Sean Strickland was a good bet.

[Joy_learns_crypto]

UFC champion Khamzat took on Sean Strickland in a very hostile pairing. Both fighters expressed hated to each other during the build up of the fight, they both have to be separated by heavy security during their faceoff, it was also very heated online with both fighters using curse words and racial profiling at each other.

In the aspect of gambling Khamzat was supposed to be the safest option as the defending champion and has better grapple and take down than Strickland but I had always thought Strickland was a good bet and with the higher odds he will generate the more money. Before the fight would you have placed your money on Sean?

[Churchillvv]

Sean was a good bet of course, from what I have always known it’s a psychological fight, he had to break khamzat from the mind first before breaking him in the ring and that is exactly what he did, remind khamzat that they both learnt how to fight together knew each other and khamzat has always been in one position might have led khamzat to try to learn new was to face Sean hence Sean got a good chance at him but he was still a good fighter maintaining his standards.

[yahoo62278]

I got a promo from rainbet that was giving an extra 50% up to 1k if you bet on Strickland and he won. Wonder how much they had to pay out for that in free bets? I don't really thing Strickland won in all honesty, but I wasn't a judge. He didn't do a lot, just jab jab jab.