Roboex.io - Another Copy-Paste Scam Exchange With Fake Statistics

[albon]

What happened:: This member is promoting what looks like a scam site using made-up statistics as the website claims to already have 10,000 users and 1,000 exchanges and despite the domain being only 10 days old thats looks like another recycled scam template.





Also, he advertising No KYC/No AML, but their Privacy Policy states they collect email addresses, transaction logs, IP addresses, and browser data. So the [No KYC] claim doesn’t really mean much used as bait to harvest user data.




The site displays logos of [Visa, Mastercard, Sberbank, T-Bank]. It is legally impossible for these entities partner with a service that avoids openly advertises “No AML". these logos added to make people trust the platform



Scammers Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3755958  | FLAG

Reference Link: https://bitlist.co/topic/5582215


[1] Roboex.io || WHOIS | ARCHIVED | URLSCAN

Code:

Domain: roboex.io
Registered On: 2026-04-27
Expires On: 2027-04-27
Age: 10 Days
Updated On: 2026-05-02
Registrar: TLD Registrar Solutions Ltd.

Additional Notes: Although all of this member’s threads have already been deleted, I still wanted to post this scam accusation as a reference for anyone inside or outside the forum who may consider using this new and suspicious exchange. It should be avoided at all costs.

[WeLiveCrypto]

I want to share a couple of our thoughts. This isn’t about any specific site, including the accused Roboex site - t’s just how we see the matter in general.

This member is promoting what looks like a scam site using made-up statistics as the website claims to already have 10,000 users and 1,000 exchanges

Many people may not like it, but this is more about marketing with statistics. A legitimate site might share such information until they have real data to show. For example, showing ‘0 users’ and ‘0 exchanges’ makes it very hard to attract the first customer. Should we call a site a scam based on this alone? We believe this is not a reliable way to judge a business.

Also, he advertising No KYC/No AML, but their Privacy Policy states they collect email addresses, transaction logs, IP addresses, and browser data. So the [No KYC] claim doesn’t really mean much used as bait to harvest user data.

If they were claiming ‘No LOG’ (we haven’t verified this), it raises a question. Email addresses, transaction logs, IP addresses, and browsing data aren’t directly related to ‘No KYC/No AML'.

Now our opinion about Roboex.io: We are not calling them a scam at this point, but we believe the product is incomplete. Without a solid reputation, it will likely be difficult for them to succeed. It seems the owner rushed to launch the business. Many new business owners get excited and start promoting an unfinished product, which can hurt the business over time. We recommend taking the time to carefully test a product before launching.

Happy to be part of this discussion!

[yahoo62278]

I want to share a couple of our thoughts. This isn’t about any specific site, including the accused Roboex site - t’s just how we see the matter in general.

This member is promoting what looks like a scam site using made-up statistics as the website claims to already have 10,000 users and 1,000 exchanges

Many people may not like it, but this is more about marketing with statistics. A legitimate site might share such information until they have real data to show. For example, showing ‘0 users’ and ‘0 exchanges’ makes it very hard to attract the first customer. Should we call a site a scam based on this alone? We believe this is not a reliable way to judge a business.

Also, he advertising No KYC/No AML, but their Privacy Policy states they collect email addresses, transaction logs, IP addresses, and browser data. So the [No KYC] claim doesn’t really mean much used as bait to harvest user data.

If they were claiming ‘No LOG’ (we haven’t verified this), it raises a question. Email addresses, transaction logs, IP addresses, and browsing data aren’t directly related to ‘No KYC/No AML'.

Now our opinion about Roboex.io: We are not calling them a scam at this point, but we believe the product is incomplete. Without a solid reputation, it will likely be difficult for them to succeed. It seems the owner rushed to launch the business. Many new business owners get excited and start promoting an unfinished product, which can hurt the business over time. We recommend taking the time to carefully test a product before launching.

Happy to be part of this discussion!

If i sell you a cake with icing and filled with cream inside and you pick up the cake, take it home, start eating it and find it's not cream filled, did I scam you? I get what you're saying that it is a marketing tactic, but there has to be a better way than outright lying to potential customers. Businesses can't start out lying and expect everyone to be ok with it.

[The Cryptovator]

What happened:: This member is promoting what looks like a scam site using made-up statistics as the website claims to already have 10,000 users and 1,000 exchanges and despite the domain being only 10 days old thats looks like another recycled scam template.

I am pretty sure invalid claims. Any sites unless it's been created by any big companies or person won't gain such numbers of users anyway. For a new platform even reaching 10K users is quite impossible. So they are laying.

Also, he advertising No KYC/No AML, but their Privacy Policy states they collect email addresses, transaction logs, IP addresses, and browser data. So the [No KYC] claim doesn’t really mean much used as bait to harvest user data.

No KYC doesn't mean it's privacy protected. Also we don't know if they ask KYC later for some reason. But pretty sure they are storing users data.

The site displays logos of [Visa, Mastercard, Sberbank, T-Bank]. It is legally impossible for these entities partner with a service that avoids openly advertises “No AML". these logos added to make people trust the platform

Fake slogan probably to attract users. I am not sure either they directly scammed someone or not, but not looking good to me. Just been using common template and laying isn't good sign for a platform. Need to be careful if anyone wants to use it.

[SuperBitMan]

This member is promoting what looks like a scam site using made-up statistics as the website claims to already have 10,000 users and 1,000 exchanges

Many people may not like it, but this is more about marketing with statistics. A legitimate site might share such information until they have real data to show. For example, showing ‘0 users’ and ‘0 exchanges’ makes it very hard to attract the first customer. Should we call a site a scam based on this alone? We believe this is not a reliable way to judge a business.

Lying to people should not be encouraged in business, lying is already a big red flag to me, if as a company you are new make it very clear that you are new and you will still get customers when you apply strategic advertisement.
You don’t even need to use statistics of how many users you have and how many successful transactions you have completed as a new company it’s not necessary because you don’t have it, we have a lot of promotion strategies to draw customers and not by lying to the general public, don’t you know you can be sued for deceit with this wrong statistics.
This is a very good reliable way to judge a business and stop normalizing lying. You can’t lie to me and then expect me to trust you.

[Coyster]

For example, showing ‘0 users’ and ‘0 exchanges’ makes it very hard to attract the first customer. Should we call a site a scam based on this alone? We believe this is not a reliable way to judge a business.

I believe it to be a very reliable way to form an opinion about a business. Every new platform has to go through a process, it might be a hard one, but if you believe your product or service has something to offer, then it will naturally/organically grow. Lying about numbers from the start is a red flag and it is counterproductive when your potential customers find out you lied. How can they then trust you going forward.

It's like casinos without a valid license. If you don't have one, either say so or say nothing, until you are asked about it. But lying and fabricating one is definitely a red flag and nobody is going to trust your business when they find out.

[coupable]

Searching online about reviews that might be published accusing the service to be a scam, I came accross this article from yahoo finance published in 2024 describing an exchange platform called roboex:

RoboEx: The Future of Decentralized Trading

RoboEx is redefining the trading landscape with its decentralized exchange (DEX) platform, providing an intuitive interface suitable for traders of all experience levels. RoboEx enables users to trade various digital assets directly, without intermediaries, ensuring total control and transparency over transactions. The platform utilizes cutting-edge blockchain technology to offer a secure, swift, and dependable trading experience.

Another article published in Reddit forum under the title "why innovative exchanges like roboex are important in today's era of crypto" [1]

However when visiting roboex.com it is an online store for robotics stuff. Chosing the same name for roboex.io might be intentional if someone google the word.

[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/roboinu/comments/10yyrqr/why_innovative_exchanges_like_roboex_are/

[Bitcoin_Arena]

Many people may not like it, but this is more about marketing with statistics. A legitimate site might share such information until they have real data to show. For example, showing ‘0 users’ and ‘0 exchanges’ makes it very hard to attract the first customer. Should we call a site a scam based on this alone? We believe this is not a reliable way to judge a business.

And putting fake figures on the website makes it easy to attract first customers? What kind of world do you live in?
We have had services start from scratch, and with time they gained their reputation and clients. The problem is wanting to do everything through shortcuts

[Roboex]

Hello,

We have been unjustly accused of fraud, even though we conduct our business in good faith.

Below are our responses to the complaints posted by users:

If you didn’t like the section about 1,000+ successful exchanges, that doesn’t mean those exchanges didn’t happen. We have always operated on Telegram and did not have a website. In 2026, we decided to create a website and start promoting it. This section on the website was generated by a neural network during development according to our technical specifications. If this raises doubts, then we will remove this section. Thank you for pointing this out.

Now I’ll address the complaint regarding the collection of users’ personal data. The /rules page did indeed contain information about the collection of personal data, such as IP addresses, cookies, etc. In reality, this information is not true. That page was generated by a neural network. We didn’t have time to review all the text published on the site before launching the advertising campaign. One user correctly pointed out that we were a bit hasty in launching the business. At this time, the /rules page has been completely removed. It is not necessary for successful exchanges ))

We collect only certain cookie data to ensure the proper functioning of our affiliate program, so that users who invite their acquaintances and friends to join us can continuously track their applications and earn from them

[albon]

If you didn’t like the section about 1,000+ successful exchanges, that doesn’t mean those exchanges didn’t happen. We have always operated on Telegram and did not have a website. In 2026, we decided to create a website and start promoting it.

Anyone can say what you said, but where is the real proof that shows what you’re saying is real?

This section on the website was generated by a neural network during development according to our technical specifications. If this raises doubts, then we will remove this section. Thank you for pointing this out.

This excuse is honestly ridiculous technically. What you just said is pretty much admitting that AI was used, but you were the one who instructed it to generate those fake numbers we found in the statistics.

That page was generated by a neural network. We didn’t have time to review all the text published on the site before launching the advertising campaign. One user correctly pointed out that we were a bit hasty in launching the business.

LOL, that’s another huge red flag from you about how unsafe your platform looks. How can you run a financial exchange service that handles users’ money while being reckless enough to not even read your own Privacy Policy or the rules clearly stated on your platform?

At this time, the /rules page has been completely removed. It is not necessary for successful exchanges ))

“No longer necessary”?? Are you serious? No exchange platform can succeed or gain users’ trust without clear Terms of Service or properly defined rules. This basically means your platform operates without any real legal commitment or accountability toward its users.
-------------
You also completely avoided answering the part about using Visa, Mastercard, and Sberbank logos while advertising yourselves as No AML... Using well-known financial brands like this make people trust you more than they should. As we know real financial companies simply do not work with anonymous exchanges that operate this carelessly.

[Roboex]

You also completely avoided answering the part about using Visa, Mastercard, and Sberbank logos while advertising yourselves as No AML... Using well-known financial brands like this make people trust you more than they should. As we know real financial companies simply do not work with anonymous exchanges that operate this carelessly.

You’ve been given answers to all your questions. What’s confusing you about the Visa and Mastercard logos? We can indeed process transfers to Visa and Mastercard cards as part of the exchange. What’s confusing you?

Don’t try to convince everyone here that the long text in the privacy policy section means anything. It’s usually fraudulent organizations that write a lot of text, which the average internet user won’t read. Users need to come to the service and exchange their assets so they get from point A to point B. Users don’t need to read the pile of text you’re suggesting we post on our website. You don’t understand people’s needs. You’re one of those bureaucrats responsible for the chaos in the world today. You simply have nothing better to do at home, or perhaps you’re retired, but the fact is that out of boredom, you’ve chosen to sabotage other people’s businesses.

[albon]

You’ve been given answers to all your questions. What’s confusing you about the Visa and Mastercard logos? We can indeed process transfers to Visa and Mastercard cards as part of the exchange. What’s confusing you?

How can you present your service as No AML while also claiming to process Mastercard /Visa transactions?? these providers typically don’t partner with services like that, man.

Don’t try to convince everyone here that the long text in the privacy policy section means anything. It’s usually fraudulent organizations that write a lot of text, which the average internet user won’t read.

it doesn’t make sense to say that ToS/privacy policy, the primary legal safeguards of any platform are not something only fraudulent organizations use. A platform that seems to rely on AI generated stats and policies then removes them once people notice. It’s a platform I personally wouldn’t trust it with my money.

Users need to come to the service and exchange their assets so they get from point A to point B. Users don’t need to read the pile of text you’re suggesting we post on our website. You don’t understand people’s needs. You’re one of those bureaucrats responsible for the chaos in the world today.

Still no TXID or any verifiable proof has been provided for those 1000+ of Telegram transactions. Professionalism is not just about moving users from point A to point B, it’s about making sure point B is not a scam trap.

You call it bureaucracy but I see it as protecting users. And, anyone experienced in business knows that without clear Terms and Compliance, users have nothing to rely on when things go wrong. Saying users don’t need to care about policies is basically asking them to trust you with their money without any safeguards which is a great concern.

[WeLiveCrypto]

If you didn’t like the section about 1,000+ successful exchanges, that doesn’t mean those exchanges didn’t happen. We have always operated on Telegram and did not have a website. In 2026, we decided to create a website and start promoting it. This section on the website was generated by a neural network during development according to our technical specifications.

The /rules page did indeed contain information about the collection of personal data, such as IP addresses, cookies, etc. In reality, this information is not true. That page was generated by a neural network. We didn’t have time to review all the text published on the site before launching the advertising campaign.

We are sorry, but your explanations are inconsistent. You say the neural network is correct about the 1,000+ successful exchanges, but at the same time you say the /rules created by the neural network are not true. Both statements cannot be correct at the same time.

One user correctly pointed out that we were a bit hasty in launching the business.

We assume this refers to us, and that may be true, but things are different now. Sometimes new business owners become excited and promote a product before it is fully finished. However, making large claims without providing proper evidence or reliable references makes those claims difficult to trust.

[LordShanken]

...

Don’t try to convince everyone here that the long text in the privacy policy section means anything. It’s usually fraudulent organizations that write a lot of text, which the average internet user won’t read. Users need to come to the service and exchange their assets so they get from point A to point B. Users don’t need to read the pile of text you’re suggesting we post on our website. You don’t understand people’s needs. You’re one of those bureaucrats responsible for the chaos in the world today. You simply have nothing better to do at home, or perhaps you’re retired, but the fact is that out of boredom, you’ve chosen to sabotage other people’s businesses.

You are completely wrong about this. Maybe not everyone reads the full privacy policy, but what is written there actually matters a lot. It’s not about being a bureaucrat, but it’s about safety. On this forum, the community and people like @albon work hard to check all details to warn and protect less experienced users from losing their money.
We are just trying to make sure people don't get scammed. If you think safety is a waste of time, you’re the one who doesn't understand what is all about here and dont understand users.

[AakZaki]

hi Bro.. It looks like they created a new ANN for their exchange today here and they have removed the ANN that was created on May 5 yesterday.
In the latest ANN I actually suspect that there is a suspicious link, I will quote it and I hope you can check it further.

Code:

https://forum.duty-free.cc/threads/7182

The problem is that When I checked the link on VirusTotal, there were 5 Malicious tags and 1 Spam.
I think they, out of frustration getting a negative tag from you, then they spread malicious links. Maybe you can verify it


https://www.virustotal.com/gui/url/d835d10c1969ed3919ff490f8ffbba4591202b0ea89d5c4fb2d829e2158dc704

[hugeblack]

Good job, you can create a flag because I think they will continue to create more topics.
These scammers are willing to continue even if they make $10 from every exchange they create.

[albon]

The problem is that When I checked the link on VirusTotal, there were 5 Malicious tags and 1 Spam.
I think they, out of frustration getting a negative tag from you, then they spread malicious links. Maybe you can verify it

Good catch, man.

Yes, I already checked the link through VirusTotal and got the same result you did: “5/93 security vendors flagged this URL as malicious.” Based on this malicious link and the scam accusation posted here, I have already reported the thread they published, and I hope the mods take quick action to protect the crypto community.

Good job, you can create a flag because I think they will continue to create more topics.
These scammers are willing to continue even if they make $10 from every exchange they create.

Thank you for your valuable advice. I have already created a flag through this link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3529

Anyone can choose to support or oppose the flag based on their own judgment regarding the information presented in this topic. The warning banner that appears on topics promoted by this member would serve as a strong cautionary signal to help prevent more members from becoming victims of this potential scam.