial rules, this is what makes me not interested in bonuses.

The point is that players strive to win, not focus on losses. Cashback is simply a mitigating factor that can provide some peace of mind for a player who has lost. Those players who have been playing for a long time have received quite a bit of cashback, even if they've lost a lot of money. It's certainly better to get at least some cashback than nothing at all. If I were choosing a casino, I'd choose one with a higher cashback than others; that would be at least one of the reasons for my choice.

[Agbe]

The point is that players strive to win, not focus on losses. Cashback is simply a mitigating factor that can provide some peace of mind for a player who has lost. Those players who have been playing for a long time have received quite a bit of cashback, even if they've lost a lot of money. It's certainly better to get at least some cashback than nothing at all. If I were choosing a casino, I'd choose one with a higher cashback than others; that would be at least one of the reasons for my choice.

Every gambler is there to win and losing is inevitable and cashback make the gamblers come back regularly and if there was no gambler has cashback for a long term gambling then, many would have stopped gambling by now. It is the motivational factor for all the gamblers. If a gambler has lost $2,000 in gambling and he has managed to cashback $100 or more, he will have hope to hit the bigger amount one day.

[Wakate]

The point is that players strive to win, not focus on losses. Cashback is simply a mitigating factor that can provide some peace of mind for a player who has lost. Those players who have been playing for a long time have received quite a bit of cashback, even if they've lost a lot of money. It's certainly better to get at least some cashback than nothing at all. If I were choosing a casino, I'd choose one with a higher cashback than others; that would be at least one of the reasons for my choice.

Every gambler is there to win and losing is inevitable and cashback make the gamblers come back regularly and if there was no gambler has cashback for a long term gambling then, many would have stopped gambling by now. It is the motivational factor for all the gamblers. If a gambler has lost $2,000 in gambling and he has managed to cashback $100 or more, he will have hope to hit the bigger amount one day.

Almost all gamblers that are involving themselves in betting want to make money by all means and some people don't mind going as far as cheating for them to be profitable. Losing bet is one thing that supposed to make gamblers to reduce the risks they are taking when gambling. To be profitable is not really easy because you have so many things to put in place for you to gamble responsibly.

[Agathamay]

I’m curious to hear where the community stands on wagering requirements.

Before everyone jumps in with “0x”,  yes, that’s obviously the ideal. But realistically, casinos need some edge to sustain bonuses and promotions.

So the real question is: what do you consider acceptable?

Personally, I see anything above 35x as a hard no-go.
Around 30x or lower feels reasonable to me, depending on other terms (game weighting, max bet rules, etc.).

Where do you draw the line?

there was a time i got a bonus from bcgames of about 22,000 naira and i was asked to gamble about 400k naira before i can claim that bonus and it took me over 8 days to achieve that result and i got really disappointed when i got that bonus amount of 22k after raising the balance to over 450k+
i think some of these casinos make it seem almost impossible to achieve their wagering requirement because why on earth will you ask me to raise 22k to over 400k and be sure to have gambled  equivalent of the 400k

to me, a 20x is fine and would drag more people into trying their site  but maybe they can make the entry level more higher but claiming the bonuses shouldn't be something too difficult.

[blockman]

20x is very likeable as a wagering requirement and near to the current standard that's being asked for 30x. Beyond 60x could be too much and I think everyone is already aching if it's around 50x. So these are the estimates that everyone might think of the numbers given by the casinos as their wagering requirement. I remember at time that there's this 90x or 100x just for withdrawal to fill in the requirement. I guess that's too much but when we're too determined to do that, it can be done but at our expense.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

20x is very likeable as a wagering requirement and near to the current standard that's being asked for 30x. Beyond 60x could be too much and I think everyone is already aching if it's around 50x. So these are the estimates that everyone might think of the numbers given by the casinos as their wagering requirement. I remember at time that there's this 90x or 100x just for withdrawal to fill in the requirement. I guess that's too much but when we're too determined to do that, it can be done but at our expense.

Unfortunately, casino will not give us the option to choose what percentage or x of wager requirement we would be comfortable with when they give or want to offer us a bonus, so all that we are actually discussing here is nothing but for discussion sake.

Casinos don't give a general bonus without attaching some strings to it, it's not but a business which they plan to make profit from as well, so when ever a casino launches a bonus that any body can take advantage of, rest assured that what ever percentage they are going to place the wager requirement is one they have calculated well and are very sure it's going to benefit them more than it should benefit any gambler except it's a situation where the gambler is or was extremely lucky.
So, I think if we find a way to really understand this, it will help us as gamblers to know when and which bonus to say no to, cus not every casino bonuses come with good motive from the casino.

[LUCKMCFLY]

to me, a 20x is fine and would drag more people into trying their site  but maybe they can make the entry level more higher but claiming the bonuses shouldn't be something too difficult.

I honestly don't know how many people you'd attract, but if someone tells me that with a 20x requirement, I'll never look at that site again. If 2x or 3x already seems like too much, now you're saying 20x? No way, bro. I think it's better to just give the money to the casino and be done with it, without needing to bet because that's a sure way to lose it.

[SamReomo]

I honestly don't know how many people you'd attract, but if someone tells me that with a 20x requirement, I'll never look at that site again. If 2x or 3x already seems like too much

I second you here, I would also not look at a site again if it needs 20x wagering requirement for the bonus and instead I would avoid any kind of bonus that needs 20x wagering because it's almost impossible to complete 20x wagering requirement without losing every last dollar in your account and if someone losses every last dollar in their account then how could they complete 20x wagering requirement? They can't the answer is simple because they've lost even the deposited amount.