Roboex.io - Another Copy-Paste Scam Exchange With Fake Statistics

[albon]

What happened:: This member is promoting what looks like a scam site using made-up statistics as the website claims to already have 10,000 users and 1,000 exchanges and despite the domain being only 10 days old thats looks like another recycled scam template.





Also, he advertising No KYC/No AML, but their Privacy Policy states they collect email addresses, transaction logs, IP addresses, and browser data. So the [No KYC] claim doesn’t really mean much used as bait to harvest user data.




The site displays logos of [Visa, Mastercard, Sberbank, T-Bank]. It is legally impossible for these entities partner with a service that avoids openly advertises “No AML". these logos added to make people trust the platform



Scammers Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3755958

Reference Link: https://bitlist.co/topic/5582215


[1] Roboex.io || WHOIS | ARCHIVED | URLSCAN

Code:

Domain: roboex.io
Registered On: 2026-04-27
Expires On: 2027-04-27
Age: 10 Days
Updated On: 2026-05-02
Registrar: TLD Registrar Solutions Ltd.

Additional Notes: Although all of this member’s threads have already been deleted, I still wanted to post this scam accusation as a reference for anyone inside or outside the forum who may consider using this new and suspicious exchange. It should be avoided at all costs.

[WeLiveCrypto]

I want to share a couple of our thoughts. This isn’t about any specific site, including the accused Roboex site - t’s just how we see the matter in general.

This member is promoting what looks like a scam site using made-up statistics as the website claims to already have 10,000 users and 1,000 exchanges

Many people may not like it, but this is more about marketing with statistics. A legitimate site might share such information until they have real data to show. For example, showing ‘0 users’ and ‘0 exchanges’ makes it very hard to attract the first customer. Should we call a site a scam based on this alone? We believe this is not a reliable way to judge a business.

Also, he advertising No KYC/No AML, but their Privacy Policy states they collect email addresses, transaction logs, IP addresses, and browser data. So the [No KYC] claim doesn’t really mean much used as bait to harvest user data.

If they were claiming ‘No LOG’ (we haven’t verified this), it raises a question. Email addresses, transaction logs, IP addresses, and browsing data aren’t directly related to ‘No KYC/No AML'.

Now our opinion about Roboex.io: We are not calling them a scam at this point, but we believe the product is incomplete. Without a solid reputation, it will likely be difficult for them to succeed. It seems the owner rushed to launch the business. Many new business owners get excited and start promoting an unfinished product, which can hurt the business over time. We recommend taking the time to carefully test a product before launching.

Happy to be part of this discussion!

[yahoo62278]

I want to share a couple of our thoughts. This isn’t about any specific site, including the accused Roboex site - t’s just how we see the matter in general.

This member is promoting what looks like a scam site using made-up statistics as the website claims to already have 10,000 users and 1,000 exchanges

Many people may not like it, but this is more about marketing with statistics. A legitimate site might share such information until they have real data to show. For example, showing ‘0 users’ and ‘0 exchanges’ makes it very hard to attract the first customer. Should we call a site a scam based on this alone? We believe this is not a reliable way to judge a business.

Also, he advertising No KYC/No AML, but their Privacy Policy states they collect email addresses, transaction logs, IP addresses, and browser data. So the [No KYC] claim doesn’t really mean much used as bait to harvest user data.

If they were claiming ‘No LOG’ (we haven’t verified this), it raises a question. Email addresses, transaction logs, IP addresses, and browsing data aren’t directly related to ‘No KYC/No AML'.

Now our opinion about Roboex.io: We are not calling them a scam at this point, but we believe the product is incomplete. Without a solid reputation, it will likely be difficult for them to succeed. It seems the owner rushed to launch the business. Many new business owners get excited and start promoting an unfinished product, which can hurt the business over time. We recommend taking the time to carefully test a product before launching.

Happy to be part of this discussion!

If i sell you a cake with icing and filled with cream inside and you pick up the cake, take it home, start eating it and find it's not cream filled, did I scam you? I get what you're saying that it is a marketing tactic, but there has to be a better way than outright lying to potential customers. Businesses can't start out lying and expect everyone to be ok with it.

[The Cryptovator]

What happened:: This member is promoting what looks like a scam site using made-up statistics as the website claims to already have 10,000 users and 1,000 exchanges and despite the domain being only 10 days old thats looks like another recycled scam template.

I am pretty sure invalid claims. Any sites unless it's been created by any big companies or person won't gain such numbers of users anyway. For a new platform even reaching 10K users is quite impossible. So they are laying.

Also, he advertising No KYC/No AML, but their Privacy Policy states they collect email addresses, transaction logs, IP addresses, and browser data. So the [No KYC] claim doesn’t really mean much used as bait to harvest user data.

No KYC doesn't mean it's privacy protected. Also we don't know if they ask KYC later for some reason. But pretty sure they are storing users data.

The site displays logos of [Visa, Mastercard, Sberbank, T-Bank]. It is legally impossible for these entities partner with a service that avoids openly advertises “No AML". these logos added to make people trust the platform

Fake slogan probably to attract users. I am not sure either they directly scammed someone or not, but not looking good to me. Just been using common template and laying isn't good sign for a platform. Need to be careful if anyone wants to use it.

[SuperBitMan]

This member is promoting what looks like a scam site using made-up statistics as the website claims to already have 10,000 users and 1,000 exchanges

Many people may not like it, but this is more about marketing with statistics. A legitimate site might share such information until they have real data to show. For example, showing ‘0 users’ and ‘0 exchanges’ makes it very hard to attract the first customer. Should we call a site a scam based on this alone? We believe this is not a reliable way to judge a business.

Lying to people should not be encouraged in business, lying is already a big red flag to me, if as a company you are new make it very clear that you are new and you will still get customers when you apply strategic advertisement.
You don’t even need to use statistics of how many users you have and how many successful transactions you have completed as a new company it’s not necessary because you don’t have it, we have a lot of promotion strategies to draw customers and not by lying to the general public, don’t you know you can be sued for deceit with this wrong statistics.
This is a very good reliable way to judge a business and stop normalizing lying. You can’t lie to me and then expect me to trust you.