One who wins big after many try or one who plays big who's smarter

[Joy- maker]

So the question is who do you think is smarter and which is a more favorable way to bet.

Gambling is not all about who is smart and who is not smart. In this case some people will say that the guy who stakes a large amount of money at ones is the smartest. Gambling is not the way you see it, someone can a stake large amount of money at ones and still end up losing, while someone who staks with small amount continuously may keep on winning back to back.

Personally, I would say that people should only gamble with an amount of money they can afford to lose, I know there are people who can willingly gamble with a large amount at once, while there are other who prefer to stake small amounts  continuously till they exhaust their gambling budget for the day.

[mak013]

~
So the question is who do you think is smarter and which is a more favorable way to bet.

There is no one decision. Everybody has his own strategy. In your example both ways are good, but only if you win.
In my experience - the main thing is analyze and strategy. Your bet size depends on your style of gambling. You can make one big bet and get 10.000(for example) in one game, or you can make 10 bets with high odds and get the same profit.
The main thing that matters - is the result. Try different ways and compare 2-3 months of different style. As the result you can understand what would be more profitable for you.

[famososMuertos]

I was arguing on this topic earlier today with some friends and we discussing about a gambler who has been gambler for a while and a few win and also one big win over a long period of time but plays with less funds like uses small money to win big and  and one who plays with serious funds and always wins big ones in a while, the question here is who is smarter.
Some persons were of the opinion that the high staker is smarter for always staking high and that his returns when he wins will always be high and cover up if he doesn't win next time.
While others say the the low staker is smarter and would not probably feel the pain of losing if he eventually does and would make more profit if he eventually wins.
So the question is who do you think is smarter and which is a more favorable way to bet.

Lol... I’m sorry, it’s just that your reasoning feels so misguided.

I think the mistake here is asking who’s smarter and which option is supposedly better.

There’s a basic principle behind all this, but let’s take it one step at a time. What does “winning big” actually mean? If you measure it by the net prize, then obviously winning $1,000 isn’t the same as winning $100,000.

The point is, if the guy who bet $1 won $1,000, then yes—he won big. In fact, just recently someone betting $0.20 hit a $1,000 prize on a slot machine. He won big because such a tiny bet produced a 5000x return. (If I remember correctly, but we’re just using it as an example.)

Now, the guy who won $100,000—how much did he bet? Let’s say $10,000. That means he won big based on the net payout, sure. But he only got a 10x return, and I say “only” because we’re comparing it to 5000x. A 10x return is still very good, and depending on where you bet, it can be difficult or rare to achieve.

So, in general, the issue here is pure mathematics, not simplistic narratives. If we want to improve our understanding of gambling and develop emotional intelligence around it, we need to focus more on these concepts instead of reducing everything to oversimplified takes and recycled phrases.

Since everything is relative, success can’t be measured through emotional qualifiers or collections of shallow one-liners.

In conclusion, you can’t measure the intelligence of two individuals by their betting style or ability, and you can’t measure success or failure simply because one person wagered more money than the other.

[BIT-BENDER]

One who wins big after many try is not trying to play smart, it is not their making that they only had to win after many try, like it is not a strategic approach nor is it corollary of a big smart move.
Those who plays big can be said to be playing smart but to know the extent of how smart they are you should check out the games they have played big on.

[junder]

I was arguing on this topic earlier today with some friends and we discussing about a gambler who has been gambler for a while and a few win and also one big win over a long period of time but plays with less funds like uses small money to win big and  and one who plays with serious funds and always wins big ones in a while, the question here is who is smarter.
Some persons were of the opinion that the high staker is smarter for always staking high and that his returns when he wins will always be high and cover up if he doesn't win next time.
While others say the the low staker is smarter and would not probably feel the pain of losing if he eventually does and would make more profit if he eventually wins.
So the question is who do you think is smarter and which is a more favorable way to bet.

With big bets in my opinion, it's not smarter but they take risks, although sometimes we think that these big bets can more easily get a win but basically everything depends on luck. With small capital and small stakes, it is possible to get a big win as well as with large bets too, this is only the difference in the appearance of the numbers that we see because basically in gambling the victory depends on luck so no one is smarter in gambling except to say that taking risks is more reasonable in my opinion. I myself if choosing which one is more profitable of course is a big bet but again it depends on the luck of each.

[ZeroVinsonN]

If they're both gambling with the amount of money that they can afford to lose, they're doing the right thing and I call that smartness. However, any gambler that gambles beyond the amount of money that he cannot afford to lose because he wants to win big is dumb because profit isn't guaranteed when gambling.

Fun fact, these dumb people actually exist and they are everywhere and these are usually the kind of people that end up going broke, entering into debt and becoming addicted to gambling, why? Because they want to pay back what they've lost but with no money they effectively begin to borrow from the people around them, it usually starts with something small but then it starts coming from different people and all of a sudden they are owing a lot of people and the amount has gotten quite big, they can't pay back so they keep gambling compulsively in hopes of winning enough to pay off everything.

[ruykeri]

In my opinion, if someone can continue to gamble responsibly for a long time for entertainment purposes, then they will be in a good position . In this case, it is necessary to stay within the limits for betting. Whether it is a small amount of money or a large amount of money, if he has to control emotions within the limits. Even if someone bets a small amount, if they do not control their emotions, cannot stay within their budget or put their required money into the game of betting, then even after betting with a small amount, they will suffer financial losses. Emotion control and staying within the budget are more important.

[Yablee0]

The answer is whoever is winning over all is the smarter one, which I can tell from my end that those who gamble with small money are smarter; he is spending little money over time. If he's lucky, he could easily recover what has been lost compared to the high roller who can lose all that was won in a day or two and later start chasing a big win, which could take him forever before one will be witnessed.

Anyone who is just gambling within his limit based on their worth is the smartest one and not making decisions based on what they plan or target to win.

That's true, the smartest way for you as a gambler is for you to be getting it small but steady, you stake a little amount without recking your bank account and at the same time had fun alongside, then if lucky enough you stand a better chance of taking something home. And again, small staking power is easily accepted if in case you lost unlike a huge staking power. Moreover, their is no guarantee in gambling winnings so why will I risk more when their is no better assurance of getting it back. However, those that trend with caution and gamble with what they can afford to lose, I consider such dudes as the smartest in the game.

[viljy]

It depends on the preferred manner of the game, which is determined by the character of the individual (his propensity for risk). But also! For many gamblers, it primarily depends on the amount. If the bet is small, it is usually more risky. If the bet is large, it is less risky. That is, what matters is not the relative proportions, but the absolute amount of possible winnings.

Here are a couple of examples. If the bet is $1, it is better to put it on a single roulette number ($36 or nothing). If the bet is $100, then you can bet on a dozen or a column, or with even less risk, for example, on red or, say, odd. That is, choose a lower risk, with a sufficiently large potential gain (the well-known phrase is appropriate here: money begets money).

Or another example from the prediction market. Betting on Trump's Insults. From April 10th to April 30th, Trump insulted no one for only 2 days and insulted for 18 days. Those who bet, say, $1,000 on insults could win about $100 a day. And those who bet $1 each could win twice for about $20 or more.

[CryptoYar]

Even if staker is big winner, he or she will seem more intelligent during winning streak due to huge returns but will always be one bad week away from losing everything. Professional gamblers do not consider big win to be measure of their wealth. They consider ability to remain in game for long haul.
Smarter gambler is one that understands Bankroll Proportion between the two. High stakes player who puts 50% of his savings on table is a gambler, while low stakes player who puts 1% of his savings on table, but who hopes for big win, is strategist. But, generally, Low Staker is wiser, employing Asymmetric Risk, risking little for potentially life changing gain. Many times high roller is caught in trap of Revenge Betting and tries to make up for previous big losses and goes downhill. Good betting is never about amount of money you wager, it is always about value of odds. Eventually, math will catch up with you, whether you are betting $1 or $1,000, if you dont have an edge.

[Hardyrobust]

 It depends if the person that is playing with a big amount is using what he can afford to lose . So if he is playing or gambling with an amount he can't afford to lose then he is not playing smart but if he can actually afford to lose that amount then he is playing smart. As for the person that is using small amount the same is also applicable to him. Moreover the amount you consider big maybe small to the next person. It is just a matter of what they can both afford to lose if they are gambling within there limits then they are both smart.

[LastKiss]

~snip~
So the question is who do you think is smarter and which is a more favorable way to bet.

None of them tho. It’s all about risk management I guess cause some people are comfortable with small risks, while others able to risk bigger plays. You don’t need to be smart to understand risk management since it’s essential in gambling. Which one is more favorable goes back to the individual and what feels most comfortable for them, something that doesn’t bring stress or greed while gambling. It’s all useless if you can’t enjoy the moment you gamble and if you keep stressing yourself over winning and losing, you’ll only make it worse because of greed

[Muba20]

So the question is who do you think is smarter and which is a more favorable way to bet.

In the case of gambling, we generally consider the one who bets with small risks to be more intelligent. Because by taking small risks, the gambler gets the opportunity to gamble for a long time. And if there is a loss, the amount is not much. It is not unusual to occasionally win big because of staying in the bet for a long time. Considering these things, I think that low stake gamblers are smart in gambling. Naturally those who place big bets also get big rewards if they win, but if they lose in a row in a few bets, they will not be able to survive in gambling, which will expose them to big losses. Those who can manage their own risk-taking and money management in gambling will be able to survive in gambling.

[Finestream]

So the question is who do you think is smarter and which is a more favorable way to bet.

In the case of gambling, we generally consider the one who bets with small risks to be more intelligent. Because by taking small risks, the gambler gets the opportunity to gamble for a long time. And if there is a loss, the amount is not much. It is not unusual to occasionally win big because of staying in the bet for a long time. Considering these things, I think that low stake gamblers are smart in gambling. Naturally those who place big bets also get big rewards if they win, but if they lose in a row in a few bets, they will not be able to survive in gambling, which will expose them to big losses. Those who can manage their own risk-taking and money management in gambling will be able to survive in gambling.

Personally, I don't think betting size will determine who's smart or not. It's always based on the outcome of their bets. Most of these high rollers have also better financial status, so as long as they can sustain the amount of their bets, I don't see wrong with that. They can be considered smart if they mostly acquire wins over losses.

Same goes for small bettors, its not on how much they can afford to bet, but its on the consistency of their wins over their losses from gambling.

[Achalugo BTC]

With big bets in my opinion, it's not smarter but they take risks, although sometimes we think that these big bets can more easily get a win but basically everything depends on luck. With small capital and small stakes, it is possible to get a big win as well as with large bets too, this is only the difference in the appearance of the numbers that we see because basically in gambling the victory depends on luck so no one is smarter in gambling except to say that taking risks is more reasonable in my opinion. I myself if choosing which one is more profitable of course is a big bet but again it depends on the luck of each.

Luck is just the ultimate key in gambling, that is why its not underrated when it comes to gambling and people that thinks they can stake high are not even consider responsible and those who can't also manage their emotions are also consider not to be responsible, understanding that gambling is for fun and is supported by luck, the best for us because we can be able to navigate through our emotions and keep everything in balanced including our emotions.

[Somto9Light]

Gambling is not all about who is smart and who is not smart. In this case some people will say that the guy who stakes a large amount of money at ones is the smartest. Gambling is not the way you see it, someone can a stake large amount of money at ones and still end up losing, while someone who staks with small amount continuously may keep on winning back to back.

Personally, I would say that people should only gamble with an amount of money they can afford to lose, I know there are people who can willingly gamble with a large amount at once, while there are other who prefer to stake small amounts  continuously till they exhaust their gambling budget for the day.

Right, gambling is about who can control themselves and do the needful and not to show smartness by how much one uses to bet because it can turn out that the one who uses small money are likely to win or vice versa and that is because gambling is unpredictable, it works on its own. That's why gamblers are not bet and expect they can control luck by themselves but no, it doesn't work like that, the only thing is that they will have go adapt to know when to gamble and when to leave for their own protection.

[Loyang]

So the question is who do you think is smarter and which is a more favorable way to bet.

Gambling is not all about who is smart and who is not smart. In this case some people will say that the guy who stakes a large amount of money at ones is the smartest. Gambling is not the way you see it, someone can a stake large amount of money at ones and still end up losing, while someone who staks with small amount continuously may keep on winning back to back.

Personally, I would say that people should only gamble with an amount of money they can afford to lose, I know there are people who can willingly gamble with a large amount at once, while there are other who prefer to stake small amounts  continuously till they exhaust their gambling budget for the day.

Yes I agree with you. Many people believe that a person who gambles with a lot of money will win or profit more. But the reality is not like that, they do not understand one thing that when they lose they face a lot of money loss and when they win they profit according to their money.

Gambling is completely based on luck. If your luck is not on your side then you will never win. I believe that a person who thinks he is smart while gambling is the biggest fool, especially in the case of online casinos.

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

I was arguing on this topic earlier today with some friends and we discussing about a gambler who has been gambler for a while and a few win and also one big win over a long period of time but plays with less funds like uses small money to win big and  and one who plays with serious funds and always wins big ones in a while, the question here is who is smarter.
Some persons were of the opinion that the high staker is smarter for always staking high and that his returns when he wins will always be high and cover up if he doesn't win next time.
While others say the the low staker is smarter and would not probably feel the pain of losing if he eventually does and would make more profit if he eventually wins.
So the question is who do you think is smarter and which is a more favorable way to bet.

The smartness here depends on how much are they ready and willing to lose, because it is obvious that the first person who stakes small amount while gambling might not be that financially bouyant, and that small amount is the least he/she can afford losing, and for that reason, he went about gambling with that amount over and over again on multiple parley games, of which sometimes he is lucky to win and likewise other times he loses too. While the second individual might be financially bouyant enough and don't mind risking huge amount,  and he might want to stake his bet on a single game with low risk and high chances of winning repeatedly. So in a nutshell, the amount used in staking is not a factor to determine who is either smart or not.

[KiaKia]

In my opinion, it’s just as illogical to chase extremely low odds with very small amounts as it is to chase almost guaranteed bets with huge sums. I prefer to take a reasonable approach.

For example, just as I don’t think buying lottery tickets is sensible, I also don’t think it’s sensible to bet my entire bankroll on the day’s favorite team at 1.10 odds. What’s sensible is managing your bankroll in a way that fits your budget and taking risks that align with that. In gambling, you don’t have to push everything to the absolute limits.

Good thinking, it's not about the odds, you can choose them anyhow you like, it's all about how much you are risking on the odds, small money on small or big odds is the best way to go about gambling.

Fortunately for casinos and sports bets platforms, people will want to force the win,  they will prefer to place high amount of money on bigger odds, I wonder how many times this have failed so many people

Name the gambling code or strategy that people haven't failed with, there is no, odds or not luck plays a huge role when you gamble, I've learnt this the easy way and I am glad that I believe in it.

[alastantiger]

So the question is who do you think is smarter and which is a more favorable way to bet.

The gambler that gets the result is the one who is smarter, it is only the result that makes you make a profit when gambling and then people can think about you as a good gambler but if you are not making a profit then you are not a good gambler it does not matter the kind of strategy that you are using. If you decide to gamble many times with a smaller capital and this works for you then you can say you are a smart or a lucky gambler because that is not always the end result for other gamblers but then if you decide to gamble one time with a large amount of money and it works for you also you can consider yourself lucky but not smart. In gambling it's always about the results and not about the strategy that you use because at the end of the day what matters the most is if you win or you lose.